Cited by 1,698Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The origins of genome complexity

Lynch, Michael, Conery, John S.·2003·Science

Abstract

Complete genomic sequences from diverse phylogenetic lineages reveal notable increases in genome complexity from prokaryotes to multicellular eukaryotes. The changes include gradual increases in gene number, resulting from the retention of duplicate genes, and more abrupt increases in the abundance of spliceosomal introns and mobile genetic elements. We argue that many of these modifications emerged passively in response to the long-term population-size reductions that accompanied increases in organism size. According to this model, much of the restructuring of eukaryotic genomes was initiated by nonadaptive processes, and this in turn provided novel substrates for the secondary evolution of phenotypic complexity by natural selection. The enormous long-term effective population sizes of prokaryotes may impose a substantial barrier to the evolution of complex genomes and morphologies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1089370

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Given the extremely high costs of building and maintaining nervous systems, neutral evolutionary processes are arguably less prevalent during nervous system evolution than for example in genome evolution.

    “Given the extremely high costs of building and maintaining nervous systems [10–12], neutral evolutionary processes are arguably less prevalent during nervous system evolution than for example in genome evolution [13].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Lynch, Michael
Venue
Science
Published
2003-11-21
Volume
302
Issue
5649
Pages
1401-1404
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1988714210
Cited by
1,698
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 90
FWCI
69.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
genome complexity, eukaryotic genome evolution, gene duplication, spliceosomal introns, mobile genetic elements, population size reduction, organism size, effective population size, prokaryotes, multicellularity, phenotypic complexity
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Bacteria, Body Constitution, Fungi, Humans, Introns, Invertebrates, Mutation, Phylogeny, Plants, Population Density, Recombination, Genetic, Selection, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Vertebrates, Genome, Spliceosomes, Evolution, Molecular, Interspersed Repetitive Sequences, Gene Duplication, Gene Silencing, Genetic Drift, Eukaryota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review