The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mammal diversity and metacommunity dynamics in urban green spaces: implications for urban wildlife conservation
Abstract
As urban growth expands and natural environments fragment, it is essential to understand the ecological roles fulfilled by urban green spaces. To evaluate how urban green spaces function as wildlife habitat, we estimated mammal diversity and metacommunity dynamics in city parks, cemeteries, golf courses, and natural areas throughout the greater Chicago, Illinois, USA region. We found similar α‐diversity (with the exception of city parks), but remarkably dissimilar communities in different urban green spaces. Additionally, the type of urban green space greatly influenced species colonization and persistence rates. For example, coyotes (Canis latrans) had the highest, but white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) the lowest probability of persistence in golf courses compared to other green space types. Further, most species had a difficult time colonizing city parks even when sites were seemingly available. Our results indicate that urban green spaces contribute different, but collectively important, habitats for maintaining and conserving biodiversity in cities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A. (2006) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/06-ba117a · Cited by 4,050 · cited 1×
“We assumed that rs follows a semi-informed Inv–Gamma(3,2) hyperdistribution (Gelman 2006).”
BackgroundExtinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions
Soga, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.1225 · Cited by 1,802 · cited 1×
“Urban green spaces also provide opportunities for people to recreate and interact with nature; thus increasing human well-being and cultivating an interest in nature conservation (Miller 2005, Dearborn and Kark 2010, Wolch et al. 2014, Soga and Gaston 2016).”
BackgroundRelative sensitivities of mammalian carnivores to habitat fragmentation
Crooks, K. R. (2002) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00386.x · Cited by 943
Cited by
So overt it's covert: Wildlife coloration in the city
Kreling, S. E. S. (2023) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biad021 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallo, T., Fidino, M., Lehrer, E. W., & Magle, S. B.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-10-20
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2330-2341
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5582
- OpenAlex
- W2746140262
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mammal diversity and metacommunity dynamics in urban green spaces: implications for urban wildlife conservation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/eap.1611
- The paper
- Gallo, T., Fidino, M., Lehrer, E. W., & Magle, S. B. (2017). Mammal diversity and metacommunity dynamics in urban green spaces: implications for urban wildlife conservation. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1611
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.