Cited by 14Animal Behavior and Reproductionmelanin and skin pigmentationEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

So overt it's covert: Wildlife coloration in the city

Kreling, Samantha E S·2023·BioScience

Abstract

With novel human–wildlife interaction, predation regimes, and environmental conditions, in addition to often fragmented and smaller populations, urban areas present wildlife with altered natural selection parameters and genetic drift potential compared with nonurban regions. Plumage and pelage coloration in birds and mammals has evolved as a balance between avoiding detection by predator or prey, sexual selection, and thermoregulation. However, with altered mutation rates, reduced predation risk, increased temperatures, strong genetic drift, and increased interaction with people, the evolutionary contexts in which these colorations arose are radically different from what is present in urban areas. Regionally alternative color morphs or leucistic or melanistic individuals that aren't typical of most avian or mammalian populations may become more frequent as a result of adaptive or neutral evolution. Therefore, I conceptualize that, in urban areas, conspicuous color morphologies may persist, leading to an increase in the frequency of regionally atypical pelage coloration. In the present article, I discuss the potential for conspicuous color morphs to arise and persist in urban mammalian and avian populations, as well as the mechanisms for such persistence, as a result of altered environmental conditions and natural selection pressures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/biosci/biad021

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human social perceptions of charismatic color morphs are often in stark contrast to how individual wildlife are treated.

    “Our case studies illustrate that human social perceptions of charismatic color morphs are often in stark contrast to how individual wildlife are treated (Kreling, 2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kreling, S. E. S.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Kreling, Samantha E S
Venue
BioScience
Published
2023-04-19
Volume
73
Issue
5
Pages
333-346
ISSN
  • 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3244
OpenAlex
W4366404388
Cited by
14
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BioScience (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Washington
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
urban wildlife, animal coloration, plumage coloration, coat color, color morphs, leucism, melanism, human-wildlife interactions, predation risk, sexual selection, thermoregulation, natural selection, genetic drift, urbanization, birds, mammals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review