The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Applying network theory to animal movements to identify properties of landscape space use
Abstract
Network (graph) theory is a popular analytical framework to characterize the structure and dynamics among discrete objects and is particularly effective at identifying critical hubs and patterns of connectivity. The identification of such attributes is a fundamental objective of animal movement research, yet network theory has rarely been applied directly to animal relocation data. We develop an approach that allows the analysis of movement data using network theory by defining occupied pixels as nodes and connection among these pixels as edges. We first quantify node‐level (local) metrics and graph‐level (system) metrics on simulated movement trajectories to assess the ability of these metrics to pull out known properties in movement paths. We then apply our framework to empirical data from African elephants (Loxodonta africana), giant Galapagos tortoises (Chelonoidis spp.), and mule deer (Odocoileous hemionus). Our results indicate that certain node‐level metrics, namely degree, weight, and betweenness, perform well in capturing local patterns of space use, such as the definition of core areas and paths used for inter‐patch movement. These metrics were generally applicable across data sets, indicating their robustness to assumptions structuring analysis or strategies of movement. Other metrics capture local patterns effectively, but were sensitive to specified graph properties, indicating case specific applications. Our analysis indicates that graph‐level metrics are unlikely to outperform other approaches for the categorization of general movement strategies (central place foraging, migration, nomadism). By identifying critical nodes, our approach provides a robust quantitative framework to identify local properties of space use that can be used to evaluate the effect of the loss of specific nodes on range wide connectivity. Our network approach is intuitive, and can be implemented across imperfectly sampled or large‐scale data sets efficiently, providing a framework for conservationists to analyze movement data. Functions created for the analyses are available within the R package move NT.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In reality, most species progress without a planned destination during their lifespan80 and have no memory of longterm prior displacements: their movements are only determined from local information81 and immediate prior displacement.”
From Javanese homo erectus on the move in SE asia circa 1.8 ma (2022) · cites this paper as [81]
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398
ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis
Wickham, H. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 · Cited by 14,447
The igraph software package for complex network research
Csárdi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,078
Model-Based Clustering, Discriminant Analysis, and Density Estimation
Fraley, C., & Raftery, A. E. (2002) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214502760047131 · Cited by 4,257
Calenge, C. (2006) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.017 · Cited by 4,068
Keeling, M. J., & Eames, K. T. D. (2005) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2005.0051 · Cited by 1,876
Guimerà, R., Mossa, S., Turtschi, A., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0407994102 · Cited by 1,762
Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet
Kays, R., Crofoot, M. C., Jetz, W., & Wikelski, M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa2478 · Cited by 1,638
Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size
Dunne, J. A., Williams, R. J., & Martinez, N. D. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.192407699 · Cited by 1,519
Cited by
Javanese homo erectus on the move in SE asia circa 1.8 ma
Husson, L., Salles, T., Lebatard, A.-E., Zerathe, S., Braucher, R., Noerwidi, S., Aribowo, S., Mallard, C., Carcaillet, J., Natawidjaja, D. H., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-23206-9 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Bastille‐Rousseau, G., Douglas‐Hamilton, I., Blake, S., Northrup, J. M., & Wittemyer, G.
- Affiliations
- Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado 80523 USA
- Save the Elephants Nairobi Kenya
- Max Planck Institute for Ornithology Radolfzell Germany
- Wildlife Research and Monitoring Section Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Peterborough ON Canada K9L 1Z8
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 854-864
- ISSN
- 1051-0761
- 1939-5582
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 53
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- Colorado Parks and Wildlife
- National Science Foundation (DEB 1258062)
- Fundación Charles Darwin
- National Geographic Society
- Nature Conservancy of Canada
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.