The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Networks and epidemic models
Open accessAbstract
Networks and the epidemiology of directly transmitted infectious diseases are fundamentally linked. The foundations of epidemiology and early epidemiological models were based on population wide random-mixing, but in practice each individual has a finite set of contacts to whom they can pass infection; the ensemble of all such contacts forms a ‘mixing network’. Knowledge of the structure of the network allows models to compute the epidemic dynamics at the population scale from the individual-level behaviour of infections. Therefore, characteristics of mixing networks—and how these deviate from the random-mixing norm—have become important applied concerns that may enhance the understanding and prediction of epidemic patterns and intervention measures. Here, we review the basis of epidemiological theory (based on random-mixing models) and network theory (based on work from the social sciences and graph theory). We then describe a variety of methods that allow the mixing network, or an approximation to the network, to be ascertained. It is often the case that time and resources limit our ability to accurately find all connections within a network, and hence a generic understanding of the relationship between network structure and disease dynamics is needed. Therefore, we review some of the variety of idealized network types and approximation techniques that have been utilized to elucidate this link. Finally, we look to the future to suggest how the two fields of network theory and epidemiological modelling can deliver an improved understanding of disease dynamics and better public health through effective disease control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35019019 · Cited by 7,534
The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions
Keeling, M. J. (1999) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0716 · Cited by 798
Self-citationHow Viruses Spread Among Computers and People
Lloyd, A. L., & May, R. M. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1061076 · Cited by 661
Cited by
Epidemic processes in complex networks
Pastor-Satorras, R., Castellano, C., Van Mieghem, P., & Vespignani, A. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.925 · Cited by 3,697
Network ‘Small-World-Ness’: A Quantitative Method for Determining Canonical Network Equivalence
Humphries, M. D., & Gurney, K. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002051 · Cited by 1,442
Modern temporal network theory: a colloquium
Holme, P. (2015) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/e2015-60657-4 · Cited by 734
Disease Spread, Susceptibility and Infection Intensity: Vicious Circles?
Beldomenico, P. M., & Begon, M. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.015 · Cited by 359
Dale, M. R. T., & Fortin, M.-J. (2010) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144718 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Keeling, M. J., & Eames, K. T. D.
- Venue
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2005-06-20
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 295-307
- ISSN
- 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-5689
- OpenAlex
- W2073627497
- Cited by
- 1,876
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 23.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Networks and epidemic models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsif.2005.0051
- The paper
- Keeling, M. J., & Eames, K. T. D. (2005). Networks and epidemic models. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2005.0051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.