The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnostic concordance of the interview and questionnaire versions of the eating disorder examination
Open accessAbstract
Objective: The diagnostic concordance of the interview (EDE) and questionnaire (EDE‐Q) versions of the Eating Disorder Examination was examined. Method: Two‐hundred seventeen patients seeking eating disorder treatment completed the EDE and EDE‐Q before beginning treatment. Diagnostic algorithms were generated for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision (DSM‐IV‐TR) and proposed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM‐5) criteria using data first from the EDE and then from the EDE‐Q; thus, each participant received four diagnoses. Results: The sensitivity of the EDE‐Q for individual diagnoses ranged from 27.8% to 84.3% (DSM‐IV‐TR) and from 36.8% to 80.8% (DSM‐5). The specificity of the EDE‐Q for individual diagnoses ranged from 71.1% to 98.5% (DSM‐IV‐TR) and from 77.3% to 98.0% (DSM‐5). The overall diagnostic concordance was moderate (κ = .57–.60). Discussion: The proposed DSM‐5 criteria improved the diagnostic concordance of the two instruments and reduced the prevalence of Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS). However, concordance improvement was modest and both instruments still diagnosed most respondents with EDNOS. © 2011 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2011;45:850–855)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Several studies have shown that concordance on the number of binge-eating episodes between self-report and interview data are moderate at best (Berg et al., 2012; Melisse et al., 2021).”
From Effectiveness of web-based guided self-help cognitive behavioral therapy-enhanced for binge-eating disorder: An implementation study (2024) · cites this paper as Berg et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“The EDE-Q demonstrates good internal consistency and test–retest reliability [50–52].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment of binge eating severity among obese persons
Gormally, J., Black, S., Daston, S., & Rardin, D. (1982) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/0306-4603(82)90024-7 · Cited by 2,129
Binge eating: nature, assessment, and treatment
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4640 · Cited by 1,801
Mond, J., Hay, P., Rodgers, B., Owen, C., & Beumont, P. J. (2003) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00161-x · Cited by 1,124
Berg, K. C., Peterson, C. B., Frazier, P., & Crow, S. J. (2012) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20931 · Cited by 1,042
Self-citationThe Eating Disorder Examination (12th edition).
Fairburn, C. G., & Cooper, Z. (1993) · Cited by 638
Sobell, M. B., Sobell, L. C., Klajner, F., Pavan, D., & Basian, E. (1986) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/0306-4603(86)90040-7 · Cited by 468
Stice, E., Fisher, M., & Lowe, M. R. (2004) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.16.1.51 · Cited by 364
Predictors of Treatment Acceptance and Completion in Anorexia Nervosa
Halmi, K. A., Agras, W. S., Crow, S. J., Mitchell, J. D., Wilson, G. T., Bryson, S. W., & KRAEMER, H. C. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.7.776 · Cited by 315
Stice, E. M., Cooper, J. A., Schoeller, D. A., Tappe, K. A., & Lowe, M. R. (2007) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.449 · Cited by 201
Berg, K. C., Peterson, C. B., Frazier, P. A., & Crow, S. J. (2011) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0023246 · Cited by 159
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition Text Revision (DSM‐IV‐TR). Washington D.C.: APA;1994.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phillipou, A., Meyer, D., Neill, E., Tan, E. J., Toh, W. L., Van Rheenen, T. E., & Rossell, S. L. (2020) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23317 · Cited by 437
McElroy, S. L., Hudson, J. I., Mitchell, J. E., Wilfley, D., Ferreira-Cornwell, M. C., Gao, J., Wang, J., Whitaker, T., Jonas, J., & Gasior, M. (2015) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2162 · Cited by 322
“Scores were in the clinical (≥12) and high (9-11) ranges for the disinhibition and hunger factors, respectively (Table 2).”
BackgroundAllen, K., Byrne, S., Oddy, W., & Crosby, R. (2013) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034004 · Cited by 308
Sysko, R., Glasofer, D. R., Hildebrandt, T., Klimek, P., Mitchell, J. E., Berg, K. C., Peterson, C. B., Wonderlich, S. A., & Walsh, B. T. (2015) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22388 · Cited by 255
“Thus, we conducted a second study (Study 2), with the aims of: (1) developing an electronic application of the EDA-5 (the EDA-5 “App”); (2) comparing diagnoses assigned by the EDA-5 and clinician interview; (3) examining interview-based diagnoses on the EDA-5 to self-reported eating disorder diagnoses from the Eating…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationGrilo, C. M., Reas, D. L., Hopwood, C. J., & Crosby, R. D. (2014) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22358 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Berg, K. C., Stiles‐Shields, E. C., Swanson, S. A., Peterson, C. B., Lebow, J., & Le Grange, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Berg, Kelly C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Eating Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-08-08
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 850-855
- ISSN
- 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-108X
- PMC
- PMC3213320
- OpenAlex
- W2068963883
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH082761)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK050456)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- Eating Disorder Examination, Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, diagnostic agreement, eating disorders, DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria, DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, eating disorder not otherwise specified, sensitivity and specificity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Child, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
