Cited by 14Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Anorexia nervosa, neuroimaging research, and the contextual salience of food cues: The food approach–avoidance conundrum

Open access
Murray, Stuart B., Strigo, Irina A.·2018·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is characterized by an avoidance and marked apprehension around food intake, yet paradoxically, those with AN often display approach behaviors to food, engaging in food shopping or preparation activities which are described as rewarding. This approach–avoidance conundrum is of much importance as neuroimaging studies continue to probe mechanisms relating to core AN psychopathology. This Idea Worth Researching discusses the notion that neuroimaging studies relying on food cue presentation paradigms may be methodologically flawed without specifying the contextual salience of the food cues presented in paradigms. The appraisal of food cues may diverge as a function of one's intent‐to‐eat, and thus, neuroimaging studies not specifying the contextual salience of food cues (i.e., intent‐to‐eat or not) may confound two distinctly different processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.22883

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Beumont PJV 2002 Clinical presentation of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa Fairburm CG Brownell KD Eating disorders and obesity, second edition: A comprehensive handbook 162 170 New York, NY Guilford Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murray, S. B., & Strigo, I. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Murray, Stuart B.
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-05-30
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
822-825
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W2805219564
Cited by
14
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23 MH115184)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, food cues, neuroimaging methodology, food reward
MeSH terms
Anorexia Nervosa, Choice Behavior, Cues, Eating, Female, Humans, Research, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review