Cited by 74Eating Disorders and BehaviorsGastrointestinal motility and disordersPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Disorders of gut–brain interaction common among outpatients with eating disorders including avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder

Open access
Murray, Helen Burton, Kuo, Braden, Eddy, Kamryn T., Breithaupt, Lauren, Becker, Kendra R., Dreier, Melissa J., Thomas, Jennifer J., Staller, Kyle·2021·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Objective: Little research exists on Rome IV disorders of gut–brain interaction (DGBI; formerly called functional gastrointestinal disorders) in outpatients with eating disorders (EDs). These data are particularly lacking for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), which shares core features with DGBI. We aimed to identify the frequency and nature of DGBI symptoms among outpatients with EDs. Method: Consecutively referred pediatric and adult patients diagnosed with an ED (n = 168, 71% female, ages 8–76 years) in our tertiary care ED program between March 2017 and July 2019 completed a modified Rome IV Questionnaire for DGBI and psychopathology measure battery. Results: The majority (n = 122, 72%) of participants reported at least one bothersome gastrointestinal symptom. Sixty‐six (39%) met criteria for a DBGI, most frequently functional dyspepsia—post‐prandial distress syndrome subtype (31%). DGBI were surprisingly less frequent among patients with ARFID (30%) versus EDs that are associated with shape or weight concerns (45%; X2[1] = 3.61, p = .058, Cramer's V = .147). Among those with ARFID, DGBI presence was associated with the fear of aversive consequences prototype and multiple comorbid prototype presence. Discussion: We demonstrated notable overlap between DGBI and EDs, particularly post‐prandial distress symptoms. Further research is needed to examine if gastrointestinal symptoms predict or are a result of greater ED pathology, including ARFID prototypes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.23414

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anxiety is associated with eating pathology among individuals with chronic constipation.

    “High illness anxiety has been associated with the maintenance of gastrointestinal symptoms over treatment (Salvioli et al., 2013) and anxiety is associated with eating pathology among individuals with chronic constipation (Burton Murray et al., 2020).”

    From Preliminary data that psychological treatment and baseline anxiety are associated with a decrease in postprandial fullness and early satiation for individuals with bulimia nervosa and related other specified feeding or eating disorder. (2023) · cites this paper as Burton Murray et al., 2020

    The Results report functional constipation in a small subset of eating-disorder outpatients, but do not test whether anxiety is associated with eating pathology among people with chronic constipation. The Discussion suggests a possible role for anxiety around GI symptoms, while the References list a separate study on chronic constipation and gastrointestinal-specific anxiety; neither passage establishes the claimed association in this paper. Searched for chronic constipation, gastrointestinal-specific anxiety, and eating-disorder pathology. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Aziz I, Palsson OS, Törnblom H, Sperber AD, Whitehead WE, & Simrén M (2018). Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and associations for symptom-based Rome IV functional dyspepsia in adults in the USA, Canada, and the UK: A cross-sectional population-based study. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 3(4), 252– 262. 29396034
  2. Boyd C, Abraham S, & Kellow J (2005). Psychological features are important predictors of functional gastrointestinal disorders in patients with eating disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 40(8), 929– 935. 16170899
  3. Boyd C, Abraham S, & Kellow J (2010). Appearance and disappearance of functional gastrointestinal disorders in patients with eating disorders. Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 22(12), 1279– 1283. 20718945
  4. Chami TN, Andersen AE, Crowell MD, Schuster MM, & Whitehead W (1995). Gastrointestinal symptoms in bulimia nervosa: effects of treatment. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 90(1), 88– 92. 7801956
  5. DeJong H, Perkins S, Grover M, & Schmidt U (2011). The prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in outpatients with bulimia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 44(7), 661– 664. 21997430
  6. Drossman D, Chang L, Chey WD, Kellow J, Tack J, Whitehead WE, & Committees RI (Eds.). (2016). ROME IV: Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders—Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction (4 ed. Vol. 2). Raleigh, NC: Rome Foundation.
  7. Eaton WW, Smith C, Ybarra M, Muntaner C, & Tien A (2004). Center for epidemiologic studies depression scale: Review and revision (CESD and CESD-R). In Maruish ME (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (3rd ed., pp. 363– 377). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  8. Fairburn CG, & Beglin S (2008). Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q 6.0). In Fairburn CG (Ed.), Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders (pp. 309– 313). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  9. Murray HB, Bailey AP, Keshishian AC, Silvernale CJ, Staller K, Eddy KT, … Kuo B (2020). Prevalence and characteristics of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in adult neurogastroenterology patients. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 18(9), 1995– 2002. 31669056
  10. Murray HB, Flanagan R, Banashefski B, Silvernale CJ, Kuo B, & Staller K (2020). Frequency of Eating Disorder Pathology Among Patients With Chronic Constipation and Contribution of Gastrointestinal-Specific Anxiety. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 8(11), 2471– 2478. 31923640
  11. Murray HB, Bailey AP, Keshishian AC, Silvernale CJ, Staller K, Eddy KT, … Kuo B (2020). Prevalence and Characteristics of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder in Adult Neurogastroenterology Patients. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 18(9), 1995– 2002. 31669056
  12. Murray HB, Riddle M, Rao F, McCann BS, Staller K, Heitkemper M, & Zia J (2020). Eating disorder symptoms, including avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, in patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction. Manuscript submitted for publication. 34693609
  13. Palsson OS, Whitehead W, Törnblom H, Sperber AD, & Simren M (2020). Prevalence of Rome IV functional bowel disorders among adults in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Gastroenterology, 158, 1262– 1273.e3. 31917991
  14. Santonicola A, Siniscalchi M, Capone P, Gallotta S, Ciacci C, & Iovino P (2012). Prevalence of functional dyspepsia and its subgroups in patients with eating disorders. World journal of gastroenterology, 18 (32), 4379– 4385. 22969202 PMC3436054
  15. Spielberger C, Gorsuch R, Lushene R, Vagg P, & Jacobs G (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  16. Thomas JJ, & Eddy K (2019). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: children, adolescents, and adults. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  17. van Dyck Z, Schulz A, Blechert J, Herbert BM, Lutz AP, & Vögele C (2020). Gastric interoception and gastric myoelectrical activity in bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder. In International Journal of Eating Disorders. 10.1002/eat.23291. PMC8359291 32400920 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murray, H. B., Kuo, B., Eddy, K. T., Breithaupt, L., Becker, K. R., Dreier, M. J., Thomas, J. J., & Staller, K.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Murray, Helen Burton
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-11-26
Volume
54
Issue
6
Pages
952-958
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W3109061588
Cited by
74
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
American Gastroenterological Association
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
functional gastrointestinal disorders, eating disorders, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, Rome IV criteria, functional dyspepsia, postprandial distress syndrome, gastrointestinal symptoms, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Brain, Child, Eating, Female, Humans, Male, Outpatients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review