Cited by 94Gastrointestinal motility and disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Mechanisms of change in an exposure-based treatment for irritable bowel syndrome.

Ljótsson, Brjánn, Hesser, Hugo, Andersson, Erik, Lindfors, Perjohan, Hursti, Timo, Rück, Christian, Lindefors, Nils, Andersson, Gerhard +1 more·2013·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to identify mediators of change in a previously published randomized controlled trial that compared Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral treatment based on exposure exercises (ICBT) with Internet-delivered stress management (ISM) for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). ICBT and ISM targeted distinct proposed mechanisms of illness maintenance and symptom exacerbation, gastrointestinal symptom-specific anxiety (GSA), and stress reactivity, respectively. The original study found that ICBT was more effective than ISM in improving IBS symptoms. Method Weekly measurements of GSA and stress reactivity (putative mediators) and treatment outcome were obtained from 195 participants with IBS, who had been randomized to ICBT or ISM. Results Parallel process growth mediational analyses revealed that the larger reduction of IBS symptoms from ICBT compared to ISM was mediated by changes in GSA, αβ = -0.42, 95% CI asymmetric [-0.71, -0.16]. In contrast, changes in stress reactivity did not mediate the difference in outcomes between treatments, αβ = 0.04, 95% CI asymmetric [-0.09, 0.20]. Analyses of the temporal sequence of week-to-week changes in process and outcome measures showed that only GSA displayed a pattern consistent with a causal model in which change in process preceded and contributed to symptom change. Furthermore, engagement in treatment specific activities was related to change in GSA but not to stress reactivity in the ICBT arm, whereas trea…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0033439

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ljótsson, B., Hesser, H., Andersson, E., Lindfors, P., Hursti, T., Rück, C., Lindefors, N., Andersson, G., & Hedman, E.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Sabbatsberg Hospital (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2013
Volume
81
Issue
6
Pages
1113-1126
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2075378461
Cited by
94
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Stockholm City Council
  • Stockholm Centre for Psychiatry Research
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Linköping University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, exposure therapy, stress management, stress reactivity, mediators of change, treatment engagement
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Arousal, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Relaxation Therapy, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Internet, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review