Cited by 16Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesChild Abuse and TraumaMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

Cochrane review: School‐based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse

Zwi, KJ, Woolfenden, SR, Wheeler, DM, O'Brien, TA, Tait, P, Williams, KW·2008·Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal

Abstract

Background Child sexual abuse is a significant problem that requires an effective means of prevention. Objectives To assess: if school‐based programmes are effective in improving knowledge about sexual abuse and self‐protective behaviours; whether participation results in an increase in disclosure of sexual abuse and/or produces any harm; knowledge retention and the effect of programme type or setting. Search strategy Electronic searches of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, Dissertation Abstracts and other databases using MESH headings and text words specific for child sexual assault and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted in August 2006. Selection criteria RCTs or quasi‐RCTs of school‐based interventions to prevent child sexual abuse compared with another intervention or no intervention. Data collection and analysis Meta‐analyses and sensitivity analysis, using two imputed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) (0.1, 0.2), were used for four outcomes: protective behaviours, questionnaire‐based knowledge, vignette‐based knowledge and disclosure of abuse. Meta‐analysis was not possible for retention of knowledge, likelihood of harm, or effect of programme type and setting. Main results Fifteen trials measuring knowledge and behaviour change as a result of school‐based child sexual abuse intervention programmes were included. Over half the studies in each initial meta‐analysis contained u…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ebch.264

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zwi, K., Woolfenden, Sr., Wheeler, D., O'Brien, T., Tait, P., & Williams, K.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
603-634
ISSN
1557-6272 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048444885
Cited by
16
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Evidence-Based Child Health A Cochrane Review Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse prevention, child sexual abuse, self-protective behavior, disclosure of abuse, knowledge retention, child sexual assault, child protection education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review