Don't let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring)
Open accessAbstract
Pseudoreplication is defined as the use of inferential statistics to test for treatment effects where treatments are not replicated and/or replicates are not statistically independent. It is a genuine but controversial issue in ecology particularly in the case of costly landscape‐scale manipulations, behavioral studies where ethics or other concerns may limit sample sizes, ad hoc monitoring data, and the analysis of natural experiments where chance events occur at a single site. Here key publications on the topic are reviewed to illustrate the debate that exists about the conceptual validity of pseudoreplication. A survey of ecologists and case studies of experimental design and publication issues are used to explore the extent of the problem, ecologists’ solutions, reviewers’ attitudes, and the fate of submitted manuscripts. Scientists working across a range of ecological disciplines regularly come across the problem of pseudoreplication and build solutions into their designs and analyses. These include carefully defining hypotheses and the population of interest, acknowledging the limits of statistical inference and using statistical approaches including nesting and random effects. Many ecologists face considerable challenges getting their work published if accusations of pseudoreplication are made – even if the problem has been dealt with. Many reviewers reject papers for pseudoreplication, and this occurs more often if they haven't experienced the issue themselves. The concept of pseudoreplication is being applied too dogmatically and often leads to rejection during review. There is insufficient consideration of the associated philosophical issues and potential statistical solutions. By stopping the publication of ecological studies, reviewers are slowing the pace of ecological research and limiting the scope of management case studies, natural events studies, and valuable data available to form evidence‐based solutions. Recommendations for fair and consistent treatment of pseudoreplication during writing and review are given for authors, reviewers, and editors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Excluding pseudoreplicated studies is undesirable, as they might contribute relevant information to the meta-analysis.
“However, excluding pseudoreplicated studies is undesirable, as they might contribute relevant information to the meta‐analysis (Nakagawa & Santos, 2012; Davies & Gray, 2015).”
From Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity: a meta‐analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Davies & Gray, 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,706 · see citing works
A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance
Anderson, M. J. (2001) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x · Cited by 13,828 · see citing works
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068 · cited 7× · see citing works
“The recent reviews by Waller et al. (2013) and Ramage et al. (2013) highlight the potential dangers associated with pseudoreplicated experiments. Waller et al. (2013) found that 39% of primate communication studies were pseudoreplicated, but in 88% of these, the issue was avoidable. Ramage et al. (2013) found that 68%…”
BackgroundInfluentialPseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942661 · Cited by 8,377 · see citing works
Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4
Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015) · Cited by 5,924 · see citing works
Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm?
Legendre, P. (1993) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939924 · Cited by 3,733 · see citing works
Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution
(2013) · doi:10.1515/9781400846184 · Cited by 1,183 · see citing works
Encyclopedia of survey research methods
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-4199 · Cited by 718 · see citing works
Logic of experiments in ecology: is pseudoreplication a pseudoissue?
Oksanen, L. (2001) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.11311.x · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Gurevitch, J., Curtis, P. S., & Jones, M. H. (2001) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(01)32013-5 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Pseudoreplication: a sine qua non for regional ecology
Hargrove, W. W., & Pickering, J. (1992) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf00129703 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Getting started with meta‐analysis
Harrison, F. (2010) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00056.x · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Channel Narrowing and Vegetation Development Following a Great Plains Flood
Friedman, J. M., Osterkamp, W. R., & Lewis, W. M. (1996) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265710 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Johnstone, J. F., & Kasischke, E. S. (2005) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x05-087 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Nagel, T. A., Svoboda, M., & Diaci, J. (2006) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.01.039 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
On misinterpretations of pseudoreplication and related matters: a reply to Oksanen
Hurlbert, S. H. (2004) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12752.x · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Pseudoreplication is a pseudoproblem.
Schank, J. C., & Koehnle, T. J. (2009) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013579 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Maltby, E., Legg, C. J., & Proctor, M. C. F. (1990) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261126 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Pseudoreplication in Tropical Forests and the Resulting Effects on Biodiversity Conservation
Ramage, B. S., Sheil, D., Salim, H. M. W., Fletcher, C. D., MUSTAFA, N. A., LURUTHUSAMAY, J. C., Harrison, R. D., Butod, E., Dzulkiply, A., Kassim, A. R., et al. (2013) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12004 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Vegetation patterns 25 years after the eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington, USA
del Moral, R., & Lacher, I. (2005) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.92.12.1948 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
The devil lies in details: reply to Stuart Hurlbert
Oksanen, L. (2004) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13266.x · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Comment to Oksanen (2001): reconciling Oksanen (2001) and Hurlbert (1984)
Cottenie, K., & Meester, L. D. (2003) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.11953.x · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Pseudoreplication: a widespread problem in primate communication research
Waller, B. M., Warmelink, L., Liebal, K., Micheletta, J., & Slocombe, K. E. (2013) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.05.038 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
P values, hypothesis testing, and model selection: it's déjà vu all over again1
Ellison, A. M., Gotelli, N. J., Inouye, B. D., & Strong, D. R. (2014) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/13-1911.1 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Winter desiccation and rapid changes in the live fuel moisture content of Calluna vulgaris
Davies, G. M., Legg, C. J., O’Hara, R. B., MacDonald, A. J., & Smith, A. A. (2010) · Plant Ecology & Diversity · doi:10.1080/17550874.2010.544335 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationPseudoreplication is (still) a problem.
Freeberg, T. M., & Lucas, J. R. (2009) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017031 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Kozlov, M. V., & Hurlbert, S. H. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Davies, G., & Bodart, J. A. (2015) · iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry · doi:10.3832/ifor1557-008 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Miller, D. A., E. B. Arnett, and M. J. Lacki. 2003 Habitat management for forest‐roosting bats of North America: a critical review of habitat studies. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 31: 30– 44.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boyd, P. W., Collins, S., Dupont, S., Fabricius, K., Gattuso, J., Havenhand, J. N., Hutchins, D. A., Riebesell, U., Rintoul, M. S., Vichi, M., et al. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14102 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Grazing vs. mowing: A meta-analysis of biodiversity benefits for grassland management
Tälle, M., Déak, B., Poschlod, P., Valkó, O., Westerberg, L. M., & Milberg, P. (2016) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.008 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity: a meta‐analysis
Alcocer, I., Lima, H., Sugai, L. S. M., & Llusia, D. (2022) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12890 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
“However, excluding pseudoreplicated studies is undesirable, as they might contribute relevant information to the metaanalysis (Nakagawa & Santos, 2012; Davies & Gray, 2015).”
BackgroundIgnoring non‐English‐language studies may bias ecological meta‐analyses
Konno, K., Akasaka, M., Koshida, C., Katayama, N., Osada, N., Spake, R., & Amano, T. (2020) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.6368 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Manfrin, A., Singer, G. A., Larsen, S., Weiß, N., van Grunsven, R. H. A., Weiß, N., Wohlfahrt, S., Monaghan, M. T., & Hölker, F. (2017) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2017.00061 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
High plant diversity and slow assembly of old-growth grasslands
Nerlekar, A. N., & Veldman, J. W. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1922266117 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Weather explains the decline and rise of insect biomass over 34 years
Müller, J. C., Hothorn, T., Yuan, Y., Seibold, S., Mitesser, O., Rothacher, J., Freund, J., Wild, C., Wolz, M., & Menzel, A. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06402-z · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Poor availability of context-specific evidence hampers decision-making in conservation
Christie, A. P., Amano, T., Martin, P. A., Petrovan, S. O., Shackelford, G. E., Simmons, B. I., Smith, R. K., Williams, D., Wordley, C. F. R., & Sutherland, W. J. (2020) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108666 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Christie, A. P., Abecasis, D., Adjeroud, M., Alonso, J. C., Amano, T., Antón, Á., Baldigo, B. P., Barrientos, R., Bicknell, J. E., Buhl, D. A., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20142-y · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Restoration of blanket peat moorland delays stormflow from hillslopes and reduces peak discharge
Shuttleworth, E., Evans, M., Pilkington, M., Spencer, T., Walker, J., Milledge, D. G., & Allott, T. (2018) · Journal of Hydrology X · doi:10.1016/j.hydroa.2018.100006 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Prendergast‐Miller, M. T., de Menezes, A. B., Macdonald, L. M., Toscas, P., Bissett, A. B., Baker, G. H., Farrell, M., Richardson, A. E., Wark, T., & Thrall, P. H. (2017) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.01.027 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Using Biological Insight and Pragmatism When Thinking about Pseudoreplication
Colegrave, N., & Ruxton, G. D. (2017) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2017.10.007 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Hao, M., Messier, C., Geng, Y., Zhang, C., Zhao, X., & von Gadow, K. (2020) · European Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1007/s10342-020-01298-0 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
A review of soil carbon change in New Zealand’s grazed grasslands
Schipper, L. A., Mudge, P. L., Kirschbaum, M. U. F., Hedley, C. L., Golubiewski, N. E., Smaill, S. J., & Kelliher, F. M. (2017) · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1080/00288233.2017.1284134 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Correction for bias in meta‐analysis of little‐replicated studies
Doncaster, C. P., & Spake, R. (2017) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12927 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Ocean warming and tropical invaders erode the performance of a key herbivore
Yeruham, E., Shpigel, M., Abelson, A., & Rilov, G. (2019) · Ecology · doi:10.1002/ecy.2925 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
dos Santos, J. S., Dodonov, P., Oshima, J. E. D. F., Martello, F., de Jesus, A. S., Ferreira, M. E., Silva‐Neto, C. D. M. E., Ribeiro, M. C., & Collevatti, R. G. (2021) · Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.pecon.2020.11.002 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Use of meta-analysis in forest biodiversity research: key challenges and considerations
Spake, R., & Doncaster, C. P. (2017) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2017.05.059 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“The ecological literature nevertheless includes repeated proposals for using meta-analysis to solve the problem of a pseudoreplicated literature (Hargrove and Pickering, 1992; Cottenie and De Meester, 2003; Davies and Gray, 2015).”
BackgroundFire-induced forest transition to derived savannas: Cascading effects on ant communities
Paolucci, L. N., Schoereder, J. H., Brando, P. M., & Andersen, A. N. (2017) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.08.020 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Dietary changes in predators and scavengers in a nocturnally illuminated riparian ecosystem
Manfrin, A., Lehmann, D., van Grunsven, R. H. A., Larsen, S., Syväranta, J., Wharton, G., Voigt, C. C., Monaghan, M. T., & Hölker, F. (2017) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/oik.04696 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
A Review of Overlapping Landscapes: Pseudoreplication or a Red Herring in Landscape Ecology?
Zuckerberg, B., Cohen, J. M., Nunes, L. A., Bernath‐Plaisted, J. S., Clare, J. D. J., Gilbert, N. A., Kozidis, S. S., Nelson, S. B. M., Shipley, A. A., Thompson, K. L., et al. (2020) · Current Landscape Ecology Reports · doi:10.1007/s40823-020-00059-4 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Effectively integrating experiments into conservation practice
Ockendon, N., Amano, T., Cadotte, M. W., Downey, H., Hancock, M. H., Thornton, A., Tinsley‐Marshall, P., & Sutherland, W. J. (2021) · Ecological Solutions and Evidence · doi:10.1002/2688-8319.12069 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Koorem, K., Tulva, I., Davison, J., Jairus, T., Öpik, M., Vasar, M., Zobel, M., & Moora, M. (2016) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-016-3004-0 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Werner, W. J., Sanderman, J., & Melillo, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences · doi:10.1029/2019jg005158 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
A Bayesian predictive approach for dealing with pseudoreplication
Lazic, S., Mellor, J., Ashby, M. C., & Munafo, M. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-59384-7 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Farrar, B. G., Voudouris, K., & Clayton, N. S. (2021) · Animal Behavior and Cognition · doi:10.26451/abc.08.02.14.2021 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Increased population size of fish in a lowland river following restoration of structural habitat
Lyon, J., Bird, T. J., Kearns, J., Nicol, S., Tonkin, Z., Todd, C. R., O’Mahony, J., Hackett, G., Raymond, S. M. C., Lieschke, J. A., et al. (2019) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.1882 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Amano, T., Bako, L. A., Best, M., Boenisch, N., Boersch‐Supan, P. H., Browne, D., Buckley, Y. M., Burgman, M., Cadotte, M. W., Canessa, S., et al. (2022) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0321 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
The Impact of ‘Selfie’ Tourism on the Behaviour and Welfare of Brown-Throated Three-Toed Sloths
Carder, G., Plese, T., Machado, F. C., Paterson, S., Matthews, N., McAnea, L., & D’Cruze, N. C. (2018) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani8110216 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Elephant rewilding affects landscape openness and fauna habitat across a 92‐year period
Gordon, C. E., Greve, M., Henley, M. D., Bedetti, A., Allin, P., & Svenning, J. (2023) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2810 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
What stabilizes biological soil crusts in the Negev Desert?
Felde, V. J. M. N. L., Chamizo, S., Felix‐Henningsen, P., & Drahorad, S. L. (2017) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-017-3459-7 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Lukenbach, M., Hokanson, K., Devito, K. J., Kettridge, N., Petrone, R. M., Mendoza, C. A., Granath, G., & Waddington, J. M. (2017) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.034 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Links between slope aspect and rate of litter decomposition on inland dunes
Jasińska, J., Sewerniak, P., & Markiewicz, M. (2018) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2018.09.025 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Koskenpato, K., Lehikoinen, A. S., Lindstedt, C., & Karell, P. (2020) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.5914 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Putman, L. I., Sabuda, M. C., Brazelton, W. J., Kubo, M. D. Y., Hoehler, T. M., McCollom, T. M., Cardace, D., & Schrenk, M. O. (2021) · mSystems · doi:10.1128/msystems.00300-21 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Schmidt, J., Fester, T., Schulz, E., Michalzik, B., Buscot, F., & Gutknecht, J. (2017) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.005 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Stand age, disturbance history and the temporal stability of forest production
Wales, S. B., Kreider, M. R., Atkins, J. W., Hulshof, C. M., Fahey, R. T., Nave, L. E., Nadelhoffer, K. J., & Gough, C. M. (2020) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117865 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Bakacsy, L., & Bagi, I. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-71202-8 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Fifty years after deep‐ploughing: Effects on yield, roots, nutrient stocks and soil structure
Burger, D., Schneider, F., Bauke, S. L., Kautz, T., Don, A., & Amelung, W. (2023) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/ejss.13426 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Ant diversity in Brazilian tropical dry forests across multiple vegetation domains
Silva, L. F., Souza, R. M., Solar, R., & Neves, F. S. (2017) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa5f2a · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Verdon, M., Rawnsley, R., Raedts, P. J. M., & Freeman, M. (2018) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani8070115 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Nitrogen balance along a northern boreal forest fire chronosequence
Palviainen, M., Pumpanen, J., Berninger, F. A., Ritala, K., Duan, B., Heinonsalo, J., Sun, H., Köster, E., & Köster, K. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174720 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Decadal variability in sponge abundance and biodiversity on an Indo-Pacific coral reef
Rovellini, A., Dunn, M., Fulton, E. A., Webster, N. S., Smith, D., Jompa, J., Haris, A., Berman, J., & Bell, J. J. (2019) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps12968 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Can root traits predict communities of soil nematodes in restored northern prairies?
Otfinowski, R., & Coffey, V. (2020) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-020-04624-y · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Lindenmayer, D. B., & Bowd, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Forests and Global Change · doi:10.3389/ffgc.2022.878570 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Neves, F. S., Antoniazzi, R., Camarota, F., Pacelhe, F. T., & Powell, S. (2021) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/btp.12918 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The importance of independent replication of treatments in plant science
Rogers, A., Dietz, K., Gifford, M. L., & Lunn, J. E. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erab268 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
One, two, three: portable sample size in agricultural research
Piepho, H., Gabriel, D., Hartung, J., Büchse, A., Grosse, M., Kurz, S., Laidig, F., Michel, V., Proctor, I., Sedlmeier, J. E., et al. (2022) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859622000466 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Seipel, T. F., Rew, L. J., Taylor, K., Maxwell, B. D., & Lehnhoff, E. A. (2018) · Applied Vegetation Science · doi:10.1111/avsc.12370 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Lamperty, T., Zhu, K., Poulsen, J. R., & Dunham, A. E. (2019) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108329 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Johnson, S. N., Gherlenda, A. N., Frew, A., & Ryalls, J. M. W. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00489 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Chamane, S., Kirkman, K. P., Morris, C. D., & O'Connor, T. G. (2017) · African Journal of Range and Forage Science · doi:10.2989/10220119.2017.1364295 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Boissier, O., Feer, F., Henry, P., & Forget, P. (2020) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2086 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Peatland Wildfire Severity and Post-fire Gaseous Carbon Fluxes
Gray, A. J., Davies, G. M., Domènech, R., Taylor, E. S., & Levy, P. (2020) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-020-00545-0 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationCerumen microbial community shifts between healthy and otitis affected dogs
Borriello, G., Paradiso, R., Catozzi, C., Brunetti, R., Roccabianca, P., Riccardi, M. G., Cecere, B., Lecchi, C., Fusco, G., Ceciliani, F., et al. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241447 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Whitworth, A. W., Beirne, C., Flatt, E. J., Froese, G., Núñez, C. L., & Forsyth, A. B. (2021) · Insect Conservation and Diversity · doi:10.1111/icad.12470 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Trevelline, B. K., Nuttle, T., Porter, B. A., Brouwer, N. L., Hoenig, B. D., Steffensmeier, Z. D., & Latta, S. C. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.5141 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Soil Fungal Community Structure in Boreal Pine Forests: From Southern to Subarctic Areas of Finland
Qu, Z., Santalahti, M., Köster, K., Berninger, F. A., Pumpanen, J., Heinonsalo, J., & Sun, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.653896 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Anderson, C., Jones, R., Moscicki, M. K., Clotfelter, E. D., & Earley, R. L. (2016) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-016-2085-3 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Disturbance‐modulated symbioses in termitophily
Monteiro, I. M., Junior, A. B. V., Solar, R., Neves, F. S., & DeSouza, O. (2017) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.3601 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Contrasting effects of short- and long-term grazing exclusion on plant diversity in humid grasslands
Wang, H., Li, X., Pang, C., Chen, H. Y. H., He, Y., Tao, T., Gao, Y., Zhu, W., Liu, H., Xu, J., et al. (2024) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2024.109420 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Wildlife response to recreational trail building: An experimental method and Appalachian case study
Miller, A. B., Kays, R., & Leung, Y. (2020) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125815 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Landscape controls on fuel moisture variability in fire-prone heathland and peatland landscapes
Little, K., Graham, L., Flannigan, M., Belcher, C. M., & Kettridge, N. (2024) · Fire Ecology · doi:10.1186/s42408-024-00248-0 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Sitzia, T., Campagnaro, T., Dainese, M., Cassol, M., Cortivo, M., Gatti, E., Padovan, F., Sommacal, M., & Nascimbene, J. (2017) · iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry · doi:10.3832/ifor2181-010 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Poor availability of context-specific evidence hampers decision-making in conservationPreprint
Christie, A. P., Amano, T., Martin, P. A., Petrovan, S. O., Shackelford, G. E., Simmons, B. I., Smith, R. K., Williams, D., Wordley, C. F. R., & Sutherland, W. J. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.02.13.946954 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Galantinho, A., Herrera, J. M., Eufrázio, S., Silva, C., Carvalho, F., Alpizar‐Jara, R., & Mira, A. P. P. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110033 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Eger, A., & Baum, J. K. (2020) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps13430 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Stark, J. S., Peltzer, E. T., Kline, D. I., Queirós, A. M., Cox, T. E., Headley, K. L., Barry, J., Gazeau, F., Runcie, J. W., Widdicombe, S., et al. (2019) · Progress In Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2019.01.006 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Increased Peatland Nutrient Availability Following the Fort McMurray Horse River Wildfire
van Beest, C., Petrone, R. M., Nwaishi, F. C., Waddington, J. M., & Macrae, M. L. (2019) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d11090142 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Galantinho, A., Santos, S., Eufrázio, S., Silva, C., Carvalho, F., Alpizar‐Jara, R., & Mira, A. P. P. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115272 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Whitworth, A. W., Villacampa, J., Rojas, S. J. S., Downie, R., & MacLeod, R. (2016) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.055 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Castro, J., & Leverkus, A. B. (2019) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f10010074 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Kasprzak, P., Gonsiorczyk, T., Grossart, H., Hupfer, M., Koschel, R. H., Petzoldt, T., & Wauer, G. (2018) · Limnologica · doi:10.1016/j.limno.2018.04.002 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Schwieger, S., Kreyling, J., Peters, B., Gillert, A., von Lukas, U. F., Jurasinski, G., Kohn, D. W., & Blume‐Werry, G. (2022) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.14222 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Cox, T. E., Nash, M., Gazeau, F., Déniel, M., Legrand, E., Alliouane, S., Mahacek, P., Fur, A. L., Gattuso, J., & Martin, S. G. (2017) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-017-3136-7 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Using metagenomics to show the efficacy of forest restoration in the New Jersey Pine Barrens
Eaton, W. D., Shokralla, S., McGee, K. M., & Hajibabaei, M. (2017) · Genome · doi:10.1139/gen-2015-0199 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Dufour, C., Fournier, V., & Giovenazzo, P. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227970 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Blier-Langdeau, A., Guêné‐Nanchen, M., Hugron, S., & Rochefort, L. (2021) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.13545 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Gavrichkova, O. V., Pretto, G., Brugnoli, E., Chiti, T., Викторовна, И. К., Mattioni, M., Moscatelli, M. C., Scartazza, A., & Calfapietra, C. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11162121 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Bosch, N. E., Pessarrodona, A., Filbee‐Dexter, K., Tuya, F., Mulders, Y. R., Bell, S., Langlois, T. J., & Wernberg, T. (2022) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-022-05278-6 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Effects of neonicotinoids on Bees: an invalid experiment
Bailey, R. A., & Greenwood, J. J. D. (2017) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-017-1877-1 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Peteiro, C., Bidegain, G., & Sánchez, N. (2019) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2019.101678 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Three-dimensional light structure of an upland Quercus stand post-tornado disturbance
Willson, K. G., Cox, L. E., Hart, J. L., & Dey, D. C. (2019) · Journal of Forestry Research · doi:10.1007/s11676-019-00907-y · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Dufour, C., Fournier, V., & Giovenazzo, P. (2020) · The Canadian Entomologist · doi:10.4039/tce.2020.29 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Alder, D., Fuller, R. J., & Marsden, S. J. (2018) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.04.004 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Ondei, S., Prior, L. D., McGregor, H. W., Reid, A. M., Johnson, C. N., Vigilante, T., Goonack, C., Williams, D., & Bowman, D. M. J. S. (2020) · Wildlife Research · doi:10.1071/wr20010 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Can reed harvest be used as a management strategy for improving invertebrate biomass and diversity?
Andersen, L. H., Nummi, P., Rafn, J., Frederiksen, C. M. S., Kristjansen, M. P., Lauridsen, T. L., Trøjelsgaard, K., Pertoldi, C., Bruhn, D., & Bahrndorff, S. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113637 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
An enhanced national-scale urban tree canopy cover dataset for the United States
Corro, L. M., Bagstad, K. J., Heris, M. P., Ibsen, P. C., Schleeweis, K. G., Diffendorfer, J. E., Troy, A. R., Megown, K., & O’Neil-Dunne, J. P. M. (2025) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-025-04816-0 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Soil Use Legacy as Driving Factor for Soil Erosion under Conservation Agriculture
Grahmann, K., Rubio, V., Bidegain, M. P., & Quincke, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.822967 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Ecosystem properties in urban areas vary with habitat type and settlement age
Eldridge, D. J., Benham, M., Singh, B. K., & Delgado‐Baquerizo, M. (2021) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-021-04836-w · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Vijayakumar, S., Bazrgar, A. B., Coleman, B., Gordon, A. D., Voroney, P. R., & Thevathasan, N. V. (2020) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2020.107149 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Diet diversity and seasonality of robust capuchins (Sapajus sp.) in a tiny urban forest
Gonçalves, B. D. A., Lima, L. C. P., & Aguiar, L. M. (2022) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.23396 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Bernauer, O. M., Jain, A., de Bivort, B. L., Holbrook, N. M., Myers, S. S., Ziska, L. H., & Crall, J. D. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-63967-z · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Ali, K. A., & Willenborg, C. J. (2021) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.7898 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Mason, S. C., Shirey, V. M., Waite, E. S., Gallagher, M. R., & Skowronski, N. S. (2023) · Fire · doi:10.3390/fire6090366 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Depecker, J., Asimonyio, J. A., Miteho, R., Hatangi, Y., Kambale, J., Verleysen, L., Stoffelen, P., Janssens, S. B., Dhed’a, B. D., Vandelook, F. E. A., et al. (2022) · Journal of Tropical Ecology · doi:10.1017/s0266467422000347 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Hill, J. M., Hutton, B., Steffins, K., & Rieucau, G. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2021.151618 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Evaluation of three methods for manually counting fish in dam turbines using DIDSON
Braga, L. T. M. D., Giraldo, A., & Godinho, A. L. (2021) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-021-04605-x · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Stefanello, M. D. M., Rovedder, A. P. M., Felker, R. M., Gazzola, M. D., Camargo, B., Piaia, B. B., Matiello, J., & Procknow, D. (2021) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106154 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Multifunctional bioretention basins as urban stepping stone habitats for wildflowers and pollinators
Bjørn, M. C., & Howe, A. G. (2023) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128133 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Davies, G. M., & Gray, A.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Davies, G. Matt
- Venue
- Ecology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-10-26
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 5295-5304
- ISSN
- 2045-7758 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6102510
- OpenAlex
- W2155746446
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 19.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council (ceh020002)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- pseudoreplication, natural experiment, ecological monitoring, peer review, statistical inference, random effects, nested designs, evidence-based management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review