Cited by 65Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Pyrogenic fuels produced by savanna trees can engineer humid savannas

Platt, William J., Ellair, Darin P., Huffman, Jean M., Potts, Stephen E., Beckage, Brian·2016·Ecological Monographs

Abstract

Natural fires ignited by lightning strikes following droughts frequently are posited as the ecological mechanism maintaining discontinuous tree cover and grass‐dominated ground layers in savannas. Such fires, however, may not reliably maintain humid savannas. We propose that savanna trees producing pyrogenic shed leaves might engineer fire characteristics, affecting ground‐layer plants in ways that maintain humid savannas. We explored our hypothesis in a high‐rainfall, frequently burned pine savanna in which the dominant tree, longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), produces resinous needles that become highly flammable when shed and dried. We postulated that pyrogenic needles should have much greater influence on fire characteristics at ground level, and hence post‐fire responses of dominant shrubs and grasses, than other abundant fine fuels (shed oak leaves and grass culms). We further reasoned that these effects should increase with amounts of needles. We managed site conditions that affect fuels (time since fire, dominant vegetation), manipulated amounts of needles in ground‐layer plots, prescribed burned the plots, and measured fire characteristics at ground level. We also measured characteristics of ground‐layer oaks and grasses before, then 2 and 8 months after fires. We tested our hypotheses regarding effects of pyrogenic pine fuels on fire characteristics and vegetation regrowth and explored direct and indirect effects of fuels on fire characteristics and vegetation using a structural equation model. Pine needles influenced fire characteristics, elevating maximum temperature increases, durations of heating above 60°C, and fine fuel consumption considerably above measurements when fuels only included other savanna plants. Presence of pine needles depressed post‐fire numbers of oak stems and grass culms, especially in the interior of grass genets, as well as post‐fire flowering of grasses. The structural equation model indicated strong direct and indirect pathways from pine needles to post‐fire responses of oaks and grasses. The experimental field tests of hypotheses, bolstered by structural equation modeling, indicate pyrogenic fine fuels modify characteristics of prescribed fires at ground level, negatively affecting dominant ground‐layer oaks and grasses. Frequent fires fueled by pyrogenic needles should maintain humid savannas and generate spatial pyrodiversity that affects composition and dynamics of pine savanna ground‐layer vegetation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ecm.1224

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Strong feedbacks between plants and fire mean that plants directly influence fire regimes.

    “However, strong feedbacks between plants and fire also mean that plants directly influence fire regimes (Beckage, Platt, & Gross, 2009;Nowacki & Abrams, 2008;Platt, Ellair, Huffman, Potts, & Beckage, 2016).”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Platt, Ellair, Huffman, Potts, & Beckage, 2016

  • Vegetation structure, microclimate and plant flammability vary along post-fire succession sequences, and these characteristics interact with climate and weather to influence fire regimes and the persistence of different vegetation types.

    “Vegetation structure, microclimate and plant flammability vary along post-fire succession sequences, and these characteristics interact with climate and weather to influence fire regimes and the persistence of different vegetation types (Pausas et al., 2017;Platt et al., 2016;Varner, Kane, Kreye, & Engber, 2015).”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Platt et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Platt, W. J., Ellair, D. P., Huffman, J. M., Potts, S. E., & Beckage, B.
Affiliations
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Platt, William J.
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08
Volume
86
Issue
3
Pages
352-372
ISSN
  • 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7015
OpenAlex
W2409841451
Cited by
65
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecological Monographs (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks -A service of University of Vermont Libraries (University of Vermont) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0950302)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Keywords
longleaf pine, Pinus palustris, pine needles, savanna fire regimes, humid savanna, prescribed burning, ground layer vegetation, oak regeneration, post-fire vegetation response, pyrodiversity, fire characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review