Repeated fire shifts carbon and nitrogen cycling by changing plant inputs and soil decomposition across ecosystems
Abstract
Fires shape the biogeochemistry and functioning of many ecosystems, and fire frequencies are changing across much of the globe. Frequent fires can change soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) storage by altering the quantity and chemistry of plant inputs through changes in plant biomass and composition as well as the decomposition of soil organic matter. How decomposition rates change with shifting inputs remains uncertain because most studies focus on the effects of single fires, where transient responses may not reflect responses to decadal changes in burning frequencies. Here, we sampled seven sites exposed to different fire frequencies. In four of the sites, we intensively sampled both soils and plant communities across four ecosystems in North America and Africa spanning tropical savanna, temperate coniferous savanna, temperate broadleaf savanna, and temperate coniferous forest ecosystems. Each site contained multiple plots burned frequently for 33–61 years and nearby plots that had remained unburned over the same period replicated at the landscape scale. Across all sites, repeatedly burned plots had 25–185% lower bulk soil C and N concentrations but also 2–10‐fold lower potential decomposition of organic matter compared to unburned sites. Soil C and N concentrations and extracellular enzyme activities declined with frequent fire because fire reduced both plant biomass inputs into soils and dampened the localized enrichment effect of tree canopies. Examination of soil extrace…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Frequently burned sites across continents were found to have up to tenfold less soil organic matter decomposing extracellular enzyme activity and up to 185% lower soil carbon and nitrogen concentrations due to reduced biomass inputs and reduced tree abundance.
“Frequently burned sites across continents were found to have up to tenfold less soil organic matter decomposing extracellular enzyme activity and up to 185% lower soil carbon and nitrogen concentrations due to reduced biomass inputs and reduced tree abundance (80).”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [80]
Cites
<b>lmerTest</b> Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v082.i13 · Cited by 24,346 · see citing works
Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity.
Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R., & Swetnam, T. W. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128834 · Cited by 5,176 · see citing works
A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology
Harrison, X. A., Donaldson, L., Correa-Cano, M. E., Evans, J., Fisher, D. N., Goodwin, C. E. D., Robinson, B. S., Hodgson, D. J., & Inger, R. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.4794 · Cited by 2,094 · see citing works
Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands.
Jackson, R. B., Banner, J. L., Jobbágy, E. G., Pockman, W. T., & Wall, D. H. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00910 · Cited by 1,007 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Arneth, A., Olsson, L., Cowie, A., Erb, K.-H., Hurlbert, M., Kurz, W. A., Mirzabaev, A., & Rounsevell, M. D. A. (2021) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-054809 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
“Frequently burned sites across continents were found to have up to tenfold less soil organic matter decomposing extracellular enzyme activity and up to 185% lower soil carbon and nitrogen concentrations due to reduced biomass inputs and reduced tree abundance (80).”
BackgroundPhotodegradation in terrestrial ecosystems
Austin, A. T., & Ballaré, C. L. (2024) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.20105 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pellegrini, A. F. A., Hobbie, S. E., Reich, P. B., Jumpponen, A., Brookshire, E. N. J., Caprio, A. C., Coetsee, C., & Jackson, R. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Kansas State University (US)
- Montana State University (US)
- National Park Service (US)
- South African National Parks (ZA)
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pellegrini, Adam F. A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-04-29
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W3010423606
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Ecological Monographs (publishedVersion)
- Nelson Mandela University Research Repository (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture (2018‐67012‐28077)
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Climate and Global Change Postdoctoral Fellowship)
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Keywords
- fire frequency, soil carbon, soil nitrogen, soil organic matter decomposition, plant litter inputs, extracellular enzyme activity, carbon cycle, nitrogen cycling, savanna ecosystems, coniferous forest, δ13C, long-term fire effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review