Cited by 106Soil erosion and sediment transportLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesWater and Land Management

Restoring Degraded Lands

Open access
Arneth, Almut, Olsson, Lennart, Cowie, Annette, Erb, Karl-Heinz, Hurlbert, Margot, Kurz, Werner A., Mirzabaev, Alisher, Rounsevell, Mark D.A.·2021·Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Abstract

Land degradation continues to be an enormous challenge to human societies, reducing food security, emitting greenhouse gases and aerosols, driving the loss of biodiversity, polluting water, and undermining a wide range of ecosystem services beyond food supply and water and climate regulation. Climate change will exacerbate several degradation processes. Investment in diverse restoration efforts, including sustainable agricultural and forest land management, as well as land set aside for conservation wherever possible, will generate co-benefits for climate change mitigation and adaptation and morebroadly for human and societal well-being and the economy. This review highlights the magnitude of the degradation problem and some of the key challenges for ecological restoration. There are biophysical as well as societal limits to restoration. Better integrating policies to jointly address poverty, land degradation, and greenhouse gas emissions and removals is fundamental to reducing many existing barriers and contributing to climate-resilient sustainable development.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Land degradation is a widespread challenge driven mainly by socioeconomic factors, and climate change is expected to exacerbate it while degradation itself contributes to greenhouse gas emissions and biodiversity loss. Restoration and sustainable land management can deliver climate mitigation, adaptation, and broader co-benefits, but adoption barriers and hard ecological/social limits remain.

Key findings

  • Approximately 70–75% of the ice-free land area is affected by human use, nearly 50% intensively; degradation negatively impacts livelihoods in more than a quarter of the Earth’s ice-free land area, with possibly up to 3.2 (1.3–3.2) billion people affected globally, and about 500 (±120) million people live in or near desertification hotspots.
  • Since 1961, crop production increased about 3.5-fold and animal product production 2.5-fold, enabled by fertilizer inputs (+800%) and freshwater withdrawals (+100%); population rose from 3.0 to 7.8 billion by 2020, while per capita calorie intake increased 32%.
  • Restoration and sustainable land management can yield economic returns: case studies found each US$1 invested in land restoration could yield US$3–$6 in societal economic returns over 30 years; forest restoration increased biodiversity by 15–84% and vegetation structure by 36–77% above degraded ecosystems, though values remained below old-growth forests.
  • Risks exist: large-scale afforestation/reforestation or bioenergy can backfire through biodiversity loss, food-production trade-offs, and land-use displacement; the Bonn Challenge aims to restore 3.5 Mkm² of forested landscapes by 2030, while 2019 voluntary restoration commitments totaled 230 million hectares of forest.

Methods

  • This is a review/synthesis article; it draws on cited literature and IPCC/IPBES assessments and presents summary tables (Tables 1–2) and figures rather than primary data collection.
  • Data/sample: Not stated in the paper as a primary dataset; the article synthesizes global and regional estimates from referenced studies and assessments.
  • Main analysis: narrative synthesis of degradation drivers, climate interactions, restoration practices, governance, and policy, with no new empirical modeling or systematic review protocol reported.

Limitations

  • The paper states soft barriers (human, social, economic, institutional, technological) and hard limits to restoration, including species already committed to extinction, habitat loss from sea-level rise, and possible tipping points such as climate-driven desertification or permafrost collapse; return to pristine historical states may be difficult or impossible.
  • The paper states uncertainties and a lack of restoration scenarios, noting that attribution of climate change as a degradation driver is complicated by concurrent CO₂ increases and regional variability, and that measuring mitigation-adaptation co-benefits is technically complex, expensive, and may take years to decades.
  • Evident from the text: as a review, reported estimates depend on cited sources with differing definitions and methods (e.g., forest area, wetland extent), and no systematic search or quality appraisal is described.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-054809

Cites

151 of 151 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

111 of 246 cited sources checked · 33 supported · 3 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    The shift from conventional agriculture to regenerative (or conservation) agriculture is universally applicable.

    “The shift from conventional agriculture, characterized by frequent tillage and complete removal of vegetation for parts of the season, to regenerative (or conservation) agriculture is particularly promising and universally applicable (104).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [104] source

      Section 5.6, “Practices of sustainable agriculture” (page unavailable), says practices must be tailored to each case and that there is no “one size fits all” approach. Section 5.6.1, “Conservation agriculture” (page unavailable), also reports variable outcomes depending on conditions, contrary to the claim of universal applicability. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    Land conversions and land management almost equally cause the differences in carbon storage between the theoretical absence of land use and current conditions.

    “Land conversions (i.e., replacement of forests with cropland and pastures) and land management [i.e., harvesting of timber from managed forests or removal of herbaceous biomass through grazing (9)] almost equally cause these differences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Premisecitation

    Land degradation is of great concern for oceans, manifested by the now more than 500 dead coastal marine zones where excessive nutrient runoff from agriculture has contributed to the collapse of coastal marine ecosystems.

    “For instance, land degradation is of great concern for oceans, manifested by the now more than 500 dead coastal marine zones where excessive nutrient runoff from agriculture has contributed to the collapse of coastal marine ecosystems (5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] source

      The passages labeled Abstract (page unavailable) link agricultural runoff and nutrient inputs to coastal hypoxia and report massive coral-reef mortality in a documented event. But the paper lists 494 coastal dead zones, not more than 500, and does not say that agricultural runoff caused the collapse of ecosystems in all of them. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Removal of deadwood as part of forest management is associated with reduced habitat diversity for numerous species.

    “Removal of deadwood as part of forest management has also been associated with reducing habitat diversity for numerous species (20).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Premisecitation

    Grassland established after deforestation is estimated at 11.3 Mkm2 in 2000.

    “The latter is estimated at 11.3 Mkm 2 in 2000 (9)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] source

      Extended Data Table 1 gives an area of 11.3 Mkm² for artificial grasslands, and Methods (‘Actual biomass stock maps 1 and 2’) defines these as grasslands on potentially forested areas. The paper describes the underlying land-use dataset as present-day and derived from a year-2000 dataset, but does not explicitly date the 11.3 Mkm² estimate to 2000. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 86
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 58
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Since the Neolithic Revolution about 12,000 years ago, the upper 2 m of soils are estimated to have lost almost 116 GtC, of which 37 GtC have been attributed to croplands and associated vegetation cover classes.

    “Since the Neolithic Revolution some 12,000 years ago, the upper 2 m of soils are estimated to have lost almost 116 GtC, of which 37 GtC have been attributed to croplands and associated vegetation cover classes (39).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] source

      The Results and Discussion section (page unavailable) estimates 133 Pg C lost from the upper 2 m of soil, not almost 116 GtC. It attributes 35 Pg C, not 37 GtC, to the cropland and crop/natural vegetation mosaic categories. The source supports the historical scope and soil depth, but gives contrary figures for both quantities. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Increasing forest areas also led to the contraction and further intensification of cropland and pastureland, in some scenarios causing negative impacts on many carbon and biodiversity hotspots in the Americas, India, and Indonesia due to land-use displacement.

    “However, increasing forest areas also led to the contraction and further intensification of cropland and pastureland, in some scenarios causing negative impacts on many carbon and biodiversity hotspots in the Americas, India, and Indonesia due to land-use displacement (Section 4.2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [130] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Soil disturbance accompanying clear-cutting reduces soil carbon on average by approximately 10%, with larger losses in forest floor and organic soil horizons.

    “For instance, soil disturbance accompanying clear-cutting reduces soil carbon on average by approximately 10% with much larger losses in forest floor and organic soil horizons (19).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] source

      Section 4 (Harvesting; page not provided) reports average soil-carbon losses of 8% and 11.2% after harvesting, with larger losses in forest-floor and organic horizons. But it does not attribute those average losses specifically to soil disturbance accompanying clear-cutting; it principally relates losses to reduced carbon inputs and/or faster decomposition. Section 6 discusses soil disturbance from site preparation separately. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Associated above-ground carbon losses from forest degradation have been estimated to increase estimates of gross deforestation losses by approximately 25% up to >600%, with additional unknown soil carbon losses.

    “associated above-ground carbon losses have been estimated to increase estimates of gross deforestation losses by approximately 25% up to >600% (17), with additional, unknown amounts of carbon lost from soils.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] source

      The Results (Fig. 2; page unavailable) report a 626% increase over the forest-clearance estimate, but that figure includes forgone carbon removals as well as emissions from degradation. It does not establish a range starting at approximately 25% for above-ground degradation losses. The soil-carbon clause follows the citation in the citing sentence, so it is not treated as attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Climate change impacts can also increase forest productivity in cases where other factors are not limiting, resulting in faster tree growth or elevating treelines in mountain regions.

    “However, climate change impacts (including also the effects of increasing atmospheric CO 2 concentration) can, in cases where other factors are not limiting, also increase forest productivity, resulting in, for example, faster tree growth (13) or elevating treelines in mountain regions (14).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [13] source
    • cites [14] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Currently approximately one-quarter to one-third of the total potential net primary production on land is used by humans.

    “Currently approximately one-quarter to one-third of the total potential net primary production on land is used by humans, i.e., of the net primary productivity (NPP) that would prevail in the absence of land use [estimated at approximately 60 GtC a -1 (6)]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Less than 40% of global forest area has been estimated to contain old-growth forest (older than 140 years).

    “less than 40% of forest area has been estimated to contain old-growth forest [in Reference 18, forests identified to be older than 140 years].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    N2O emissions are generally associated with increased use of (mostly mineral) fertilizer, which on an expanding area of cropland has been estimated to have contributed >80% of the N2O emission increase since the 1860s.

    “N 2 O emissions are generally associated with increased use of (mostly mineral) fertilizer, which (on an expanding area of cropland) has been estimated to have contributed >80% of the N 2 O emission increase since the 1860s (43).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [43] source

      The Results passage on cropland emissions (page unavailable) estimates that increased cropland soil N₂O emissions accounted for 82% of the global soil-emission increase from the 1860s to the recent decade. The ‘Contributions of factors responsible for the increased N₂O emissions’ section also identifies fertilizer addition as a contributor. But the 82% figure is for cropland emissions, not the share caused by mostly mineral fertilizer on expanding cropland; the paper assesses manure, deposition, climate and other factors separately. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Deadwood is important as a living environment for insects and wood-inhabiting fungi and affects higher trophic levels through related food webs.

    “Deadwood is especially important as a living environment for insects and wood-inhabiting fungi but also affects higher trophic levels through related food webs (20).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Key sustainable land management practices contribute strongly to halting and reversing degradation and have notable co-benefits for climate change mitigation and/or adaptation.

    “Overview of key sustainable land management practices that contribute strongly to halting and reversing degradation and with notable co-benefits for climate change mitigation and/or adaptation.Sources: see References 3, 4, 62, 67, 96, 147”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [3] Olsson L, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [4] Mirzabaev A, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [62] source

      Section 2.3 (p. 10) says some land-management activities create CO₂ sinks, and the Discussion (p. 32) notes the importance of land-use emissions for climate mitigation strategies. The paper does not establish that key sustainable land-management practices strongly halt or reverse degradation, or that they provide adaptation co-benefits. (LLM, conf=0.81)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • Rests on an assumption: Grassland degradation is a widespread phenomenon, with overgrazing being a key driver, together with frequent wheel traffic, or overfertilization, all of which result in changes in sward composition, reduction in yields, and deterioration of soils.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dryland areas have high climatic variability, with periods of dry and wet climates and corresponding cycles of greening and browning, most famously in the Sahel.

    “For instance, dryland areas have high climatic variability, with periods of dry and wet climates, and corresponding cycles of greening and browning, most famously in the Sahel region (29,30).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [29] source

      The opening summary (pp. 1–11) describes Sahel droughts in the 1970s and 1980s, followed by increased rainfall and vegetation greening. It supports the Sahel example, but does not establish recurring greening-and-browning cycles or extend that pattern to drylands generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [30] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Natural temperate grasslands are now reduced to a fraction of their original area and are considered one of the most endangered biomes.

    “natural temperate grasslands are now reduced to a fraction of their original area and are considered one of the most endangered biomes in the world (27,28).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [27] source
    • cites [28] source

      The Introduction describes permanent grasslands as biodiversity hot spots, but does not say natural temperate grasslands have shrunk to a fraction of their original area or rank among the most endangered biomes. Searches for their original extent, loss, and endangered status found no passage addressing those claims in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.70)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The large historic loss of soil carbon implies that agricultural systems have a significant capacity to take up CO2 from the atmosphere and to store it in the form of soil carbon with a wide range of co-benefits in addition to climate change mitigation.

    “However, the large historic loss of soil carbon implies that agricultural systems have a significant capacity to take up CO 2 from the atmosphere and to store it in the form of soil carbon with a wide range of co-benefits in addition to climate change mitigation (40).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The total amount of carbon stored in wetlands and peatlands has been estimated at approximately 1,500 GtC, approximately 30-40% of the global terrestrial carbon stock.

    “The total amount of carbon stored in wetlands and peatlands has been estimated at approximately 1,500 GtC, approximately 30-40% of the global terrestrial carbon stock (44,45).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [44] source
    • cites [45] source

      Section 1 and the Summary Points describe peatlands as major carbon stores and estimate that they contain 500–700 GtC. The paper does not give the claimed 1,500 GtC estimate for wetlands and peatlands together or the figure of 30–40% of global terrestrial carbon stock. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Tropical grassy biomes have a substantially lower proportion of protected areas than tropical forest, often with individual protected areas far too small.

    “The lack of formal protection, therefore, is of concern; tropical grassy biomes have a substantially lower proportion of protected areas than tropical forest, often with individual areas under protection that are far too small (26).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] source

      In “Tropical grassy biomes in protected areas” (page unavailable), the paper reports that 13% of tropical grassy biomes are protected, versus 24% of tropical forest. It also explains why protected areas need to be large and discusses small areas in fragmented landscapes, but does not establish that individual protected areas are often too small. The paper qualifies the overall protection gap: outside the Neotropics, the two biomes receive proportionally similar protection. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Key human drivers of grassland and savannah degradation include expansion of cropped areas or conversion to intensive pasture systems, reduced livestock mobility and overgrazing, and fuelwood extraction in savannahs.

    “The key human drivers of grassland and savannah degradation include expansion of cropped areas or conversion to intensive pasture systems (Section 2.3) (27), reduced livestock mobility and overgrazing, and-in savannahs-fuelwood extraction (4,31).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [27] source
    • cites [4] Mirzabaev A, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [31] source

      The paper’s “Drivers of Change” section says land-use change and intensification disrupt tropical grassy biomes, and that roads and fences prohibit large-scale animal movements. Its “Human use and value” discussion identifies fuelwood harvesting as significant, but says its sustainability varies; the copy does not identify reduced livestock mobility, overgrazing, and fuelwood extraction together as key drivers of degradation, or specifically describe conversion to intensive pasture systems. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Global CH4 emissions have risen rapidly since 2007, with a further acceleration after 2014.

    “Global CH 4 emissions have risen rapidly since 2007, with a further acceleration after 2014 (50).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] source

      The Results and Figure 3 discussion report that atmospheric methane growth resumed in 2007 and became stronger from 2014 (page numbers not supplied). But Section 5 says the causes remain uncertain and may involve changes in emissions, sinks, or both; the paper does not establish that global emissions themselves accelerated. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Estimates of the current and recent areal extent of wetlands vary substantially, from under 2% to over 20% of the global land area.

    “Estimates of the current and recent areal extent of wetlands vary substantially, from under 2% to over 20% of the global land area (46).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [46] source

      The Introduction (p. 2) describes substantially varying wetland estimates and reports that satellite imagery places permanent water coverage as low as 1.6% of land. Section 2.5.2 (p. 8) reports a wetland estimate of 22.6%, but identifies it as potential extent that does not account for human-caused losses. The claimed range therefore draws on different measures, rather than estimates of current or recent wetland extent throughout. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Changes in river flow regimes and pollution inflow from agricultural fields can increase algal biomass, reduce invertebrate richness, abundance, and density, and alter organic matter decomposition.

    “Changes in river flow regimes, but also pollution inflow from agricultural fields, can increase algal biomass; reduce invertebrate richness, abundance, and density; and alter organic matter decomposition (58).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [58] source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that human-driven water stress increased algal biomass, reduced invertebrate richness, abundance and density, and reduced organic matter breakdown. It links these effects chiefly to altered flows from dams and water abstraction; the passages do not establish pollution inflow from agricultural fields as a cause of those outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Restoring already degraded wetlands can sequester carbon on a century scale, albeit often relatively slowly and possibly at the expense of increased CH4 emissions.

    “Restoring already degraded wetlands can sequester carbon on a century scale, albeit at an often relatively slow pace and possibly at the expense of increased CH 4 emissions (53), but with large potential to improve conditions for biodiversity (54).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [53] source

      Section 3.5 reports that restored wetlands sequestered carbon and that methane emissions delayed net greenhouse-gas benefits for at least half a century, with the wetlands becoming net atmospheric sinks after a century or more. It does not establish that carbon sequestration itself proceeds slowly; the century-scale delay concerns climate benefit after the methane burden, and the paper describes the restored wetlands as sizeable carbon sinks. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Vegetation fires are an important ecological feature of most land ecosystems and are used as a management tool but also often negatively affect human societies through losses of properties and lives and local and long-range air pollution.

    “Vegetation fires are an important ecological feature of most land ecosystems and are used as a management tool but also often negatively affect human societies through, e.g., losses of properties and lives and local and long-range air pollution (75).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [75] source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) describes fire as fundamental to most terrestrial ecosystems, notes its use as a management tool, and says recent fires have had negative consequences for humans. Section 6.3 (page unavailable) says smoke affects human health and travels beyond burn perimeters. Our copy does not specifically substantiate the claimed losses of property and lives. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Groundwater recharge is expected to respond to climate change with increases during wet, winter periods and declines during dry, summer periods; overall declines are expected in more arid locations.

    “Groundwater recharge is expected to respond to climate change with increases during wet, winter periods and declines during dry, summer periods; overall declines are expected in more arid locations (72).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [72] source

      Section 3.3 (page unavailable) projects dry-season declines for Bandung and Ho Chi Minh City and wet-season increases for Bangkok, supporting parts of the seasonal pattern. It does not equate wet and dry seasons with winter and summer or predict overall declines for arid locations. The pattern is not general across the four cities: Lahore’s recharge increases in both seasons, with the larger increase in the dry season. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Climate change has contributed to degradation chiefly in regions around 15-45°S, although studies disagree regarding the exact region of impact.

    “Analyses of remotely sensed vegetation greenness (and vegetation browning) as well as model-based studies found that climate change has contributed to degradation chiefly in regions located around 15-45 o S, although studies disagree regarding the exact region of impact (36,60,61).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [36] source
    • cites [60] source

      The passage on regional climate effects (section labeled Abstract; no page given) says climatic effects are negative in some regions and that South America is the only continent where negative effects were statistically significant. It also reports inconsistency between models. It does not establish that degradation occurred chiefly at 15–45°S or that studies disagree about the exact region affected. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [61] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These categories are difficult to gauge and difficult to compare, which often prevents the assessment of co-benefits or trade-offs.

    “These are difficult to gauge and difficult to compare, which often prevents the assessment of co-benefits or trade-offs (101, 103).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [101] source
    • cites [103] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    High intensity tropical cyclones are expected to increase in number and intensity, as well as the amount and intensity of rainfall, with continued climate change.

    “The overall frequency of tropical cyclones may not change, or may even decrease with continued climate change, but high intensity cyclones are expected to increase in number and intensity as well as the amount and intensity of rainfall (87,88).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [87] source
    • cites [88] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These SLM practices enhance ecosystem carbon sinks and food security as well as deliver multiple other co-benefits.

    “As a co-benefit, these practices also enhance ecosystem carbon sinks and food security as well as deliver multiple other co-benefits (63), with positive changes in areas totaling globally greater than 10 Mkm 2 (63).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63] source

      The Discussion (Co-delivery across the land challenges; page unavailable) says most agricultural land-management practices have benefits across the four land challenges, while noting exceptions for food security. The Results (Potential of practices for addressing land degradation and desertification; page unavailable) say more than 10 million km² could benefit from improved management—not that positive changes have already occurred across that area. The citing sentence presents these potential benefits as established outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Regionally adapted restoration activities have large potential to support climate change mitigation while simultaneously reducing climate change impacts on ecosystems and people, with added benefits for multiple ecosystem services.

    “These analyses demonstrate that regionally adapted restoration activities have large potential to support climate change mitigation while simultaneously reducing climate change impacts on ecosystems and people, with added benefits for multiple ecosystem services.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [97] source

      The Discussion (page not provided) says carbon conservation could mitigate climate change while benefiting biodiversity and other ecosystem services, and recommends regional-to-local conservation planning. It does not demonstrate that regionally adapted restoration activities reduce climate-change impacts on ecosystems and people; its analyses concern conservation priorities, not restoration outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [98] source

      The Discussion (p. 14) reports substantial climate-mitigation and biodiversity benefits from spatially planned restoration in the Atlantic Forest, and the Discussion (p. 12) identifies potential local ecosystem-service benefits. But the Results (p. 10) say climate-change adaptation *might* benefit from more resilient ecosystems; the paper does not demonstrate that restoration reduces climate-change impacts on ecosystems and people. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [99] source

      The paper’s summary and its section on synergies between forest-based carbon emission reduction and biodiversity conservation describe modeled REDD+ scenarios with climate-mitigation and biodiversity benefits. They do not establish that regionally adapted restoration reduces climate-change impacts on ecosystems and people or provides benefits across multiple ecosystem services; the analysis concerns allocation of REDD+ funds, not those restoration outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The reduction of negative impacts, which reflects successful adaptation, could be quantified in terms of enhanced assets and livelihoods; resources (food, water) security, health, cultural, or spiritual well-being; or conservation and biodiversity.

    “Likewise, the reduction of negative impacts, which reflects successful adaptation, could be quantified, e.g., in terms of enhanced assets and livelihoods; in resources (food, water) security, health, cultural, or spiritual well-being; or in conservation and biodiversity (101, 102).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [101] source
    • cites [102] source

      Section 2.3 defines adaptation outcomes as reduced harm or risk, and section 3.3 identifies assets, livelihoods, food security, resource security, and health as outcome dimensions. But section 3.3 mentions culture and spirituality only as part of an earlier typology, while sections 3.5 and 4 treat conservation and biodiversity as intervention components rather than the adaptation outcomes measured here. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Under current climatic conditions, erosion and nutrient leakage from agricultural land is substantial and an important cause of deterioration of marine and terrestrial aquatic ecosystems.

    “Under current climatic conditions, erosion and nutrient leakage from agricultural land is substantial and an important cause of deterioration of marine and terrestrial aquatic ecosystems (84,85).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [84] Wang Z-H, 2019 source
    • cites [85] source

      The Introduction and §3.1 describe agricultural nutrient leakage as a major contributor to eutrophication and degraded inland and coastal waters. §2 identifies erosion as a pathway for nutrient loss, but the passages do not establish that erosion itself is substantial under current climatic conditions. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The intensification of the hydrological cycle as a result of warming of the atmosphere is well understood, and the effect has been detected in climatic time series for several decades.

    “But the intensification of the hydrological cycle as a result of warming of the atmosphere is well understood, and the effect has been detected in climatic time series for several decades.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [82] source
    • cites [83] source

      The supplied passages are bibliographic material, not discussion of the hydrological cycle. Searches of the indexed copy for atmospheric warming, hydrological-cycle intensification, and detection in climatic time series found no passage addressing either part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The overall frequency of tropical cyclones may not change, or may even decrease with continued climate change.

    “The overall frequency of tropical cyclones may not change, or may even decrease with continued climate change, but high intensity cyclones are expected to increase in number and intensity as well as the amount and intensity of rainfall (87,88).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [87] source
    • cites [88] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sustainable cultivation of lignocellulosic energy crops provides a financial return, while at the same time supporting the rehabilitation of degraded lands and restoring productivity.

    “Sustainable cultivation of lignocellulosic energy crops provides a financial return, while at the same time supporting the rehabilitation of degraded lands and restoring productivity (125).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [125] source

      The paper’s Lesson 3 (page unavailable) calls for restoring damaged land to its pre-project agricultural capability, and Lesson 8 describes pasture establishment as a way to restore soil function. These passages support the rehabilitation and productivity aspect, but do not establish that cultivating lignocellulosic energy crops achieves it or provides a financial return. (LLM, conf=0.79)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Afforestation and reforestation are considered relatively cost-effective climate change mitigation options.

    “Afforestation and reforestation are considered relatively cost-effective climate change mitigation options (96).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Exotic monoculture plantations have little or no benefit for biodiversity, or can be detrimental if the planted species becomes invasive.

    “Exotic monoculture plantations have little or no benefit for biodiversity, or they can even be detrimental if the planted species becomes invasive (115).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [115] source

      The Introduction (p. 2) says non-native trees can harm nature conservation when they become invasive, supporting the second half of the claim. It does not say exotic monoculture plantations generally have little or no biodiversity benefit: the habitat-restoration section (p. 22) says some alien-tree plantations remain monocultures, while the Introduction also notes that planted forests can support biodiversity conservation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Energy crops can enhance the biodiversity of degraded lands, especially if native species are included and/or if perennial grasses and woody crops enhance habitat diversity in otherwise large cropland monocultures.

    “Energy crops can enhance the biodiversity of degraded lands, especially if native species are included and/or if perennial grasses and woody crops enhance habitat diversity in what are otherwise large cropland monocultures (109).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The need for dynamic conservation strategies was not considered in the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, nor is it being considered in the current draft of the post-Aichi objectives.

    “However, the need for dynamic conservation strategies was not considered in the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, nor is it being considered in the current draft of the post-Aichi objectives (144).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [144] source

      In “Climate Change and Global Biodiversity Targets” (page unavailable), the paper says Aichi Target 11 and the corresponding draft post-2020 targets may lead to static protected-area approaches, although flexible, dynamic measures are needed. It says the draft targets *might* lead to static approaches, not that the need for dynamic conservation was wholly unconsidered across the draft objectives; the citing sentence overstates that conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The commitments of approximately a quarter of countries are larger than the existing forest or agricultural areas in those countries, which implies the need for enormous transformation in current land-use practices and agricultural and forest economies.

    “However, the commitments of approximately a quarter of countries are larger than the existing forest or agricultural areas in those countries, which implies the need for enormous transformation in current land-use practices and agricultural and forest economies (137; see also Section 4.2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [137] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Establishing financial mechanisms for compensating land users for SLM and improved delivery of ecosystem services, e.g., through payments for ecosystem services, could provide a much-needed incentive for increased investment into land restoration and rehabilitation.

    “Establishing financial mechanisms for compensating land users for SLM and improved delivery of ecosystem services, e.g., through payments for ecosystem services, could provide a much-needed incentive for increased investment into land restoration and rehabilitation (111, 127, 128).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [111] source

      In “Challenges to Agroforestry Adoption” (page unavailable), the paper says that some agroforestry practices may need markets that compensate land users for ecosystem services to make financial sense. “Moving Forward—Policy and Research Needs” (page unavailable) also proposes credits for environmental services to encourage adoption. These passages support the proposed financial incentive, but they do not extend it to sustainable land management generally or explicitly link it to increased investment in land restoration and rehabilitation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [127] source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [128] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Enhancing synergies and reducing trade-offs can be achieved by policy decisions and implementation that consider cross-disciplinary scientific knowledge on natural, economic, and societal aspects and by mapping and quantification of stakeholder choices in relation to various ecosystem service choices.

    “Enhancing synergies and reducing trade-offs can be achieved by (a) policy decisions and implementation that consider cross-disciplinary scientific knowledge on natural, economic, and societal aspects and (b) mapping and quantification of stakeholder choices in relation to various ecosystem service choices (139).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [139] source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) describes an ecosystem-services framework that bridges disciplines and incorporates human decisions and values into natural-resource management. The paper also discusses working with policy and practice, but it does not establish that these steps enhance synergies or reduce trade-offs, or describe mapping and quantifying stakeholder choices to achieve that result. A search for “trade-offs” found only a comment about understanding them, not reducing them. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Wolff et al. found that meeting global land restoration targets outlined in the SDGs and by several multinational environmental agreements would require an increase in global tree cover of 4 million km2 that would increase forest carbon stocks by 50 Gt and protect 28% of the terrestrial surface with high biodiversity and carbon values.

    “They found that meeting these targets would require an increase in global tree cover of 4 million km² that would increase forest carbon stocks by 50 Gt and protect 28% of the terrestrial surface with high biodiversity and carbon values.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    Alternative climate change mitigation and restoration pathways could explore the future outcomes of decision-making when accounting for climate or socioeconomic developments, new knowledge or technologies, and changing societal values.

    “Rather than making fixed and irreversible decisions now, alternative climate change mitigation and restoration pathways could explore the future outcomes of decision-making when accounting for climate or socioeconomic developments, new knowledge or technologies, and changing societal values (145).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [145] source

      The Introduction supports flexible decisions that adapt as conditions unfold, and §2.2 describes evaluating alternative policy pathways and monitoring developments that trigger later actions. The Waas case considers climate and land-use scenarios. The paper addresses climate adaptation and flood management, however, not mitigation or restoration pathways; the cited passages also do not establish changing societal values or new knowledge as factors evaluated in those pathways. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Scown et al. estimated that subsidies in the CAP supported high-pollution practices in agriculture and low nature-value farmland, as well as increasing income inequality.

    “Scown et al. (129), who estimated that subsidies in the CAP (common agricultural policy) supported high-pollution practices in agriculture and low nature-value farmland, as well as increasing income inequality.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Improved forest management has an estimated mitigation potential of 0.4-2.1 Gt CO2-eq yr-1 and an adaptation potential of >25 million people.

    “Improved forest management For example, improved tree varieties, mixed forests, reduced disturbance when harvesting, selective logging Enhance forest carbon content; reduced risks from insects/pathogens; habitat for biodiversity 0.4-2.1 >25 Access to knowledge, technology”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Biochar addition has an estimated mitigation potential of 0.03-6.6 Gt CO2-eq yr-1 (plausible to technical potential) and 0.5-2 Gt CO2-eq yr-1 (sustainable potential), and an adaptation potential up to 3,200 million people unless arable land would be used for biochar feedstock production.

    “Biochar addition Add biochar to agricultural soils Enhanced soil structure, water-and nutrientholding capacity and enhance long-term carbon storage Mitigation estimate is net across supply chain from feedstock production to soil application, including avoided emissions and carbon sequestered.0.03-6.6(Plausible to technical potential) 0.5-2 (Sustainable potential) Up to 3,200 unless arable land w”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Integrated water management has an estimated mitigation potential of 0.1-0.72 Gt CO2-eq yr-1 and an adaptation potential of 250 million people.

    “Integrated water management Increase irrigation effi ciency Reduce competition for drinking water; reduce water pollution; reduce pressure on freshwater biodiversity 0.1-0.72 250 Access to fi nance, technology”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Reduced deforestation/degradation has an estimated mitigation potential of 0.5-5.8 Gt CO2-eq yr-1 and an adaptation potential of 1-25 million people.

    “Reduced deforestation/ degradation Stop conversion of forests and savannahs into agricultural systems Maintain carbon stocks and uptake potential; fl ood control; habitat for biodiversity 0.5-5.81-25 Government regulation; land-use zoning and planning; alternative income opportunities to forest-dependent communities; weak law enforcement to protect forests and dependent communities”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Restoration/reduced conversion of inland wetlands and peatlands has an estimated mitigation potential of 0.6-2 Gt CO2-eq yr-1 and an adaptation potential unknown.

    “Restoration/ reduced conversion of inland wetlands and peatlands Remove drainage systems in former peatlands; create/ maintain natural dams Enhance net carbon content (balance of CO 2 uptake and CH 4 emissions); fl ood regulation; habitat for biodiversity 0.6-2 Unknown Government regulation, restoration requirements; alternative income opportunities to wetlanddependent communities; weak law enforc”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Reforestation/restoration has an estimated mitigation potential of 1.5-10.1 Gt CO2-eq yr-1 and an adaptation potential of >25 million people.

    “Reforestation/ restoration Foster natural forest regrowth or planting of mixed-species forests on former cropland or pastures that are naturally forested Enhance forest carbon content; reduced risks from insects/pathogens; habitat for biodiversity 1.5-10.1 >25 Access to knowledge, fi nance and technology”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Fire management has an estimated mitigation potential of 0.5-8.1 Gt CO2-eq yr-1 and an adaptation potential of >6 million people.

    “Fire management Foster controlled burning; minimize risks of extreme wildfi res Reduce risk of large-scale forest (and property) loss and fi re-related ecosystem shifts; maintain ecological role of fi re 0.5-8.1 >6 Government regulation, restoration requirements”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Changes in carbon pool sizes indicate a loss of ecological integrity, including loss of biodiversity and altered ecosystem functioning and services.

    “Although changes in carbon pool sizes do not necessarily imply a loss of productivity, they nonetheless indicate a loss of ecological integrity, including loss of biodiversity and altered ecosystem functioning and services (see the sidebar titled A Short Reflection on Terminology).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Annual forestry harvest has continuously increased since the early 1960s, and in the first decades of the twenty-first century amounts to approximately 1 GtC a-1.

    “Annual forestry harvest has continuously increased since the early 1960s, and in the first decades of the twenty-first century amounts to approximately 1 GtC a -1 (1,8).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] Arneth A, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [8] 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Avoiding, reducing, and reversing land degradation has many possible co-benefits for ecosystems and human societies.

    “Avoiding, reducing, and reversing land degradation needs to be part of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies, with many possible co-benefits for ecosystems and human societies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Climate change contributes to forest degradation; drought and heat stress increase regeneration failure and tree mortality.

    “Climate change contributes to forest degradation; e.g., drought and heat stress increase regeneration failure and tree mortality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Drivers of degradation include very short-term events (such as rainstorms causing erosion) as well as slow processes that accumulate over years and decades (such as nutrient losses or loss in biodiversity).

    “Drivers of degradation include very short-term events [such as rainstorms causing erosion (10)] as well as slow processes that accumulate over years and decades (such as nutrient losses or loss in biodiversity), interacting with management and land-use change”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Restoration measures work best if the short-term, often weather-driven impacts are alleviated and the long-term impacts are addressed.

    “As a consequence, restoration measures (Sections 4 and 5) work best if the short-term, often weather-driven impacts are alleviated and the long-term impacts are addressed”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although harvested above-ground biomass and litter carbon recovers in regrowing vegetation, the impacts of forest management on soil processes are longer term and much more difficult to quantify.

    “Although harvested above-ground biomass and litter carbon recovers in regrowing vegetation, the impacts of forest management on soil processes are longer term and much more difficult to quantify.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Heavy grazing decreases soil organic carbon content in grassland dominated by C3 photosynthetic pathway vegetation and increases soil organic carbon content in mixed and C4 photosynthetic-type grasslands.

    “A meta-analysis of studies found that heavy grazing decreases soil organic carbon content in grassland dominated by vegetation of the C3 photosynthetic pathway and increased soil organic carbon content in mixed and C4 photosynthetic-type grasslands (37).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Drivers of grassland degradation also limit adaptive capacities of pastoral communities, making them severely vulnerable to climate change, degradation, and continuing marginalization in favor of crop production.

    “These drivers of grassland degradation also limit the adaptive capacities of pastoral communities, making them severely vulnerable to climate change, degradation, and continuing marginalization in favor of crop production (4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Mirzabaev A, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • Rests on an assumption: These grasslands represent the key source of livelihoods for approximately 100 million to 200 million pastoralists around the world.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Improved access to financial markets creates more possibilities for obtaining credit to invest in SLM measures, and insurance can reduce associated risks.

    “Improved access to financial markets creates more possibilities for obtaining credit to invest in SLM measures, and insurance can reduce associated risks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Using biological productivity as an indicator, degradation in numerous grasslands across Europe, North America, and Asia was found to be primarily caused directly by human activities, although climate change is also a strong contributing factor.

    “Using biological productivity (e.g., NPP; see the sidebar titled A Short Reflection on Terminology) as an indicator, degradation in numerous grasslands across Europe, North America, and Asia was found to be primarily caused directly by human activities, although climate change is also a strong contributing factor (36) (Section 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    30% of the approximately 46% (±0.8%) of global land area defined as drylands are grassy ecosystems.

    “30% of the approximately 46% (±0.8%) of the global land area defined as drylands are grassy ecosystems (22)(23)(24).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [22] source
    • cites [23] source
    • cites [24] FAO (United Nations Food Agric. Organ.), 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Isolated trees in tropical savannahs support biodiversity and provide food and shelter to humans.

    “Likewise, isolated trees in tropical savannahs support biodiversity in these ecosystems, as well as providing food and shelter to humans (25).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Crop management and soil moisture are important determinants of emissions, whereby waterlogging and soil compaction generally are associated with high CH4 emissions.

    “Crop management and soil moisture are also important determinants of emissions whereby waterlogging and soil compaction generally are associated with high CH 4 emissions (42).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Better access to input and output markets lowers costs of applied inputs and transportation, ultimately increasing profit margins, which provides greater capacity for reinvestment in SLM.

    “Similarly, better access to input and output markets lowers the costs of applied inputs (e.g., fertilizer) and transportation (e.g., for sales), ultimately increasing profit margins, which provides greater capacity for reinvestment in SLM.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Ruminant livestock are the main source of CH4 from the agricultural sector, and rice cultivation is the most important source of CH4 from agricultural soils.

    “Whereas ruminant livestock are the main source of CH 4 from the agricultural sector, rice cultivation is the most important source of CH 4 from agricultural soils (41).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41] Humphreys J, 2019, Geoderma Reg source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Carbon sinks or sources in grasslands depend heavily on previous land use, climate, and/or time since conversion.

    “Others have argued that carbon sinks or sources in grasslands depend heavily on the previous land use, climate, and/or time since conversion (38).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The large variation in estimates of wetland areal extent is due to the lack of an accepted definition of wetlands and difficulties in linking definitions with data sources.

    “This large variation is due to the lack of an accepted definition of wetlands and difficulties in linking definitions with data sources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The most important human drivers of wetland decline are urbanization, drainage for agricultural expansion, and increasing use of irrigation in agriculture causing wetlands to dry.

    “The most important human drivers of wetland decline are urbanization, drainage for agricultural expansion, and increasing use of irrigation in agriculture causing wetlands to dry (48).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Historical data on the areal extent of wetlands are highly uncertain, but an estimated 87% of the world's wetlands were lost in the past 300 years, 54% since 1900, and 35% since 1970.

    “Historical data on their areal extent are highly uncertain, but an estimated 87% of the world's wetlands were lost in the past 300 years, 54% since 1900 (47), and 35% since 1970 (48).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [47] Prince S, 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [48] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Climate change is projected to exacerbate wetland degradation due to increasing evaporation and increasing demand for irrigation, as well as enhancing fire risks.

    “Climate change is projected to exacerbate the degradation of wetlands due to increasing evaporation and increasing demand for irrigation, as well as enhancing fire risks (49) (Section 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Building dams alters habitats and results in biodiversity loss, putting pressure on freshwater megafauna by blocking fish migration, range contraction, and population decline.

    “The building of dams alters habitats and results in biodiversity loss putting pressure on freshwater megafauna by blocking fish migration, range contraction, and population decline.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Wildfires that have coevolved with an ecosystem are not a degrading feature.

    “Although wildfires that have coevolved with an ecosystem are not a degrading feature, there is concern that a change in fire regimes caused by climate change could negatively interfere with the integrity of an ecosystem, lead to changes in biome type, and cause increased risk to the human populations living in fire-prone environments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Increasing droughts will cause stress to coastal and inland wetlands.

    “Increasing droughts will cause stress to coastal and inland wetlands.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Frequently burned sites across continents were found to have up to tenfold less soil organic matter decomposing extracellular enzyme activity and up to 185% lower soil carbon and nitrogen concentrations due to reduced biomass inputs and reduced tree abundance.

    “Frequently burned sites across continents were found to have up to tenfold less soil organic matter decomposing extracellular enzyme activity and up to 185% lower soil carbon and nitrogen concentrations due to reduced biomass inputs and reduced tree abundance (80).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Wildfires in boreal regions, which have experienced overproportional warming, can accelerate permafrost thaw and cause large carbon losses from vegetation and organic soils.

    “Wildfires in boreal regions, which have experienced overproportional warming, can accelerate permafrost thaw and cause large carbon losses from vegetation and organic soils.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Climate change is expected to become more important for degradation in the future, exacerbating the effects of land-use change.

    “Although climate change has until now had relatively minor impacts on degradation, it is expected to become more important for degradation in the future (3, 4), exacerbating the effects of land-use change.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] Olsson L, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [4] Mirzabaev A, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Droughts usually evolve relatively slowly, posing difficulties in identifying their onset and end, although rapid onset of flash droughts is also possible.

    “Droughts usually evolve relatively slowly, posing difficulties in identifying their onset and end (64), although the rapid onset of flash droughts is also possible (65).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [64] Wilhite D, 2017
    • cites [65] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Responding to droughts proactively by increasing the resilience of societies and ecosystems was found to be more efficient in limiting drought impacts than reactive drought relief efforts, which are still widely practiced across the world.

    “Responding to droughts proactively by increasing the resilience of societies and ecosystems was found to be more efficient in limiting drought impacts than reactive drought relief efforts, which are still widely practiced across the world (4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Mirzabaev A, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Ignition sources, vegetation characteristics, land use, fire management, and climate all play a role in determining the frequency, severity, and spread of wildfires.

    “Ignition sources, vegetation characteristics, land use, fire management, and climate all play a role in determining the frequency, severity, and spread of wildfires.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Measures to achieve mitigation in land ecosystems with immediate positive synergies with conservation and adaptation are foremost a reduction in the conversion of forest and nonforest (semi)natural ecosystems into intensively managed ecosystems, together with the restoration of ecosystems with large carbon sequestration potential.

    “Measures to achieve mitigation in land ecosystems with immediate positive synergies with conservation and adaptation are foremost a reduction in the conversion of forest and nonforest (semi)natural ecosystems into intensively managed ecosystems, together with the restoration of ecosystems with large carbon sequestration potential.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In mountainous regions, landslides and other impacts of intensive rainfall are often the major cause of climate-related loss of life and damage to property.

    “In mountainous regions, landslides and other impacts of intensive rainfall are often the major cause of climate-related loss of life and damage to property (90).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [90] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Multiple and very different indicators need to be used that are cognizant of the agreements made in international conventions as well as capturing local consequences.

    “Measuring and monitoring the success of combined mitigation-adaptation approaches is nontrivial; multiple and very different indicators need to be used that are cognizant of the agreements made in international conventions as well as capturing local consequences (101).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [101] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Acting immediately and simultaneously with regionally adjusted measures would enhance food, fiber, and water security, help to curb loss of biodiversity, as well as alleviate and reverse land degradation, without compromising the nonmaterial or regulating benefits from land ecosystems.

    “Acting immediately and simultaneously with regionally adjusted measures would enhance food, fiber, and water security, help to curb loss of biodiversity, as well as alleviate and reverse land degradation, without compromising the nonmaterial or regulating benefits from land ecosystems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Socioeconomic drivers of degradation such as population growth and increasing per capita demand for ecosystem services are projected to continue into the future.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    When faced with climate change, restoration will be about managing change, with a return to historical states hard or impossible to achieve.

    “When faced with climate change, restoration will be about managing change, with a return to historical states hard or impossible to achieve.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Removal of residues that would otherwise be retained on the soil surface increases the risk of soil erosion and depletes soil organic matter.

    “Likewise, removal of residues that would otherwise be retained on the soil surface increases the risk of soil erosion and depletes soil organic matter (93,94).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [93] source
    • cites [94] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Demand for bioenergy is anticipated to grow along with demand for other renewables, especially bioenergy linked with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), which emerges in future scenarios as one of the few technologies that can deliver carbon dioxide removal at required scales.

    “Demand for bioenergy is anticipated to grow along with demand for other renewables, especially bioenergy linked with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), which emerges in future scenarios as one of the few technologies that can deliver carbon dioxide removal at required scales.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [91] IPCC (Intergov. Panel Clim. Change), 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Biodiversity and productivity in forests are positively correlated globally.

    “Biodiversity and productivity in forests are positively correlated globally (118).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [118] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The overall impact on productivity (as an important degradation measure) will likely differ between regions and ecosystem types.

    “The overall impact on productivity (as an important degradation measure) will likely differ between regions and ecosystem types.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Animals have an essential role in shaping habitat structure, ecosystem productivity, and nutrient cycling.

    “These discussions mostly neglect the role of animals, despite their essential role in shaping habitat structure, ecosystem productivity, and nutrient cycling (122).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [122] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Practices that enhance soil carbon and nutrients in principle should deliver the same yields with less input and hence be more economically viable.

    “Practices that enhance soil carbon and nutrients in principle should deliver the same yields with less input and hence be more economically viable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Using timber in construction has a large potential to decrease carbon emissions from concrete and steel production and provide long-term carbon storage in wood.

    “In addition to the carbon removal during tree growth, Churkina et al. (112) recently estimated a large potential for using timber in construction, which decreases carbon emissions from concrete and steel production and provides long-term carbon storage in wood.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [112] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Two strategies apply to address barriers: revision of policies that impede restoration objectives and introduction of targeted initiatives that could directly help remove key barriers.

    “In principle, two strategies apply (141): the revision of policies that impede restoration objectives and the introduction of targeted initiatives that could directly help remove the key barriers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [141] Wreford A, 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    More than 120 countries have already committed to set land degradation neutrality targets.

    “More than 120 countries have already committed to set land degradation neutrality targets (https://www.unccd.int/actions/ldn-target-setting- programme).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites https://www.unccd.int/actions/ldn-target-setting- programme

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Effective mainstreaming of mitigation and adaptation in sustainable land and forest management needs to combine the advantages of centralized governance with those of more horizontal structures.

    “Effective main-streaming of mitigation and adaptation in sustainable land and forest management needs to combine the advantages of centralized governance (notably coordination, stability, compliance) with those of more horizontal structures (that allow flexibility, autonomy for local decision-making, multistakeholder engagement, co-management) (133).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [133] Acosta LA, 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Climate change is expected to exacerbate degradation processes in many regions, while degradation-related greenhouse gas emissions and the loss of carbon sink capacity in turn contribute to climate change.

    “Climate change is expected to exacerbate degradation processes in many regions, while degradation-related greenhouse gas emissions and the loss of carbon sink capacity in turn contribute to climate change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Approximately 30% of government pledges in the NDCs are predicated on land-based measures to help achieve their climate change mitigation and/or adaptation goals, but many of the measures are not yet clearly defined.

    “Approximately 30% of government pledges in the NDCs are predicated on land-based measures to help achieve their climate change mitigation and/or adaptation goals, but many of the measures are not yet clearly defined (138).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [138] Seddon N, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Successful restoration will be much more about managing change, with a return to a pristine historical ecosystem state in some places difficult or impossible to achieve.

    “Successful restoration will, therefore, be much more about managing change, with a return to a pristine historical ecosystem state in some places difficult or impossible to achieve.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    The results of Wolff et al. highlight the importance of targeted land-management measures that are consistent with policy targets of global restoration.

    “This highlighted the importance of targeted land-management measures that are consistent with policy targets of global restoration.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Restoration measures could also be aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement.

    “restoration measures could also be aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Global leadership could advance such local initiatives.

    “Global leadership could advance such local initiatives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Soft barriers to restoration include human, social, economic, institutional, and technological barriers.

    “Soft barriers to restoration include human (cognitive and behavioral obstacles), social (undermined participation in decision-making and inequity), economic (market failures, perverse incentives, lack of domestic funds), institutional (mal-coordination of policies, government failures, path-dependent institutions and a lack of cross-sectoral policy making), and technological (140).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [140] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The SSPs currently widely used in the global environmental change research community vary in their challenges to climate change adaptation and mitigation, but do not specify challenges to nature conservation, nor many of the critical drivers of ecosystem change.

    “The SSPs currently widely used in the global environmental change research community vary in their challenges to climate change adaptation and mitigation, but do not specify challenges to nature conservation, nor many of the critical drivers of ecosystem change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The SSPs are currently widely used in the global environmental change research community.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These new models could be used to identify the environmental and societal co-benefits of considering multiple ecosystem services as part of human agency.

    “These new models could be used to identify the environmental and societal co-benefits of considering multiple ecosystem services as part of human agency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The required efforts of coordination and societal and policy coherence are massive.

    “Nevertheless, the required efforts of coordination and societal and policy coherence are massive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Barriers specific to restoration may include a perceived lack of financial benefit, insufficient information or education, prohibitive costs of adoption, lack of access to credit, systems of uncertain land tenure, and lack of infrastructure or appropriate spatial planning.

    “Barriers specific to restoration may include a perceived lack of financial benefit, insufficient information or education, prohibitive costs of adoption, lack of access to credit, systems of uncertain land tenure, and lack of infrastructure or appropriate spatial planning (141) (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [141] Wreford A, 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Applying new modeling methods to novel scenario frameworks would help to identify plausible pathways that achieve multiple societal and political visions, while concurrently avoiding further degradation.

    “Given the challenges at hand, but also the multiple co-benefits from restoration, applying new modeling methods to novel scenario frameworks would help to identify plausible pathways that achieve multiple societal and political visions, while concurrently avoiding further degradation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Many of these barriers can be addressed.

    “Many of these barriers can be addressed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although there is climate change mitigation potential in restoring forests (and avoiding further deforestation), if done poorly, both land-based climate change mitigation measures and restoration measures could backfire.

    “Although there is climate change mitigation potential in restoring forests (and avoiding further deforestation), if done poorly, both land-based climate change mitigation measures and restoration measures could backfire.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These measures also contribute to many SDGs, including 15 (through restored landscapes and protected forests and biodiversity), 13 (through carbon capture and storage and enhanced ecosystem resilience), and 1 (by increasing income from forest and agriculture sector).

    “These measures also contribute to many SDGs, including 15 (through restored landscapes and protected forests and biodiversity), 13 (through carbon capture and storage and enhanced ecosystem resilience), and 1 (by increasing income from forest and agriculture sector).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Many synergies exist between restoration and key international policy areas that relate to nature-based solutions for climate change mitigation and adaptation (UNFCCC), avoiding and reducing degradation and restoring degraded land (UNCCD), and the CBD and its Aichi Biodiversity Targets.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Future climate change will cause shifts in species distributions and ranges that may go beyond the boundaries of static protected areas and/or increase the number and frequency of episodic, forest stand-destroying events such as wildfire or insect and pest outbreaks.

    “Future climate change will cause shifts in species distributions and ranges that may go beyond the boundaries of static protected areas and/or increase the number and frequency of episodic, forest stand-destroying events such as wildfire or insect and pest outbreaks (12).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Impacts could cascade through SDGs due to trade-offs between land for climate mitigation versus food production, or between forest biomass-based livelihoods versus global carbon storage with impacts on poverty alleviation.

    “Impacts could cascade through SDGs due to trade-offs between land for climate mitigation versus food production, or between forest biomass-based livelihoods versus global carbon storage with impacts on poverty alleviation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Land degradation is a ubiquitous challenge to human societies, driven mostly by socioeconomic factors.

    “Land degradation is a ubiquitous challenge to human societies, driven mostly by socioeconomic factors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Enhanced adoption of SLM technologies and the initiation of land restoration and rehabilitation activities will require overcoming numerous societal and economic barriers to provide the necessary incentive for increased investments in land restoration.

    “Enhanced adoption of SLM technologies and the initiation of land restoration and rehabilitation activities will require overcoming numerous societal and economic barriers to provide the necessary incentive for increased investments in land restoration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Land-based solutions aimed only at greenhouse gas mitigation, such as large-scale afforestation or bioenergy plantations, are at risk of contributing to land degradation and can have other negative, unintended societal and environmental consequences.

    “Land-based solutions aimed only at greenhouse gas mitigation, such as large-scale afforestation or bioenergy plantations, are at risk of contributing to land degradation and can have other negative, unintended societal and environmental consequences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Acting immediately and simultaneously with regionally adjusted measures to alleviate and reverse land degradation would enhance food, fiber, and water security and help to curb loss of biodiversity, without compromising the nonmaterial or regulating benefits from land.

    “Acting immediately and simultaneously with regionally adjusted measures to alleviate and reverse land degradation would enhance food, fiber, and water security and help to curb loss of biodiversity, without compromising the nonmaterial or regulating benefits from land.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The success of land restoration activities can be promoted by the provision of incentive schemes such as payments for ecosystem services.

    “The success of land restoration activities can be promoted by the provision of incentive schemes such as payments for ecosystem services, although more research and experimentation is needed to test other options, especially in nonforest ecosystems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Governance is key to fostering successful restoration if it supports the identification and integration of the interests of all actors, but the degree of extant environmental change commitments and the rate of change can pose hard environmental and social limits.

    “Governance is key to fostering successful restoration if it supports the identification and integration of the interests of all actors, but the degree of extant environmental change commitments and the rate of change can pose hard environmental and social limits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Synergies exist between fostering restoration in international policies and goals related to the Paris Agreement, land degradation neutrality targets, and the post-2020 biodiversity targets.

    “Synergies exist between fostering restoration in international policies and goals related to, for example, the Paris Agreement, land degradation neutrality targets, and the post-2020 biodiversity targets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Investment in diverse restoration efforts, and land set aside for conservation, can generate co-benefits for climate change mitigation and adaptation, economically and more broadly for human and societal well-being.

    “Investment in diverse restoration efforts, and land set aside for conservation, can generate co-benefits for climate change mitigation and adaptation, economically and more broadly for human and societal well-being.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given

    Removing the existing barriers to adaptation requires multilevel governance supported by crossdisciplinary scientific knowledge of natural, economic, and societal drivers and impacts.

    “Removing the existing barriers to their adaptation (such as financial incentives and the redirection of perverse subsidies, access to knowledge and technology, enforcement of environmental policies, appropriate spatial planning) requires multilevel governance supported by crossdisciplinary scientific knowledge of natural, economic, and societal drivers and impacts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Climate change is expected to increase in importance as a driver of degradation in the future, exacerbating the effects of land use and management.

    “Climate change is expected to increase in importance as a driver of degradation in the future, exacerbating the effects of land use and management.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Multiple strands of evidence show that degradation can be halted and reversed with appropriate land management practices, which would deliver co-benefits for a range of sustainable development objectives.

    “However, multiple strands of evidence show that degradation can be halted and reversed with appropriate land management practices, which would deliver co-benefits for a range of sustainable development objectives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
122 of 122
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    These grasslands represent the key source of livelihoods for approximately 100 million to 200 million pastoralists around the world.

    “These grasslands represent the key source of livelihoods for approximately 100 million to 200 million pastoralists around the world.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Grasslands provide essential supporting, regulating, and cultural ecosystem functions and services.

    “Grasslands also provide essential supporting, regulating, and cultural ecosystem functions and services.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Tropical grassy ecosystems harbor approximately half of the vascular plant richness found in tropical forests, and species richness for mammals, birds, and amphibians is also high.

    “For instance, tropical grassy ecosystems harbor approximately half of the vascular plant richness found in tropical forests, and species richness for mammals, birds, and amphibians is also high.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Grassland degradation is a widespread phenomenon, with overgrazing being a key driver, together with frequent wheel traffic, or overfertilization, all of which result in changes in sward composition, reduction in yields, and deterioration of soils.

    “Grassland degradation is a widespread phenomenon, with overgrazing being a key driver, together with frequent wheel traffic, or overfertilization, all of which result in changes in sward composition, reduction in yields, and deterioration of soils.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Grasslands can act as carbon sinks, transferring carbon below-ground via their expansive root systems.

    “Grasslands can act as carbon sinks, transferring carbon below-ground via their expansive root systems.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The global extent of land used for grazing is estimated to be 28–42 Mkm², with the range mainly determined by differences in definitions.

    “The global extent of land used for grazing is estimated to be 28-42 Mkm², the range being mainly determined by differences in definitions.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Grassland established after deforestation can be assumed to be under intensive management schemes.

    “and can be assumed to be under intensive management schemes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Grasslands are sources of ruminant methane (CH4) emissions and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from excreta or fertilized pastures.

    “grasslands are sources of ruminant methane (CH 4 ) emissions as well as nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions from excreta or fertilized pastures.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Modern conventional agriculture is a driver of terrestrial and marine ecosystem degradation and emissions of greenhouse gases.

    “It is axiomatic that modern conventional agriculture is a driver of terrestrial and marine ecosystem degradation as well as emissions of greenhouse gases.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Agricultural soils and practices are a major source of CH4 and N2O.

    “Agricultural soils and practices are also a major source of CH 4 and N 2 O.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Within the agricultural and forestry sector, annual emissions of CH4 and N2O together are similar (in CO2-equivalents) to emissions of CO2 from net deforestation.

    “Within the agricultural and forestry sector, annual emissions of CH 4 and N 2 O together are similar (in CO 2 -equivalents) to emissions of CO 2 from net deforestation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Wetlands play a vital role for a range of ecosystem services, such as flood control, water purification, groundwater replenishment, and nutrient retention, and they are often hotspots of biodiversity.

    “Wetlands play a vital role for a range of ecosystem services, such as flood control, water purification, groundwater replenishment, and nutrient retention, and they are often hotspots of biodiversity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Wetlands are under severe stress and subject to degradation.

    “Despite their importance, wetlands are under severe stress and subject to degradation.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The intensification of the hydrological cycle is at least linearly linked to warming at a rate of 6-7% per degree K (the Clausius-Clapeyron response).

    “Theoretically, the intensification is assumed to be at least linearly linked to warming at a rate of 6-7% per degree K (the Clausius-Clapeyron response), but empirical evidence and model studies indicate a steeper increase in precipitation intensity, particularly in dry regions (82,83).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Erosion from agricultural fields under conventional tillage is often 2-3 orders of magnitude larger than the rate of soil formation.

    “Erosion from agricultural fields under conventional tillage is often 2-3 orders of magnitude larger than the rate of soil formation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Unsustainable harvesting of fuelwood for domestic use is a major cause of land degradation, especially in tropical and dryland regions.

    “Unsustainable harvesting of fuelwood for domestic use is a major cause of land degradation, especially in tropical and dryland regions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Expansion of purpose-grown energy crops such as canola, soy, miscanthus, or oil palm causes loss of carbon stocks in biomass and soil, loss of soil fertility, and loss of biodiversity if it leads, directly or indirectly, to the conversion of grassland or natural forest to cropland or plantations and/or to further environmentally detrimental intensification of cropland management.

    “Expansion of purposegrown energy crops such as canola, soy, miscanthus, or oil palm causes loss of carbon stocks in biomass and soil, loss of soil fertility, and loss of biodiversity if it leads, directly or indirectly, to the conversion of grassland or natural forest to cropland or plantations and/or to further environmentally detrimental intensification of cropland management.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Socioeconomic drivers of degradation such as population growth and increasing per capita demand for ecosystem services are projected to continue into the future.

    “Socioeconomic drivers of degradation such as population growth and increasing per capita demand for ecosystem services are projected to continue into the future.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Reductions in net greenhouse gas emissions or atmospherically reactive precursors of climate forcers are in principle measurable, but these measurements are often technically complex and expensive and require large investment in human power and instrumental infrastructure.

    “For instance, reductions in net greenhouse gas emissions or atmospherically reactive precursors of climate forcers are in principle measurable, but these measurements are often technically complex and expensive and require large investment in human power and instrumental infrastructure.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The effectiveness of measures may only become evident years or even decades after implementation.

    “In both cases, the effectiveness of measures may only become evident years or even decades after implementation, such as the carbon uptake of a restored forest (including the fate of wood products or carbon losses through fire or insects) or the net carbon budget (CO 2 versus CH 4 ) and catchment water balance in restored wetlands, which may take decades to centuries to semiequilibrate.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Carbon sinks decline in all forests as they mature.

    “Carbon sinks decline in all forests as they mature.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Biophysical surface exchange processes in tropical forests cause local cooling as a climate co-benefit.

    “Biophysical surface exchange processes in tropical forests, with often large evapotranspiration rates, cause local cooling as a climate co-benefit.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Animals have carbon to nitrogen ratios lower than plant material.

    “And animals have carbon to nitrogen ratios that are lower than plant material; hence, the return of nutrients to soil in the form of animal feces has quite different decomposition rates than plant litter.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The return of nutrients to soil in the form of animal feces has quite different decomposition rates than plant litter.

    “And animals have carbon to nitrogen ratios that are lower than plant material; hence, the return of nutrients to soil in the form of animal feces has quite different decomposition rates than plant litter.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The presence or absence of large carnivores impacts type and density of prey animals, including the abundance of herbivores and the type and amount of consumed green leaf area.

    “Furthermore, the presence or absence of large carnivores impacts type and density of prey animals, including the abundance of herbivores and the type and amount of consumed green leaf area.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Earthworms and termites are well known for their role in decomposition of litter and soil organic matter and nutrient turnover.

    ““Soil engineers” such as earthworms and termites are well known for their role in decomposition of litter and soil organic matter and nutrient turnover.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Perennial woody or herbaceous energy crops are able to grow, albeit slowly, on low fertility soils.

    “Likewise, perennial woody or herbaceous energy crops (e.g., grasses such as switchgrass or Miscanthus species) can be grown where topsoil has been lost, as they are able to grow, albeit slowly, on low fertility soils.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Wolves preying on moose in Northern American boreal forests enhance NPP and net ecosystem carbon uptake by up to 30% via increased growth of deciduous trees and enhanced tree leaf area index.

    “Wolves preying on moose in Northern American boreal forests were also estimated to enhance NPP and net ecosystem carbon uptake by up to 30% via increased growth of deciduous trees (which, as the preferred fodder of moose, are suppressed in their presence) and enhanced tree leaf area index.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are very few examples of large-scale scenarios of restoring degraded land.

    “Although scenario analysis is used widely across the environmental sciences, there are very few examples of large-scale scenarios of restoring degraded land.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Restoration is part of the CBD's post-2020 biodiversity targets expected to be agreed at the next UN CBD COP in China in 2021.

    “Restoration is also part of the CBD's post-2020 biodiversity targets that are expected to be agreed upon at the next UN CBD Conference of the Parties (COP) in China (which will take place in 2021)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    At least 66% of Paris Agreement signatories include nature-based solutions in some form in their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).

    “At least 66% of Paris Agreement signatories were found to include nature-based solutions in some form in their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    An important share of the economic benefits of restoration is in the form of nonprovisioning ecosystem services, which benefit society as a whole, but individual land users cannot fully monetize these benefits.

    “Firstly, an important share of the economic benefits of restoration is in the form of nonprovisioning ecosystem services, which benefit society as a whole, but individual land users cannot fully monetize these benefits.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Benefits of private goods may accrue only after a long period of time, while up-front costs may be prohibitively high, especially for the poor without access to credit.

    “Secondly, even when the value of private goods can be realized by land users, the benefits may accrue only after a long period of time, while up-front costs may be prohibitively high, especially for the poor without access to credit.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Continuing institutional barriers such as land tenure insecurity and lack of access to rural advisory services pose formidable barriers to the wider adoption of SLM practices and technologies.

    “Furthermore, continuing institutional barriers such as land tenure insecurity and lack of access to rural advisory services, i.e., to the information and know-how about SLM and land restoration technologies, pose formidable barriers to the wider adoption of SLM practices and technologies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many synergies exist between restoration and key international policy areas that relate to nature-based solutions for climate change mitigation and adaptation (UNFCCC), avoiding and reducing degradation and restoring degraded land (UNCCD), and the CBD and its Aichi Biodiversity Targets.

    “Many synergies exist between restoration and key international policy areas that relate to nature-based solutions for climate change mitigation and adaptation (UNFCCC), avoiding and reducing degradation and restoring degraded land (UNCCD), and the CBD and its Aichi Biodiversity Targets.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Large uncertainties about the future exist.

    “Given large uncertainties about the future (and a general lack of restoration scenarios) static goals and policies that aim to achieve restoration (and sustainable development more generally) are likely to fail.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    There is a general lack of restoration scenarios.

    “Given large uncertainties about the future (and a general lack of restoration scenarios) static goals and policies that aim to achieve restoration (and sustainable development more generally) are likely to fail.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The SSPs are currently widely used in the global environmental change research community.

    “The SSPs currently widely used in the global environmental change research community vary in their challenges to climate change adaptation and mitigation, but do not specify challenges to nature conservation, nor many of the critical drivers of ecosystem change.”
38 of 38

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Bioenergy section is cited as Section 3.3

    Minor

    The text directs readers to Section 3.3 for bioenergy, but the Bioenergy section is numbered 3.4. Section 3.3 covers rainfall extremes and floods.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. IPBES (Intergov. Sci.-Policy Platf. Biodivers. Ecosyst. Serv.), 2019, The IPBES Global Assessment on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
  2. Olsson L, 2019, Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems, 345
  3. Mirzabaev A, 2019, Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems, 249
  4. FAO (United Nations Food Agric. Organ.), 2016, Trees, Forests and Land Use in Drylands: The First Global Assessment—Preliminary Findings
  5. Shin Y-J, 2019, The IPBES Global Assessment on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
  6. Prince S, 2018, The IPBES Assessment Report on Land Degradation and Restoration, 315
  7. Jia G, 2019, Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems, 131
  8. Hurlbert M, 2019, Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems, 673
  9. IPCC (Intergov. Panel Clim. Change), 2018, Global Warming of 1.5°C
  10. Montgomery DR., 2017, Growing a Revolution: Bringing Our Soil Back to Life
  11. De Stefano A, 2018, Agroforestry Syst, 92, 285
  12. Seddon N, 2019, Nature-Based Solutions in Nationally Determined Contributions: Synthesis and Recommendations for Enhancing Climate Ambition and Action by 2020

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arneth, A., Olsson, L., Cowie, A., Erb, K.-H., Hurlbert, M., Kurz, W. A., Mirzabaev, A., & Rounsevell, M. D. A.
Affiliations
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Government of New South Wales (AU)
  • BOKU University (AT)
  • University of Regina (CA)
  • Canadian Forest Service (CA)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
Venue
Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Published
2021-10-18
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
569-599
ISSN
  • 1543-5938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2050
OpenAlex
W3193845121
Cited by
106
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Environment and Resources (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • KITopen (cc-by)
Funders
  • Canada Research Chairs
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2016-06300)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (773901, 757995)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Water and Land Management
Keywords
land degradation, ecological restoration, climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, greenhouse gas emissions, ecosystem services, sustainable agriculture, forest management, land conservation, poverty, sustainable development, food security, biodiversity loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-17.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-17.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review