Restoring Degraded Lands
Open accessAbstract
Land degradation continues to be an enormous challenge to human societies, reducing food security, emitting greenhouse gases and aerosols, driving the loss of biodiversity, polluting water, and undermining a wide range of ecosystem services beyond food supply and water and climate regulation. Climate change will exacerbate several degradation processes. Investment in diverse restoration efforts, including sustainable agricultural and forest land management, as well as land set aside for conservation wherever possible, will generate co-benefits for climate change mitigation and adaptation and morebroadly for human and societal well-being and the economy. This review highlights the magnitude of the degradation problem and some of the key challenges for ecological restoration. There are biophysical as well as societal limits to restoration. Better integrating policies to jointly address poverty, land degradation, and greenhouse gas emissions and removals is fundamental to reducing many existing barriers and contributing to climate-resilient sustainable development.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Land degradation is a widespread challenge driven mainly by socioeconomic factors, and climate change is expected to exacerbate it while degradation itself contributes to greenhouse gas emissions and biodiversity loss. Restoration and sustainable land management can deliver climate mitigation, adaptation, and broader co-benefits, but adoption barriers and hard ecological/social limits remain.
Key findings
- Approximately 70–75% of the ice-free land area is affected by human use, nearly 50% intensively; degradation negatively impacts livelihoods in more than a quarter of the Earth’s ice-free land area, with possibly up to 3.2 (1.3–3.2) billion people affected globally, and about 500 (±120) million people live in or near desertification hotspots.
- Since 1961, crop production increased about 3.5-fold and animal product production 2.5-fold, enabled by fertilizer inputs (+800%) and freshwater withdrawals (+100%); population rose from 3.0 to 7.8 billion by 2020, while per capita calorie intake increased 32%.
- Restoration and sustainable land management can yield economic returns: case studies found each US$1 invested in land restoration could yield US$3–$6 in societal economic returns over 30 years; forest restoration increased biodiversity by 15–84% and vegetation structure by 36–77% above degraded ecosystems, though values remained below old-growth forests.
- Risks exist: large-scale afforestation/reforestation or bioenergy can backfire through biodiversity loss, food-production trade-offs, and land-use displacement; the Bonn Challenge aims to restore 3.5 Mkm² of forested landscapes by 2030, while 2019 voluntary restoration commitments totaled 230 million hectares of forest.
Methods
- This is a review/synthesis article; it draws on cited literature and IPCC/IPBES assessments and presents summary tables (Tables 1–2) and figures rather than primary data collection.
- Data/sample: Not stated in the paper as a primary dataset; the article synthesizes global and regional estimates from referenced studies and assessments.
- Main analysis: narrative synthesis of degradation drivers, climate interactions, restoration practices, governance, and policy, with no new empirical modeling or systematic review protocol reported.
Limitations
- The paper states soft barriers (human, social, economic, institutional, technological) and hard limits to restoration, including species already committed to extinction, habitat loss from sea-level rise, and possible tipping points such as climate-driven desertification or permafrost collapse; return to pristine historical states may be difficult or impossible.
- The paper states uncertainties and a lack of restoration scenarios, noting that attribution of climate change as a degradation driver is complicated by concurrent CO₂ increases and regional variability, and that measuring mitigation-adaptation co-benefits is technically complex, expensive, and may take years to decades.
- Evident from the text: as a review, reported estimates depend on cited sources with differing definitions and methods (e.g., forest area, wetland extent), and no systematic search or quality appraisal is described.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
111 of 246 cited sources checked · 33 supported · 3 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The shift from conventional agriculture to regenerative (or conservation) agriculture is universally applicable.
“The shift from conventional agriculture, characterized by frequent tillage and complete removal of vegetation for parts of the season, to regenerative (or conservation) agriculture is particularly promising and universally applicable (104).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [104] source
Section 5.6, “Practices of sustainable agriculture” (page unavailable), says practices must be tailored to each case and that there is no “one size fits all” approach. Section 5.6.1, “Conservation agriculture” (page unavailable), also reports variable outcomes depending on conditions, contrary to the claim of universal applicability. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Land conversions and land management almost equally cause the differences in carbon storage between the theoretical absence of land use and current conditions.
“Land conversions (i.e., replacement of forests with cropland and pastures) and land management [i.e., harvesting of timber from managed forests or removal of herbaceous biomass through grazing (9)] almost equally cause these differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] source
- Premisecitation
Land degradation is of great concern for oceans, manifested by the now more than 500 dead coastal marine zones where excessive nutrient runoff from agriculture has contributed to the collapse of coastal marine ecosystems.
“For instance, land degradation is of great concern for oceans, manifested by the now more than 500 dead coastal marine zones where excessive nutrient runoff from agriculture has contributed to the collapse of coastal marine ecosystems (5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] source
The passages labeled Abstract (page unavailable) link agricultural runoff and nutrient inputs to coastal hypoxia and report massive coral-reef mortality in a documented event. But the paper lists 494 coastal dead zones, not more than 500, and does not say that agricultural runoff caused the collapse of ecosystems in all of them. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Removal of deadwood as part of forest management is associated with reduced habitat diversity for numerous species.
“Removal of deadwood as part of forest management has also been associated with reducing habitat diversity for numerous species (20).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] source
- Premisecitation
Grassland established after deforestation is estimated at 11.3 Mkm2 in 2000.
“The latter is estimated at 11.3 Mkm 2 in 2000 (9)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] source
Extended Data Table 1 gives an area of 11.3 Mkm² for artificial grasslands, and Methods (‘Actual biomass stock maps 1 and 2’) defines these as grasslands on potentially forested areas. The paper describes the underlying land-use dataset as present-day and derived from a year-2000 dataset, but does not explicitly date the 11.3 Mkm² estimate to 2000. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Converted grassland holds biomass stocks less than 10% of the potential biomass stock.
“Converted grassland holds biomass stocks that are less than 10% of the potential biomass stock (9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] source
- Premisecitation
Residue removal or whole-tree harvest can cause soil disturbance and remove root, stump, or bark biomass that would otherwise contribute to soil organic matter cycling, including recalcitrant carbon pools.
“Likewise, residue removal or whole-tree harvest can also cause soil disturbance, and remove root, stump, or bark biomass that would otherwise be part of soil organic matter cycling, including the formation of recalcitrant carbon pools (19).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
Section 5 (Removal of harvest residues; page unavailable) identifies bark and roots as harvest residues and says stump harvesting causes additional soil disturbance and reduces root litter input. It does not establish that residue removal or whole-tree harvesting generally causes that disturbance. Section 5.2 (Gaps in knowledge and research needs; page unavailable) says the effects of residue management on labile and recalcitrant carbon pools need further study, so the claim about formation of recalcitrant pools is not established. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Intensively used grasslands are relatively species-poor.
“Intensively used grasslands are relatively species-poor (34)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] source
The Results text (page not available in our copy) says land-use intensification reduced species richness for most aboveground groups. But it reports neutral or positive effects on belowground organisms, so the unqualified claim that intensively used grasslands are relatively species-poor overgeneralizes the finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The extent of permanent pastures and meadows spans 28 to 34 Mkm2, including extensively used natural grasslands, intensively managed pastures and meadows established in natural grassland areas, and grassland established after deforestation.
“The extent of permanent pastures and meadows, the key category for which global statistical data are available (http://faostat.fao.org;any grazing land used for more than five consecutive years), spans 28 (33) to 34 Mkm², including extensively used natural grasslands (Section 2.2), intensively managed pastures and meadows established in natural grassland areas, as well as grassland that was estab”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] source
Section 4.1 (§32) estimates 28.0 million km² of pasture and reports FAOSTAT’s 34.4 million km²; section 2.2 (§12) defines permanent pasture to include cultivated and wild forage land. Section 4.2 (§36) describes pasture replacing grasslands and forests. But the Discussion (§45) says the pasture data reveal nothing about grazing intensity, so the claim that pastures established in natural grassland areas are intensively managed is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
At present humans withdraw approximately 2,500-3,200 km3 a-1.
“Given that at present humans withdraw approximately 2,500-3,200 km 3 a -1 , these numbers paint at first sight a relatively encouraging picture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] source
The ‘A Basis for a PB on Water’ section gives 3,200 km³/year as a modeled planetary-boundary estimate, not a measurement of present human withdrawals. The ‘Model Variability and Limitations’ section reports runoff and water-availability estimates. Searches for 2,500 and current withdrawals found no passage giving the claimed withdrawal range; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Approximately half of the rise in global CH4 emissions since 2007 comes from the increasing number of ruminant livestock.
“Approximately half of the rise since 2007 comes from the increasing number of ruminant livestock, whereas the other half has uncertain origins.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] source
Section 6.1 says expanding tropical ruminant populations may have contributed to methane growth, and the discussion says cattle probably contribute alongside wetlands. Section 5 says the relative causes of the rise are not yet constrained. The paper does not assign approximately half of the rise since 2007 to livestock or identify the other half as having uncertain origins. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Only 37% of rivers longer than 1,000 km remain free-flowing over their entire length, often in very remote regions.
“Only 37% of rivers longer than 1,000 km remain free-flowing over their entire length, often in very remote regions (57).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] source
The Abstract (p. 3) says that 36% of rivers longer than 1,000 km remain free-flowing along their full length, not 37%. The Main Text (p. 6) supports the location claim, saying that these rivers remain prevalent only in remote or less-developed areas. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Restoring already degraded wetlands has large potential to improve conditions for biodiversity.
“Restoring already degraded wetlands can sequester carbon on a century scale, albeit at an often relatively slow pace and possibly at the expense of increased CH 4 emissions (53), but with large potential to improve conditions for biodiversity (54).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] source
- Premisecitation
Dam building for irrigation is expected to disproportionately impact South America, south and east Asia, and the Balkan region.
“The availability and quality of freshwater is projected to continue to decline in the future due to extraction for irrigation, drinking water, and energy, pollution, and increased shipping, with dam building for irrigation expected to disproportionately impact South America, south and east Asia, and the Balkan region (59).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] source
The Abstract identifies South America, South and East Asia, and the Balkan region as areas disproportionately affected by dam development. But it specifies hydropower dams and impacts on freshwater megafauna richness, not dams built for irrigation or a general decline in freshwater availability and quality. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Freshwater availability and quality are projected to continue declining due to extraction for irrigation, drinking water, and energy, pollution, and increased shipping.
“The availability and quality of freshwater is projected to continue to decline in the future due to extraction for irrigation, drinking water, and energy, pollution, and increased shipping, with dam building for irrigation expected to disproportionately impact South America, south and east Asia, and the Balkan region (59).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] source
The Introduction reports that dam construction can affect water use and availability and deteriorate water quality. It does not project an overall decline in freshwater availability and quality caused by extraction for irrigation or drinking water, pollution, and increased shipping. The paper identifies South America, South and East Asia, and the Balkans as areas disproportionately affected by hydropower development, not dam building for irrigation. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Based on estimated global blue water runoff of approximately 42,000 km3 a-1, a sustainable level of human use may be 1,200-8,300 km3 a-1 depending on the chosen criteria.
“On the basis of estimated global blue water runoff (approximately 42,000 km 3 a -1 ), a sustainable level of human use may be 1,200-8,300 km 3 a -1 (55), depending on the chosen criteria.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] source
- Premisecitation
The other half of the rise in global CH4 emissions since 2007 has uncertain origins.
“Approximately half of the rise since 2007 comes from the increasing number of ruminant livestock, whereas the other half has uncertain origins.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] source
Section 5 says the causes of methane’s rise are not fully understood and that evidence is insufficient to determine the relative contributions of sources and sinks. Section 6.1 discusses expanding ruminant populations as one possible contributor, but the paper does not establish that ruminants account for half the rise or define a remaining half of uncertain origin. The uncertainty is supported; the numerical split is not. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Projected increases in drought severity can also increase the incidence and extent of wildfires.
“The projected increases in drought severity can also increase the incidence and extent of wildfires (73,74).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Under SSP3, by 2050 the number of people in dryland areas exposed to higher drought intensity and water stress at 2°C warming would be increased to 1,267 million.
“Projections show that under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) SSP2 (a “middle of the road” scenario), by 2050 approximately 1,152 million people in dryland areas alone will be exposed to higher drought intensity and water stress at 2°C warming, whereas this number would be reduced to 974 million people under SSP1 (“sustainable” scenario) and increased to 1,267 million people in an SSP3 (“frag”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [70] source
Section 3.1 discusses drought intensity and water stress, but does not give a population estimate for dryland areas; it also says arid areas were masked out for the drought-intensity indicator. Section 3.3 compares population exposure across SSPs and warming levels, but does not report 1,267 million people under SSP3 for this combination of hazards. Searches for the figure and for dryland exposure found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [71] Hurlbert M, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Changes in fire regimes can contribute to a shift in vegetation composition, as more frequent fires, especially those coinciding with drought or insect outbreaks, suppress seedling regeneration and push closed forests toward more open forest-steppe systems.
“Changes in fire regimes can also contribute to a shift in vegetation composition, as more frequent fires, especially those coinciding with drought or insect outbreaks, suppress seedling regeneration and push, for example, closed forests toward more open forest-steppe systems (77,78).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Drought impacts can be alleviated by SLM practices, such as cover crops, mulching, supplementary irrigation if surface or groundwater sources are available, or selection of drought-tolerant crop and forest species.
“Furthermore, drought impacts can be alleviated by SLM practices, such as use of cover crops and mulching, supplementary irrigation if surface or groundwater sources are available, or the selection of drought-tolerant crop and forest species (66).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [66] source
The available Abstract passage links agricultural drought to rainwater losses and says mulching can improve water availability, supporting that example. It does not establish the other listed practices—cover crops, supplementary irrigation, or selection of drought-tolerant crop and forest species—and the passage ends mid-sentence. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Under SSP1, by 2050 the number of people in dryland areas exposed to higher drought intensity and water stress at 2°C warming would be reduced to 974 million.
“Projections show that under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) SSP2 (a “middle of the road” scenario), by 2050 approximately 1,152 million people in dryland areas alone will be exposed to higher drought intensity and water stress at 2°C warming, whereas this number would be reduced to 974 million people under SSP1 (“sustainable” scenario) and increased to 1,267 million people in an SSP3 (“frag”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [70] source
Section 3.3 discusses how exposure and vulnerability differ across SSP scenarios, and Section 3.1 discusses water stress and drought intensity. Neither gives a projection of 974 million people in dryland areas exposed to both hazards under SSP1 at 2°C. Searches for “974,” “drylands,” and the combined hazard description found no matching estimate in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [71] Hurlbert M, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In drylands, the land area annually experiencing droughts has already increased by approximately 50% since 1961.
“In drylands, the land area annually experiencing droughts has already increased by approximately 50% since 1961 (69).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] source
The Introduction defines drought and distinguishes it from aridity, but does not report a trend in the annual area affected by drought in drylands. Searches for the claimed 50% increase since 1961 found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In many regions, leaf-area index and land ecosystem carbon uptake have increased over recent decades, partly due to the CO2 fertilization effect.
“In many regions, for example, leaf-area index and land ecosystem carbon uptake have increased over recent decades, partly due to the CO 2 fertilization effect (60,62).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [60] source
The Abstract reports widespread increases in leaf-area index during 1982–2009 and attributes much of the greening trend to CO2 fertilization. It also describes a modeled increase in leaf-level carbon assimilation in response to rising CO2, but does not establish an increase in land-ecosystem carbon uptake over recent decades. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [62] source
Section 3.1.2 (pp. 20–21) reports that the global terrestrial CO₂ sink increased from the 1960s to 2008–2017, and Section 2.6.1 (p. 16) identifies fertilization by rising atmospheric CO₂ as a possible contributor. The paper does not report an increase in leaf-area index across many regions; its discussion of leaf-area index concerns model evaluation (Sections 2.6.2 and 3.1.3, pp. 17, 22). (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Climate change-related forest decline is observed in many regions, e.g., in the US Northwest and British Columbia, in which drought and increasing fire frequency interact with additional stressors such as insect infestation.
“Climate change-related forest decline is observed in many regions, e.g., in the US Northwest and British Columbia, in which drought and increasing fire frequency interact with additional stressors such as insect infestation (79).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [79] source
The Abstract and Discussion and conclusion report climate-related increases in fire, drought and insect disturbances across many forests. Pathways of climate influence says drought can facilitate both insects and fire, but the paper does not establish the claimed combination of observed forest decline and interacting stressors specifically in the US Northwest and British Columbia; British Columbia appears in reference titles, not in that finding. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Higher temperature increases result in higher projected numbers of people exposed to, and vulnerable to, water scarcity and droughts.
“Higher temperature increases result in higher projected numbers of people exposed to, and vulnerable to, water scarcity and droughts (70,71).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [70] source
Section 3.3 reports that higher warming increases the projected numbers of people exposed to and vulnerable to multi-sector risks. Section 3.1 identifies water stress and drought intensity among the water-sector risks, but the cited passages do not establish that the projected numbers exposed to each of those specific hazards increase with temperature. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [71] Hurlbert M, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Under SSP2, by 2050 approximately 1,152 million people in dryland areas alone will be exposed to higher drought intensity and water stress at 2°C warming.
“Projections show that under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) SSP2 (a “middle of the road” scenario), by 2050 approximately 1,152 million people in dryland areas alone will be exposed to higher drought intensity and water stress at 2°C warming, whereas this number would be reduced to 974 million people under SSP1 (“sustainable” scenario) and increased to 1,267 million people in an SSP3 (“frag”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [70] source
Section 2.1 describes projections for SSP2 in 2050 at 2°C warming, and Section 3.1 discusses drought intensity and water stress as separate indicators. The passages do not report that 1,152 million people in drylands are exposed to both; searches for that figure and dryland-specific exposure found no such estimate. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [71] Hurlbert M, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Climate change is projected to increase the frequency and severity of droughts in many areas of the world.
“Climate change is projected to increase the frequency and severity of droughts in many areas of the world (67,68).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [67] Jia G, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [68] source
The Introduction reports observed drought trends since 1950, including increases in some regions and decreases in others. A search for future drought projections found no passage in our copy stating that climate change is projected to increase drought frequency and severity across many areas of the world. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Indirect climate change-related drivers, such as large-scale mitigation efforts on land, have raised concerns with respect to increasing degradation.
“Moreover, indirect climate change-related drivers, such as large-scale mitigation efforts on land, have also raised concerns with respect to increasing degradation (1, 63).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Arneth A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [63] source
- Premisecitation
Over an 80-year perspective, a recent study estimated for different forms of BECCS and a range of annual bioenergy production potentials a land area requirement between 22 and 46 Mkm2, with the upper end similar in magnitude to the entire remaining global forest area.
“Over an 80-year perspective, a recent study (92) estimated for different forms of BECCS and a range of annual bioenergy production potentials a land area requirement between 22 and 46 Mkm 2 , with the upper end similar in magnitude to the entire remaining global forest area.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Mitigating climate change by utilizing vast land areas globally for the production of bioenergy or reforestation and afforestation is unsustainable.
“Mitigating climate change by utilizing vast land areas globally for the production of bioenergy (Section 3.3) or reforestation and afforestation (Section 4.2), which is at present still integral to many climate change scenarios, is unsustainable (1, 63, 96; also see the IPCC Annex-I Glossary's definition of reforestation and afforestation: https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/chapter/glossary/).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [1] Arneth A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [63] source
The Discussion (Co-delivery across the land challenges; page unavailable) identifies potential adverse effects when bioenergy, afforestation, and reforestation are deployed at very large scales. But it says those effects depend on scale and context and may be ameliorated through sustainable landscape management; the Conclusions likewise describe possible harms rather than declaring these approaches categorically unsustainable. The claim overstates that qualified finding, particularly for reforestation. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [96] source
The Introduction says large bioenergy deployment can conflict with biodiversity and food production, and §4.3, “Side-effects,” says large-scale BECCS and afforestation pose risks for other land uses. But §4.3 also says outcomes depend on implementation and scale, with land governance and marginal-land cultivation able to reduce risks; it does not conclude that such mitigation is categorically unsustainable. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Rests on an assumption: Expansion of purpose-grown energy crops such as canola, soy, miscanthus, or oil palm causes loss of carbon stocks in biomass and soil, loss of soil fertility, and loss of biodiversity if it leads, directly or indirectly, to the conversion of grassland or natural forest to cropland or plantations and/or to further environmentally detrimental intensification of cropland management.
- Premisecitation
Proven and cost-effective methods exist that can be implemented now to increase the soil carbon content of agricultural soils without compromising productivity and food security.
“Proven and cost-effective methods exist that can be implemented now to increase the soil carbon content of agricultural soils without compromising productivity and food security (40).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] source
The Status of soil carbon as a climate solution section (page unavailable) describes soil-carbon practices as generally beneficial and readily deployable without additional land, while Soil contribution to Natural Climate Solution Pathways (page unavailable) identifies substantial cost-effective potential and possible productivity benefits. The paper does not establish that the methods can be implemented without compromising productivity or food security in all cases; it treats food security as a reason to exclude croplands from its reforestation pathway. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
For strong climate change mitigation scenarios, the required expansion of land area for bioenergy crops was found to have similarly negative impacts on terrestrial biodiversity as had unmitigated climate change due to the reduction in species' ranges and pressure on protected areas.
“For strong climate change mitigation scenarios, the required expansion of land area for bioenergy crops was found to have similarly negative impacts on terrestrial biodiversity as had unmitigated climate change (95) due to the reduction in species' ranges and pressure on protected areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [95] source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Empirical evidence and model studies indicate a steeper increase in precipitation intensity than the Clausius-Clapeyron rate of 6-7% per degree K, particularly in dry regions.
“Theoretically, the intensification is assumed to be at least linearly linked to warming at a rate of 6-7% per degree K (the Clausius-Clapeyron response), but empirical evidence and model studies indicate a steeper increase in precipitation intensity, particularly in dry regions (82,83).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [82] source
- cites [83] source
The indexed passages labeled Abstract contain bibliographic information rather than the paper’s substantive text. Searches for precipitation intensity, the Clausius–Clapeyron rate, and dry regions found no passage addressing the claim, so our copy cannot verify it. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Restoration and management of restored ecosystems will need to be dynamically adopted in response to ongoing and unavoidable changes.
“There is also increasing recognition that restoration and management of restored ecosystems will need to be dynamically adopted in response to ongoing and unavoidable changes (101-103).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [101] source
- cites [102] source
Section 3.2 describes restoration and management of ecosystems as activities that help people adapt to climate change. Section 3.5 recommends monitoring outcomes over time, but does not say that management of restored ecosystems must be dynamically adjusted in response to ongoing and unavoidable changes. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [103] source
Section 4, “Effectiveness of nature-based solutions under climate change” (page unavailable), says climate change can shift ecosystems to new states and that active management can reduce exposure to its impacts. It does not specifically say that restoration and the management of restored ecosystems must be dynamically adjusted as conditions change. (LLM, conf=0.80)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Whether increased fire risk translates into larger areas burnt or more intense fires depends greatly on location and on active (suppression, extinction) and passive (landscape fragmentation, fuel reduction) management.
“Whether this will translate into larger areas burnt or more intense fires depends greatly on location and on active (suppression, extinction) and passive (landscape fragmentation, fuel reduction) management (81).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [81] source
The Discussion reports regional differences in burned area and describes how reduced fuel continuity can suppress fire spread. The Conclusions say that fire policies beyond suppression could avoid fuel buildup and counteract climate-change effects. The paper does not establish the claim about more intense fires or specifically assess extinction and landscape fragmentation as management measures. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Positive changes in areas totaling globally greater than 10 Mkm2 have been achieved with these practices.
“As a co-benefit, these practices also enhance ecosystem carbon sinks and food security as well as deliver multiple other co-benefits (63), with positive changes in areas totaling globally greater than 10 Mkm 2 (63).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] source
Table 11 in the Results section estimates that several practices have the potential to benefit areas exceeding 10 Mkm². The paper presents these as potential impacts, not positive changes already achieved across that area globally. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Agroforestry reduces risks by having at least partial production if one crop fails.
“Agroforestry not only reduces risks (having at least partial production if one crop fails) but also delivers cash crops such as fruits and nuts; however, potentially higher costs of harvest, storage, and transport need to be considered (111).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [111] source
- Premisecitation
Values of biodiversity and vegetation structure after forest restoration remained below those found in old-growth forests.
“A global meta-analysis found that forest restoration can increase biodiversity (mammals, birds, herpetofauna, invertebrates, and plants) by 15-84% and vegetation structure (biomass, cover, stem density, and height or amount of leaf litter) by 36-77% above degraded ecosystems-although values remained below those found in old-growth forests (119).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [119] source
The Results section reports that biodiversity and vegetation-structure values in restored systems were lower than in reference systems. The comparison does not establish the result specifically for old-growth forests: the paper's reference systems also included less-disturbed forests. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Agroforestry delivers cash crops such as fruits and nuts.
“Agroforestry not only reduces risks (having at least partial production if one crop fails) but also delivers cash crops such as fruits and nuts; however, potentially higher costs of harvest, storage, and transport need to be considered (111).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [111] source
- Premisecitation
Forests planted in savannahs or other ecosystems with low tree cover will critically damage these often highly species-diverse and carbon-rich ecosystems.
“Forests planted in savannahs or other ecosystems with low tree cover will critically damage these often highly species-diverse and carbon-rich ecosystems (113, 114).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [113] source
- cites [114] source
The Results report substantial losses of savanna plant and ant species where forest encroached, and the Discussion extends the biodiversity concern to other species-rich savannas and grasslands (page numbers unavailable). But the study examined forest encroachment following fire suppression, not planted forests, and it does not characterize the affected low-tree-cover ecosystems as carbon-rich; its Results report higher carbon stocks in forest than in open savanna. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Agroforestry may have higher costs of harvest, storage, and transport.
“Agroforestry not only reduces risks (having at least partial production if one crop fails) but also delivers cash crops such as fruits and nuts; however, potentially higher costs of harvest, storage, and transport need to be considered (111).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [111] source
Section 5, “Challenges to Agroforestry Adoption” (page unavailable), says harvesting fruits and nuts can be logistically challenging and that larger plantings may need mechanization to be economically competitive. This supports considering harvest-related costs, but the paper does not state that storage or transport costs may be higher. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A global meta-analysis found that forest restoration can increase vegetation structure (biomass, cover, stem density, and height or amount of leaf litter) by 36-77% above degraded ecosystems.
“A global meta-analysis found that forest restoration can increase biodiversity (mammals, birds, herpetofauna, invertebrates, and plants) by 15-84% and vegetation structure (biomass, cover, stem density, and height or amount of leaf litter) by 36-77% above degraded ecosystems-although values remained below those found in old-growth forests (119).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [119] source
- Premisecitation
A global meta-analysis found that forest restoration can increase biodiversity (mammals, birds, herpetofauna, invertebrates, and plants) by 15-84% above degraded ecosystems.
“A global meta-analysis found that forest restoration can increase biodiversity (mammals, birds, herpetofauna, invertebrates, and plants) by 15-84% and vegetation structure (biomass, cover, stem density, and height or amount of leaf litter) by 36-77% above degraded ecosystems-although values remained below those found in old-growth forests (119).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [119] source
- Premisecitation
Agroforestry is beneficial to conservation and enhancement of biodiversity.
“Given that trees, shrubs, or hedges provide very different habitat to agricultural crops or pure pasture, agroforestry is also beneficial to conservation and enhancement of biodiversity-which in turn can be beneficial to production by enhancing pollinator presence or biological pest control (111).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [111] source
- Premisecitation
On heavily contaminated or saline soils, energy crops such as perennial grasses and short-rotation woody species including poplar and mallee can be strategically planted to improve soil conditions and contribute to phytoremediation.
“In addition, on heavily contaminated or saline soils, energy crops such as perennial grasses and short-rotation woody species including poplar and mallee can be strategically planted to improve soil conditions and contribute to phytoremediation (107, 108).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [107] source
The temperate short-rotation coppice case study describes planting mallee energy crops where salinity is evident and identifies dryland salinity mediation as an environmental objective. The tropical fast-growing legume tree case study also describes revegetating mine wastes and tailings. Our copy does not establish that poplar or perennial grasses are planted on heavily contaminated or saline soils for phytoremediation. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [108] source
- Premisecitation
Relying on forests for long-term carbon sequestration is a risk, particularly for monocultures with high vulnerability to storms, fire, or pest outbreaks.
“Furthermore, relying on forests for long-term carbon sequestration is a risk, particularly for monocultures with high vulnerability to storms, fire, or pest outbreaks (12,116).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- Rests on an assumption: Carbon sinks decline in all forests as they mature.
- Interpretationcitation
Agroforestry can be beneficial to production by enhancing pollinator presence or biological pest control.
“Given that trees, shrubs, or hedges provide very different habitat to agricultural crops or pure pasture, agroforestry is also beneficial to conservation and enhancement of biodiversity-which in turn can be beneficial to production by enhancing pollinator presence or biological pest control (111).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [111] source
- Premisecitation
A suite of case studies conducted in various settings across the world showed that each dollar invested into land restoration activities could yield between US$3 and $6 of societal economic returns, through both provisioning and nonprovisioning ecosystem services, over a 30-year period.
“A suite of case studies conducted in various settings across the world (124) showed that each dollar invested into land restoration activities could yield between US$3 and $6 of societal economic returns, through both provisioning and nonprovisioning ecosystem services, over a 30-year period (124).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [124] source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
When combined with a strong restoration focus (regrowth of natural vegetation and limited management), large co-benefits exist from both an economic and nature conservation perspective.
“As with the beneficial aspect of different crop production systems, when combined with a strong restoration focus (i.e., regrowth of natural vegetation and limited management), large co-benefits exist from both an economic and nature conservation perspective (98, 116).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [98] source
- cites [116] source
The Conclusions (page unavailable) describe different co-benefits from forest recovery, and the Spontaneously regenerating forests section reports biodiversity gains and some useful forest products. But the Conclusions also say naturally regenerating forests tend to provide fewer economically valuable services. The paper therefore does not support the claim that a restoration focus yields large co-benefits from both economic and nature-conservation perspectives. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Globally, the estimated forest carbon sink for 2001-2010 was approximately 40% in intact old-growth forests and 60% in regrowing forests.
“Globally, the estimated forest carbon sink for 2001-2010 was approximately 40% in intact old-growth forests and 60% in regrowing forests (18).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] source
- Premisecitation
Yields in agroforestry areas tend to be higher than yields obtained if crops and woody perennials were grown separately.
“Yields in agroforestry areas also tend to be higher when compared to the yields obtained if crops and woody perennials were grown separately (111).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [111] source
- Premisecitation
Land degradation neutrality, target 15.3 of the SDGs, provides an incentive and framework that encourages strategic actions to restore and rehabilitate degraded land, within the context of integrated landscape planning and management, aimed at delivering multiple environmental and development objectives.
“Land degradation neutrality, 1 target 15.3 of the SDGs, provides an incentive and framework that encourages strategic actions to restore and rehabilitate degraded land, within the context of integrated landscape planning and management, aimed at delivering multiple environmental and development objectives (136).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [136] source
- Premisecitation
Governance of ecosystems can be a hard limit to adaptation or restoration, unless radical changes can be achieved.
“Governance of ecosystems can be a hard limit to adaptation or restoration, unless radical changes can be achieved (142, 143).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [142] source
The Small inland communities section describes persistent governance failures as possible limits to adaptation for downstream ecosystems, and the Conclusions say radical changes in governance may push back adaptation limits. But the paper calls governance-related limits “soft,” reserving “hard” limits for cases where species or ecosystems cannot adjust to climate change. It does not establish the claim about restoration. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [143] source
- Premisecitation
Commitments under the Bonn Challenge and other voluntary restoration targets in 2019 resulted in the aim of restoring a total of 230 million hectares of forest.
“Commitments under the Bonn Challenge and other voluntary restoration targets in 2019 resulted in the aim of restoring a total of 230 million hectares of forest (137).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [137] source
Section 2.1 (Source data; page unavailable) says the authors compiled Bonn Challenge pledges and other voluntary national restoration targets, supporting that part of the claim. Neither that section nor the retrieved passages give a combined target of 230 million hectares for 2019; the specific total is therefore unsupported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Governance is key in fostering restoration because of its social function in steering collective behavior toward desired outcomes and decision-making by individuals, households, markets, organizations, and government.
“Governance is key in fostering restoration because of its social function in steering collective behavior toward desired outcomes and decision-making by individuals, households, markets, organizations, and government (132).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [132] source
In “Capturing resilience” (page unavailable), the paper says governance arrangements can shift human activities toward adaptive management and that governance systems are needed for sustainability. It does not specifically say governance fosters restoration or describe decision-making across the listed groups—individuals, households, markets, organizations, and government. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Continuous, collaborative problem solving of multiscale decision-making that employs experimentation and conflict resolution has been shown to build capacity for resource self-management.
“Continuous, collaborative problem solving of multiscale decision-making that employs experimentation and conflict resolution has been shown to build capacity for resource self-management (135).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [135] source
The ‘Lessons for Adaptive Comanagement’ section (page unavailable) supports collaborative problem solving, ongoing monitoring, and conflict resolution in marine-resource governance. It does not establish that experimentation and multiscale decision-making build capacity for resource self-management; the sentence presents that outcome as demonstrated when the cited discussion does not. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
For the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, spatial prioritization of restoration efforts could deliver large co-benefits for biodiversity conservation and carbon storage, at drastically lower costs compared to a nonsystematic baseline approach.
“As one example, for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, Strassburg et al. (98) showed that a spatial prioritization of restoration efforts could deliver large co-benefits for biodiversity conservation and carbon storage, at drastically lower costs compared to a nonsystematic baseline approach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Strassburg et al. (98) source
- Premisecitation
Coupled global-scale, socio-ecological models are emerging as tools to account for a full range of human decision-making processes, beyond economic factors alone.
“Coupled global-scale, socio-ecological models are emerging as tools to account for a full range of human decision-making processes, beyond economic factors alone (146).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [146] source
The available passages labeled Abstract contain bibliographic details and keywords, including “Human agency” and “Integrated assessment models,” but no substantive discussion of what the models account for. Searches for coupled socio-ecological models, decision-making processes, and economic factors found no passage that verifies the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Restoration of grasslands, drylands, coastal ecosystems (e.g., mangroves), and wetlands has large scope to contribute to climate change mitigation and biodiversity, if climate change risks to carbon uptake are minimized.
“large scope for the restoration of grasslands, drylands, coastal ecosystems (e.g., mangroves), and wetlands to contribute to climate change mitigation and biodiversity, if the climate change risks to carbon uptake (Section 3) are minimized (63).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] source
The Results (Potential of the practices for delivering mitigation; page unavailable) say coastal wetland restoration could provide high levels of mitigation and peatland restoration moderate levels. Materials and Methods (page unavailable) also identifies biodiversity protection as a benefit of peatland restoration. The grassland finding concerns preventing conversion to cropland, not restoration; the cited passages do not establish large mitigation and biodiversity benefits across all the listed ecosystems or the stated condition about minimizing climate risks to carbon uptake. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingnone given
In a theoretical analysis based on the complete absence of land use and with current climate, land ecosystems were estimated to store approximately twice as much as the current 450 GtC in vegetation.
“In a theoretical analysis based on the complete absence of land use and with current climate, land ecosystems were estimated to store approximately twice as much as the current 450 GtC in vegetation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Nearly 50% of the ice-free land area is intensively used by humans.
“Approximately 70 to 75% of the ice-free land area is affected by human use, nearly 50% intensively so (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Approximately 70 to 75% of the ice-free land area is affected by human use.
“Approximately 70 to 75% of the ice-free land area is affected by human use, nearly 50% intensively so (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
A particular challenge in providing solutions to halt and reverse degradation arises from the majority of the people affected living in poverty in developing countries.
“A particular challenge in providing solutions to halt and reverse degradation arises from the majority of the people affected living in poverty in developing countries (3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Olsson L, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Land degradation has social, political, cultural, and economic causes.
“Land degradation has social, political, cultural, and economic causes (3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Olsson L, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Intensive use of land has been the dominant driver of the accelerating loss of terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.
“The intensive use of land, with the extraction of wood, agricultural commodities, and water, has until now been the dominant driver of degradation and desertification, as well as the associated accelerating loss of terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (1,2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Arneth A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [2] IPBES (Intergov. Sci.-Policy Platf. Biodivers. Ecosyst. Serv.), 2019 source
- Premisecitation
Climate change impacts amplify the impacts of forest mismanagement.
“These climate change impacts also amplify the impacts of forest mismanagement (12) (Section 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
- Premisereasoning
Unsustainable forest exploitation is a driver of forest degradation.
“Drivers of forest degradation include unsustainable forest exploitation such as illegal logging; extracting high-value species and leaving behind lower-value, damaged, and diseased trees; failure to regenerate forests after harvest; conversion of natural forests to monoculture plantations; and other forms of degradation that in severe cases can culminate in deforestation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The impacts of degradation extend beyond the local land surface and societies, affecting marine and freshwater systems, as well as people and ecosystems far away from the location of degradation.
“However, the impacts of degradation extend beyond the local land surface and societies, affecting marine and freshwater systems, as well as people and ecosystems far away from the location of degradation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Degradation contributes to climate change chiefly through emissions of greenhouse gases.
“Climate change is expected to exacerbate degradation, in particular through weather extremes (Section 3), and degradation also contributes to climate change, chiefly through emissions of greenhouse gases and by reducing the capacity of ecosystems to absorb atmospheric CO 2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Since 1961, fertilizer inputs increased by 800%.
“Since 1961, crop production increased approximately 3.5-fold and production of animal products 2.5-fold, which was made possible by a massive increase in fertilizer inputs (+800%) and freshwater withdrawals (+100%) (1) (Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Arneth A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Climate change is expected to exacerbate degradation, in particular through weather extremes.
“Climate change is expected to exacerbate degradation, in particular through weather extremes (Section 3), and degradation also contributes to climate change, chiefly through emissions of greenhouse gases and by reducing the capacity of ecosystems to absorb atmospheric CO 2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Globally, less than 30% of the world's forests are considered still intact.
“Globally, less than 30% of the world's forests are considered to be still intact (1)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Arneth A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Degradation contributes to climate change by reducing the capacity of ecosystems to absorb atmospheric CO2.
“Climate change is expected to exacerbate degradation, in particular through weather extremes (Section 3), and degradation also contributes to climate change, chiefly through emissions of greenhouse gases and by reducing the capacity of ecosystems to absorb atmospheric CO 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Intensive use of land, with extraction of wood, agricultural commodities, and water, has been the dominant driver of degradation and desertification.
“The intensive use of land, with the extraction of wood, agricultural commodities, and water, has until now been the dominant driver of degradation and desertification, as well as the associated accelerating loss of terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (1,2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Arneth A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [2] IPBES (Intergov. Sci.-Policy Platf. Biodivers. Ecosyst. Serv.), 2019 source
- Premisecitation
Since 1961, freshwater withdrawals increased by 100%.
“Since 1961, crop production increased approximately 3.5-fold and production of animal products 2.5-fold, which was made possible by a massive increase in fertilizer inputs (+800%) and freshwater withdrawals (+100%) (1) (Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Arneth A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Since 1961, crop production increased approximately 3.5-fold.
“Since 1961, crop production increased approximately 3.5-fold and production of animal products 2.5-fold, which was made possible by a massive increase in fertilizer inputs (+800%) and freshwater withdrawals (+100%) (1) (Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Arneth A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Degradation occurs as a consequence of complex and highly dynamic interactions of natural and socioeconomic drivers.
“Degradation occurs as a consequence of complex and highly dynamic interactions of natural and socioeconomic drivers (3,4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Olsson L, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [4] Mirzabaev A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Degradation is strongly associated with the conversion of natural into managed land and the increase of use intensity in agricultural, freshwater, and forest systems.
“It is strongly associated with the conversion of natural into managed land and the increase of use intensity in agricultural, freshwater, and forest systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In many tropical forest regions, the area of degraded forests could equal or exceed the area of deforestation.
“Still, at least in many tropical forest regions, the area of degraded forests could well equal or even exceed the area of deforestation (15,16);”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Since 1961, production of animal products increased 2.5-fold.
“Since 1961, crop production increased approximately 3.5-fold and production of animal products 2.5-fold, which was made possible by a massive increase in fertilizer inputs (+800%) and freshwater withdrawals (+100%) (1) (Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Arneth A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The proportion of soil carbon lost from agricultural soils varies from approximately 20% to more than 60%.
“The proportion of soil carbon lost from agricultural soils varies from approximately 20% to more than 60% (3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Olsson L, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Ambiguous and insecure land tenure regimes combined with widespread poverty and frequent marginalization of pastoralist communities across many grassland areas limit investment in their sustainable use and management, including access to veterinary and rural advisory services, financial and insurance markets, and input and output markets.
“Ambiguous and insecure land tenure regimes combined with widespread poverty and frequent marginalization of pastoralist communities across many grassland areas (32) limit investment in their sustainable use and management, including access to veterinary and rural advisory services, financial and insurance markets, as well as input and output markets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] source
- Interpretationreasoning
Different management practices, policies, and law enforcement can have large impacts on the long-term maintenance of forest carbon stocks, including below-ground.
“Different management practices, policies, and law enforcement can have large impacts on the long-term maintenance of forest carbon stocks (including below-ground).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This natural variability makes dryland regions vulnerable to widespread and longer-term degradation as a result of human use.
“This natural variability makes these regions vulnerable to widespread and longer-term degradation as a result of human use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Intensively managed grazing land is likely a net greenhouse gas source.
“Intensively managed grazing land is thus likely to be a net greenhouse gas source.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Grasslands are sources of ruminant methane (CH4) emissions and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from excreta or fertilized pastures.
- Premisecitation
Many sustainable land management practices require up-front investments that take several years to pay back.
“Many sustainable land management (SLM) (3) practices require up-front investments that take several years to pay back (both in pasture-and cropland-related SLM; see Tables 1 and 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Olsson L, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Less than 5% of global temperate grasslands are protected.
“Less than 5% of global temperate grasslands are protected (27).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] source
- Premisecitation
Grazing systems are particularly threatened by invasive plant species.
“grazing systems are also particularly threatened by invasive plant species (35).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Shin Y-J, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Traditions and practices are a moderate/high barrier for farmers/foresters.
“Traditions, practices Human Farmer/forester Moderate/high Communication and engagement”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] Wreford A, 2017 source
- Premisecitation
Reliance on imports and trade agreements is a high-importance barrier for governments preventing adoption of restoration/sustainable land management practices.
“Reliance on imports, trade agreements Institutional Government High Include environmental standards in trade agreements”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] Wreford A, 2017 source
- Premisecitation
One possible cause of accelerated CH4 emissions since 2014 is high global temperatures, which have accelerated emissions from low-latitude wetlands.
“One cause might be the high global temperatures since 2014, which have accelerated emissions of CH 4 from low-latitude wetlands (51), whereas emissions responses from high-latitude wetlands are more uncertain (52).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] source
- Premisecitation
Perverse subsidies are a high-importance barrier for governments preventing adoption of restoration/sustainable land management practices.
“Perverse subsidies Institutional Government High Redirect to act on environmental concerns”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] Wreford A, 2017 source
- Premisecitation
Wetland degradation can result in emissions of both CO2 and CH4.
“Wetland degradation can result in emissions of both CO 2 and CH 4 (3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Olsson L, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Global averages hide the very large regional and intra-annual variation in river runoff.
“However, global averages hide the very large regional and intra-annual variation in river runoff.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Lack of access to input and output markets is a moderate barrier for farmers/foresters and government.
“Lack of access to input and output markets Economic Farmer/forester; government Moderate Financial incentives, transportation infrastructure, labeling”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] Wreford A, 2017 source
- Premisecitation
Diverse lobby groups are a high-importance barrier for governments preventing adoption of restoration/sustainable land management practices.
“Diverse lobby groups Institutional Government High Dialog with lobbyists transparent to public”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] Wreford A, 2017 source
- Premisecitation
Freshwater extraction typically takes place in regions where freshwater is much scarcer than the global average.
“Freshwater extraction typically takes place in regions where freshwater is much scarcer than the global average (56).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] source
- Premisecitation
Lack of adequate spatial planning is a moderate/locally contextual barrier for government and farmer/forester.
“Lack of adequate spatial planning Institutional Government; farmer/forester Moderate/locally contextual Appropriate regulations and engagement with stakeholders”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] Wreford A, 2017 source
- Premisecitation
Hidden and transaction costs are a moderate barrier for farmers/foresters.
“Hidden and transaction costs Economic/institutional Farmer/forester Moderate Simplification of regulations”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] Wreford A, 2017 source
- Premisecitation
Lack of political incentives is a high-importance barrier for governments preventing adoption of restoration/sustainable land management practices.
“Lack of political incentives Institutional Government High Targeted political measures, redirection of subsidies”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] Wreford A, 2017 source
- Premisecitation
Costs of adoption/lack of access to credit are a moderate barrier for farmers/foresters.
“Costs of adoption/lack of access to credit Economic Farmer/forester Moderate Investment support”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] Wreford A, 2017 source
- Premisecitation
Lack of infrastructure is a moderate/locally contextual barrier for farmers/foresters.
“Lack of infrastructure Technological/economic Farmer/forester Moderate/locally contextual Investment support”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] Wreford A, 2017 source
- Premisecitation
Actual or perceived effects on performance of restoration/sustainable land management practices are a high-importance barrier for farmers/foresters.
“Actual or perceived effects on performance of restoration/sustainable land management practices Human/social Farmer/forester High Communication and education; rural advisory services”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] Wreford A, 2017 source
- Premisecitation
Actual or perceived lack of financial benefit is a high-importance barrier for farmers/foresters.
“Actual or perceived lack of financial benefit Economic Farmer/forester High Communication and education, financial incentives”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] Wreford A, 2017 source
- Premisecitation
Emissions responses from high-latitude wetlands are more uncertain.
“One cause might be the high global temperatures since 2014, which have accelerated emissions of CH 4 from low-latitude wetlands (51), whereas emissions responses from high-latitude wetlands are more uncertain (52).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] source
- Premisecitation
Uncertain land tenure is a moderate/locally contextual barrier for government and farmer/forester.
“Uncertain land tenure Institutional Government; farmer/forester Moderate/locally contextual Appropriate regulations and engagement with stakeholders”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] Wreford A, 2017 source
- Premisecitation
If droughts increase in numbers and intensity, this can disrupt the ability of vegetation to recover, leading to degradation, particularly when coupled with unsustainable land management.
“However, if droughts increase in numbers and intensity, this can disrupt the ability of vegetation to recover (47), leading to degradation, particularly when coupled with unsustainable land management.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Prince S, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The extreme fires in parts of Australia during 2019-2020, associated with unprecedented drought and heat, were estimated to impact >30% of the habitat area of 21 animal species threatened with extinction.
“The extreme fires in parts of Australia during 2019-2020, which were associated with unprecedented drought and heat, were estimated to impact >30% of the habitat area of 21 animal species threatened with extinction (76).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] source
- Premisecitation
Climate change has until now had relatively minor impacts on degradation.
“Although climate change has until now had relatively minor impacts on degradation, it is expected to become more important for degradation in the future (3, 4), exacerbating the effects of land-use change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Olsson L, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [4] Mirzabaev A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Occurrence of droughts does not automatically lead to land degradation, as land productivity may recover completely after the end of a drought event.
“Occurrence of droughts does not automatically lead to land degradation, as the land productivity may recover completely after the end of a drought event (4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Mirzabaev A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Model-based estimates of NPP indicate that climate change is an important driver of degradation in approximately 35-45% of the world's degraded grasslands.
“Model-based estimates of NPP indicate that climate change is an important driver of degradation in approximately 35-45% of the world's degraded grasslands (36,61).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationnone given
Attribution of climate change as a driver of degradation is made more difficult by concurrent increases in atmospheric CO2 and large regional variability in observed and projected climate trends.
“Attribution of climate change as a driver of degradation is made more difficult by concurrent increases in atmospheric CO 2 and the large regional variability in observed and projected climate trends.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Future climate change is expected to accelerate degradation most strongly through weather extremes (heatwaves, drought, floods) and associated episodic events such as wildfire and insect outbreaks, because these extremes override positive impacts from trends in temperature, precipitation, or CO2.
“Future climate change is expected to accelerate degradation most strongly through weather extremes (heatwaves, drought, floods) and associated episodic events such as wildfire and insect outbreaks (12), given that these extremes override the positive impacts that might arise from trends in temperature, precipitation, or CO 2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
- Interpretationnone given
In many dryland areas, droughts together with unsustainable land management can amplify degradation, including increasing duststorm activity.
“Moreover, in many dryland areas, droughts together with unsustainable land management can amplify degradation, including increasing duststorm activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The increasing intensity of rainfall expected from climate change will lead to increased erosion and nutrient loss from croplands unless SLM practices are widely implemented.
“The increasing intensity of rainfall expected from climate change will lead to increased erosion and nutrient loss from croplands unless SLM practices are widely implemented (86).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] source
- Interpretationnone given
It seems unlikely that impacts from changes in fires on remote ecosystems can be prevented.
“Although investment in adopting fire management practices under climate change can reduce wildfire impacts in populated regions, it seems unlikely that impacts from changes in fires on remote ecosystems can be prevented.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Investment in adopting fire management practices under climate change can reduce wildfire impacts in populated regions.
“Although investment in adopting fire management practices under climate change can reduce wildfire impacts in populated regions, it seems unlikely that impacts from changes in fires on remote ecosystems can be prevented.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Measuring and monitoring the success of combined mitigation-adaptation approaches is nontrivial.
“Measuring and monitoring the success of combined mitigation-adaptation approaches is nontrivial; multiple and very different indicators need to be used that are cognizant of the agreements made in international conventions as well as capturing local consequences (101).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [101] source
- Premisecitation
The benefits to biodiversity or the avoided damage to human societies, especially from extreme weather events, will accrue only over a long-term time period.
“Likewise, the benefits to biodiversity or the avoided damage to human societies, especially from extreme weather events (101), will accrue only over a long-term time period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [101] source
- Premisecitation
Most scenarios illustrating pathways to meet a 1.5 or 2°C temperature goal show heavy reliance on BECCS.
“Because most scenarios illustrating pathways to meet a 1.5 or 2° temperature goal show heavy reliance on BECCS (91), bioenergy could become an indirect climate change-related cause of degradation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [91] IPCC (Intergov. Panel Clim. Change), 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Numerous options exist to create synergies between the management of agriculture and forest vegetation and soils with the objective to reverse degradation.
“Numerous options exist to create synergies between the management of agriculture and forest vegetation and soils with the objective to reverse degradation (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Regenerative agriculture increased from 7.5% to 15% of global croplands between 2008/2009 and 2015/2016.
“Regenerative agriculture increased from 7.5% to 15% of global croplands between 2008/2009 and 2015/2016 (105).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [105] Montgomery DR., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Bioenergy could become an indirect climate change-related cause of degradation.
“Because most scenarios illustrating pathways to meet a 1.5 or 2° temperature goal show heavy reliance on BECCS (91), bioenergy could become an indirect climate change-related cause of degradation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
In a warmer, drier climate, fire risk will increase.
“In a warmer, drier climate, fire risk will increase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In South Korea, reforestation led to a 43% simulated increase in downstream water yields across catchments.
“In South Korea, for instance, as a consequence of reforestation, total forest volume increased more than tenfold between 1973 and 2016, with significant co-benefits such as a 43% simulated increase in downstream water yields across catchments and an 87% reduction in soil losses (3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Olsson L, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Agroforestry enhances soil carbon content significantly compared with more conventional agricultural systems, especially in the upper soil layers (>30 cm), with an overall increase of approximately 25% detected in a meta-analysis of field studies.
“Agroforestry, characterized by growing woody perennials with agricultural crops, animal grazing, or a combination of both, has also been shown to enhance soil carbon content significantly compared with more conventional agricultural systems, especially in the upper soil layers (>30 cm), in which an overall increase of approximately 25% was detected in a meta-analysis of field studies (110).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [110] De Stefano A, 2018, Agroforestry Syst source
- Premisecitation
In South Korea, as a consequence of reforestation, total forest volume increased more than tenfold between 1973 and 2016.
“In South Korea, for instance, as a consequence of reforestation, total forest volume increased more than tenfold between 1973 and 2016, with significant co-benefits such as a 43% simulated increase in downstream water yields across catchments and an 87% reduction in soil losses (3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Olsson L, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Large herbivores influence ecosystem structure and function through physical impacts such as trampling or pushing over trees.
“Large herbivores also influence ecosystem structure and function through physical impacts such as trampling or pushing over trees (122).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [122] source
- Premisecitation
Inoculating soil animals into degraded soils, or stimulating them through indirect measures such as compost, enhances important soil physical and chemical properties, especially related to restoring land for crop production.
“Inoculating such types of soil animals into degraded soils, or stimulating them through indirect measures (such as compost), has been found to enhance important soil physical and chemical properties, especially related to restoring land for crop production (121).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [121] source
- Rests on an assumption: Earthworms and termites are well known for their role in decomposition of litter and soil organic matter and nutrient turnover.
- Premisecitation
Regenerative agriculture now covers 34% of the cropland in North America.
“It now covers more than 70% of the cropland in the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR) region and 34% in North America, but only approximately 5% in Europe (106).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [106] source
- Premisecitation
Predicting the trophic response (and hence its interaction with functioning) of restoring carnivores (or large mammals) to ecosystems is challenging.
“However, predicting the trophic response (and hence its interaction with functioning) of restoring carnivores (or large mammals) to ecosystems has been shown to be challenging (123), and assumptions about ecosystems simply returning to a historical state seem too simplistic given interactions with climate change and episodic events such as fire.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [123] source
- Interpretationreasoning
Replacing savannahs or other low-tree-cover ecosystems with forest will severely limit the intended climate change mitigation benefits.
“Hence, replacing these ecosystems with forest will severely limit the intended climate change mitigation benefits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Perennial woody or herbaceous energy crops (e.g., switchgrass or Miscanthus) can be grown where topsoil has been lost.
“Likewise, perennial woody or herbaceous energy crops (e.g., grasses such as switchgrass or Miscanthus species) can be grown where topsoil has been lost, as they are able to grow, albeit slowly, on low fertility soils.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Perennial woody or herbaceous energy crops are able to grow, albeit slowly, on low fertility soils.
- Premisecitation
Tree cover increased in Serengeti National Park following the recovery of the wildebeest population after the eradication of rinderpest.
“Tree cover was observed to increase in the Serengeti National Park following the recovery of the wildebeest population after the eradication of rinderpest (122).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [122] source
- Interpretationreasoning
SLM and restoring and rehabilitating degraded lands are high-return actions from not only an environmental but also an economic and social perspective.
“SLM and restoring and rehabilitating degraded lands are high-return actions from not only an environmental but also an economic and social perspective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In South Korea, reforestation led to an 87% reduction in soil losses.
“In South Korea, for instance, as a consequence of reforestation, total forest volume increased more than tenfold between 1973 and 2016, with significant co-benefits such as a 43% simulated increase in downstream water yields across catchments and an 87% reduction in soil losses (3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Olsson L, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Regenerative agriculture now covers more than 70% of the cropland in the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR) region.
“It now covers more than 70% of the cropland in the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR) region and 34% in North America, but only approximately 5% in Europe (106).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [106] source
- Premisecitation
Regenerative agriculture now covers approximately 5% of the cropland in Europe.
“It now covers more than 70% of the cropland in the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR) region and 34% in North America, but only approximately 5% in Europe (106).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [106] source
- Premisecitation
Most of the SLM technologies analyzed became profitable within three to ten years after continued application.
“Giger et al.'s (126) analysis of the costs and benefits of individual SLM technologies showed that most of the SLM technologies analyzed became profitable within three to ten years after continued application.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [126] source
- Interpretationreasoning
The fact that an important share of restoration benefits is in nonprovisioning ecosystem services that individual land users cannot fully monetize reduces the incentive to invest in land restoration.
“This reduces the incentive to invest in land restoration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: An important share of the economic benefits of restoration is in the form of nonprovisioning ecosystem services, which benefit society as a whole, but individual land users cannot fully monetize these benefits.
- Interpretationnone given
In cases of rapid environmental change, societal or institutional resistance to change has been too large to enact necessary and forward-looking responses.
“In these cases, societal or institutional resistance to change has been too large to enact necessary and forward-looking responses to a rapid environmental change (such as climate change).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
An increasing set of studies indicate that farming practices exist that reverse degradation while still producing sufficient food for a growing human population.
“Overall, an increasing set of studies indicate that farming practices exist that reverse degradation while still producing sufficient food for a growing human population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Despite strong economic justification, the adoption of SLM technologies and the initiation of land restoration and rehabilitation activities remains insufficient to address the ongoing land degradation around the world.
“Despite this strong economic justification, the adoption of SLM technologies and the initiation of land restoration and rehabilitation activities remains insufficient to address the ongoing land degradation around the world (4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Mirzabaev A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The European Court of Auditors highlighted that €66 billion spent within the common agricultural policy between 2014 and 2020 did not achieve its goal of stopping agricultural biodiversity loss.
“the European Court of Auditors highlighted that €66 billion spent within the common agricultural policy between 2014 and 2020 did not achieve its goal of stopping agricultural biodiversity loss”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=53892
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Given large uncertainties about the future and a general lack of restoration scenarios, static goals and policies that aim to achieve restoration (and sustainable development more generally) are likely to fail.
“Given large uncertainties about the future (and a general lack of restoration scenarios) static goals and policies that aim to achieve restoration (and sustainable development more generally) are likely to fail.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Large uncertainties about the future exist.
- The authors state this as an assumption: There is a general lack of restoration scenarios.
- Interpretationnone given
Large-scale deployment of bioenergy and afforestation/reforestation would have major negative impacts on biodiversity and land degradation, if they were to lead to the conversion of natural vegetation.
“As indicated in Sections 3.3 and 4.2, largescale deployment of bioenergy and afforestation/reforestation would have major negative impacts on biodiversity and land degradation, if they were to lead to the conversion of natural vegetation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Sustainable, bottom-up and place-based solutions build on existing governance arrangements.
“Sustainable, bottom-up and place-based solutions build on existing governance arrangements (134).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [134] source
- Interpretationreasoning
Projected outcomes of agricultural or forest land-use change do not capture whether crops, pastures, or forests are managed sustainably.
“Projected outcomes of agricultural or forest land-use change do not, therefore, capture whether crops, pastures, or forests are managed sustainably.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Land degradation emits greenhouse gases and aerosols.
“Land degradation exacerbates food insecurity; emits greenhouse gases and aerosols; drives the loss of biodiversity; and undermines wide-ranging ecosystem services, including access to clean drinking water and the regulation of air quality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
If done poorly, both land-based climate change mitigation measures and restoration measures could backfire as a result of trade-offs between land for climate mitigation versus food or conservation, or between forest biomass-based livelihoods versus global carbon storage.
“If done poorly, both land-based climate change mitigation measures and restoration measures could backfire as a result of trade-offs between land for climate mitigation versus food or conservation, or between forest biomass-based livelihoods versus global carbon storage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Land degradation drives the loss of biodiversity.
“Land degradation exacerbates food insecurity; emits greenhouse gases and aerosols; drives the loss of biodiversity; and undermines wide-ranging ecosystem services, including access to clean drinking water and the regulation of air quality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Land degradation exacerbates food insecurity.
“Land degradation exacerbates food insecurity; emits greenhouse gases and aerosols; drives the loss of biodiversity; and undermines wide-ranging ecosystem services, including access to clean drinking water and the regulation of air quality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Land degradation undermines wide-ranging ecosystem services, including access to clean drinking water and the regulation of air quality.
“Land degradation exacerbates food insecurity; emits greenhouse gases and aerosols; drives the loss of biodiversity; and undermines wide-ranging ecosystem services, including access to clean drinking water and the regulation of air quality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 86
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 58
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSince the Neolithic Revolution about 12,000 years ago, the upper 2 m of soils are estimated to have lost almost 116 GtC, of which 37 GtC have been attributed to croplands and associated vegetation cover classes.
“Since the Neolithic Revolution some 12,000 years ago, the upper 2 m of soils are estimated to have lost almost 116 GtC, of which 37 GtC have been attributed to croplands and associated vegetation cover classes (39).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] source
The Results and Discussion section (page unavailable) estimates 133 Pg C lost from the upper 2 m of soil, not almost 116 GtC. It attributes 35 Pg C, not 37 GtC, to the cropland and crop/natural vegetation mosaic categories. The source supports the historical scope and soil depth, but gives contrary figures for both quantities. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIncreasing forest areas also led to the contraction and further intensification of cropland and pastureland, in some scenarios causing negative impacts on many carbon and biodiversity hotspots in the Americas, India, and Indonesia due to land-use displacement.
“However, increasing forest areas also led to the contraction and further intensification of cropland and pastureland, in some scenarios causing negative impacts on many carbon and biodiversity hotspots in the Americas, India, and Indonesia due to land-use displacement (Section 4.2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [130] source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSoil disturbance accompanying clear-cutting reduces soil carbon on average by approximately 10%, with larger losses in forest floor and organic soil horizons.
“For instance, soil disturbance accompanying clear-cutting reduces soil carbon on average by approximately 10% with much larger losses in forest floor and organic soil horizons (19).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
Section 4 (Harvesting; page not provided) reports average soil-carbon losses of 8% and 11.2% after harvesting, with larger losses in forest-floor and organic horizons. But it does not attribute those average losses specifically to soil disturbance accompanying clear-cutting; it principally relates losses to reduced carbon inputs and/or faster decomposition. Section 6 discusses soil disturbance from site preparation separately. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAssociated above-ground carbon losses from forest degradation have been estimated to increase estimates of gross deforestation losses by approximately 25% up to >600%, with additional unknown soil carbon losses.
“associated above-ground carbon losses have been estimated to increase estimates of gross deforestation losses by approximately 25% up to >600% (17), with additional, unknown amounts of carbon lost from soils.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] source
The Results (Fig. 2; page unavailable) report a 626% increase over the forest-clearance estimate, but that figure includes forgone carbon removals as well as emissions from degradation. It does not establish a range starting at approximately 25% for above-ground degradation losses. The soil-carbon clause follows the citation in the citing sentence, so it is not treated as attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationClimate change impacts can also increase forest productivity in cases where other factors are not limiting, resulting in faster tree growth or elevating treelines in mountain regions.
“However, climate change impacts (including also the effects of increasing atmospheric CO 2 concentration) can, in cases where other factors are not limiting, also increase forest productivity, resulting in, for example, faster tree growth (13) or elevating treelines in mountain regions (14).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCurrently approximately one-quarter to one-third of the total potential net primary production on land is used by humans.
“Currently approximately one-quarter to one-third of the total potential net primary production on land is used by humans, i.e., of the net primary productivity (NPP) that would prevail in the absence of land use [estimated at approximately 60 GtC a -1 (6)]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLess than 40% of global forest area has been estimated to contain old-growth forest (older than 140 years).
“less than 40% of forest area has been estimated to contain old-growth forest [in Reference 18, forests identified to be older than 140 years].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationN2O emissions are generally associated with increased use of (mostly mineral) fertilizer, which on an expanding area of cropland has been estimated to have contributed >80% of the N2O emission increase since the 1860s.
“N 2 O emissions are generally associated with increased use of (mostly mineral) fertilizer, which (on an expanding area of cropland) has been estimated to have contributed >80% of the N 2 O emission increase since the 1860s (43).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] source
The Results passage on cropland emissions (page unavailable) estimates that increased cropland soil N₂O emissions accounted for 82% of the global soil-emission increase from the 1860s to the recent decade. The ‘Contributions of factors responsible for the increased N₂O emissions’ section also identifies fertilizer addition as a contributor. But the 82% figure is for cropland emissions, not the share caused by mostly mineral fertilizer on expanding cropland; the paper assesses manure, deposition, climate and other factors separately. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeadwood is important as a living environment for insects and wood-inhabiting fungi and affects higher trophic levels through related food webs.
“Deadwood is especially important as a living environment for insects and wood-inhabiting fungi but also affects higher trophic levels through related food webs (20).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKey sustainable land management practices contribute strongly to halting and reversing degradation and have notable co-benefits for climate change mitigation and/or adaptation.
“Overview of key sustainable land management practices that contribute strongly to halting and reversing degradation and with notable co-benefits for climate change mitigation and/or adaptation.Sources: see References 3, 4, 62, 67, 96, 147”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [3] Olsson L, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [4] Mirzabaev A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [62] source
Section 2.3 (p. 10) says some land-management activities create CO₂ sinks, and the Discussion (p. 32) notes the importance of land-use emissions for climate mitigation strategies. The paper does not establish that key sustainable land-management practices strongly halt or reverse degradation, or that they provide adaptation co-benefits. (LLM, conf=0.81)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Rests on an assumption: Grassland degradation is a widespread phenomenon, with overgrazing being a key driver, together with frequent wheel traffic, or overfertilization, all of which result in changes in sward composition, reduction in yields, and deterioration of soils.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDryland areas have high climatic variability, with periods of dry and wet climates and corresponding cycles of greening and browning, most famously in the Sahel.
“For instance, dryland areas have high climatic variability, with periods of dry and wet climates, and corresponding cycles of greening and browning, most famously in the Sahel region (29,30).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [29] source
The opening summary (pp. 1–11) describes Sahel droughts in the 1970s and 1980s, followed by increased rainfall and vegetation greening. It supports the Sahel example, but does not establish recurring greening-and-browning cycles or extend that pattern to drylands generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [30] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNatural temperate grasslands are now reduced to a fraction of their original area and are considered one of the most endangered biomes.
“natural temperate grasslands are now reduced to a fraction of their original area and are considered one of the most endangered biomes in the world (27,28).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [27] source
- cites [28] source
The Introduction describes permanent grasslands as biodiversity hot spots, but does not say natural temperate grasslands have shrunk to a fraction of their original area or rank among the most endangered biomes. Searches for their original extent, loss, and endangered status found no passage addressing those claims in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe large historic loss of soil carbon implies that agricultural systems have a significant capacity to take up CO2 from the atmosphere and to store it in the form of soil carbon with a wide range of co-benefits in addition to climate change mitigation.
“However, the large historic loss of soil carbon implies that agricultural systems have a significant capacity to take up CO 2 from the atmosphere and to store it in the form of soil carbon with a wide range of co-benefits in addition to climate change mitigation (40).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe total amount of carbon stored in wetlands and peatlands has been estimated at approximately 1,500 GtC, approximately 30-40% of the global terrestrial carbon stock.
“The total amount of carbon stored in wetlands and peatlands has been estimated at approximately 1,500 GtC, approximately 30-40% of the global terrestrial carbon stock (44,45).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [44] source
- cites [45] source
Section 1 and the Summary Points describe peatlands as major carbon stores and estimate that they contain 500–700 GtC. The paper does not give the claimed 1,500 GtC estimate for wetlands and peatlands together or the figure of 30–40% of global terrestrial carbon stock. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTropical grassy biomes have a substantially lower proportion of protected areas than tropical forest, often with individual protected areas far too small.
“The lack of formal protection, therefore, is of concern; tropical grassy biomes have a substantially lower proportion of protected areas than tropical forest, often with individual areas under protection that are far too small (26).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] source
In “Tropical grassy biomes in protected areas” (page unavailable), the paper reports that 13% of tropical grassy biomes are protected, versus 24% of tropical forest. It also explains why protected areas need to be large and discusses small areas in fragmented landscapes, but does not establish that individual protected areas are often too small. The paper qualifies the overall protection gap: outside the Neotropics, the two biomes receive proportionally similar protection. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKey human drivers of grassland and savannah degradation include expansion of cropped areas or conversion to intensive pasture systems, reduced livestock mobility and overgrazing, and fuelwood extraction in savannahs.
“The key human drivers of grassland and savannah degradation include expansion of cropped areas or conversion to intensive pasture systems (Section 2.3) (27), reduced livestock mobility and overgrazing, and-in savannahs-fuelwood extraction (4,31).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [27] source
- cites [4] Mirzabaev A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [31] source
The paper’s “Drivers of Change” section says land-use change and intensification disrupt tropical grassy biomes, and that roads and fences prohibit large-scale animal movements. Its “Human use and value” discussion identifies fuelwood harvesting as significant, but says its sustainability varies; the copy does not identify reduced livestock mobility, overgrazing, and fuelwood extraction together as key drivers of degradation, or specifically describe conversion to intensive pasture systems. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGlobal CH4 emissions have risen rapidly since 2007, with a further acceleration after 2014.
“Global CH 4 emissions have risen rapidly since 2007, with a further acceleration after 2014 (50).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] source
The Results and Figure 3 discussion report that atmospheric methane growth resumed in 2007 and became stronger from 2014 (page numbers not supplied). But Section 5 says the causes remain uncertain and may involve changes in emissions, sinks, or both; the paper does not establish that global emissions themselves accelerated. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEstimates of the current and recent areal extent of wetlands vary substantially, from under 2% to over 20% of the global land area.
“Estimates of the current and recent areal extent of wetlands vary substantially, from under 2% to over 20% of the global land area (46).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] source
The Introduction (p. 2) describes substantially varying wetland estimates and reports that satellite imagery places permanent water coverage as low as 1.6% of land. Section 2.5.2 (p. 8) reports a wetland estimate of 22.6%, but identifies it as potential extent that does not account for human-caused losses. The claimed range therefore draws on different measures, rather than estimates of current or recent wetland extent throughout. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChanges in river flow regimes and pollution inflow from agricultural fields can increase algal biomass, reduce invertebrate richness, abundance, and density, and alter organic matter decomposition.
“Changes in river flow regimes, but also pollution inflow from agricultural fields, can increase algal biomass; reduce invertebrate richness, abundance, and density; and alter organic matter decomposition (58).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] source
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that human-driven water stress increased algal biomass, reduced invertebrate richness, abundance and density, and reduced organic matter breakdown. It links these effects chiefly to altered flows from dams and water abstraction; the passages do not establish pollution inflow from agricultural fields as a cause of those outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRestoring already degraded wetlands can sequester carbon on a century scale, albeit often relatively slowly and possibly at the expense of increased CH4 emissions.
“Restoring already degraded wetlands can sequester carbon on a century scale, albeit at an often relatively slow pace and possibly at the expense of increased CH 4 emissions (53), but with large potential to improve conditions for biodiversity (54).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] source
Section 3.5 reports that restored wetlands sequestered carbon and that methane emissions delayed net greenhouse-gas benefits for at least half a century, with the wetlands becoming net atmospheric sinks after a century or more. It does not establish that carbon sequestration itself proceeds slowly; the century-scale delay concerns climate benefit after the methane burden, and the paper describes the restored wetlands as sizeable carbon sinks. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationVegetation fires are an important ecological feature of most land ecosystems and are used as a management tool but also often negatively affect human societies through losses of properties and lives and local and long-range air pollution.
“Vegetation fires are an important ecological feature of most land ecosystems and are used as a management tool but also often negatively affect human societies through, e.g., losses of properties and lives and local and long-range air pollution (75).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] source
The Introduction (page unavailable) describes fire as fundamental to most terrestrial ecosystems, notes its use as a management tool, and says recent fires have had negative consequences for humans. Section 6.3 (page unavailable) says smoke affects human health and travels beyond burn perimeters. Our copy does not specifically substantiate the claimed losses of property and lives. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGroundwater recharge is expected to respond to climate change with increases during wet, winter periods and declines during dry, summer periods; overall declines are expected in more arid locations.
“Groundwater recharge is expected to respond to climate change with increases during wet, winter periods and declines during dry, summer periods; overall declines are expected in more arid locations (72).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] source
Section 3.3 (page unavailable) projects dry-season declines for Bandung and Ho Chi Minh City and wet-season increases for Bangkok, supporting parts of the seasonal pattern. It does not equate wet and dry seasons with winter and summer or predict overall declines for arid locations. The pattern is not general across the four cities: Lahore’s recharge increases in both seasons, with the larger increase in the dry season. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationClimate change has contributed to degradation chiefly in regions around 15-45°S, although studies disagree regarding the exact region of impact.
“Analyses of remotely sensed vegetation greenness (and vegetation browning) as well as model-based studies found that climate change has contributed to degradation chiefly in regions located around 15-45 o S, although studies disagree regarding the exact region of impact (36,60,61).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [36] source
- cites [60] source
The passage on regional climate effects (section labeled Abstract; no page given) says climatic effects are negative in some regions and that South America is the only continent where negative effects were statistically significant. It also reports inconsistency between models. It does not establish that degradation occurred chiefly at 15–45°S or that studies disagree about the exact region affected. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [61] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese categories are difficult to gauge and difficult to compare, which often prevents the assessment of co-benefits or trade-offs.
“These are difficult to gauge and difficult to compare, which often prevents the assessment of co-benefits or trade-offs (101, 103).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHigh intensity tropical cyclones are expected to increase in number and intensity, as well as the amount and intensity of rainfall, with continued climate change.
“The overall frequency of tropical cyclones may not change, or may even decrease with continued climate change, but high intensity cyclones are expected to increase in number and intensity as well as the amount and intensity of rainfall (87,88).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese SLM practices enhance ecosystem carbon sinks and food security as well as deliver multiple other co-benefits.
“As a co-benefit, these practices also enhance ecosystem carbon sinks and food security as well as deliver multiple other co-benefits (63), with positive changes in areas totaling globally greater than 10 Mkm 2 (63).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] source
The Discussion (Co-delivery across the land challenges; page unavailable) says most agricultural land-management practices have benefits across the four land challenges, while noting exceptions for food security. The Results (Potential of practices for addressing land degradation and desertification; page unavailable) say more than 10 million km² could benefit from improved management—not that positive changes have already occurred across that area. The citing sentence presents these potential benefits as established outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationRegionally adapted restoration activities have large potential to support climate change mitigation while simultaneously reducing climate change impacts on ecosystems and people, with added benefits for multiple ecosystem services.
“These analyses demonstrate that regionally adapted restoration activities have large potential to support climate change mitigation while simultaneously reducing climate change impacts on ecosystems and people, with added benefits for multiple ecosystem services.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [97] source
The Discussion (page not provided) says carbon conservation could mitigate climate change while benefiting biodiversity and other ecosystem services, and recommends regional-to-local conservation planning. It does not demonstrate that regionally adapted restoration activities reduce climate-change impacts on ecosystems and people; its analyses concern conservation priorities, not restoration outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [98] source
The Discussion (p. 14) reports substantial climate-mitigation and biodiversity benefits from spatially planned restoration in the Atlantic Forest, and the Discussion (p. 12) identifies potential local ecosystem-service benefits. But the Results (p. 10) say climate-change adaptation *might* benefit from more resilient ecosystems; the paper does not demonstrate that restoration reduces climate-change impacts on ecosystems and people. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [99] source
The paper’s summary and its section on synergies between forest-based carbon emission reduction and biodiversity conservation describe modeled REDD+ scenarios with climate-mitigation and biodiversity benefits. They do not establish that regionally adapted restoration reduces climate-change impacts on ecosystems and people or provides benefits across multiple ecosystem services; the analysis concerns allocation of REDD+ funds, not those restoration outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe reduction of negative impacts, which reflects successful adaptation, could be quantified in terms of enhanced assets and livelihoods; resources (food, water) security, health, cultural, or spiritual well-being; or conservation and biodiversity.
“Likewise, the reduction of negative impacts, which reflects successful adaptation, could be quantified, e.g., in terms of enhanced assets and livelihoods; in resources (food, water) security, health, cultural, or spiritual well-being; or in conservation and biodiversity (101, 102).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [101] source
- cites [102] source
Section 2.3 defines adaptation outcomes as reduced harm or risk, and section 3.3 identifies assets, livelihoods, food security, resource security, and health as outcome dimensions. But section 3.3 mentions culture and spirituality only as part of an earlier typology, while sections 3.5 and 4 treat conservation and biodiversity as intervention components rather than the adaptation outcomes measured here. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUnder current climatic conditions, erosion and nutrient leakage from agricultural land is substantial and an important cause of deterioration of marine and terrestrial aquatic ecosystems.
“Under current climatic conditions, erosion and nutrient leakage from agricultural land is substantial and an important cause of deterioration of marine and terrestrial aquatic ecosystems (84,85).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [84] Wang Z-H, 2019 source
- cites [85] source
The Introduction and §3.1 describe agricultural nutrient leakage as a major contributor to eutrophication and degraded inland and coastal waters. §2 identifies erosion as a pathway for nutrient loss, but the passages do not establish that erosion itself is substantial under current climatic conditions. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe intensification of the hydrological cycle as a result of warming of the atmosphere is well understood, and the effect has been detected in climatic time series for several decades.
“But the intensification of the hydrological cycle as a result of warming of the atmosphere is well understood, and the effect has been detected in climatic time series for several decades.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [82] source
- cites [83] source
The supplied passages are bibliographic material, not discussion of the hydrological cycle. Searches of the indexed copy for atmospheric warming, hydrological-cycle intensification, and detection in climatic time series found no passage addressing either part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe overall frequency of tropical cyclones may not change, or may even decrease with continued climate change.
“The overall frequency of tropical cyclones may not change, or may even decrease with continued climate change, but high intensity cyclones are expected to increase in number and intensity as well as the amount and intensity of rainfall (87,88).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSustainable cultivation of lignocellulosic energy crops provides a financial return, while at the same time supporting the rehabilitation of degraded lands and restoring productivity.
“Sustainable cultivation of lignocellulosic energy crops provides a financial return, while at the same time supporting the rehabilitation of degraded lands and restoring productivity (125).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [125] source
The paper’s Lesson 3 (page unavailable) calls for restoring damaged land to its pre-project agricultural capability, and Lesson 8 describes pasture establishment as a way to restore soil function. These passages support the rehabilitation and productivity aspect, but do not establish that cultivating lignocellulosic energy crops achieves it or provides a financial return. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAfforestation and reforestation are considered relatively cost-effective climate change mitigation options.
“Afforestation and reforestation are considered relatively cost-effective climate change mitigation options (96).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [96] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExotic monoculture plantations have little or no benefit for biodiversity, or can be detrimental if the planted species becomes invasive.
“Exotic monoculture plantations have little or no benefit for biodiversity, or they can even be detrimental if the planted species becomes invasive (115).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [115] source
The Introduction (p. 2) says non-native trees can harm nature conservation when they become invasive, supporting the second half of the claim. It does not say exotic monoculture plantations generally have little or no biodiversity benefit: the habitat-restoration section (p. 22) says some alien-tree plantations remain monocultures, while the Introduction also notes that planted forests can support biodiversity conservation. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEnergy crops can enhance the biodiversity of degraded lands, especially if native species are included and/or if perennial grasses and woody crops enhance habitat diversity in otherwise large cropland monocultures.
“Energy crops can enhance the biodiversity of degraded lands, especially if native species are included and/or if perennial grasses and woody crops enhance habitat diversity in what are otherwise large cropland monocultures (109).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [109] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe need for dynamic conservation strategies was not considered in the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, nor is it being considered in the current draft of the post-Aichi objectives.
“However, the need for dynamic conservation strategies was not considered in the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, nor is it being considered in the current draft of the post-Aichi objectives (144).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [144] source
In “Climate Change and Global Biodiversity Targets” (page unavailable), the paper says Aichi Target 11 and the corresponding draft post-2020 targets may lead to static protected-area approaches, although flexible, dynamic measures are needed. It says the draft targets *might* lead to static approaches, not that the need for dynamic conservation was wholly unconsidered across the draft objectives; the citing sentence overstates that conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe commitments of approximately a quarter of countries are larger than the existing forest or agricultural areas in those countries, which implies the need for enormous transformation in current land-use practices and agricultural and forest economies.
“However, the commitments of approximately a quarter of countries are larger than the existing forest or agricultural areas in those countries, which implies the need for enormous transformation in current land-use practices and agricultural and forest economies (137; see also Section 4.2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [137] source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationEstablishing financial mechanisms for compensating land users for SLM and improved delivery of ecosystem services, e.g., through payments for ecosystem services, could provide a much-needed incentive for increased investment into land restoration and rehabilitation.
“Establishing financial mechanisms for compensating land users for SLM and improved delivery of ecosystem services, e.g., through payments for ecosystem services, could provide a much-needed incentive for increased investment into land restoration and rehabilitation (111, 127, 128).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [111] source
In “Challenges to Agroforestry Adoption” (page unavailable), the paper says that some agroforestry practices may need markets that compensate land users for ecosystem services to make financial sense. “Moving Forward—Policy and Research Needs” (page unavailable) also proposes credits for environmental services to encourage adoption. These passages support the proposed financial incentive, but they do not extend it to sustainable land management generally or explicitly link it to increased investment in land restoration and rehabilitation. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [127] source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [128] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationEnhancing synergies and reducing trade-offs can be achieved by policy decisions and implementation that consider cross-disciplinary scientific knowledge on natural, economic, and societal aspects and by mapping and quantification of stakeholder choices in relation to various ecosystem service choices.
“Enhancing synergies and reducing trade-offs can be achieved by (a) policy decisions and implementation that consider cross-disciplinary scientific knowledge on natural, economic, and societal aspects and (b) mapping and quantification of stakeholder choices in relation to various ecosystem service choices (139).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [139] source
The Introduction (page unavailable) describes an ecosystem-services framework that bridges disciplines and incorporates human decisions and values into natural-resource management. The paper also discusses working with policy and practice, but it does not establish that these steps enhance synergies or reduce trade-offs, or describe mapping and quantifying stakeholder choices to achieve that result. A search for “trade-offs” found only a comment about understanding them, not reducing them. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWolff et al. found that meeting global land restoration targets outlined in the SDGs and by several multinational environmental agreements would require an increase in global tree cover of 4 million km2 that would increase forest carbon stocks by 50 Gt and protect 28% of the terrestrial surface with high biodiversity and carbon values.
“They found that meeting these targets would require an increase in global tree cover of 4 million km² that would increase forest carbon stocks by 50 Gt and protect 28% of the terrestrial surface with high biodiversity and carbon values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [130] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationAlternative climate change mitigation and restoration pathways could explore the future outcomes of decision-making when accounting for climate or socioeconomic developments, new knowledge or technologies, and changing societal values.
“Rather than making fixed and irreversible decisions now, alternative climate change mitigation and restoration pathways could explore the future outcomes of decision-making when accounting for climate or socioeconomic developments, new knowledge or technologies, and changing societal values (145).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [145] source
The Introduction supports flexible decisions that adapt as conditions unfold, and §2.2 describes evaluating alternative policy pathways and monitoring developments that trigger later actions. The Waas case considers climate and land-use scenarios. The paper addresses climate adaptation and flood management, however, not mitigation or restoration pathways; the cited passages also do not establish changing societal values or new knowledge as factors evaluated in those pathways. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationScown et al. estimated that subsidies in the CAP supported high-pollution practices in agriculture and low nature-value farmland, as well as increasing income inequality.
“Scown et al. (129), who estimated that subsidies in the CAP (common agricultural policy) supported high-pollution practices in agriculture and low nature-value farmland, as well as increasing income inequality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [129] source
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenImproved forest management has an estimated mitigation potential of 0.4-2.1 Gt CO2-eq yr-1 and an adaptation potential of >25 million people.
“Improved forest management For example, improved tree varieties, mixed forests, reduced disturbance when harvesting, selective logging Enhance forest carbon content; reduced risks from insects/pathogens; habitat for biodiversity 0.4-2.1 >25 Access to knowledge, technology”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenBiochar addition has an estimated mitigation potential of 0.03-6.6 Gt CO2-eq yr-1 (plausible to technical potential) and 0.5-2 Gt CO2-eq yr-1 (sustainable potential), and an adaptation potential up to 3,200 million people unless arable land would be used for biochar feedstock production.
“Biochar addition Add biochar to agricultural soils Enhanced soil structure, water-and nutrientholding capacity and enhance long-term carbon storage Mitigation estimate is net across supply chain from feedstock production to soil application, including avoided emissions and carbon sequestered.0.03-6.6(Plausible to technical potential) 0.5-2 (Sustainable potential) Up to 3,200 unless arable land w”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIntegrated water management has an estimated mitigation potential of 0.1-0.72 Gt CO2-eq yr-1 and an adaptation potential of 250 million people.
“Integrated water management Increase irrigation effi ciency Reduce competition for drinking water; reduce water pollution; reduce pressure on freshwater biodiversity 0.1-0.72 250 Access to fi nance, technology”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenReduced deforestation/degradation has an estimated mitigation potential of 0.5-5.8 Gt CO2-eq yr-1 and an adaptation potential of 1-25 million people.
“Reduced deforestation/ degradation Stop conversion of forests and savannahs into agricultural systems Maintain carbon stocks and uptake potential; fl ood control; habitat for biodiversity 0.5-5.81-25 Government regulation; land-use zoning and planning; alternative income opportunities to forest-dependent communities; weak law enforcement to protect forests and dependent communities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenRestoration/reduced conversion of inland wetlands and peatlands has an estimated mitigation potential of 0.6-2 Gt CO2-eq yr-1 and an adaptation potential unknown.
“Restoration/ reduced conversion of inland wetlands and peatlands Remove drainage systems in former peatlands; create/ maintain natural dams Enhance net carbon content (balance of CO 2 uptake and CH 4 emissions); fl ood regulation; habitat for biodiversity 0.6-2 Unknown Government regulation, restoration requirements; alternative income opportunities to wetlanddependent communities; weak law enforc”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenReforestation/restoration has an estimated mitigation potential of 1.5-10.1 Gt CO2-eq yr-1 and an adaptation potential of >25 million people.
“Reforestation/ restoration Foster natural forest regrowth or planting of mixed-species forests on former cropland or pastures that are naturally forested Enhance forest carbon content; reduced risks from insects/pathogens; habitat for biodiversity 1.5-10.1 >25 Access to knowledge, fi nance and technology”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFire management has an estimated mitigation potential of 0.5-8.1 Gt CO2-eq yr-1 and an adaptation potential of >6 million people.
“Fire management Foster controlled burning; minimize risks of extreme wildfi res Reduce risk of large-scale forest (and property) loss and fi re-related ecosystem shifts; maintain ecological role of fi re 0.5-8.1 >6 Government regulation, restoration requirements”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningChanges in carbon pool sizes indicate a loss of ecological integrity, including loss of biodiversity and altered ecosystem functioning and services.
“Although changes in carbon pool sizes do not necessarily imply a loss of productivity, they nonetheless indicate a loss of ecological integrity, including loss of biodiversity and altered ecosystem functioning and services (see the sidebar titled A Short Reflection on Terminology).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnnual forestry harvest has continuously increased since the early 1960s, and in the first decades of the twenty-first century amounts to approximately 1 GtC a-1.
“Annual forestry harvest has continuously increased since the early 1960s, and in the first decades of the twenty-first century amounts to approximately 1 GtC a -1 (1,8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Arneth A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [8] 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningAvoiding, reducing, and reversing land degradation has many possible co-benefits for ecosystems and human societies.
“Avoiding, reducing, and reversing land degradation needs to be part of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies, with many possible co-benefits for ecosystems and human societies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenClimate change contributes to forest degradation; drought and heat stress increase regeneration failure and tree mortality.
“Climate change contributes to forest degradation; e.g., drought and heat stress increase regeneration failure and tree mortality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDrivers of degradation include very short-term events (such as rainstorms causing erosion) as well as slow processes that accumulate over years and decades (such as nutrient losses or loss in biodiversity).
“Drivers of degradation include very short-term events [such as rainstorms causing erosion (10)] as well as slow processes that accumulate over years and decades (such as nutrient losses or loss in biodiversity), interacting with management and land-use change”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningRestoration measures work best if the short-term, often weather-driven impacts are alleviated and the long-term impacts are addressed.
“As a consequence, restoration measures (Sections 4 and 5) work best if the short-term, often weather-driven impacts are alleviated and the long-term impacts are addressed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough harvested above-ground biomass and litter carbon recovers in regrowing vegetation, the impacts of forest management on soil processes are longer term and much more difficult to quantify.
“Although harvested above-ground biomass and litter carbon recovers in regrowing vegetation, the impacts of forest management on soil processes are longer term and much more difficult to quantify.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHeavy grazing decreases soil organic carbon content in grassland dominated by C3 photosynthetic pathway vegetation and increases soil organic carbon content in mixed and C4 photosynthetic-type grasslands.
“A meta-analysis of studies found that heavy grazing decreases soil organic carbon content in grassland dominated by vegetation of the C3 photosynthetic pathway and increased soil organic carbon content in mixed and C4 photosynthetic-type grasslands (37).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDrivers of grassland degradation also limit adaptive capacities of pastoral communities, making them severely vulnerable to climate change, degradation, and continuing marginalization in favor of crop production.
“These drivers of grassland degradation also limit the adaptive capacities of pastoral communities, making them severely vulnerable to climate change, degradation, and continuing marginalization in favor of crop production (4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Mirzabaev A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: These grasslands represent the key source of livelihoods for approximately 100 million to 200 million pastoralists around the world.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningImproved access to financial markets creates more possibilities for obtaining credit to invest in SLM measures, and insurance can reduce associated risks.
“Improved access to financial markets creates more possibilities for obtaining credit to invest in SLM measures, and insurance can reduce associated risks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationUsing biological productivity as an indicator, degradation in numerous grasslands across Europe, North America, and Asia was found to be primarily caused directly by human activities, although climate change is also a strong contributing factor.
“Using biological productivity (e.g., NPP; see the sidebar titled A Short Reflection on Terminology) as an indicator, degradation in numerous grasslands across Europe, North America, and Asia was found to be primarily caused directly by human activities, although climate change is also a strong contributing factor (36) (Section 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation30% of the approximately 46% (±0.8%) of global land area defined as drylands are grassy ecosystems.
“30% of the approximately 46% (±0.8%) of the global land area defined as drylands are grassy ecosystems (22)(23)(24).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIsolated trees in tropical savannahs support biodiversity and provide food and shelter to humans.
“Likewise, isolated trees in tropical savannahs support biodiversity in these ecosystems, as well as providing food and shelter to humans (25).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCrop management and soil moisture are important determinants of emissions, whereby waterlogging and soil compaction generally are associated with high CH4 emissions.
“Crop management and soil moisture are also important determinants of emissions whereby waterlogging and soil compaction generally are associated with high CH 4 emissions (42).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBetter access to input and output markets lowers costs of applied inputs and transportation, ultimately increasing profit margins, which provides greater capacity for reinvestment in SLM.
“Similarly, better access to input and output markets lowers the costs of applied inputs (e.g., fertilizer) and transportation (e.g., for sales), ultimately increasing profit margins, which provides greater capacity for reinvestment in SLM.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRuminant livestock are the main source of CH4 from the agricultural sector, and rice cultivation is the most important source of CH4 from agricultural soils.
“Whereas ruminant livestock are the main source of CH 4 from the agricultural sector, rice cultivation is the most important source of CH 4 from agricultural soils (41).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Humphreys J, 2019, Geoderma Reg source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCarbon sinks or sources in grasslands depend heavily on previous land use, climate, and/or time since conversion.
“Others have argued that carbon sinks or sources in grasslands depend heavily on the previous land use, climate, and/or time since conversion (38).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe large variation in estimates of wetland areal extent is due to the lack of an accepted definition of wetlands and difficulties in linking definitions with data sources.
“This large variation is due to the lack of an accepted definition of wetlands and difficulties in linking definitions with data sources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe most important human drivers of wetland decline are urbanization, drainage for agricultural expansion, and increasing use of irrigation in agriculture causing wetlands to dry.
“The most important human drivers of wetland decline are urbanization, drainage for agricultural expansion, and increasing use of irrigation in agriculture causing wetlands to dry (48).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHistorical data on the areal extent of wetlands are highly uncertain, but an estimated 87% of the world's wetlands were lost in the past 300 years, 54% since 1900, and 35% since 1970.
“Historical data on their areal extent are highly uncertain, but an estimated 87% of the world's wetlands were lost in the past 300 years, 54% since 1900 (47), and 35% since 1970 (48).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [47] Prince S, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [48] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationClimate change is projected to exacerbate wetland degradation due to increasing evaporation and increasing demand for irrigation, as well as enhancing fire risks.
“Climate change is projected to exacerbate the degradation of wetlands due to increasing evaporation and increasing demand for irrigation, as well as enhancing fire risks (49) (Section 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenBuilding dams alters habitats and results in biodiversity loss, putting pressure on freshwater megafauna by blocking fish migration, range contraction, and population decline.
“The building of dams alters habitats and results in biodiversity loss putting pressure on freshwater megafauna by blocking fish migration, range contraction, and population decline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenWildfires that have coevolved with an ecosystem are not a degrading feature.
“Although wildfires that have coevolved with an ecosystem are not a degrading feature, there is concern that a change in fire regimes caused by climate change could negatively interfere with the integrity of an ecosystem, lead to changes in biome type, and cause increased risk to the human populations living in fire-prone environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIncreasing droughts will cause stress to coastal and inland wetlands.
“Increasing droughts will cause stress to coastal and inland wetlands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFrequently burned sites across continents were found to have up to tenfold less soil organic matter decomposing extracellular enzyme activity and up to 185% lower soil carbon and nitrogen concentrations due to reduced biomass inputs and reduced tree abundance.
“Frequently burned sites across continents were found to have up to tenfold less soil organic matter decomposing extracellular enzyme activity and up to 185% lower soil carbon and nitrogen concentrations due to reduced biomass inputs and reduced tree abundance (80).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWildfires in boreal regions, which have experienced overproportional warming, can accelerate permafrost thaw and cause large carbon losses from vegetation and organic soils.
“Wildfires in boreal regions, which have experienced overproportional warming, can accelerate permafrost thaw and cause large carbon losses from vegetation and organic soils.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationClimate change is expected to become more important for degradation in the future, exacerbating the effects of land-use change.
“Although climate change has until now had relatively minor impacts on degradation, it is expected to become more important for degradation in the future (3, 4), exacerbating the effects of land-use change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Olsson L, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [4] Mirzabaev A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDroughts usually evolve relatively slowly, posing difficulties in identifying their onset and end, although rapid onset of flash droughts is also possible.
“Droughts usually evolve relatively slowly, posing difficulties in identifying their onset and end (64), although the rapid onset of flash droughts is also possible (65).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [64] Wilhite D, 2017
- cites [65] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationResponding to droughts proactively by increasing the resilience of societies and ecosystems was found to be more efficient in limiting drought impacts than reactive drought relief efforts, which are still widely practiced across the world.
“Responding to droughts proactively by increasing the resilience of societies and ecosystems was found to be more efficient in limiting drought impacts than reactive drought relief efforts, which are still widely practiced across the world (4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Mirzabaev A, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenIgnition sources, vegetation characteristics, land use, fire management, and climate all play a role in determining the frequency, severity, and spread of wildfires.
“Ignition sources, vegetation characteristics, land use, fire management, and climate all play a role in determining the frequency, severity, and spread of wildfires.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMeasures to achieve mitigation in land ecosystems with immediate positive synergies with conservation and adaptation are foremost a reduction in the conversion of forest and nonforest (semi)natural ecosystems into intensively managed ecosystems, together with the restoration of ecosystems with large carbon sequestration potential.
“Measures to achieve mitigation in land ecosystems with immediate positive synergies with conservation and adaptation are foremost a reduction in the conversion of forest and nonforest (semi)natural ecosystems into intensively managed ecosystems, together with the restoration of ecosystems with large carbon sequestration potential.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn mountainous regions, landslides and other impacts of intensive rainfall are often the major cause of climate-related loss of life and damage to property.
“In mountainous regions, landslides and other impacts of intensive rainfall are often the major cause of climate-related loss of life and damage to property (90).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMultiple and very different indicators need to be used that are cognizant of the agreements made in international conventions as well as capturing local consequences.
“Measuring and monitoring the success of combined mitigation-adaptation approaches is nontrivial; multiple and very different indicators need to be used that are cognizant of the agreements made in international conventions as well as capturing local consequences (101).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [101] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenActing immediately and simultaneously with regionally adjusted measures would enhance food, fiber, and water security, help to curb loss of biodiversity, as well as alleviate and reverse land degradation, without compromising the nonmaterial or regulating benefits from land ecosystems.
“Acting immediately and simultaneously with regionally adjusted measures would enhance food, fiber, and water security, help to curb loss of biodiversity, as well as alleviate and reverse land degradation, without compromising the nonmaterial or regulating benefits from land ecosystems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Socioeconomic drivers of degradation such as population growth and increasing per capita demand for ecosystem services are projected to continue into the future.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhen faced with climate change, restoration will be about managing change, with a return to historical states hard or impossible to achieve.
“When faced with climate change, restoration will be about managing change, with a return to historical states hard or impossible to achieve.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationRemoval of residues that would otherwise be retained on the soil surface increases the risk of soil erosion and depletes soil organic matter.
“Likewise, removal of residues that would otherwise be retained on the soil surface increases the risk of soil erosion and depletes soil organic matter (93,94).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDemand for bioenergy is anticipated to grow along with demand for other renewables, especially bioenergy linked with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), which emerges in future scenarios as one of the few technologies that can deliver carbon dioxide removal at required scales.
“Demand for bioenergy is anticipated to grow along with demand for other renewables, especially bioenergy linked with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), which emerges in future scenarios as one of the few technologies that can deliver carbon dioxide removal at required scales.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [91] IPCC (Intergov. Panel Clim. Change), 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBiodiversity and productivity in forests are positively correlated globally.
“Biodiversity and productivity in forests are positively correlated globally (118).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [118] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe overall impact on productivity (as an important degradation measure) will likely differ between regions and ecosystem types.
“The overall impact on productivity (as an important degradation measure) will likely differ between regions and ecosystem types.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnimals have an essential role in shaping habitat structure, ecosystem productivity, and nutrient cycling.
“These discussions mostly neglect the role of animals, despite their essential role in shaping habitat structure, ecosystem productivity, and nutrient cycling (122).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [122] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenPractices that enhance soil carbon and nutrients in principle should deliver the same yields with less input and hence be more economically viable.
“Practices that enhance soil carbon and nutrients in principle should deliver the same yields with less input and hence be more economically viable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationUsing timber in construction has a large potential to decrease carbon emissions from concrete and steel production and provide long-term carbon storage in wood.
“In addition to the carbon removal during tree growth, Churkina et al. (112) recently estimated a large potential for using timber in construction, which decreases carbon emissions from concrete and steel production and provides long-term carbon storage in wood.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [112] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo strategies apply to address barriers: revision of policies that impede restoration objectives and introduction of targeted initiatives that could directly help remove key barriers.
“In principle, two strategies apply (141): the revision of policies that impede restoration objectives and the introduction of targeted initiatives that could directly help remove the key barriers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] Wreford A, 2017 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMore than 120 countries have already committed to set land degradation neutrality targets.
“More than 120 countries have already committed to set land degradation neutrality targets (https://www.unccd.int/actions/ldn-target-setting- programme).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites https://www.unccd.int/actions/ldn-target-setting- programme
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationEffective mainstreaming of mitigation and adaptation in sustainable land and forest management needs to combine the advantages of centralized governance with those of more horizontal structures.
“Effective main-streaming of mitigation and adaptation in sustainable land and forest management needs to combine the advantages of centralized governance (notably coordination, stability, compliance) with those of more horizontal structures (that allow flexibility, autonomy for local decision-making, multistakeholder engagement, co-management) (133).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [133] Acosta LA, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenClimate change is expected to exacerbate degradation processes in many regions, while degradation-related greenhouse gas emissions and the loss of carbon sink capacity in turn contribute to climate change.
“Climate change is expected to exacerbate degradation processes in many regions, while degradation-related greenhouse gas emissions and the loss of carbon sink capacity in turn contribute to climate change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationApproximately 30% of government pledges in the NDCs are predicated on land-based measures to help achieve their climate change mitigation and/or adaptation goals, but many of the measures are not yet clearly defined.
“Approximately 30% of government pledges in the NDCs are predicated on land-based measures to help achieve their climate change mitigation and/or adaptation goals, but many of the measures are not yet clearly defined (138).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [138] Seddon N, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSuccessful restoration will be much more about managing change, with a return to a pristine historical ecosystem state in some places difficult or impossible to achieve.
“Successful restoration will, therefore, be much more about managing change, with a return to a pristine historical ecosystem state in some places difficult or impossible to achieve.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationThe results of Wolff et al. highlight the importance of targeted land-management measures that are consistent with policy targets of global restoration.
“This highlighted the importance of targeted land-management measures that are consistent with policy targets of global restoration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenRestoration measures could also be aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement.
“restoration measures could also be aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningGlobal leadership could advance such local initiatives.
“Global leadership could advance such local initiatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSoft barriers to restoration include human, social, economic, institutional, and technological barriers.
“Soft barriers to restoration include human (cognitive and behavioral obstacles), social (undermined participation in decision-making and inequity), economic (market failures, perverse incentives, lack of domestic funds), institutional (mal-coordination of policies, government failures, path-dependent institutions and a lack of cross-sectoral policy making), and technological (140).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [140] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe SSPs currently widely used in the global environmental change research community vary in their challenges to climate change adaptation and mitigation, but do not specify challenges to nature conservation, nor many of the critical drivers of ecosystem change.
“The SSPs currently widely used in the global environmental change research community vary in their challenges to climate change adaptation and mitigation, but do not specify challenges to nature conservation, nor many of the critical drivers of ecosystem change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The SSPs are currently widely used in the global environmental change research community.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThese new models could be used to identify the environmental and societal co-benefits of considering multiple ecosystem services as part of human agency.
“These new models could be used to identify the environmental and societal co-benefits of considering multiple ecosystem services as part of human agency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe required efforts of coordination and societal and policy coherence are massive.
“Nevertheless, the required efforts of coordination and societal and policy coherence are massive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBarriers specific to restoration may include a perceived lack of financial benefit, insufficient information or education, prohibitive costs of adoption, lack of access to credit, systems of uncertain land tenure, and lack of infrastructure or appropriate spatial planning.
“Barriers specific to restoration may include a perceived lack of financial benefit, insufficient information or education, prohibitive costs of adoption, lack of access to credit, systems of uncertain land tenure, and lack of infrastructure or appropriate spatial planning (141) (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] Wreford A, 2017 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningApplying new modeling methods to novel scenario frameworks would help to identify plausible pathways that achieve multiple societal and political visions, while concurrently avoiding further degradation.
“Given the challenges at hand, but also the multiple co-benefits from restoration, applying new modeling methods to novel scenario frameworks would help to identify plausible pathways that achieve multiple societal and political visions, while concurrently avoiding further degradation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenMany of these barriers can be addressed.
“Many of these barriers can be addressed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough there is climate change mitigation potential in restoring forests (and avoiding further deforestation), if done poorly, both land-based climate change mitigation measures and restoration measures could backfire.
“Although there is climate change mitigation potential in restoring forests (and avoiding further deforestation), if done poorly, both land-based climate change mitigation measures and restoration measures could backfire.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese measures also contribute to many SDGs, including 15 (through restored landscapes and protected forests and biodiversity), 13 (through carbon capture and storage and enhanced ecosystem resilience), and 1 (by increasing income from forest and agriculture sector).
“These measures also contribute to many SDGs, including 15 (through restored landscapes and protected forests and biodiversity), 13 (through carbon capture and storage and enhanced ecosystem resilience), and 1 (by increasing income from forest and agriculture sector).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Many synergies exist between restoration and key international policy areas that relate to nature-based solutions for climate change mitigation and adaptation (UNFCCC), avoiding and reducing degradation and restoring degraded land (UNCCD), and the CBD and its Aichi Biodiversity Targets.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFuture climate change will cause shifts in species distributions and ranges that may go beyond the boundaries of static protected areas and/or increase the number and frequency of episodic, forest stand-destroying events such as wildfire or insect and pest outbreaks.
“Future climate change will cause shifts in species distributions and ranges that may go beyond the boundaries of static protected areas and/or increase the number and frequency of episodic, forest stand-destroying events such as wildfire or insect and pest outbreaks (12).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningImpacts could cascade through SDGs due to trade-offs between land for climate mitigation versus food production, or between forest biomass-based livelihoods versus global carbon storage with impacts on poverty alleviation.
“Impacts could cascade through SDGs due to trade-offs between land for climate mitigation versus food production, or between forest biomass-based livelihoods versus global carbon storage with impacts on poverty alleviation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenLand degradation is a ubiquitous challenge to human societies, driven mostly by socioeconomic factors.
“Land degradation is a ubiquitous challenge to human societies, driven mostly by socioeconomic factors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenEnhanced adoption of SLM technologies and the initiation of land restoration and rehabilitation activities will require overcoming numerous societal and economic barriers to provide the necessary incentive for increased investments in land restoration.
“Enhanced adoption of SLM technologies and the initiation of land restoration and rehabilitation activities will require overcoming numerous societal and economic barriers to provide the necessary incentive for increased investments in land restoration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenLand-based solutions aimed only at greenhouse gas mitigation, such as large-scale afforestation or bioenergy plantations, are at risk of contributing to land degradation and can have other negative, unintended societal and environmental consequences.
“Land-based solutions aimed only at greenhouse gas mitigation, such as large-scale afforestation or bioenergy plantations, are at risk of contributing to land degradation and can have other negative, unintended societal and environmental consequences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenActing immediately and simultaneously with regionally adjusted measures to alleviate and reverse land degradation would enhance food, fiber, and water security and help to curb loss of biodiversity, without compromising the nonmaterial or regulating benefits from land.
“Acting immediately and simultaneously with regionally adjusted measures to alleviate and reverse land degradation would enhance food, fiber, and water security and help to curb loss of biodiversity, without compromising the nonmaterial or regulating benefits from land.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe success of land restoration activities can be promoted by the provision of incentive schemes such as payments for ecosystem services.
“The success of land restoration activities can be promoted by the provision of incentive schemes such as payments for ecosystem services, although more research and experimentation is needed to test other options, especially in nonforest ecosystems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenGovernance is key to fostering successful restoration if it supports the identification and integration of the interests of all actors, but the degree of extant environmental change commitments and the rate of change can pose hard environmental and social limits.
“Governance is key to fostering successful restoration if it supports the identification and integration of the interests of all actors, but the degree of extant environmental change commitments and the rate of change can pose hard environmental and social limits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSynergies exist between fostering restoration in international policies and goals related to the Paris Agreement, land degradation neutrality targets, and the post-2020 biodiversity targets.
“Synergies exist between fostering restoration in international policies and goals related to, for example, the Paris Agreement, land degradation neutrality targets, and the post-2020 biodiversity targets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenInvestment in diverse restoration efforts, and land set aside for conservation, can generate co-benefits for climate change mitigation and adaptation, economically and more broadly for human and societal well-being.
“Investment in diverse restoration efforts, and land set aside for conservation, can generate co-benefits for climate change mitigation and adaptation, economically and more broadly for human and societal well-being.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenRemoving the existing barriers to adaptation requires multilevel governance supported by crossdisciplinary scientific knowledge of natural, economic, and societal drivers and impacts.
“Removing the existing barriers to their adaptation (such as financial incentives and the redirection of perverse subsidies, access to knowledge and technology, enforcement of environmental policies, appropriate spatial planning) requires multilevel governance supported by crossdisciplinary scientific knowledge of natural, economic, and societal drivers and impacts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenClimate change is expected to increase in importance as a driver of degradation in the future, exacerbating the effects of land use and management.
“Climate change is expected to increase in importance as a driver of degradation in the future, exacerbating the effects of land use and management.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMultiple strands of evidence show that degradation can be halted and reversed with appropriate land management practices, which would deliver co-benefits for a range of sustainable development objectives.
“However, multiple strands of evidence show that degradation can be halted and reversed with appropriate land management practices, which would deliver co-benefits for a range of sustainable development objectives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
These grasslands represent the key source of livelihoods for approximately 100 million to 200 million pastoralists around the world.
“These grasslands represent the key source of livelihoods for approximately 100 million to 200 million pastoralists around the world.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Grasslands provide essential supporting, regulating, and cultural ecosystem functions and services.
“Grasslands also provide essential supporting, regulating, and cultural ecosystem functions and services.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Tropical grassy ecosystems harbor approximately half of the vascular plant richness found in tropical forests, and species richness for mammals, birds, and amphibians is also high.
“For instance, tropical grassy ecosystems harbor approximately half of the vascular plant richness found in tropical forests, and species richness for mammals, birds, and amphibians is also high.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Grassland degradation is a widespread phenomenon, with overgrazing being a key driver, together with frequent wheel traffic, or overfertilization, all of which result in changes in sward composition, reduction in yields, and deterioration of soils.
“Grassland degradation is a widespread phenomenon, with overgrazing being a key driver, together with frequent wheel traffic, or overfertilization, all of which result in changes in sward composition, reduction in yields, and deterioration of soils.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Grasslands can act as carbon sinks, transferring carbon below-ground via their expansive root systems.
“Grasslands can act as carbon sinks, transferring carbon below-ground via their expansive root systems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The global extent of land used for grazing is estimated to be 28–42 Mkm², with the range mainly determined by differences in definitions.
“The global extent of land used for grazing is estimated to be 28-42 Mkm², the range being mainly determined by differences in definitions.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Grassland established after deforestation can be assumed to be under intensive management schemes.
“and can be assumed to be under intensive management schemes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Grasslands are sources of ruminant methane (CH4) emissions and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from excreta or fertilized pastures.
“grasslands are sources of ruminant methane (CH 4 ) emissions as well as nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions from excreta or fertilized pastures.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Modern conventional agriculture is a driver of terrestrial and marine ecosystem degradation and emissions of greenhouse gases.
“It is axiomatic that modern conventional agriculture is a driver of terrestrial and marine ecosystem degradation as well as emissions of greenhouse gases.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Agricultural soils and practices are a major source of CH4 and N2O.
“Agricultural soils and practices are also a major source of CH 4 and N 2 O.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Within the agricultural and forestry sector, annual emissions of CH4 and N2O together are similar (in CO2-equivalents) to emissions of CO2 from net deforestation.
“Within the agricultural and forestry sector, annual emissions of CH 4 and N 2 O together are similar (in CO 2 -equivalents) to emissions of CO 2 from net deforestation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Wetlands play a vital role for a range of ecosystem services, such as flood control, water purification, groundwater replenishment, and nutrient retention, and they are often hotspots of biodiversity.
“Wetlands play a vital role for a range of ecosystem services, such as flood control, water purification, groundwater replenishment, and nutrient retention, and they are often hotspots of biodiversity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Wetlands are under severe stress and subject to degradation.
“Despite their importance, wetlands are under severe stress and subject to degradation.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The intensification of the hydrological cycle is at least linearly linked to warming at a rate of 6-7% per degree K (the Clausius-Clapeyron response).
“Theoretically, the intensification is assumed to be at least linearly linked to warming at a rate of 6-7% per degree K (the Clausius-Clapeyron response), but empirical evidence and model studies indicate a steeper increase in precipitation intensity, particularly in dry regions (82,83).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Erosion from agricultural fields under conventional tillage is often 2-3 orders of magnitude larger than the rate of soil formation.
“Erosion from agricultural fields under conventional tillage is often 2-3 orders of magnitude larger than the rate of soil formation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Unsustainable harvesting of fuelwood for domestic use is a major cause of land degradation, especially in tropical and dryland regions.
“Unsustainable harvesting of fuelwood for domestic use is a major cause of land degradation, especially in tropical and dryland regions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Expansion of purpose-grown energy crops such as canola, soy, miscanthus, or oil palm causes loss of carbon stocks in biomass and soil, loss of soil fertility, and loss of biodiversity if it leads, directly or indirectly, to the conversion of grassland or natural forest to cropland or plantations and/or to further environmentally detrimental intensification of cropland management.
“Expansion of purposegrown energy crops such as canola, soy, miscanthus, or oil palm causes loss of carbon stocks in biomass and soil, loss of soil fertility, and loss of biodiversity if it leads, directly or indirectly, to the conversion of grassland or natural forest to cropland or plantations and/or to further environmentally detrimental intensification of cropland management.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Socioeconomic drivers of degradation such as population growth and increasing per capita demand for ecosystem services are projected to continue into the future.
“Socioeconomic drivers of degradation such as population growth and increasing per capita demand for ecosystem services are projected to continue into the future.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Reductions in net greenhouse gas emissions or atmospherically reactive precursors of climate forcers are in principle measurable, but these measurements are often technically complex and expensive and require large investment in human power and instrumental infrastructure.
“For instance, reductions in net greenhouse gas emissions or atmospherically reactive precursors of climate forcers are in principle measurable, but these measurements are often technically complex and expensive and require large investment in human power and instrumental infrastructure.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The effectiveness of measures may only become evident years or even decades after implementation.
“In both cases, the effectiveness of measures may only become evident years or even decades after implementation, such as the carbon uptake of a restored forest (including the fate of wood products or carbon losses through fire or insects) or the net carbon budget (CO 2 versus CH 4 ) and catchment water balance in restored wetlands, which may take decades to centuries to semiequilibrate.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Carbon sinks decline in all forests as they mature.
“Carbon sinks decline in all forests as they mature.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Biophysical surface exchange processes in tropical forests cause local cooling as a climate co-benefit.
“Biophysical surface exchange processes in tropical forests, with often large evapotranspiration rates, cause local cooling as a climate co-benefit.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Animals have carbon to nitrogen ratios lower than plant material.
“And animals have carbon to nitrogen ratios that are lower than plant material; hence, the return of nutrients to soil in the form of animal feces has quite different decomposition rates than plant litter.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The return of nutrients to soil in the form of animal feces has quite different decomposition rates than plant litter.
“And animals have carbon to nitrogen ratios that are lower than plant material; hence, the return of nutrients to soil in the form of animal feces has quite different decomposition rates than plant litter.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The presence or absence of large carnivores impacts type and density of prey animals, including the abundance of herbivores and the type and amount of consumed green leaf area.
“Furthermore, the presence or absence of large carnivores impacts type and density of prey animals, including the abundance of herbivores and the type and amount of consumed green leaf area.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Earthworms and termites are well known for their role in decomposition of litter and soil organic matter and nutrient turnover.
““Soil engineers” such as earthworms and termites are well known for their role in decomposition of litter and soil organic matter and nutrient turnover.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Perennial woody or herbaceous energy crops are able to grow, albeit slowly, on low fertility soils.
“Likewise, perennial woody or herbaceous energy crops (e.g., grasses such as switchgrass or Miscanthus species) can be grown where topsoil has been lost, as they are able to grow, albeit slowly, on low fertility soils.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Wolves preying on moose in Northern American boreal forests enhance NPP and net ecosystem carbon uptake by up to 30% via increased growth of deciduous trees and enhanced tree leaf area index.
“Wolves preying on moose in Northern American boreal forests were also estimated to enhance NPP and net ecosystem carbon uptake by up to 30% via increased growth of deciduous trees (which, as the preferred fodder of moose, are suppressed in their presence) and enhanced tree leaf area index.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are very few examples of large-scale scenarios of restoring degraded land.
“Although scenario analysis is used widely across the environmental sciences, there are very few examples of large-scale scenarios of restoring degraded land.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Restoration is part of the CBD's post-2020 biodiversity targets expected to be agreed at the next UN CBD COP in China in 2021.
“Restoration is also part of the CBD's post-2020 biodiversity targets that are expected to be agreed upon at the next UN CBD Conference of the Parties (COP) in China (which will take place in 2021)”
The paper relies on this without support.
At least 66% of Paris Agreement signatories include nature-based solutions in some form in their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).
“At least 66% of Paris Agreement signatories were found to include nature-based solutions in some form in their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).”
The paper relies on this without support.
An important share of the economic benefits of restoration is in the form of nonprovisioning ecosystem services, which benefit society as a whole, but individual land users cannot fully monetize these benefits.
“Firstly, an important share of the economic benefits of restoration is in the form of nonprovisioning ecosystem services, which benefit society as a whole, but individual land users cannot fully monetize these benefits.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Benefits of private goods may accrue only after a long period of time, while up-front costs may be prohibitively high, especially for the poor without access to credit.
“Secondly, even when the value of private goods can be realized by land users, the benefits may accrue only after a long period of time, while up-front costs may be prohibitively high, especially for the poor without access to credit.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Continuing institutional barriers such as land tenure insecurity and lack of access to rural advisory services pose formidable barriers to the wider adoption of SLM practices and technologies.
“Furthermore, continuing institutional barriers such as land tenure insecurity and lack of access to rural advisory services, i.e., to the information and know-how about SLM and land restoration technologies, pose formidable barriers to the wider adoption of SLM practices and technologies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many synergies exist between restoration and key international policy areas that relate to nature-based solutions for climate change mitigation and adaptation (UNFCCC), avoiding and reducing degradation and restoring degraded land (UNCCD), and the CBD and its Aichi Biodiversity Targets.
“Many synergies exist between restoration and key international policy areas that relate to nature-based solutions for climate change mitigation and adaptation (UNFCCC), avoiding and reducing degradation and restoring degraded land (UNCCD), and the CBD and its Aichi Biodiversity Targets.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Large uncertainties about the future exist.
“Given large uncertainties about the future (and a general lack of restoration scenarios) static goals and policies that aim to achieve restoration (and sustainable development more generally) are likely to fail.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
There is a general lack of restoration scenarios.
“Given large uncertainties about the future (and a general lack of restoration scenarios) static goals and policies that aim to achieve restoration (and sustainable development more generally) are likely to fail.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The SSPs are currently widely used in the global environmental change research community.
“The SSPs currently widely used in the global environmental change research community vary in their challenges to climate change adaptation and mitigation, but do not specify challenges to nature conservation, nor many of the critical drivers of ecosystem change.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Bioenergy section is cited as Section 3.3
MinorThe text directs readers to Section 3.3 for bioenergy, but the Bioenergy section is numbered 3.4. Section 3.3 covers rainfall extremes and floods.
“Mitigating climate change by utilizing vast land areas globally for the production of bioenergy (Section 3.3)”
“## 3.4. Bioenergy”
Cites
(2019) · Cited by 3,602 · see citing works
Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020
(2020) · doi:10.4060/ca9825en · Cited by 3,408 · see citing works
Forest disturbances under climate change
Seidl, R., Thom, D., Kautz, M., Martin-Benito, D., Peltoniemi, M., Vacchiano, G., Wild, J., Ascoli, D., Petr, M., Honkaniemi, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3303 · Cited by 2,878 · see citing works
Greening of the Earth and its drivers
Zhu, Z., Piao, S., Myneni, R. B., Huang, M., Zeng, Z., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Sitch, S., Friedlingstein, P., Arneth, A., et al. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3004 · Cited by 2,779 · see citing works
Self-citationMapping the world’s free-flowing rivers
Grill, G., Lehner, B., Thieme, M., Geenen, B., Tickner, D., Antonelli, F., Babu, S., Borrelli, P., Cheng, L., Crochetiere, H., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1111-9 · Cited by 2,473 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Only 37% of rivers longer than 1,000 km remain free-flowing over their entire length, often in very remote regions (57).”
BackgroundSeddon, N., Chausson, A., Berry, P., Girardin, C. A. J., Smith, A., & Turner, B. (2020) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0120 · Cited by 2,024 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These are difficult to gauge and difficult to compare, which often prevents the assessment of co-benefits or trade-offs (101, 103).”
BackgroundFarming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000
Ramankutty, N., Evan, A. T., Monfreda, C., & Foley, J. A. (2008) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2007gb002952 · Cited by 1,942 · cited 1× · see citing works
“org; any grazing land used for more than five consecutive years), spans 28 (33) to 34 Mkm2, including extensively used natural grasslands (Section 2.”
BackgroundMore extreme precipitation in the world’s dry and wet regions
Donat, M. G., Lowry, A. L., Alexander, L. V., O’Gorman, P. A., & Maher, N. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2941 · Cited by 1,792 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Theoretically, the intensification is assumed to be at least linearly linked to warming at a rate of 6–7% per degree K (the Clausius-Clapeyron response), but empirical evidence and model studies indicate a steeper increase in precipitation intensity, particularly in dry regions (82, 83).”
BackgroundLe Quéré, C., Andrew, R. M., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Hauck, J., Pongratz, J., Pickers, P. A., Korsbakken, J. I., Peters, G. P., Canadell, J. G., et al. (2018) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-10-2141-2018 · Cited by 1,645 · see citing works
Self-citationNegative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects
Fuss, S., Lamb, W. F., Callaghan, M. W., Hilaire, J., Creutzig, F., Amann, T., Beringer, T., de Oliveira Garcia, W., Hartmann, J., Khanna, T., et al. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f · Cited by 1,525 · see citing works
Soil carbon debt of 12,000 years of human land use
Sanderman, J., Hengl, T., & Fiske, G. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1706103114 · Cited by 1,495 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Since the Neolithic Revolution some 12,000 years ago, the upper 2mof soils are estimated to have lost almost 116GtC,of which 37GtC have been attributed to croplands and associated vegetation cover classes (39).”
BackgroundPositive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests
Liang, J., Crowther, T. W., Picard, N., Wiser, S., Zhou, M., Alberti, G., Schulze, E.-D., McGuire, A. D., Bozzato, F., Pretzsch, H., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf8957 · Cited by 1,490 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Biodiversity and productivity in forests are positively correlated globally (118).”
BackgroundThe role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions
Bossio, D. A., Cook-Patton, S. C., Ellis, P. W., Fargione, J., Sanderman, J., Smith, P., Wood, S., Zomer, R. J., von Unger, M., Emmer, I. M., et al. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0491-z · Cited by 1,273 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Proven and cost-effective methods exist that can be implemented now to increase the soil carbon content of agricultural soils without compromising productivity and food security (40).”
BackgroundBuildings as a global carbon sink
Churkina, G., Organschi, A., Reyer, C. P. O., Ruff, A., Vinke, K., Liu, Z., Reck, B. K., Graedel, T. E., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0462-4 · Cited by 1,045 · see citing works
Livestock: On our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate
Mottet, A., de Haan, C., Falcucci, A., Tempio, G., Opio, C., & Gerber, P. (2017) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2017.01.001 · Cited by 1,034 · see citing works
Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities
Bullock, J. M., Aronson, J. C., Newton, A. C., Pywell, R. F., & Beñayas, J. M. R. (2011) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011 · Cited by 1,009 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This might be achieved by restoring natural water flow regimes, the passive regrowth of natural vegetation (which can still be used at low intensity), or actively replanting managed land with vegetation that consists of at least some of the dominant native species (148, 149).”
BackgroundFolke, C. (2016) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09088-210444 · Cited by 982 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Governance is key in fostering restoration because of its social function in steering collective behavior toward desired outcomes and decision-making by individuals, households, markets, organizations, and government (132).”
BackgroundClimate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests
Anderegg, W. R. L., Trugman, A. T., Badgley, G., Anderson, C. M., Bartuska, A., Ciais, P., Cullenward, D., Field, C. B., Freeman, J., Goetz, S. J., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz7005 · Cited by 854 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Future climate change is expected to accelerate degradation most strongly through weather extremes (heatwaves, drought, floods) and associated episodic events such as wildfire and insect outbreaks (12), given that these extremes override the positive impacts that might arise from trends in temperature, precipitation,…”
BackgroundInfluentialEffects of grazing on grassland soil carbon: a global review
McSherry, M. E., & Ritchie, M. E. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12144 · Cited by 829 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A meta-analysis of studies found that heavy grazing decreases soil organic carbon content in grassland dominated by vegetation of the C3 photosynthetic pathway and increased soil organic carbon content in mixed and C4 photosynthetic-type grasslands (37).”
BackgroundGlobal spread of Conservation Agriculture
Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., & Derpsch, R. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Studies · doi:10.1080/00207233.2018.1494927 · Cited by 818 · see citing works
Drylands extent and environmental issues. A global approach
Prăvălie, R. (2016) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.08.003 · Cited by 816 · see citing works
Mayer, M., Prescott, C. E., Abaker, W. E. A., Augusto, L., Cécillon, L., Ferreira, G. W. D., James, J., Jandl, R., Katzensteiner, K., Laclau, J.-P., et al. (2020) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118127 · Cited by 748 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Likewise, residue removal or whole-tree harvest can also cause soil disturbance, and remove root, stump, or bark biomass that would otherwise be part of soil organic matter cycling, including the formation of recalcitrant carbon pools (19).”
BackgroundNisbet, E. G., Manning, M. R., Dlugokencky, E. J., Fisher, R. E., Lowry, D., Michel, S. E., Myhre, C. L., Platt, S. M., Allen, G., Bousquet, P., et al. (2019) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2018gb006009 · Cited by 735 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Global CH4 emissions have risen rapidly since 2007, with a further acceleration after 2014 (50).”
BackgroundRole of forest regrowth in global carbon sink dynamics
Pugh, T. A. M., Lindeskog, M., Smith, B., Poulter, B., Arneth, A., Haverd, V., & Calle, L. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1810512116 · Cited by 731 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Globally, the estimated forest carbon sink for 2001–2010 was approximately 40% in intact old-growth forests and 60% in regrowing forests (18).”
BackgroundSelf-citationFire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, losses of properties and lives and local and long-range air pollution (75).”
BackgroundUnexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass
Erb, K.-H., Kastner, T., Plutzar, C., Bais, A. L. S., Carvalhais, N., Fetzel, T., Gingrich, S., Haberl, H., Lauk, C., Niedertscheider, M., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25138 · Cited by 727 · see citing works
Self-citationLand-use intensification causes multitrophic homogenization of grassland communities
Gossner, M. M., Lewinsohn, T. M., Kahl, T., Grassein, F., Boch, S., Prati, D., Birkhofer, K., Renner, S. C., Sikorski, J., Wubet, T., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20575 · Cited by 706 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Intensively used grasslands are relatively species-poor (34); grazing systems are also particularly threatened by invasive plant species (35).”
BackgroundCarbon Storage and Fluxes within Freshwater Wetlands: a Critical Review
Kayranli, B., Scholz, M., Mustafa, A., & Hedmark, Å. (2010) · Wetlands · doi:10.1007/s13157-009-0003-4 · Cited by 690 · see citing works
Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century
Krausmann, F., Erb, K.-H., Gingrich, S., Haberl, H., Bondeau, A., Gaube, V., Lauk, C., Plutzar, C., & Searchinger, T. D. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211349110 · Cited by 666 · see citing works
Self-citationGlobal Forest Transition: Prospects for an End to Deforestation
Meyfroidt, P., & Lambin, E. F. (2011) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-090710-143732 · Cited by 659 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Because forest degradation involves a decline in productivity, in many regions, there is now recognition of the need for forest conservation and rehabilitation and a transition to more sustainable forest management in production forestry (21).”
BackgroundLand in balance: The scientific conceptual framework for Land Degradation Neutrality
Cowie, A. L., Orr, B. J., Castillo Sanchez, V. M., Chasek, P., Crossman, N. D., Erlewein, A., Louwagie, G., Maron, M., Metternicht, G. I., Minelli, S., et al. (2018) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.011 · Cited by 653 · cited 1× · see citing works
“3 of the SDGs, provides an incentive and framework that encourages strategic actions to restore and rehabilitate degraded land, within the context of integrated landscape planning and management, aimed at delivering multiple environmental and development objectives (136).”
BackgroundSelf-citationA global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success
Crouzeilles, R., Curran, M., Ferreira, M. S., Lindenmayer, D. B., Grelle, C. E. V., & Rey Benayas, J. M. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11666 · Cited by 652 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A global meta-analysis found that forest restoration can increase biodiversity (mammals, birds, herpetofauna, invertebrates, and plants) by 15–84% and vegetation structure (biomass, cover, stem density, and height or amount of leaf litter) by 36–77% above degraded ecosystems—although values remained below those found…”
BackgroundHalofsky, J. E., Peterson, D. L., & Harvey, B. J. (2020) · Fire Ecology · doi:10.1186/s42408-019-0062-8 · Cited by 640 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Changes in fire regimes can also contribute to a shift in vegetation composition, as more frequent fires, especially those coinciding with drought or insect outbreaks, suppress seedling regeneration and push, for example, closed forests toward more open forest-steppe systems (77, 78).”
BackgroundAgriculture and Eutrophication: Where Do We Go from Here?
Withers, P., Neal, C., Jarvie, H., & Doody, D. (2014) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su6095853 · Cited by 565 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Under current climatic conditions, erosion and nutrient leakage from agricultural land is substantial and an important cause of deterioration of marine and terrestrial aquatic ecosystems (84, 85).”
BackgroundForest responses to increasing aridity and warmth in the southwestern United States
Williams, A. P., Allen, C. D., Millar, C. I., Swetnam, T. W., Michaelsen, J., Still, C. J., & Leavitt, S. W. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0914211107 · Cited by 549 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The projected increases in drought severity can also increase the incidence and extent of wildfires (73, 74).”
BackgroundWhere Tree Planting and Forest Expansion are Bad for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
Veldman, J. W., Overbeck, G. E., Negreiros, D., Mahy, G., Le Stradic, S., Fernandes, G. W., Durigan, G., Buisson, E., Putz, F. E., & Bond, W. J. (2015) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biv118 · Cited by 531 · cited 2× · see citing works
“5 Mkm2 of forested landscapes by 2030, have also been criticized for potentially leading to wasteful usage of planted forests as sources of bioenergy, further biodiversity loss, being detrimental to existing systems’ carbon storage, and challenging food production if local environmental constraints or societal concern…”
BackgroundScientific outcome of the IPBES-IPCC co-sponsored workshop on biodiversity and climate change
Pörtner, H.-O., Scholes, R. J., Agard, J., et al. (2021) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4659158 · Cited by 523 · see citing works
Self-citationEffectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions
Lambin, E. F., Meyfroidt, P., Rueda, X., Blackman, A., Börner, J., Cerutti, P. O., Dietsch, T., Jungmann, L., Lamarque, P., Lister, J., et al. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.007 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Anthropogenic influences on major tropical cyclone events
Patricola-DiRosario, C. M., & Wehner, M. F. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0673-2 · Cited by 480 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The overall frequency of tropical cyclones may not change, or may even decrease with continued climate change, but high intensity cyclones are expected to increase in number and intensity as well as the amount and intensity of rainfall (87, 88).”
BackgroundAn unexpectedly large count of trees in the West African Sahara and Sahel
Brandt, M., Tucker, C. J., Kariryaa, A., Rasmussen, K., Abel, C., Small, J., Chave, J., Rasmussen, L. V., Hiernaux, P., Diouf, A. A., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2824-5 · Cited by 466 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Likewise, isolated trees in tropical savannahs support biodiversity in these ecosystems, as well as providing food and shelter to humans (25).”
BackgroundForest restoration, biodiversity and ecosystem functioning
Aerts, R., & Honnay, O. (2011) · BMC Ecology · doi:10.1186/1472-6785-11-29 · Cited by 447 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As with agricultural ecosystems, restoring forests from a multiple ecosystem service perspective rather than climate change mitigation alone is a more promising approach, which requires consideration of multiple species and above- and below-ground functional diversity (117).”
BackgroundGang, C., Zhou, W., Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Sun, Z., Li, J., Qi, J., & Odeh, I. (2014) · Environmental Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12665-014-3322-6 · Cited by 423 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Analyses of remotely sensed vegetation greenness (and vegetation browning) as well as model-based studies found that climate change has contributed to degradation chiefly in regions located around 15–45oS, although studies disagree regarding the exact region of impact (36, 60, 61).”
BackgroundSmith, P., Calvin, K., Nkem, J., Campbell, D., Cherubini, F., Grassi, G., Korotkov, V., Le Hoang, A., Lwasa, S., McElwee, P., et al. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14878 · Cited by 422 · cited 7× · see citing works
“The global forest cover today is 32–43 Mkm2, whereas the prehuman forest cover has been estimated as approximately 50–55Mkm2; approximately two-thirds of remaining forests are currently under some form of management (1).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationThe biodiversity cost of carbon sequestration in tropical savanna
Abreu, R. C. R., Hoffmann, W. A., Vasconcelos, H. L., Pilon, N. A., Rossatto, D. R., & Durigan, G. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1701284 · Cited by 417 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Forests planted in savannahs or other ecosystems with low tree cover will critically damage these often highly species-diverse and carbon-rich ecosystems (113, 114).”
BackgroundImpact of 2019–2020 mega-fires on Australian fauna habitat
Ward, M., Tulloch, A. I. T., Radford, J. Q., Williams, B. A., Reside, A. E., Macdonald, S. L., Mayfield, H. J., Maron, M., Possingham, H. P., Vine, S. J., et al. (2020) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1251-1 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Marsooli, R., Lin, N., Emanuel, K., & Feng, K. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11755-z · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Long-term forest degradation surpasses deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
Matricardi, E. A. T., Skole, D. L., Costa, O. B., Pedlowski, M. A., Samek, J. H., & Miguel, E. P. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb3021 · Cited by 411 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Still, at least in many tropical forest regions, the area of degraded forests could well equal or even exceed the area of deforestation (15, 16); associated above-ground carbon losses have been estimated to increase estimates of gross deforestation losses by approximately 25% up to >600% (17), with additional, unknown…”
BackgroundPeatlands and Global Change: Response and Resilience
Page, S. E., & Baird, A. J. (2016) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085520 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Tian, H., Yang, J., Xu, R., Lu, C., Canadell, J. G., Davidson, E. A., Jackson, R. B., Arneth, A., Chang, J., Ciais, P., et al. (2019) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14514 · Cited by 384 · cited 1× · see citing works
“N2O emissions are generally associated with increased use of (mostly mineral) fertilizer, which (on an expanding area of cropland) has been estimated to have contributed>80%of theN2O emission increase since the 1860s (43).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAnimals and the zoogeochemistry of the carbon cycle
Schmitz, O. J., Wilmers, C. C., Leroux, S. J., Doughty, C. E., Atwood, T. B., Galetti, M., Davies, A. B., & Goetz, S. J. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar3213 · Cited by 372 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Large herbivores also influence ecosystem structure and function through physical impacts such as trampling or pushing over trees (122).”
BackgroundInfluentialDow, K., Berkhout, F., Preston, B. L., Klein, R. J. T., Midgley, G., & Shaw, M. R. (2013) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1847 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
The Imperative for Regenerative Agriculture
Rhodes, C. J. (2017) · Science Progress · doi:10.3184/003685017x14876775256165 · Cited by 352 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The shift from conventional agriculture, characterized by frequent tillage and complete removal of vegetation for parts of the season, to regenerative (or conservation) agriculture is particularly promising and universally applicable (104).”
BackgroundTropical dead zones and mass mortalities on coral reefs
Altieri, A. H., Harrison, S. B., Seemann, J., Collin, R., Diaz, R. J., & Knowlton, N. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1621517114 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Heat wave flash droughts in decline
Mo, K. C., & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2015) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2015gl064018 · Cited by 330 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Droughts usually evolve relatively slowly, posing difficulties in identifying their onset and end (64), although the rapid onset of flash droughts is also possible (65).”
BackgroundStrategic approaches to restoring ecosystems can triple conservation gains and halve costs
Strassburg, B. B. N., Beyer, H. L., Crouzeilles, R., Iribarrem, A., Barros, F., de Siqueira, M. F., Sánchez-Tapia, A., Balmford, A., Sansevero, J. B. B., Brancalion, P. H. S., et al. (2018) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0743-8 · Cited by 326 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, regrowth of natural vegetation and limited management), large co-benefits exist from both an economic and nature conservation perspective (98, 116).”
BackgroundPost-2020 biodiversity targets need to embrace climate change
Arneth, A., Shin, Y.-J., Leadley, P., Rondinini, C., Bukvareva, E., Kolb, M., Midgley, G. F., Oberdorff, T., Palomo, I., & Saito, O. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2009584117 · Cited by 316 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, the need for dynamic conservation strategies was not considered in the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, nor is it being considered in the current draft of the post-Aichi objectives (144).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe climate change mitigation potential of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage
Hanssen, S. V., Daioglou, V., Steinmann, Z. J. N., Doelman, J. C., Van Vuuren, D. P., & Huijbregts, M. A. J. (2020) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0885-y · Cited by 301 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Over an 80-year perspective, a recent study (92) estimated for different forms of BECCS and a range of annual bioenergy production potentials a land area requirement between 22 and 46Mkm2, with the upper end similar in magnitude to the entire remaining global forest area.”
BackgroundSoil carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems: a meta-analysis
De Stefano, A., & Jacobson, M. G. (2017) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1007/s10457-017-0147-9 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Global exposure and vulnerability to multi-sector development and climate change hotspots
Byers, E., Gidden, M., Leclère, D., Balkovic, J., Burek, P., Ebi, K., Greve, P., Grey, D., Havlik, P., Hillers, A., et al. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aabf45 · Cited by 295 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Higher temperature increases result in higher projected numbers of people exposed to, and vulnerable to, water scarcity and droughts (70, 71).”
BackgroundDryland changes under different levels of global warming
Koutroulis, A. G. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.215 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Meli, P., Rey Benayas, J. M., Balvanera, P., & Martínez Ramos, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093507 · Cited by 289 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Restoring already degradedwetlands can sequester carbon on a century scale, albeit at an often relatively slow pace and possibly at the expense of increased CH4 emissions (53), but with large potential to improve conditions for biodiversity (54).”
BackgroundFrom barriers to limits to climate change adaptation: path dependency and the speed of change
Barnett, J., Evans, L. S., Gross, C., Kiem, A. S., Kingsford, R. T., Palutikof, J. P., Pickering, C. M., & Smithers, S. G. (2015) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-07698-200305 · Cited by 283 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Governance of ecosystems can be a hard limit to adaptation or restoration, unless radical changes can be achieved (142, 143).”
BackgroundAgroforestry—The Next Step in Sustainable and Resilient Agriculture
Wilson, M., & Lovell, S. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8060574 · Cited by 280 · cited 5× · see citing works
“, through payments for ecosystem services, could provide a much-needed incentive for increased investment into land restoration and rehabilitation (111, 127, 128).”
BackgroundInfluentialHuman Appropriation of Net Primary Production: Patterns, Trends, and Planetary Boundaries
Haberl, H., Erb, K.-H., & Krausmann, F. (2014) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-121912-094620 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Self-citationBiodiversity impacts of bioenergy crop production: a state‐of‐the‐art review
Immerzeel, D. J., Verweij, P. A., van der Hilst, F., & Faaij, A. P. C. (2014) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12067 · Cited by 271 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Energy crops can enhance the biodiversity of degraded lands, especially if native species are included and/or if perennial grasses and woody crops enhance habitat diversity in what are otherwise large cropland monocultures (109).”
BackgroundDo grasslands act as a perpetual sink for carbon?
Smith, P. (2014) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12561 · Cited by 262 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Others have argued that carbon sinks or sources in grasslands depend heavily on the previous land use, climate, and/or time since conversion (38).”
BackgroundKwakkel, J. H., Haasnoot, M., & Walker, W. E. (2016) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.017 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Satellite‐based estimates reveal widespread forest degradation in the Amazon
Bullock, E. L., Woodcock, C. E., Souza, C., & Olofsson, P. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15029 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
The IPBES assessment report on land degradation and restoration.
IPBES (2018) · Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3237393 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
(2019) · doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2019.01.007 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Billions in Misspent EU Agricultural Subsidies Could Support the Sustainable Development Goals
Scown, M. W., Brady, M. V., & Nicholas, K. A. (2020) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.011 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Integrating ecosystem functions into restoration ecology—recent advances and future directions
Kollmann, J., Meyer, S. T., Bateman, R., Conradi, T., Goßner, M. M., Mendonça, M. D. S., Fernandes, G. W., Hermann, J., Koch, C., Müller, S. C., et al. (2016) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.12422 · Cited by 209 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This might be achieved by restoring natural water flow regimes, the passive regrowth of natural vegetation (which can still be used at low intensity), or actively replanting managed land with vegetation that consists of at least some of the dominant native species (148, 149).”
BackgroundMeasuring the success of climate change adaptation and mitigation in terrestrial ecosystems
Morecroft, M. D., Duffield, S., Harley, M., Pearce-Higgins, J. W., Stevens, N., Watts, O., & Whitaker, J. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw9256 · Cited by 208 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Likewise, the benefits to biodiversity or the avoided damage to human societies, especially from extreme weather events (101), will accrue only over a long-term time period.”
BackgroundInfluentialBiofuels from crop residue can reduce soil carbon and increase CO2 emissions
Liska, A. J., Yang, H., Milner, M., Goddard, S., Blanco-Canqui, H., Pelton, M. P., Fang, X. X., Zhu, H., & Suyker, A. E. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2187 · Cited by 207 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Likewise, removal of residues that would otherwise be retained on the soil surface increases the risk of soil erosion and depletes soil organic matter (93, 94).”
BackgroundDarrah, S. E., Shennan-Farpón, Y., Loh, J., Davidson, N. C., Finlayson, C. M., Gardner, R. C., & Walpole, M. J. (2019) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.032 · Cited by 196 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The most important human drivers of wetland decline are urbanization, drainage for agricultural expansion, and increasing use of irrigation in agriculture causing wetlands to dry (48).”
BackgroundRising methane: A new climate challenge
Fletcher, S. E. M., & Schaefer, H. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax1828 · Cited by 192 · cited 1× · see citing works
“One cause might be the high global temperatures since 2014, which have accelerated emissions of CH4 from low-latitude wetlands (51), whereas emissions responses from high-latitudewetlands aremore uncertain (52).”
BackgroundReed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Perkins, J. S., Atlhopheng, J. R., Mulale, K., & Favretto, N. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.010 · Cited by 191 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, through payments for ecosystem services, could provide a much-needed incentive for increased investment into land restoration and rehabilitation (111, 127, 128).”
BackgroundThe underestimated biodiversity of tropical grassy biomes
Murphy, B. P., Andersen, A. N., & Parr, C. L. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0319 · Cited by 188 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The lack of formal protection, therefore, is of concern; tropical grassy biomes have a substantially lower proportion of protected areas than tropical forest, often with individual areas under protection that are far too small (26).”
BackgroundEffects of human-driven water stress on river ecosystems: a meta-analysis
Sabater, S., Bregoli, F., Acuña, V., Barceló, D., Elosegi, A., Ginebreda, A., Marcé, R., Muñoz, I., Sabater-Liesa, L., & Ferreira, V. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29807-7 · Cited by 187 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Changes in river flow regimes, but also pollution inflow from agricultural fields, can increase algal biomass; reduce invertebrate richness, abundance, and density; and alter organicmatter decomposition (58).”
BackgroundFuture large hydropower dams impact global freshwater megafauna
Zarfl, C., Berlekamp, J., He, F., Jähnig, S. C., Darwall, W., & Tockner, K. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-54980-8 · Cited by 182 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The availability and quality of freshwater is projected to continue to decline in the future due to extraction for irrigation, drinking water, and energy, pollution, and increased shipping, with dam building for irrigation expected to disproportionately impact South America, south and east Asia, and the Balkan region…”
BackgroundBrundu, G., & Richardson, D. M. (2016) · NeoBiota · doi:10.3897/neobiota.30.7015 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
How feasible are global forest restoration commitments?
Fagan, M. E., Reid, J. L., Holland, M. B., Drew, J. G., & Zahawi, R. A. (2020) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12700 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Multi-source global wetland maps combining surface water imagery and groundwater constraints
Tootchi, A., Jost, A., & Ducharne, A. (2019) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-11-189-2019 · Cited by 165 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Estimates of the current and recent areal extent of wetlands vary substantially, from under 2% to over 20% of the global land area (46).”
BackgroundThe living dead: acknowledging life after tree death to stop forest degradation
Thorn, S., Seibold, S., Leverkus, A. B., Michler, T., Müller, J., Noss, R. F., Stork, N., Vogel, S., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.2252 · Cited by 163 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Deadwood is especially important as a living environment for insects and wood-inhabiting fungi but also affects higher trophic levels through related food webs (20).”
BackgroundRestoration and Reciprocity: The Contributions of Traditional Ecological Knowledge
Kimmerer, R. (2011) · Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration · doi:10.5822/978-1-61091-039-2_18 · Cited by 161 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, predicting the trophic response (and hence its interaction with functioning) of restoring carnivores (or large mammals) to ecosystems has been shown to be challenging (123), and assumptions about ecosystems simply returning to a historical state seem too simplistic given interactions with climate change and e…”
BackgroundGround‐ and satellite‐based evidence of the biophysical mechanisms behind the greening Sahel
Brandt, M., Mbow, C., Diouf, A. A., Verger, A., Samimi, C., & Fensholt, R. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12807 · Cited by 149 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For instance, dryland areas have high climatic variability, with periods of dry and wet climates, and corresponding cycles of greening and browning, most famously in the Sahel region (29, 30).”
BackgroundClimate, CO <sub>2</sub> and human population impacts on global wildfire emissions
Knorr, W., Jiang, L., & Arneth, A. (2016) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-13-267-2016 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationReduced net methane emissions due to microbial methane oxidation in a warmer Arctic
Oh, Y., Zhuang, Q., Liu, L., Welp, L. R., Lau, M. C. Y., Onstott, T. C., Medvigy, D., Bruhwiler, L., Dlugokencky, E. J., Hugelius, G., et al. (2020) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0734-z · Cited by 144 · cited 1× · see citing works
“One cause might be the high global temperatures since 2014, which have accelerated emissions of CH4 from low-latitude wetlands (51), whereas emissions responses from high-latitudewetlands aremore uncertain (52).”
BackgroundIndicators to measure the climate change adaptation outcomes of ecosystem-based adaptation
Donatti, C. I., Harvey, C. A., Hole, D., Panfil, S. N., & Schurman, H. (2020) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02565-9 · Cited by 138 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, in terms of enhanced assets and livelihoods; in resources (food, water) security, health, cultural, or spiritual well-being; or in conservation and biodiversity (101, 102).”
BackgroundLee, C.-Y., Camargo, S. J., Sobel, A. H., & Tippett, M. K. (2020) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-19-0452.1 · Cited by 135 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The overall frequency of tropical cyclones may not change, or may even decrease with continued climate change, but high intensity cyclones are expected to increase in number and intensity as well as the amount and intensity of rainfall (87, 88).”
BackgroundHof, C., Voskamp, A., Biber, M. F., Böhning-Gaese, K., Engelhardt, E. K., Niamir, A., Willis, S. G., & Hickler, T. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1807745115 · Cited by 131 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For strong climate change mitigation scenarios, the required expansion of land area for bioenergy crops was found to have similarly negative impacts on terrestrial biodiversity as had unmitigated climate change (95) due to the reduction in species’ ranges and pressure on protected areas.”
BackgroundMeeting global land restoration and protection targets: What would the world look like in 2050?
Wolff, S., Schrammeijer, E. A., Schulp, C. J. E., & Verburg, P. H. (2018) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.002 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Degradation and forgone removals increase the carbon impact of intact forest loss by 626%
Maxwell, S. L., Evans, T., Watson, J. E. M., Morel, A., Grantham, H., Duncan, A., Harris, N., Potapov, P., Runting, R. K., Venter, O., et al. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax2546 · Cited by 129 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Still, at least in many tropical forest regions, the area of degraded forests could well equal or even exceed the area of deforestation (15, 16); associated above-ground carbon losses have been estimated to increase estimates of gross deforestation losses by approximately 25% up to >600% (17), with additional, unknown…”
BackgroundManagement swing potential for bioenergy crops
Davis, S. C., Boddey, R. M., Alves, B. J. R., Cowie, A. L., George, B. H., Ogle, S. M., Smith, P., van Noordwijk, M., & van Wijk, M. T. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12042 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationHemes, K. S., Chamberlain, S. D., Eichelmann, E., Anthony, T., Valach, A., Kasak, K., Szutu, D., Verfaillie, J., Silver, W. L., & Baldocchi, D. D. (2019) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.01.017 · Cited by 125 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Restoring already degradedwetlands can sequester carbon on a century scale, albeit at an often relatively slow pace and possibly at the expense of increased CH4 emissions (53), but with large potential to improve conditions for biodiversity (54).”
BackgroundGlobal plight of native temperate grasslands: going, going, gone?
Carbutt, C., Henwood, W. D., & Gilfedder, L. A. (2017) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-017-1398-5 · Cited by 123 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Sustainable land management (SLM): the stewardship and use of land resources to meet changing human needs, while simultaneously ensuring the longterm productive potential of these resources and the maintenance of their environmental functions 8% of the land surface, natural temperate grasslands are now reduced to a fr…”
BackgroundHuman agency in the Anthropocene
Otto, I. M., Wiedermann, M., Cremades, R., Donges, J. F., Auer, C., & Lucht, W. (2020) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106463 · Cited by 121 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Coupled global-scale, socio-ecological models are emerging as tools to account for a full range of human decision-making processes, beyond economic factors alone (146).”
BackgroundPellegrini, A. F. A., Hobbie, S. E., Reich, P. B., Jumpponen, A., Brookshire, E. N. J., Caprio, A. C., Coetsee, C., & Jackson, R. B. (2020) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1409 · Cited by 121 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Frequently burned sites across continents were found to have up to tenfold less soil organic matter decomposing extracellular enzyme activity and up to 185% lower soil carbon and nitrogen concentrations due to reduced biomass inputs and reduced tree abundance (80).”
BackgroundUtilization of earthworms and termites for the restoration of ecosystem functioning
Jouquet, P., Blanchart, E., & Capowiez, Y. (2014) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.08.004 · Cited by 115 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Discussions about restoration or renovation of ecosystems focus on vegetation type and habitat structure, assuming that whole species assemblages would follow and with it a return to healthy ecosystem functioning, especially where dominant natural species are replanted or natural regrowth takes place (120, 121).”
BackgroundForest ecosystem-service transitions: the ecological dimensions of the forest transition
Wilson, S. J., Schelhas, J., Grau, R., Nanni, A. S., & Sloan, S. (2017) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09615-220438 · Cited by 109 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Furthermore, relying on forests for long-term carbon sequestration is a risk, particularly for monocultures with high vulnerability to storms, fire, or pest outbreaks (12, 116).”
BackgroundEakin, H., York, A., Aggarwal, R., Waters, S., Welch, J., Rubiños, C., Smith-Heisters, S., Bausch, C., & Anderies, J. M. (2016) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-015-0789-y · Cited by 106 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Soft barriers to restoration include human (cognitive and behavioral obstacles), social (undermined participation in decision-making and inequity), economic (market failures, perverse incentives, lack of domestic funds), institutional (mal-coordination of policies, government failures, path-dependent institutions and…”
BackgroundThe impact of increasing fire frequency on forest transformations in southern Siberia
Kukavskaya, E. A., Buryak, L. V., Shvetsov, E. G., Conard, S. G., & Kalenskaya, O. P. (2016) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.10.015 · Cited by 103 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Changes in fire regimes can also contribute to a shift in vegetation composition, as more frequent fires, especially those coinciding with drought or insect outbreaks, suppress seedling regeneration and push, for example, closed forests toward more open forest-steppe systems (77, 78).”
BackgroundModifying land management in order to improve efficiency of rainwater use in the African highlands
Stroosnijder, L. (2009) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2008.05.019 · Cited by 102 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Furthermore, drought impacts can be alleviated by SLM practices, such as use of cover crops and mulching, supplementary irrigation if surface or groundwater sources are available, or the selection of drought-tolerant crop and forest species (66).”
BackgroundEconomics of Land Degradation and Improvement: An Introduction and Overview
Nkonya, E., Mirzabaev, A., & von Braun, J. (2016) · Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement – A Global Assessment for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19168-3_1 · Cited by 102 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A suite of case studies conducted in various settings across the world (124) showed that each dollar invested into land restoration activities could yield between US$3 and $6 of societal economic returns, through both provisioning and nonprovisioning ecosystem services, over a 30-year period (124).”
BackgroundSelf-citationExploring the future change space for fire weather in southeast Australia
Clarke, H., & Evans, J. P. (2019) · Theoretical and Applied Climatology · doi:10.1007/s00704-018-2507-4 · Cited by 98 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The projected increases in drought severity can also increase the incidence and extent of wildfires (73, 74).”
BackgroundMarzen, M., Iserloh, T., de Lima, J. L. M. P., Fister, W., & Ries, J. B. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.190 · Cited by 93 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Drivers of degradation include very short-term events [such as rainstorms causing erosion (10)] as well as slow processes that accumulate over years and decades (such as nutrient losses or loss in biodiversity), interacting with management and land-use change (see the IPCC Annex-I Glossary’s definition of land-use cha…”
BackgroundTropical grassy biomes: linking ecology, human use and conservation
Lehmann, C. E. R., & Parr, C. L. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0329 · Cited by 89 · cited 1× · see citing works
“3) (27), reduced livestock mobility and overgrazing, and—in savannahs—fuelwood extraction (4, 31).”
BackgroundWitters, N., Van Slycken, S., Ruttens, A., Adriaensen, K., Meers, E., Meiresonne, L., Tack, F. M. G., Thewys, T., Laes, E., & Vangronsveld, J. (2009) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-009-9042-1 · Cited by 88 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition, on heavily contaminated or saline soils, energy crops such as perennial grasses and short-rotation woody species including poplar and mallee can be strategically planted to improve soil conditions and contribute to phytoremediation (107, 108).”
BackgroundClimate reddening increases the chance of critical transitions
van der Bolt, B., van Nes, E. H., Bathiany, S., Vollebregt, M. E., & Scheffer, M. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0160-7 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Best practice for the use of scenarios for restoration planning
Metzger, J. P., Esler, K. J., Krug, C. B., et al. (2017) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.10.004 · Cited by 81 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(131) provided guidelines on how best to use the scenario method in support of restoration planning.”
BackgroundOvercoming barriers to the adoption of climate-friendly practices in agriculture
(2017) · OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers · doi:10.1787/97767de8-en · Cited by 80 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In principle, two strategies apply (141): the revision of policies that impede restoration objectives and the introduction of targeted initiatives that could directly help remove the key barriers.”
BackgroundGiger, M., Liniger, H., Sauter, C., & Schwilch, G. (2018) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.2429 · Cited by 77 · cited 1× · see citing works
“’s (126) analysis of the costs and benefits of individual SLM technologies showed that most of the SLM technologies analyzed became profitable within three to ten years after continued application.”
BackgroundCapping Human Water Footprints in the World's River Basins
Hogeboom, R. J., de Bruin, D., Schyns, J. F., Krol, M. S., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2020) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1029/2019ef001363 · Cited by 75 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Rivers On the basis of estimated global blue water runoff (approximately 42,000 km3 a−1), a sustainable level of human use may be 1,200–8,300 km3 a−1 (55), depending on the chosen criteria.”
BackgroundVan Oijen, M., Bellocchi, G., & Höglind, M. (2018) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy8020014 · Cited by 74 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Sustainable land management (SLM): the stewardship and use of land resources to meet changing human needs, while simultaneously ensuring the longterm productive potential of these resources and the maintenance of their environmental functions 8% of the land surface, natural temperate grasslands are now reduced to a fr…”
BackgroundGlobal synergies and trade-offs between multiple dimensions of biodiversity and ecosystem services
Girardello, M., Santangeli, A., Mori, E., Chapman, A., Fattorini, S., Naidoo, R., Bertolino, S., & Svenning, J.-C. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-41342-7 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Adaptation services of floodplains and wetlands under transformational climate change
Colloff, M. J., Lavorel, S., Wise, R. M., Dunlop, M., Overton, I. C., & Williams, K. J. (2016) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/15-0848 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
(2017) · CRC Press eBooks · Cited by 67 · see citing works
The GPCC Drought Index – a new, combined and gridded global drought index
Ziese, M., Schneider, U., Meyer-Christoffer, A., Schamm, K., Vido, J., Finger, P., Bissolli, P., Pietzsch, S., & Becker, A. (2014) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-6-285-2014 · Cited by 66 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In drylands, the land area annually experiencing droughts has already increased by approximately 50% since 1961 (69).”
BackgroundPlanetary boundaries revisited: a view through the ‘water lens’
Bogardi, J. J., Fekete, B. M., & Vörösmarty, C. J. (2013) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.006 · Cited by 56 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Freshwater extraction typically takes place in regions where freshwater is much scarcer than the global average (56).”
BackgroundHow soil erosion model conceptualization affects soil loss projections under climate change
Eekhout, J. P., & De Vente, J. (2020) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/0309133319871937 · Cited by 56 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The increasing intensity of rainfall expected from climate change will lead to increased erosion and nutrient loss from croplands unless SLM practices are widely implemented (86).”
BackgroundGregg, J. S., & Izaurralde, R. C. (2010) · Biofuels · doi:10.4155/bfs.09.8 · Cited by 54 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Likewise, removal of residues that would otherwise be retained on the soil surface increases the risk of soil erosion and depletes soil organic matter (93, 94).”
BackgroundOperationalising just sustainability: towards a model for place-based governance
George, C., & Reed, M. G. (2017) · Local Environment · doi:10.1080/13549839.2015.1101059 · Cited by 53 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Sustainable, bottom-up and place-based solutions build on existing governance arrangements (134).”
BackgroundCross, S. L., Bateman, P. W., & Cross, A. T. (2019) · Ecological Management & Restoration · doi:10.1111/emr.12393 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Ecological Restoration as a Means of Managing Inland Flood Hazards
Nilsson, C. F., Riis, T., Sarneel, J. M., & Svavarsdóttir, K. (2017) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/bix148 · Cited by 47 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Suitable actions include, for example, a global reduction in the consumption of animal protein, with a more equitable share between rich and poor countries; a reduction in the approximately 30% of food that is annually lost and wasted; and lake and wetland restoration to assist with flood control and provide water for…”
BackgroundThe IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Asia and the Pacific
IPBES (2018) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3237373 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Environmental rehabilitation of damaged land
Mentis, M. (2020) · Forest Ecosystems · doi:10.1186/s40663-020-00233-4 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
A century of high elevation ecosystem change in the Canadian Rocky Mountains
Trant, A., Higgs, E., & Starzomski, B. M. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-66277-2 · Cited by 45 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, climate change impacts (including also the effects of increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration) can, in cases where other factors are not limiting, also increase forest productivity, resulting in, for example, faster tree growth (13) or elevating treelines in mountain regions (14).”
BackgroundPalomo, I., Dujardin, Y., Midler, E., Robin, M., Sanz, M. J., & Pascual, U. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1908683116 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Zheng, J., Yu, Y., Zhang, X., & Hao, Z. (2018) · Climate of the Past · doi:10.5194/cp-14-1135-2018 · Cited by 34 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Climate change is projected to increase the frequency and severity of droughts in many areas of the world (67, 68).”
BackgroundSpatial and temporal analysis of natural hazard mortality in Nepal
Aksha, S. K., Juran, L., & Resler, L. M. (2018) · Environmental Hazards · doi:10.1080/17477891.2017.1398630 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Hember, R. A., Kurz, W. A., & Girardin, M. P. (2019) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences · doi:10.1029/2018jg004573 · Cited by 28 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, climate change impacts (including also the effects of increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration) can, in cases where other factors are not limiting, also increase forest productivity, resulting in, for example, faster tree growth (13) or elevating treelines in mountain regions (14).”
BackgroundSelf-citationLiu, Y., Yang, Y., Wang, Q., Khalifa, M., Zhang, Z., Tong, L., Li, J., & Shi, A. (2019) · Chinese Geographical Science · doi:10.1007/s11769-019-1063-x · Cited by 28 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Analyses of remotely sensed vegetation greenness (and vegetation browning) as well as model-based studies found that climate change has contributed to degradation chiefly in regions located around 15–45oS, although studies disagree regarding the exact region of impact (36, 60, 61).”
BackgroundMethane emissions from rice across a soil organic matter gradient in Alfisols of Arkansas, USA
Humphreys, J., Brye, K. R., Rector, C., & Gbur, E. E. (2019) · Geoderma Regional · doi:10.1016/j.geodrs.2018.e00200 · Cited by 27 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Whereas ruminant livestock are the main source of CH4 from the agricultural sector, rice cultivation is the most important source of CH4 from agricultural soils (41).”
BackgroundEnvironmental and Anthropogenic Degradation of Vegetation in the Sahel from 1982 to 2006
Rishmawi, K., & Prince, S. (2016) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs8110948 · Cited by 25 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For instance, dryland areas have high climatic variability, with periods of dry and wet climates, and corresponding cycles of greening and browning, most famously in the Sahel region (29, 30).”
BackgroundUsing conflict over risk management in the marine environment to strengthen measures of governance
Parlee, C. E., & Wiber, M. G. (2018) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-10334-230405 · Cited by 22 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Continuous, collaborative problem solving of multiscale decision-making that employs experimentation and conflict resolution has been shown to build capacity for resource self-management (135).”
BackgroundCardoso, A. D. S., Quintana, B. G., Janusckiewicz, E. R., de Figueiredo Brito, L., da Silva Morgado, E., Reis, R. A., & Ruggieri, A. C. (2019) · International Journal of Biometeorology · doi:10.1007/s00484-018-1641-0 · Cited by 20 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Crop management and soil moisture are also important determinants of emissions whereby waterlogging and soil compaction generally are associated with high CH4 emissions (42).”
BackgroundWhy Should Governmentality Matter for the Study of Pastoral Development?
Morton, J. (2010) · Nomadic Peoples · doi:10.3167/np.2010.140102 · Cited by 17 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Ambiguous and insecure land tenure regimes combined with widespread poverty and frequent marginalization of pastoralist communities across many grassland areas (32) limit investment in their sustainable use and management, including access to veterinary and rural advisory services, financial and insurance markets, as…”
BackgroundMetzger, M. J., Dick, J., Gardner, A., Bellamy, C., Blackstock, K., Brown, C., Chisholm, R., Cochrane, P., Drewitt, J., Gimona, A., et al. (2019) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-019-01537-0 · Cited by 16 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Enhancing synergies and reducing trade-offs can be achieved by (a) policy decisions and implementation that consider cross-disciplinary scientific knowledge on natural, economic, and societal aspects and (b) mapping and quantification of stakeholder choices in relation to various ecosystem service choices (139).”
BackgroundShrestha, S., Hoang, N. A. T., Shrestha, P. K., & Bhatta, B. (2018) · APN Science Bulletin · doi:10.30852/sb.2018.499 · Cited by 11 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Groundwater recharge is expected to respond to climate changewith increases duringwet,winter periods and declines during dry, summer periods; overall declines are expected in more arid locations (72).”
BackgroundEconomics of Land Degradation and Improvement in Bhutan
Nkonya, E. M., Srinivasan, R., Anderson, W., et al. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19168-3_12 · Cited by 7
Satellite-Based Estimates Reveal Widespread Forest Degradation in the Amazon
Bullock, E. L., Woodcock, C. E., Souza, C., Jr., et al. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3634904
Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects
Fuss, S., Lamb, W. F., Callaghan, M., Hilaire, J., Creutzig, F., Amann, T., Beringer, T., Garcia, W. D. O., Hartmann, J., Khanna, T., et al. (2018) · RENATE · doi:10.34657/9916
Oh, Y., Zhuang, Q., Liu, L., et al. (2020) · doi:10.4231/q3r8-sz17
van Oijen, M., Bellocchi, G., & Höglind, M. (2017) · doi:10.20944/preprints201712.0102.v1
Addendum: More extreme precipitation in the world's dry and wet regions
Donat, M. G., Lowry, A. L., Alexander, L. V., et al. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3160
Multi-source global wetland maps combining surface water imagery and groundwater constraints
Tootchi, A., Jost, A., & Ducharne, A. (2018) · doi:10.5194/essd-2018-87
Adaptation services of floodplains and wetlands under transformational climate change
Colloff, M. J., Lavorel, S., Wise, R., et al. (2015) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/15-0848.1
Zheng, J., Yu, Y., Zhang, X., et al. (2018) · doi:10.5194/cp-2018-45
GPCC Drought Index – a new, combined, and gridded global drought index
Ziese, M., Schneider, U., Meyer-Christoffer, A., et al. (2014) · doi:10.5194/essdd-7-243-2014
Drought and Water Crises: Integrating Science, Management, and Policy
Wilhite, D., & Pulwarty, R. (2017) · Drought and Water Crises · doi:10.1201/9781315265551
Publisher Correction: A century of high elevation ecosystem change in the Canadian Rocky Mountains
Trant, A., Higgs, E., & Starzomski, B. M. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76735-6
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- IPBES (Intergov. Sci.-Policy Platf. Biodivers. Ecosyst. Serv.), 2019, The IPBES Global Assessment on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
- Olsson L, 2019, Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems, 345
- Mirzabaev A, 2019, Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems, 249
- FAO (United Nations Food Agric. Organ.), 2016, Trees, Forests and Land Use in Drylands: The First Global Assessment—Preliminary Findings
- Shin Y-J, 2019, The IPBES Global Assessment on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
- Prince S, 2018, The IPBES Assessment Report on Land Degradation and Restoration, 315
- Jia G, 2019, Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems, 131
- Hurlbert M, 2019, Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems, 673
- IPCC (Intergov. Panel Clim. Change), 2018, Global Warming of 1.5°C
- Montgomery DR., 2017, Growing a Revolution: Bringing Our Soil Back to Life
- De Stefano A, 2018, Agroforestry Syst, 92, 285
- Seddon N, 2019, Nature-Based Solutions in Nationally Determined Contributions: Synthesis and Recommendations for Enhancing Climate Ambition and Action by 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The enduring world forest carbon sink
Pan, Y., Birdsey, R. A., Phillips, O. L., Houghton, R. A., Fang, J., Kauppi, P. E., Keith, H., Kurz, W. A., Ito, A., Lewis, S. L., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07602-x · Cited by 796 · see citing works
“Recovery of functions by degraded forests and lands offers further opportunities for enhancing carbon sinks, with many additional benefits, such as protecting biodiversity 46 .”
Self-citationActions to halt biodiversity loss generally benefit the climate
Shin, Y., Midgley, G. F., Archer, E. R. M., Arneth, A., Barnes, D. K. A., Chan, L., Hashimoto, S., Hoegh‐Guldberg, O., Insarov, G., Leadley, P., et al. (2022) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.16109 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Self-citationAlexander, P. M., Arneth, A., Henry, R., Maire, J., Rabin, S. S., & Rounsevell, M. (2022) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00659-9 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Self-citationRounsevell, M., Arneth, A., Brown, C., Cheung, W. W. L., Giménez, O., Holman, I. P., Leadley, P., Luján, C., Mahévas, S., Maréchaux, I., et al. (2021) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.06.003 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationBioenergy: a foundation to environmental sustainability in a changing global climate scenario
Rather, R. A., Wani, A. W., Mumtaz, S., Padder, S. A., Khan, A. H., Almohana, A. I., Almojil, S. F., Alam, S. S., & Baba, T. R. (2021) · Journal of King Saud University - Science · doi:10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101734 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Seed enhancement technologies for sustainable dryland restoration: Coating and scarification
Jarrar, H., El‐Keblawy, A., Ghenaï, C., et al. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166150 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Hong, G., Liu, S., Liu, W., et al. (2024) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2024.105253 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Mitigation and Development Pathways in the Near to Mid-term
(IPCC), I. P. O. C. C. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009157926.006 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Zhang, B., Zhang, R., Li, Y., et al. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119495 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Climate Change and Food Systems
Mirzabaev, A., Olsson, L., Kerr, R. B., Pradhan, P., Rivera‐Ferre, M. G., & Lotze‐Campen, H. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15703-5_27 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationBiomass—Critical limits to a vital resource
Erb, K., & Gingrich, S. (2022) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.12.014 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationThe State of the World's Arable Land
Olsson, L., Cotrufo, F., Crews, T. E., Franklin, J., King, A. E., Mirzabaev, A., Scown, M., Tengberg, A. E., Villarino, S. H., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-113741 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationEconomics of Ecosystem Restoration
Mirzabaev, A., & Wuepper, D. (2023) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-101422-085414 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationAn overview of global desertification control efforts: Key challenges and overarching solutions
Ahmed, Z., Gui, D.-W., Abd-Elmabod, S., Murtaza, G., & Ali, S. (2024) · Soil use and management · doi:10.1111/sum.13154 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Women, youth, small-scale farmers, indigenous and displaced peoples are among the vulnerable groups that typically suffer from a shortage of the necessary human and social capital to participate in desertification control efforts (Arneth et al., 2021).”
Nkiaka, E., Bryant, R. G., Dembélé, M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131874 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Zhang, P., Wang, J., Huang, L., He, M., Yang, H., Song, G., Zhao, J., & Li, X. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119353 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Ernest, B., Yanda, P. Z., Hansson, A., & Fridahl, M. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-83372-w · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“Therefore, the use of biochar is a long-term, viable strategy for sustainably improving degraded soil 50–52 .”
Sustainable land systems in the Anthropocene: Navigating the global land squeeze
Erb, K.-H., Matej, S., Haberl, H., & Gingrich, S. (2024) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2024.06.011 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationSetting Targets for Wetland Restoration to Mitigate Climate Change Effects on Watershed Hydrology
Goyette, J., Savary, S., Blanchette, M., Rousseau, A. N., Pellerin, S., & Poulin, M. (2022) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-022-01763-z · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“…predicted under future climate conditions, societies are expected to increasingly experience critical peak- and low-flow events, with detrimental effects on ecosystems as well as human health and safety (Kundzewicz et al. 2008; van Vliet et al. 2013; Hammond et al. 2015; Arneth et al. 2021).”
BackgroundMa, J., Rabin, S. S., Anthoni, P. M., Bayer, A. D., Nyawira, S. S., Olin, S., Xia, L., & Arneth, A. (2022) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-19-2145-2022 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationMa, J., Anthoni, P. M., Olin, S., Rabin, S. S., Bayer, A. D., Xia, L., & Arneth, A. (2023) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2022ef003142 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationLai, Z., Sun, Y., Yu, Y., et al. (2023) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.105023 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Hansamali, U., Makumbura, R. K., Rathnayake, U., et al. (2025) · Hydrology · doi:10.3390/hydrology12040095 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Methods such as leaky dams and reforestation aim to restore degraded landscapes, improve habitats, and boost biodiversity [78,79].”
The global extent of the grassland biome and implications for the terrestrial carbon sink
MacDougall, A. S., Vanzant, B., Sulik, J. J., et al. (2026) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-025-02955-6 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Veld restoration strategies in South African semi-arid rangelands. Are there any successes?—A review
Mudau, H. S., Msiza, N. H., Sipango, N., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.960345 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Considering durability in carbon dioxide removal strategies for climate change mitigation
Streck, C., Minoli, S., Roe, S., Barry, C., Brander, M., Chiquier, S., Cullity, G., Ellis, P. W., Funk, J., Gidden, M., et al. (2025) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2025.2501267 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Furthermore, well-planned and implemented nature-based CDR is synergistic with sustainable development as it can deliver significant benefits for people and nature along with climate mitigation (Arneth et al., 2021; Li et al., 2015; Reid et al., 2017).”
Enhancing Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: Plans and Policies
Dinesh, G. K., Sinduja, M., Priyanka, B., Sathya, V., Karthika, S., Meena, R. S., & Prasad, S. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-6179-3_4 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Qasha, V., Manyevere, A., Flynn, T., & Mashamaite, C. V. (2024) · Carbon Management · doi:10.1080/17583004.2024.2404409 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
From vegetation ecology to vegetation science: current trends and perspectives
Ibarra‐Manríquez, G., González‐Espinosa, M., Martı́nez-Ramos, M., & Meave, J. A. (2022) · Botanical Sciences · doi:10.17129/botsci.3171 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Slavíková, L., & Milman, A. (2023) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110922-031849 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Okunade, S., Assoua, J. E., Binuomote, S. O., et al. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3402 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Land degradation in Uzbekistan: key challenges and sustainable solutions
Umarov, S., Nurbekov, A., Nishanov, N., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2025.1676403 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Crop Yield Prediction Based on Bacterial Biomarkers and Machine Learning
Ma, L., Niu, W., Li, G., et al. (2024) · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition · doi:10.1007/s42729-024-01705-0 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“…management practices in China, such as fertilization and irrigation, have adversely affected soil quality (Bowles et al. 2016; Fang et al. 2021; Ma et al. 2021; O'Toole and Moya 1981) and contributed to environmental pollution (Arneth et al. 2021), hindering sustainable food production.”
Grabher, H. F., Erb, K., Singh, S. J., & Haberl, H. (2023) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108057 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationSustainable forest land management to restore degraded lands
Mishra, R. K., & Agarwal, R. (2024) · Environmental sciences · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1004793 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Organic Farming – a Sustainable Option to Reduce Soil Degradation
Pinto, A. P., Faria, J. M. S., Dordio, A. V., & Carvalho, A. J. P. (2023) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119911999.ch5 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Zong, R., Zeng, Y., Fang, N., et al. (2022) · Land Degradation and Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.4436 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Pinke, Z., Decsi, B., Demeter, G., et al. (2024) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-024-02192-w · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“…the so-called marginal lands via combined land use solutions (e.g. agroforestry and cultivation of periodically inundated areas Opperman et al. 2009; Serra-Llobet et al. 2022), and restoration of reclaimed ecosystems (IPCC 2019; European Commission 2020), and degraded lands (Arneth et al. 2021)).”
Ullah, S., Han, X., Ali, I., Li, W., Wu, T., Xu, Y., & Yang, M. (2024) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119933 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
A complex spatial inventory of land degradation and desertification in Romania
Prăvălie, R., Necula, N., Borrelli, P., Tişcovschi, A., & Săvulescu, I. (2025) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113671 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The Role of Organic Fertilizers in Transition to Sustainable Agriculture in the MENA Region
Avery, H. (2022) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.101411 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Money talks. A systems perspective on funding and financing barriers to nature-based solutions
Hüsken, L. M., Slinger, J. H., Vreugdenhil, H. S. I., & Altamirano, M. A. (2024) · Nature-Based Solutions · doi:10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100200 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Ding, Q., et al. (2025) · Land · doi:10.3390/land14061185 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“With the increasing degradation of various ecosystems and worsening environmental problems, ecological restoration research has received more and more attention [3–5].”
Carrascosa, A., Moreno, G., Rodrigo, S. M., et al. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177575 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Zhang, P., He, M., Wang, J., Lei, H., Yang, H., Song, G., Zhao, J., & Li, X. (2024) · Land Degradation and Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.5420 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Zhang, H., Lu, Y., Tian, P., et al. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127754 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Arfasa, G. F., Owusu-Sekyere, E., & Doke, D. A. (2024) · Rangeland Ecology & Management · doi:10.1016/j.rama.2024.02.005 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Regional cooling potential from expansion of perennial grasses in Europe
Zhang, X., Huang, B., de Souza, N. R. D., Hu, X., & Cherubini, F. (2024) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01923-5 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Their deployment is usually associated with improvements in multiple ecosystem services, including biodiversity (mainly insects, birds, and bees) when compared to conventional croplands 17 – 20 , and it can restore soil organic carbon (SOC) 12,13,21 in degraded soils 22 – 24 .”
Spatially explicit transition pathways for decarbonizing China’s steel industry during 2030–2050
Yang, F., Meerman, H., Shan, Y., Zhenhua, Z., Zhang, J., Li, Q., Zhang, B., Lei, T., & Faaij, A. P. C. (2025) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108528 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Bharti, Debnath, S., Ram, A., et al. (2025) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2025.106986 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Bruno, E., Castellano, R., Punzo, G., et al. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17052149 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Wasson, K., Fountain, M. C., Zimmer, M. A., et al. (2025) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.70318 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Mapping soil organic carbon as soil health indicator of cocoa landscapes in middle Côte d’Ivoire
Kouassi, G., Hounkpatin, O., Tondoh, E. J., et al. (2025) · International Soil and Water Conservation Research · doi:10.1016/j.iswcr.2025.09.002 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Upadhyay, P., & Singh, T. S. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-3905-9_29 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Approaches for Land Restoration: An Alternative Strategy for Climate Change Mitigation
Devi, S., Goswami, S., Bisaria, J., et al. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-3905-9_26 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Batool, S., Muhammad, M., Fatima, M., Abbas, K., Li, K., Amin, F., & Batool, M. (2025) · Climate change management · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-77957-2_5 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Post-conversion vegetation restoration: PRE and VPD dominated the NDVI changes on the Loess Plateau
Jia, H., Tian, B., Song, X., et al. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127434 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Aden, K., & Dirir, S. A. (2025) · Sustainability Nexus Forum · doi:10.1007/s00550-025-00565-1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“However, several cascading predicaments related to the footprint caused by the overuse of arable land lead to various land degradation processes in settled areas, i.e., diminution of the land’s health, productivity, and/or ecological stability (Arneth et al. 2021 ).”
Wang, J., Zheng, Y., Dai, X., et al. (2025) · Land Degradation and Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.70079 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Ecological restoration has become an urgent global priority, fostering increased efforts to restore degraded lands (Arneth et al. 2021).”
Systems modeling for agroecology and land restoration
Conte, L., Surra, F., Favarin, S., Comar, V., & Gonella, F. (2025) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111307 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
An Integrated Assessment of European Soil Health and Restoration Potential
Calderón‐Sanou, I., Ballabio, C., Breitkreuz, C., et al. (2026) · Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment · doi:10.1002/sae2.70163 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Plant traits mediate agroecological outcomes in restored agricultural lands
Rolhauser, A. G., & Isaac, M. E. (2024) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111951 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Bogale, D. (2024) · Forest Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/21580103.2024.2410955 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Usman, M., & Almas, L. K. (2025) · WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS · doi:10.37394/23207.2025.22.54 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Potential Tree/Shrubs Species for Restoring Degraded Land in Ethiopia
Wolde, A., Abebe, Z. K., & Desalegn, S. (2025) · Journal of Energy and Natural Resources · doi:10.11648/j.jenr.20251402.15 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Marzouk, B., Hamdi, A., Refifà, M., et al. (2025) · Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology · doi:10.1080/11263504.2025.2525873 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…to restoration/rehabilitation efforts in degraded or fragile ecosystems, practices that are considered particularly desirable as they might enhance ecosystem services and biodiversity, benefit the environment and promote sustainable development (Arneth et al. 2021; Shackelford et al. 2021).”
The half is more than the whole: How China's economic growth target affects forest eco-efficiency
Jin, B., & Wang, H. (2025) · Socio-Economic Planning Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.seps.2025.102324 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Haftu, M., Gidey, E., Mhangara, P., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-26881-6 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Rangeland Resilience on the Brink: Unravelling Ecosystem Services and Degradation Drivers
Aliyar, Q., & Keshavarz, M. (2025) · Rangeland Ecology & Management · doi:10.1016/j.rama.2025.10.007 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Cervantes-Pérez, S. A., Roy, A., Bralick, A. K., Pietrzyk, P., Thibivilliers, S., Libault, M., & Bucksch, A. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adz6873 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Environmental Effects and Potential Solutions in the Realm of Biomass Management
Nair, A. B., Francis, V., & Nandakumar, N. (2024) · Materials horizons · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-4300-1_17 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Lai, Z., Sun, Y., Yang, Y., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.01.19.524707 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Participatory forest restoration for sustainable livelihood: A case study from HimalayaPreprint
Sreenivasa, K., Semwal, R. L., Maletha, A., Nautiyal, S., Maikhuri, R. K., & Saxena, K. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3975272/v1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ma, J., Rabin, S. S., Anthoni, P. M., et al. (2022) · doi:10.5194/bg-2021-352-rc1
Self-citationMa, J., Rabin, S. S., Anthoni, P., et al. (2022) · doi:10.5194/bg-2021-352-rc2
Self-citationTransformation of sugarcane biorefinery feedstocks into fungal protein
Amini, Z. Z. (2021) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.225941
Ma, J. (2022) · doi:10.5194/bg-2021-352-ac2
Ma, J. (2022) · doi:10.5194/bg-2021-352-ac1
(1976) · Annual Review of Energy · doi:10.1146/annurev.eg.1.091306.100001
Social Aspects of Land Degradation from the Viewpoint of Experts of the Scientific Community
Bondarev, V. P., & Radomyslskiy, M. S. (2024) · Moscow University Soil Science Bulletin · doi:10.3103/s0147687424700224
“To make sustainable development more effective, it is necessary to take into account each of its three aspects: environmental, economic and social (Barbier, 1987; Arvidsson Segerkvist et al., 2020; Arneth et al., 2021).”
Social aspects of land degradation from the viewpoint of the scientifi c community experts
Bondarev, V. P., & Radomyslskiy, M. S. (2024) · Lomonosov Soil Science Journal · doi:10.55959/msu0137-0944-17-2024-79-3-106-115
Rao, K. S., Semwal, R. L., Maletha, A., Nautiyal, S., Maikhuri, R. K., & Saxena, K. G. (2025) · Journal of Mountain Science · doi:10.1007/s11629-024-8872-9
“Bleak prospects of achieving the 2030-restoration targets of United Nations after missing 2020-targets underscore the necessity and urgency of transformative changes in the current approaches to achieve them (Arneth et al. 2021; Mansourian et al. 2022; Anonymous 2023).”
Beef production and tropical pasture degradation in eastern Colombia: observational insights
Vera, R. R., Rao, I. M., & Hoyos-Garcés, F. (2025) · Academia Biology · doi:10.20935/acadbiol7720
Aboveground and Belowground Input Effects on Soil Health in Urban Camphor Tree Forests
Huang, X., Peng, Y., Yan, W., et al. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17146358
Ecological restoration of degraded lands after drought
Kumar, A., & Eslamian, S. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-29993-3.00015-1
Ecological restoration initiatives on degraded landscapes to combat droughts and desertification
Chimi, C. D., Nfornkah, B. N., Awazi, N. P., Loh, C. E., Vartant, D. P. S., Inimbock, S. L., & Nkondjoua, A. D. T. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-29993-3.00016-3
The Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizas in Organic Farming
Cole, M., & Cavallo, R. (2025) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9781800626850.0021
A systematic review of carbon sink pathways and deployment strategies
Ma, J., Zhou, Y., He, L., Liu, X., & Wang, H. (2026) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2026.105517
Land Restoration and Livelihood Improvement: A Prescription for Sustainable Development?
Upadhyay, P., Arya, N., & Dutta, J. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-2860-8_10
How to Govern the Transition to Sustainable Animal Husbandry in High-Income Open Economies?
Grethe, H., & Zöllmer, J. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-97872-2_27
Svejcar, L. N., Miller, B. P., Stevens, J. C., & Standish, R. J. (2026) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.70320
“Global demands for the ecological restoration of degraded ecosystems are increasing due to ongoing, pervasive land degradation (IPBES 2019; Arneth et al. 2021).”
Conservation Agriculture: Techniques from Indigenous Farming Systems for Soil Conservation
Chaitra, C. S., Bhattacharjee, S., Acharya, A., et al. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-17991-3_9
Pargai, C., Dash, Y., & Choudhary, N. (2026) · International Conference on Advancements and Key Challenges in Green Energy and Computing (AKGEC) · doi:10.1109/akgec68790.2026.11485887
“In the watersheds of Ethiopia, RUSLE (Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation) models estimate soil loss as a result of land use / land cover (LULC), which is related to loss of productivity [25,26].”
Araya, H. G., Wasonga, O. V., Mureithi, S., et al. (2024) · Journal of Sciences and Innovation for Sustainable Peace · doi:10.23184/jhja.vol.2.no.2.sep.2024.008
Renison, D., Rodriguez, J. M., Costas, S. M., et al. (2026) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2026.123965
Sustainable Land Management With Geospatial AI
Nag, A., & Chaudhuri, D. (2026) · Advances in geospatial technologies book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-8037-7.ch012
Grethe, H., & Zöllmer, J. (2026) · SDG - Forschung, Konzepte, Lösungsansätze zur Nachhaltigkeit · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-73184-0_27
Quijano, M. J. G., Wu, Y., Smith, C., et al. (2026) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.70484
“Demand for restoration projects is elevated in regions of high resource extraction, which can cause habitat fragmentation, bio-diversity loss, soil degradation and community displacements (Haddad et al. 2015; Weiskopf et al. 2020; Arneth et al. 2021).”
- Authors
- Arneth, A., Olsson, L., Cowie, A., Erb, K.-H., Hurlbert, M., Kurz, W. A., Mirzabaev, A., & Rounsevell, M. D. A.
- Affiliations
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
- Lund University (SE)
- Government of New South Wales (AU)
- BOKU University (AT)
- University of Regina (CA)
- Canadian Forest Service (CA)
- University of Bonn (DE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annual Review of Environment and Resources
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2021-10-18
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 569-599
- ISSN
- 1543-5938 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2050
- OpenAlex
- W3193845121
- Semantic Scholar
- f5ec9f0a28bb3d035380be5434cd39a3fbf2cf36
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 136
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Environment and Resources (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- KITopen (cc-by)
- Funders
- Canada Research Chairs
- Vetenskapsrådet (2016-06300)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (773901, 757995)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Water and Land Management
- Keywords
- land degradation, ecological restoration, climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, greenhouse gas emissions, ecosystem services, sustainable agriculture, forest management, land conservation, poverty, sustainable development, food security, biodiversity loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-17.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-17.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review