The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecohydrological consequences of drought‐ and infestation‐ triggered tree die‐off: insights and hypotheses
Abstract
Widespread, rapid, drought‐, and infestation‐triggered tree mortality is emerging as a phenomenon affecting forests globally and may be linked to increasing temperatures and drought frequency and severity. The ecohydrological consequences of forest die‐off have been little studied and remain highly uncertain. To explore this knowledge gap, we apply the extensive literature on the ecohydrological effects of tree harvest in combination with the limited existing die‐off ecohydrology research to develop new, relevant hypotheses. Tree mortality results in loss of canopy cover, which directly alters evaporation, transpiration, and canopy interception and indirectly alters other watershed hydrologic processes, including infiltration, runoff, groundwater recharge, and streamflow. Both die‐off and harvest research suggest that for most forests, water yield can be expected to increase following substantial loss of tree cover by die‐off. We hypothesize that where annual precipitation exceeds ∼500 mm or water yield is dominated by snowmelt, watersheds will experience significantly decreased evapotranspiration and increased flows if absolute canopy cover loss from die‐off exceeds 20%. However, recent observations suggest that water yield following die‐off can potentially decrease rather than increase in drier forests. To reliably predict die‐off responses, more research is needed to test these hypotheses, including observations of multiple water budget components and the persistence of ecohydrological effects with the post‐die‐off successional dynamics of tree recruitment, understorey growth, and interactions with additional disturbances. With die‐off, mitigation and restoration options are limited and costly, necessitating societal adaptation; therefore, die‐off ecohydrology should be a high priority for future research. Published in 2011. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Allen, C. D., Macalady, A. K., Chenchouni, H., Bachelet, D., McDowell, N., Vennetier, M., Kitzberger, T., Rigling, A., Breshears, D. D., Hogg, E. H. (., et al. (2010) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001 · Cited by 7,763
Self-citationBosch, J. M., & Hewlett, J. D. (1982) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(82)90117-2 · Cited by 2,567
Widespread increase of tree mortality rates in the western United States
van Mantgem, P. J., Stephenson, N. L., Byrne, J. C., Daniels, L. D., Franklin, J. F., Fulé, P. Z., Harmon, M. E., Larson, A. J., Smith, J. M., Taylor, A. H., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165000 · Cited by 1,799 · cited 1×
“Tree mortality can occur along a progression of severity, from subtle increases in background mortality (e.g., van Mantgem et al., 2009), to affecting only a single species in a diverse forest (e.g., through a host-specific tree pest; MacDonald and Hoff, 2001; Ellison et al., 2005; Ford and Vose,…”
BackgroundWildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent
Shakesby, R. A., & Doerr, S. H. (2006) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.10.006 · Cited by 1,346
Restoring ecosystem health in Ponderosa pine forests of the southwest
Covington, W. W., Fulé, P. Z., Moore, M. M., Hart, S. C., Kolb, T. E., Mast, J. N., Sackett, S. S., & Wagner, M. R. (1997) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.1093/jof/95.4.23 · Cited by 595
Monitoring the effects of timber harvest on annual water yield
Stednick, J. D. (1996) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(95)02780-7 · Cited by 579
Fettig, C. J., Klepzig, K. D., Billings, R. F., Munson, A. S., Nebeker, T. E., Negrón, J. F., & Nowak, J. T. (2007) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.10.011 · Cited by 529
Moody, J. A., & Martin, D. A. (2009) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf07162 · Cited by 283
Cited by
Allen, C. D., Breshears, D. D., & McDowell, N. G. (2015) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1890/es15-00203.1 · Cited by 2,642
Self-citationMulti-decadal trends in global terrestrial evapotranspiration and its components
Zhang, Y., Peña-Arancibia, J. L., McVicar, T. R., Chiew, F. H. S., Vaze, J., Liu, C., Lu, X., Zheng, H., Wang, Y., Liu, Y. Y., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep19124 · Cited by 770
Potential of forest thinning to mitigate drought stress: A meta-analysis
Sohn, J. A., Saha, S., & Bauhus, J. (2016) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.07.046 · Cited by 503
Impacts of extreme precipitation and seasonal changes in precipitation on plants
Zeppel, M. J. B., Wilks, J. V., & Lewis, J. D. (2014) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-11-3083-2014 · Cited by 386
Saft, M., Western, A. W., Zhang, L., Peel, M. C., & Potter, N. J. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2014wr015348 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, H. D., Luce, C. H., Breshears, D. D., Allen, C. D., Weiler, M., Hale, V. C., Smith, A. M. S., & Huxman, T. E.
- Venue
- Ecohydrology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-08-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-159
- ISSN
- 1936-0584 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-0592
- OpenAlex
- W2104404130
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 12.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecohydrological consequences of drought‐ and infestation‐ triggered tree die‐off: insights and hypotheses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/eco.233
- The paper
- Adams, H. D., Luce, C. H., Breshears, D. D., Allen, C. D., Weiler, M., Hale, V. C., Smith, A. M. S., & Huxman, T. E. (2012). Ecohydrological consequences of drought‐ and infestation‐ triggered tree die‐off: insights and hypotheses. Ecohydrology. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.233
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.