Cited by 33

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Large reptiles and cold temperatures: Do extreme cold spells set distributional limits for tropical reptiles in Florida?

Mazzotti, Frank J., Cherkiss, Michael S., Parry, Mark, Beauchamp, Jeff, Rochford, Mike, Smith, Brian, Hart, Kristen, Brandt, Laura A.·2016·Ecosphere

Abstract

Distributional limits of many tropical species in Florida are ultimately determined by tolerance to low temperature. An unprecedented cold spell during 2–11 January 2010, in South Florida provided an opportunity to compare the responses of tropical American crocodiles with warm‐temperate American alligators and to compare the responses of nonnative Burmese pythons with native warm‐temperate snakes exposed to prolonged cold temperatures. After the January 2010 cold spell, a record number of American crocodiles (n = 151) and Burmese pythons (n = 36) were found dead. In contrast, no American alligators and no native snakes were found dead. American alligators and American crocodiles behaved differently during the cold spell. American alligators stopped basking and retreated to warmer water. American crocodiles apparently continued to bask during extreme cold temperatures resulting in lethal body temperatures. The mortality of Burmese pythons compared to the absence of mortality for native snakes suggests that the current population of Burmese pythons in the Everglades is less tolerant of cold temperatures than native snakes. Burmese pythons introduced from other parts of their native range may be more tolerant of cold temperatures. We documented the direct effects of cold temperatures on crocodiles and pythons; however, evidence of long‐term effects of cold temperature on their populations within their established ranges remains lacking. Mortality of crocodiles and pythons outside of their current established range may be more important in setting distributional limits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ecs2.1439

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Areas surveyed for mortalities of American crocodiles, Burmese pythons, and other wildlife during 20 January-6 March 2010.
Fig. 1 Areas surveyed for mortalities of American crocodiles, Burmese pythons, and other wildlife during 20 January-6 March 2010.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 2 Nonhatchling crocodile density calculated as encounter rate per kilometer of route surveyed during 2004-2013. A regression line is drawn, and the 95% confidence interval is shaded in gray (slope = 0.03, P = 0.048). The cold snap had an effect on encounter rates, approximately six times as large as the per annum rate of increase in encounters (estimate = -0.17, P = 0.027). Data are aggregated from four survey routes, Joe Bay/Little Madeira Bay, Buttonwood Canal, Cape Sable/Lake Ingraham, and Biscayne Bay Complex.
Fig. 2 Nonhatchling crocodile density calculated as encounter rate per kilometer of route surveyed during 2004-2013. A regression line is drawn, and the 95% confidence interval is shaded in gray (slope = 0.03, P = 0.048). The cold snap had an effect on encounter rates, approximately six times as large as the per annum rate of increase in encounters (estimate = -0.17, P = 0.027). Data are aggregated from four survey routes, Joe Bay/Little Madeira Bay, Buttonwood Canal, Cape Sable/Lake Ingraham, and Biscayne Bay Complex.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Relative density of American alligators from 2002 to 2015 in South Florida. A regression line is drawn, and the 95% confidence interval is shaded in gray (slope = -0.07, P << 0.001). The cold snap did not have a significant effect on encounter rates ( P = 0.56). Data are aggregated from seven survey routes (N41, HD, WCA2A, TOWER, Frog City, Shark River, and Shark Slough). Monitoring at sites N41, HD, and TOWER ended in 2012. N41 = Water Conservation Area 3A North 41, HD = Water Conservation Area 3A Holiday Park, WCA2A = Water Conservation Area 2A, TOWER = Water Conservation Area 3A Tower.
Fig. 3 Relative density of American alligators from 2002 to 2015 in South Florida. A regression line is drawn, and the 95% confidence interval is shaded in gray (slope = -0.07, P << 0.001). The cold snap did not have a significant effect on encounter rates ( P = 0.56). Data are aggregated from seven survey routes (N41, HD, WCA2A, TOWER, Frog City, Shark River, and Shark Slough). Monitoring at sites N41, HD, and TOWER ended in 2012. N41 = Water Conservation Area 3A North 41, HD = Water Conservation Area 3A Holiday Park, WCA2A = Water Conservation Area 2A, TOWER = Water Conservation Area 3A Tower.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 5 Encounter rates of five most common native snakes, Agkistrodon piscivorus (AgPi) , Nerodia fasciata (NeFa) , Nerodia floridana (NeFl) , Thamnophis sauritus (ThSa) , and Thamnophis sirtalis (ThSi), along Main Park Road and annual rainfall in Everglades National Park from 2008 to 2014. Encounter rates on Main Park Road in ENP do not vary predictably with year ( P = 0.18), and the cold snap did not have a significant effect on encounter rates ( P = 0.529).
Fig. 5 Encounter rates of five most common native snakes, Agkistrodon piscivorus (AgPi) , Nerodia fasciata (NeFa) , Nerodia floridana (NeFl) , Thamnophis sauritus (ThSa) , and Thamnophis sirtalis (ThSi), along Main Park Road and annual rainfall in Everglades National Park from 2008 to 2014. Encounter rates on Main Park Road in ENP do not vary predictably with year ( P = 0.18), and the cold snap did not have a significant effect on encounter rates ( P = 0.529).CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1007/s10530-010-9761-4 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/gcb.12574 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/1446456 · DOI
  4. Brien M. L., 2008, American crocodile, Crocodylus acutus, mortalities in southern Florida, Florida Field Naturalist, 36, 55
  5. 10.2307/2425371 · DOI
  6. 10.1086/660021 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.0709472105 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.2307/1563593 · DOI
  9. 10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.11646/zootaxa.3028.1.1 · DOI
  11. Lang J. W., 1987, Wildlife management: crocodiles and alligators, 301
  12. 10.1890/12-2235.1 · DOI
  13. Mazzotti F. J., 1989, Factors affecting the nesting success of the American Crocodile, Crocodylus acutus, in Florida Bay, Bulletin of Marine Science, 44, 220
  14. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.06.008 · DOI
  15. 10.1670/0022-1511(2007)41[122:ACCAIF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s10530-010-9797-5 · DOI
  17. Meshaka W. E., 2011, A runaway train in the making: the exotic amphibians, reptiles, turtles, and crocodilians of Florida. Monograph 1, Herpetological Conservation and Biology, 6, 1
  18. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x · DOI
  19. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002931 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s10530-008-9228-z · DOI
  21. 10.2307/1928991 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/icb/19.1.239 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s13157-015-0677-8 · DOI

Cited by

See all 33

Metadata

Authors
Mazzotti, F. J., Cherkiss, M. S., Parry, M., Beauchamp, J., Rochford, M., Smith, B., Hart, K., & Brandt, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center University of Florida 3205 College Avenue Davie Florida 33314 USA
  • Southeast Ecological Science Center U.S. Geological Survey 3245 College Avenue Davie Florida 33314 USA
  • South Florida Natural Resource Center National Park Service 40001 State Road 9336 Homestead Florida 33034 USA
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 3205 College Avenue Davie Florida 33314 USA
Venue
Ecosphere
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08
Volume
7
Issue
8
ISSN
2150-8925
Cited by
33
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • U.S. Geological Survey
  • University of Florida

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large reptiles and cold temperatures: Do extreme cold spells set distributional limits for tropical reptiles in Florida? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ecs2.1439
The paper
Mazzotti, F. J., Cherkiss, M. S., Parry, M., Beauchamp, J., Rochford, M., Smith, B., Hart, K., & Brandt, L. A. (2016). Large reptiles and cold temperatures: Do extreme cold spells set distributional limits for tropical reptiles in Florida? Ecosphere. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1439