Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 377

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Embracing variability in amino acid δ15N fractionation: mechanisms, implications, and applications for trophic ecology

Open access
McMahon, Kelton W., McCarthy, Matthew D.·2016·Ecosphere

Abstract

Compound‐specific stable isotope analysis (CSIA) of individual amino acids (AA s) has become a powerful analytical tool in trophic ecology. Heavily fractionating “trophic” AA s (e.g., glutamic acid: Glu) provide a robust indicator of trophic transfer, while minimally fractionating “source” AA s (e.g., phenylalanine: Phe) closely reflect the δ 15 N value at the base of the food web (δ 15 N baseline). Together, the CSIA‐AA approach provides an unprecedented ability to disentangle the influences of δ 15 N baseline values and trophic fractionation on consumer nitrogen isotope values. Perhaps the most important assumption underlying CSIA‐AA applications to trophic ecology is that trophic fractionation of Glu and Phe, and thus the trophic discrimination factor TDF Glu‐ Phe (Δ 15N Glu − Δ 15N Phe), is effectively constant across diverse consumer–resource relationships. To test this assumption, we conducted a comprehensive meta‐analysis of controlled feeding experiments that examined individual AA trophic fractionation (Δ 15N C‐D) and resulting TDF Glu‐ Phe values. We found tremendous variability in TDF Glu‐ Phe values from 0‰ to >10‰ across 70 species (317 individuals) and 88 distinct consumer–diet combinations. However, this variability appears to follow predictable patterns driven by two dominant variables: diet quality and mode of nitrogen excretion. Consumers feeding on high‐quality diets (small diet–consumer AA imbalances) tend to have significantly lower TDF Glu‐ Phe values than consumers feeding on low‐quality diets. Similarly, urea/uric acid‐producing consumers also exhibit significantly lower TDF Glu‐ Phe values than their ammonia‐producing counterparts. While these patterns are certainly not universal, together these factors likely explain many of the observed patterns of TDF Glu‐ Phe variability. We provide an overview of the biochemical and physiological mechanisms underpinning AA Δ 15N C‐D to explain these patterns. There are several seemingly unique systems, including the remarkably consistent TDF Glu‐ Phe values across insect food webs and the isotopically “invisible” trophic transfers in microbial food webs, that may provide additional insight into the influence of diet quality and nitrogen cycling on AA fractionation. In this review, we argue that to realize the full potential of CSIA‐AA approaches in trophic ecology, we must embrace the variability in TDF Glu‐ Phe values. This likely requires developing new models of trophic transfer dynamics for some applications, including multi‐TDF Glu‐ Phe equations that directly incorporate variability in TDF Glu‐ Phe value.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ecs2.1511

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 95 references

Cited by

See all 377

Metadata

Authors
McMahon, K. W., & McCarthy, M. D.
Venue
Ecosphere
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-12
Volume
7
Issue
12
ISSN
2150-8925 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2561358511
Cited by
377
References
95
FWCI
23.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Embracing variability in amino acid δ15N fractionation: mechanisms, implications, and applications for trophic ecology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ecs2.1511
The paper
McMahon, K. W., & McCarthy, M. D. (2016). Embracing variability in amino acid δ15N fractionation: mechanisms, implications, and applications for trophic ecology. Ecosphere. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1511

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.