The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope ratios of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur
Abstract
Use of stable isotope ratios to trace pathways of organic matter among consumers requires knowledge of the isotopic shift between diet and consumer. Variation in trophic shift among consumers can be substantial. For data from the published literature and supplementary original data (excluding fluid‐feeding consumers), the mean isotopic shift for C was +0.5±0.13‰ rather than 0.0‰, as commonly assumed. The shift for C was higher for consumers analyzed as muscle (+1.3±0.30‰) than for consumers analyzed whole (+0.3±0.14‰). Among consumers analyzed whole, the trophic shift for C was lower for consumers acidified prior to analysis (−0.2±0.21‰) than for unacidified samples (+0.5±0.17‰). For N, trophic shift was lower for consumers raised on invertebrate diets (+1.4±0.21‰) than for consumers raised on other high‐protein diets (+3.3±0.26‰) and was intermediate for consumers raised on plant and algal diets (+2.2±0.30‰). The trophic shift for S differed between high‐protein (+2.0±0.65‰) and low‐protein diets (‐0.5±0.56‰). Thus, methods of analysis and dietary differences can affect trophic shift for consumers; the utility of stable isotope methods can be improved if this information is incorporated into studies of trophic relationships. Although few studies of stable isotope ratios have considered variation in the trophic shift, such variation is important because small errors in estimates of trophic shift can result in large errors in estimates of the contribution of sources to consumers or in estimates of trophic position.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nitrogen isotopes and the trophic level of humans in archaeology
Hedges, R. E. M., & Reynard, L. M. (2007) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2006.10.015 · Cited by 965
Bogaard, A., Heaton, T. H. E., Poulton, P., & Merbach, I. (2007) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2006.04.009 · Cited by 696
Fatty acids as dietary tracers in benthic food webs
Kelly, Jr., & Scheibling, R. (2012) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps09559 · Cited by 571
Trophic magnification factors: Considerations of ecology, ecosystems, and study design
Borgå, K., Kidd, K. A., Muir, D. C., Berglund, O., Conder, J. M., Gobas, F. A., Kucklick, J., Malm, O., & Powell, D. E. (2012) · Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management · doi:10.1002/ieam.244 · Cited by 531
Isoscapes: Spatial Pattern in Isotopic Biogeochemistry
Bowen, G. J. (2010) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-040809-152429 · Cited by 518
Metadata
- Authors
- McCutchan, J. H., Lewis, W. M., Kendall, C., & McGrath, C. C.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-07-04
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 378-390
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0706
- OpenAlex
- W2155009193
- Cited by
- 2,723
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 49.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope ratios of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12098.x
- The paper
- McCutchan, J. H., Lewis, W. M., Kendall, C., & McGrath, C. C. (2003). Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope ratios of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12098.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.