Are we approaching a water ceiling to maize yields in the United States?
Open accessAbstract
While annual precipitation in much of the US Corn Belt is likely to remain constant, atmospheric vapor pressure deficit (VPD), the driver of crop water loss (evapotranspiration; ET), is projected to increase from ~2.2 kPa today to ~2.7 kPa by mid‐century primarily due to the temperature increase. Without irrigation, it has been hypothesized that the increase in VPD will create a ceiling to future increases in maize yields. We calculated current and future growing season ET based on biomass, water use efficiency, and the amount of yield these levels of ET would support for maize production in the Midwest USA. We assumed that the production of more grain will necessitate a proportional increase in the production of biomass, with a corresponding increase in ET. Here we show that as VPD increases, maintaining current maize yields (2013–2016) will require a large expansion of irrigation, greater than threefold, in areas currently supported by rain. The average predicted yield for the region of 244 ± 4 bushels/acre (15,316 ± 251 kg/ha) projected for 2050, assuming yield increases observed for the past 60 yr continue, would not be possible with projected increases in VPD, creating a water ceiling to maize yields. Substantial increases in maize yields and the production of high yielding grasses for bioenergy will require developing cultivars with greater water use efficiency, a trait that has not been a priority for breeders in the past.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Water is a major resource that determines the productivity of all agricultural systems, including maize in the U.S. corn-belt.
“Water is a major resource that determines the productivity of all agricultural systems, including maize in the U.S. corn-belt”
From Integrating genetic gain and gap analysis to predict improvements in crop productivity (2020) · cites this paper as DeLucia et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production
Lesk, C., Rowhani, P., & Ramankutty, N. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16467 · Cited by 3,883 · see citing works
Jeffery, S., Verheijen, F. G. A., van der Velde, M., & Bastos, A. C. (2011) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015 · Cited by 2,422 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation
Challinor, A. J., Watson, J., Lobell, D. B., Howden, S. M., Smith, D. R., & Chhetri, N. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2153 · Cited by 2,333 · see citing works
Harvest index: a review of its use in plant breeding and crop physiology.
HAY, R. K. M. (1995) · Annals of Applied Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1995.tb05015.x · Cited by 686 · see citing works
A global data set of the extent of irrigated land from 1900 to 2005
Siebert, S., Kummu, M., Porkka, M., Döll, P., Ramankutty, N., & Scanlon, B. R. (2015) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-19-1521-2015 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Drewry, D. T., Kumar, P., & Long, S. P. (2014) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12567 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Ainsworth, E. A., and S. P. Long. 2005. What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO 2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant pro- duction to rising CO 2 . New Phytologist 165:351- 372.
- Angel, J., et al. 2018. Midwest. Pages 872-940 in D. R. Reidmiller, C. W. Avery, D. R. Easterling, K. E. Kunkel, K. L. M. Lewis, T. K. Maycock, and B. C. Stewart, editors. Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States: fourth national climate assess- ment, volume II. U.S. Global Change Research Pro- gram, Washington, D.C., USA.
- Ficklin, D. L., and K. A. Novick. 2017. Historic and projected changes in vapor pressure deficit suggest a continental-scale drying of the United States atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 122:2061-2079.
- Hatfield, J. L., T. J. Sauer, and J. H. Prueger. 2011. Managing soils to achieve greater water use effi- ciency: a review. Agronomy Journal 93:271-280.
- Leakey, A. D. B., J. N. Fergusun, C. P. Pignon, A. Wu, Z. Jin, G. L. Hammer, and D. B. Lobell. 2019. Water use efficiency as a constraint and target for improving the resilience and productivity of C3 and C4 crops. Annual Review of Plant Biology 70:781-808.
- Liang, X. Z., Y. Wo, R. G. Chambers, D. L. Schmoldt, W. Gao, C. Liu, Y. A. Liu, C. Sun, and J. A. Kennedy. 2017. Determining climate effects on US total agri- cultural productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of USA 114:E2285-E2292.
- Lobell, D. B., K. G. Cassman, and C. B. Field. 2009. Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annual Review of Environment and Resource 34:179-204.
- Lobell, D. B., and C. B. Field. 2007. Global scale cli- mate-crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environmental Research Letters 2: Article 014002.
- Pryor, S. C., and R. J. Barthelmie. 2013. The Midwest- ern United States: Socio-economic context and physical climate. Pages 12-47 in S. C. Pryor, editor. Climate change in the Midwest: Impacts, risks, vul- nerability and adaptation. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
- Reyes, A., C. D. Messina, G. L. Hammer, L. Liu, E. Van Oosterom, R. Lafitte, and M. Cooper. 2015. Soil water capture trends over 50 years of single-cross maize (Zea mays L.) breeding in the US corn-belt. Journal of Experimental Botany 66:7339-7346.
- Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., and A. Porporato. 2005. Ecohy- drology of water-controlled ecosystems: Soil mois- ture and plant dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
- Scanlon, B. R., C. C. Faunt, L. Longuevergne, R. C. Reedy, W. M. Alley, V. L. McGuire, and B. B. McMahon. 2012. Groundwater depletion and sus- tainability of irrigation in the US High Plains and Central Valley. Proceedings of the National Acad- emy of Science of USA 109:9320-9325.
- Taylor, K. E., R. J. Stouffer, and G. A. Meehl. 2012. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 93:485-498.
- Tilman, D., C. Balzer, J. Hill, and B. L. Befort. 2011. Global demand and the sustainability intensifica- tion of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of USA 108:20260-20264.
- Vega, C. R. C., V. O. Sandras, F. H. Andrade, and S. A. Uhart. 2000. Reproductive allometry of soybean, maize and sunflower. Annals of Botany 85: 461-468.
- Zeri, M., M. Z. Husain, K. J. Anderson-Teixiera, E. H. DeLucia, and C. J. Bernacchi. 2013. Water use effi- ciency of perennial and annual bioenergy crops in central Illinois. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 118:581-589.
- Zipper, S. C., J. Qui, and C. J. Kucharik. 2016. Drought effects on US maize and soybean production: spa- tiotemporal patterns and historical changes. Envi- ronmental Research Letters 11:Article 094021.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integrating genetic gain and gap analysis to predict improvements in crop productivity
Cooper, M., Tang, T., Gho, C., Hart, T., Hammer, G., & Messina, C. (2020) · Crop Science · doi:10.1002/csc2.20109 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Yang, P., Zhao, Q., & Cai, X. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab865f · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- DeLucia, E. H., Chen, S., Guan, K., Peng, B., Li, Y., Gomez‐Casanovas, N., Kantola, I. B., Bernacchi, C. J., Huang, Y., Long, S. P., & Ort, D. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Qinghai University (CN)
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- DeLucia, Evan H.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Ecosphere
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 2150-8925 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2949280173
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 8.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ecosphere (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NSSC18K0170)
- Biological and Environmental Research (DE‐SC 18420)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Keywords
- maize yield, vapor pressure deficit, evapotranspiration, crop water use, water use efficiency, irrigation expansion, climate change impacts on agriculture, bioenergy grasses, maize breeding, yield projections
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review