Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Troponins and Brain Natriuretic Peptides for the Prediction of Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Open access
Michel, Lars, Mincu, Raluca I., Mahabadi, Amir A., Settelmeier, Stephan, Al-Rashid, Fadi, Rassaf, Tienush, Totzeck, Matthias·2020·European Journal of Heart Failure

Abstract

Aims: Cardiac biomarkers are a mainstay in diagnosis of cardiovascular disease but their role in cardio-oncology has not yet been systematically evaluated. This meta-analysis aims to determine whether cardiac troponins and (N-terminal pro) brain natriuretic peptide (BNP/NT-proBNP) predict cancer therapy-related left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Methods and results: Scientific databases were searched for studies that assessed troponins or BNP/NT-proBNP in adult patients undergoing cancer therapy. Data from 61 trials with 5691 patients were included. Cancer therapy was associated with an increase in troponin levels [odds ratio (OR) 14.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.0–34.1; n = 3049]. Patients with elevated troponins receiving chemotherapy or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 inhibitor therapy were at higher risk for LV dysfunction (OR 11.9, 95% CI 4.4–32.1; n = 2163). Troponin had a negative predictive value of 93%. Mean BNP/NT-proBNP levels were increased in patients post-treatment (standardized mean difference 0.6, 95% CI 0.3–0.9; n = 912), but the available evidence did not consistently indicate prediction of LV dysfunction (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.7–4.2; n = 197). β-blocker and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy to mitigate cardiotoxicity during cancer therapy was associated with a decline in serum troponins (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.7–9.8; n = 466). Conclusion: Elevated troponin levels predict LV dysfunction in patients receiving cancer therapy. Assessment of troponin levels may qualify as a screening test to identify patients who require referral to cardio-oncology units and benefit from preventive strategies. Further evidence is required for both biomarkers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejhf.1631

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Michel, L., Mincu, R. I., Mahabadi, A. A., Settelmeier, S., Al-Rashid, F., Rassaf, T., & Totzeck, M.
Venue
European Journal of Heart Failure
Published
2019-11-12
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
350-361
ISSN
  • 1388-9842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1879-0844
OpenAlex
W2985852915
Cited by
265
References
4
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Troponins and Brain Natriuretic Peptides for the Prediction of Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ejhf.1631
The paper
Michel, L., Mincu, R. I., Mahabadi, A. A., Settelmeier, S., Al-Rashid, F., Rassaf, T., & Totzeck, M. (2020). Troponins and Brain Natriuretic Peptides for the Prediction of Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis. European Journal of Heart Failure. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1631

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.