Cited by 60Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigationCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsECG Monitoring and Analysis

Artificial intelligence-enhanced risk stratification of cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction using electrocardiographic images

Open access
Oikonomou, Evangelos K., Sangha, Veer, Dhingra, Lovedeep S., Aminorroaya, Arya, Coppi, Andreas, Krumholz, Harlan M., Baldassarre, Lauren A., Khera, Rohan·2025·Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification strategies for cancer therapeutics–related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) rely on serial monitoring by specialized imaging, limiting their scalability. We aimed to examine an application of artificial intelligence (AI) to ECG images as a surrogate for imaging risk biomarkers and its association with early CTRCD. METHODS: Across a US-based health system (2013–2023), we identified 1550 patients (aged, 60 [interquartile range, 51–69] years, 1223 [78.9%] women) without cardiomyopathy who received anthracyclines or trastuzumab for breast cancer or non-Hodgkin lymphoma and had ECG performed ≤12 months before treatment. We deployed a validated AI model of left ventricular systolic dysfunction to baseline ECG images and defined low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups based on AI-ECG left ventricular systolic dysfunction probabilities of <0.01, 0.01 to 0.1, and ≥0.1 (positive screen), respectively. We explored the association with early CTRCD (new cardiomyopathy, heart failure, or left ventricular ejection fraction <50%), or left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, up to 12 months after treatment. In a mechanistic analysis, we assessed the association between global longitudinal strain and AI-ECG left ventricular systolic dysfunction probabilities in studies performed within 15 days of each other. RESULTS: Among 1550 patients without known cardiomyopathy (median follow-up, 14.1 [interquartile range, 13.4–17.1] months), 83 (5.4%), 562 (36.3%), and 905 (58.4%) were classified as high, intermediate, and low risk, respectively, by baseline AI-ECG. A high-risk versus low-risk AI-ECG screen (≥0.1 versus <0.01) was associated with a 3.4-fold and 13.5-fold higher incidence of CTRCD (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.35 [95% CI, 2.25–4.99]) and left ventricular ejection fraction <40% (adjusted hazard ratio, 13.52 [95% CI, 5.06–36.10]), respectively. Post hoc analyses supported longitudinal increases in AI-ECG probabilities within 6 to 12 months of a CTRCD event. Among 1428 temporally linked echocardiograms and ECGs, AI-ECG left ventricular systolic dysfunction probabilities were associated with worse global longitudinal strain (global longitudinal strain, −19% [interquartile range, −21% to −17%] for probabilities <0.1, to −15% [interquartile range, −15% to −9%] for ≥0.5 [ P <0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: AI applied to baseline ECG images can stratify the risk of early CTRCD associated with anthracycline or trastuzumab exposure in the setting of breast cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.124.011504

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Miller KD, Nogueira L, Devasia T, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:409-436.
  2. Lyon AR, López-Fernández T, Couch LS, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardio-oncology developed in collaboration with the European Hematology Association (EHA), the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) and the International Cardio- Oncology Society (IC-OS). Eur Heart J. 2022;43:4229-4361.
  3. Larsen CM, Garcia Arango M, Dasari H, et al. Association of Anthracycline With Heart Failure in Patients Treated for Breast Cancer or Lymphoma, 1985-2010. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e2254669.
  4. Palaskas N, Lopez-Mattei J, Durand JB, Iliescu C, Deswal A. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Myocarditis: Pathophysiological Characteristics, Diagnosis, and Treatment. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e013757.
  5. Johnson DB, Balko JM, Compton ML, et al. Fulminant Myocarditis with Combination Immune Checkpoint Blockade. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1749-1755.
  6. Moslehi Javid, Salem Joe-Elie. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Myocarditis Treatment Strategies and Future Directions. JACC: CardioOncology. 2022;4:704-707.
  7. Abdel-Qadir H, Austin PC, Lee DS, et al. A Population-Based Study of Cardiovascular Mortality Following Early-Stage Breast Cancer. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:88-93.
  8. Herrmann J, Lenihan D, Armenian S, et al. Defining cardiovascular toxicities of cancer therapies: an International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS) consensus statement. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:280-299.
  9. Murtagh G, Januzzi JL, Scherrer-Crosbie M, et al. Circulating Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Cancer Therapeutics-Related Cardiotoxicity: Review of Critical Challenges, Solutions, and Future Directions. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12:e029574.
  10. Baldassarre Lauren A., Ganatra Sarju, Lopez-Mattei Juan, et al. Advances in Multimodality Imaging in Cardio-Oncology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80:1560-1578.
  11. Jacobs JEJ, Greason G, Mangold KE, et al. Artificial Intelligence ECG as a Novel Screening Tool to Detect a Newly Abnormal Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction After Anthracycline-Based Cancer Therapy. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023. Published onlineNovember 7, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwad348. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Yao X, Rushlow DR, Inselman JW, et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiograms for identification of patients with low ejection fraction: a pragmatic, randomized clinical trial. Nat Med. 2021;27:815-819.
  13. Kwan JM, Oikonomou EK, Henry ML, Sinusas AJ. Multimodality advanced cardiovascular and molecular imaging for early detection and monitoring of cancer therapy-associated cardiotoxicity and the role of artificial intelligence and big data. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:829553.
  14. Kaboré EG, Macdonald C, Kaboré A, et al. Risk Prediction Models for Cardiotoxicity of Chemotherapy Among Patients With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e230569.
  15. Oikonomou EK, Kokkinidis DG, Kampaktsis PN, et al. Assessment of Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain for Early Prediction of Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4:1007-1018.
  16. Thavendiranathan P, Negishi T, Somerset E, et al. Strain-Guided Management of Potentially Cardiotoxic Cancer Therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:392-401.
  17. Henriksen Peter A., Rankin Stephen, Lang Ninian N. Cardioprotection in Patients at High Risk of Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity. JACC: CardioOncology. 2023;5:292-297.
  18. Heck SL, Mecinaj A, Ree AH, et al. Prevention of Cardiac Dysfunction During Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy (PRADA): Extended Follow-Up of a 2×2 Factorial, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial of Candesartan and Metoprolol. Circulation. 2021;143:2431-2440.
  19. Silber JH, Cnaan A, Clark BJ, et al. Enalapril to prevent cardiac function decline in long- term survivors of pediatric cancer exposed to anthracyclines. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:820-828.
  20. Armenian SH, Hudson MM, Lindenfeld L, et al. Effect of carvedilol versus placebo on cardiac function in anthracycline-exposed survivors of childhood cancer (PREVENT-HF): a randomised, controlled, phase 2b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25:235-245.
  21. Neilan TG, Quinaglia T, Onoue T, et al. Atorvastatin for Anthracycline-Associated Cardiac Dysfunction: The STOP-CA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023;330:528-536.
  22. Titus A, Cheema HA, Shafiee A, et al. Statins for Attenuating Cardiotoxicity in Patients Receiving Anthracyclines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023;48:101885.
  23. Sangha V, Mortazavi BJ, Haimovich AD, et al. Automated multilabel diagnosis on electrocardiographic images and signals. Nat Commun. 2022;13:1583.
  24. Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, Vedantam R, Parikh D, Batra D. Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization. arXiv [csCV]. 2016.
  25. Plana JC, Galderisi M, Barac A, et al. Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27:911-939.
  26. Michel L, Mincu RI, Mahabadi AA, et al. Troponins and brain natriuretic peptides for the prediction of cardiotoxicity in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22:350- 361.
  27. de Azambuja E, Ponde N, Procter M, et al. A pooled analysis of the cardiac events in the trastuzumab adjuvant trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;179:161-171.
  28. Tan-Chiu E, Yothers G, Romond E, et al. Assessment of cardiac dysfunction in a randomized trial comparing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel, with or without trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy in node-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- overexpressing breast cancer: NSABP B-31. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7811-7819.
  29. Becker MMC, Arruda GFA, Berenguer DRF, Buril RO, Cardinale D, Brandão SCS. Anthracycline cardiotoxicity: current methods of diagnosis and possible role of 18F-FDG PET/CT as a new biomarker. Cardiooncology. 2023;9:17.
  30. Kelly JM, Babich JW. PET Tracers for Imaging Cardiac Function in Cardio-oncology. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022;24:247-260.
  31. Hricak H, Ward ZJ, Atun R, Abdel-Wahab M, Muellner A, Scott AM. Increasing Access to Imaging for Addressing the Global Cancer Epidemic. Radiology. 2021;301:543-546.
  32. Sierra-Galan LM, Estrada-Lopez EES, Ferrari VA, et al. Worldwide variation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance practice models. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023;25:38.
  33. Menacho KD, Ramirez S, Perez A, et al. Improving cardiovascular magnetic resonance access in low-and middle-income countries for cardiomyopathy assessment: rapid cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:2496-2507.
  34. Attia ZI, Harmon DM, Behr ER, Friedman PA. Application of artificial intelligence to the electrocardiogram. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:4717-4730.
  35. Attia ZI, Harmon DM, Dugan J, et al. Prospective evaluation of smartwatch-enabled detection of left ventricular dysfunction. Nat Med. 2022;28:2497-2503.
  36. Attia ZI, Kapa S, Lopez-Jimenez F, et al. Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram. Nat Med. 2019;25:70-74.
  37. Printezi MI, Yousif LIE, Kamphuis JAM, et al. LVEF by Multigated Acquisition Scan Compared to Other Imaging Modalities in Cardio-Oncology: a Systematic Review. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2022;19:136-145.
  38. Hswen Y, Voelker R. New AI Tools Must Have Health Equity in Their DNA. JAMA. 2023;330:1604-1607.
  39. Tahir E, Azar M, Shihada S, et al. Myocardial injury detected by T1 and T2 mapping on CMR predicts subsequent cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction in patients with breast cancer treated by epirubicin-based chemotherapy or left-sided RT. Eur Radiol. 2022;32:1853- 1865.
  40. Giusca S, Korosoglou G, Montenbruck M, et al. Multiparametric Early Detection and Prediction of Cardiotoxicity Using Myocardial Strain, T1 and T2 Mapping, and Biochemical Markers: A Longitudinal Cardiac Resonance Imaging Study During 2 Years of Follow-Up. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14:e012459.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oikonomou, E. K., Sangha, V., Dhingra, L. S., Aminorroaya, A., Coppi, A., Krumholz, H. M., Baldassarre, L. A., & Khera, R.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Khera, Rohan
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2025-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
e011504-e011504
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W4402133464
Cited by
60
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 7
FWCI
18.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL167858, K23HL153775, 1F32HL170592)
  • Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (2022060)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
cardiotoxicity, risk stratification, artificial intelligence, electrocardiogram, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, anthracyclines, trastuzumab, breast cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, left ventricular ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, early detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review