The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Initiating Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) in Heart Failure: Results of TITRATION, a Double-Blind, Randomized Comparison of Two Uptitration Regimens
Open accessAbstract
Aims: To assess the tolerability of initiating/uptitrating sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) from 50 to 200 mg twice daily (target dose) over 3 and 6 weeks in heart failure (HF) patients (ejection fraction ≤35%). Methods and results: A 5-day open-label run-in (sacubitril/valsartan 50 mg twice daily) preceded an 11-week, double-blind, randomization period [100 mg twice daily for 2 weeks followed by 200 mg twice daily (‘condensed’ regimen) vs. 50 mg twice daily for 2 weeks, 100 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 200 mg twice daily (‘conservative’ regimen)]. Patients were stratified by pre-study dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin-receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB; low-dose stratum included ACEI/ARB-naïve patients). Of 540 patients entering run-in, 498 (92%) were randomized and 429 (86.1% of randomized) completed the study. Pre-defined tolerability criteria were hypotension, renal dysfunction and hyperkalaemia; and adjudicated angioedema, which occurred in (‘condensed’ vs. ‘conservative’) 9.7% vs. 8.4% (P = 0.570), 7.3% vs. 7.6% (P = 0.990), 7.7% vs. 4.4% (P = 0.114), and 0.0% vs. 0.8% of patients, respectively. Corresponding proportions for pre-defined systolic blood pressure <95 mmHg, serum potassium >5.5 mmol/L, and serum creatinine >3.0 mg/dL were 8.9% vs. 5.2% (P = 0.102), 7.3% vs. 4.0% (P = 0.097), and 0.4% vs. 0%, respectively. In total, 378 (76%) patients achieved and maintained sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg twice daily without dose interruption/down-titration over 12 weeks (77.8% vs. 84.3% for ‘condensed’ vs. ‘conservative’; P = 0.078). Rates by ACEI/ARB pre-study dose stratification were 82.6% vs. 83.8% (P = 0.783) for high-dose/‘condensed’ vs. high-dose/‘conservative’ and 84.9% vs. 73.6% (P = 0.030) for low-dose/‘conservative’ vs. low-dose/‘condensed’. Conclusions: Initiation/uptitration of sacubitril/valsartan from 50 to 200 mg twice daily over 3 or 6 weeks had a tolerability profile in line with other HF treatments. More gradual initiation/uptitration maximized attainment of target dose in the low-dose ACEI/ARB group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure
Yancy, C. W., Jessup, M., Bozkurt, B., Butler, J., Casey, D. E., Drazner, M. H., Fonarow, G. C., Geraci, S. A., Horwich, T., Januzzi, J. L., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019 · Cited by 12,536
Self-citationThe SOLVD Investigators* (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199108013250501 · Cited by 8,029
Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure
McMurray, J. J. V., Packer, M., Desai, A. S., Gong, J., Lefkowitz, M. P., Rizkala, A. R., Rouleau, J. L., Shi, V. C., Solomon, S. D., Swedberg, K., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1409077 · Cited by 6,957
Self-citation(1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199209033271003 · Cited by 3,725
Cited by
Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in acute decompensated heart failure
Velazquez, E. J., Morrow, D. A., DeVore, A. D., Duffy, C. I., Ambrosy, A. P., McCague, K., Rocha, R., & Braunwald, E. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1812851 · Cited by 1,260
Wachter, R., Senni, M., Belohlavek, J., Straburzynska-Migaj, E., Witte, K. K., Kobalava, Z., Fonseca, C., Goncalvesova, E., Cavusoglu, Y., Fernandez, A., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ejhf.1498 · Cited by 354
Self-citationMaddox, T. M., Januzzi, J. L., Allen, L. A., Breathett, K., Brouse, S., Butler, J., Davis, L. L., Fonarow, G. C., Ibrahim, N. E., Lindenfeld, J., et al. (2024) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.12.024 · Cited by 362
Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan by dose level achieved in the PIONEER-HF trial
Berg, D. D., Braunwald, E., DeVore, A. D., Lala, A., Pinney, S. P., Duffy, C. I., Gurmu, Y., Velazquez, E. J., & Morrow, D. A. (2020) · JACC: Heart Failure · doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2020.06.008 · Cited by 36
Women and diabetes: preventing heart disease in a new era of therapies
Galati, G., Sabouret, P., Germanova, O., & Bhatt, D. L. (2021) · European Cardiology Review · doi:10.15420/ecr.2021.22 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Senni, M., McMurray, J. J. V., Wachter, R., McIntyre, H. F., Reyes, A., Majercak, I., Andreka, P., Shehova-Yankova, N., Anand, I., Yilmaz, M. B., Gogia, H., Martinez-Selles, M., Fischer, S., Zilahi, Z., Cosmi, F., Gelev, V., Galve, E., Gómez-Doblas, J. J., Nociar, J., Radomska, M., Sokolova, B., Volterrani, M., Sarkar, A., Reimund, B., Chen, F., & Charney, A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Heart Failure
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-05-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1193-1202
- ISSN
- 1388-9842 (ISSN-L)
- 1879-0844
- OpenAlex
- W2380447421
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Initiating Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) in Heart Failure: Results of TITRATION, a Double-Blind, Randomized Comparison of Two Uptitration Regimens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ejhf.548
- The paper
- Senni, M., McMurray, J. J. V., Wachter, R., McIntyre, H. F., Reyes, A., Majercak, I., Andreka, P., Shehova-Yankova, N., Anand, I., Yilmaz, M. B., Gogia, H., Martinez-Selles, M., Fischer, S., Zilahi, Z., Cosmi, F., Gelev, V., Galve, E., Gómez-Doblas, J. J., Nociar, J., . . . Charney, A. (2016). Initiating Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) in Heart Failure: Results of TITRATION, a Double-Blind, Randomized Comparison of Two Uptitration Regimens. European Journal of Heart Failure. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.548
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.