Cited by 37Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiac Fibrosis and RemodelingBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan by dose level achieved in the PIONEER-HF trial

Open access
Berg, David D., Braunwald, Eugene, DeVore, Adam D., Lala, Anuradha, Pinney, Sean P., Duffy, Carol I., Gurmu, Yared, Velazquez, Eric J. +1 more·2020·JACC: Heart Failure

Abstract

Objectives This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan according to dose level achieved in the PIONEER-HF (Comparison of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Enalapril on Effect on NT-proBNP in Patients Stabilized From an Acute Heart Failure Episode) trial.Background In patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), in-hospital initiation and continuation of sacubitril/valsartan as compared with enalapril is well tolerated, achieves a greater reduction in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and reduces the risk of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for HF through 8 weeks. However, not all patients achieve the target dose of sacubitril/valsartan, and its efficacy and safety in such patients are of interest.Methods PIONEER-HF was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril in 881 patients stabilized during hospitalization for ADHF. Blinded study medication was administered for 8 weeks, with initial dosing selected based on the systolic blood pressure at randomization and titrated toward a target of sacubitril/valsartan 97/103 mg twice daily, or enalapril 10 mg twice daily, with an algorithm based on systolic blood pressure and the investigator's assessment of tolerability.Results At 4 weeks, 199 (55%) patients allocated to sacubitril/valsartan and 211 (60%) patients allocated to enalapril were dispensed the target dose. Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 treatment groups within each dose level. There was no heterogeneity across dose levels in the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on the reduction in NT-proBNP (p interaction = 0.69), the reduction in cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure (p interaction = 0.42), or the pre-specified adverse events of special interest through 8 weeks.Conclusions In hemodynamically stabilized patients with ADHF, the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan are generally consistent across dose levels. (Comparison of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Enalapril on Effect on NT-proBNP in Patients Stabilized From an Acute Heart Failure Episode [PIONEER-HF]; NCT02554890).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.06.008

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berg, D. D., Braunwald, E., DeVore, A. D., Lala, A., Pinney, S. P., Duffy, C. I., Gurmu, Y., Velazquez, E. J., & Morrow, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Novartis (United States) (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Berg, David D.
Venue
JACC: Heart Failure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
834-843
ISSN
2213-1779 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3048688534
Cited by
36
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JACC Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Luitpold Pharmaceuticals
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • AstraZeneca
  • MyoKardia
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A.
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Daiichi-Sankyo
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  • Merck
  • Eisai
  • Bayer Fund
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Novo Nordisk
  • CareDx
  • Medtronic
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  • American Heart Association
  • Novartis
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
sacubitril/valsartan, dose titration, acute decompensated heart failure, enalapril, NT-proBNP, drug efficacy, drug safety, adverse events, heart failure pharmacotherapy
MeSH terms
Valsartan, Aminobutyrates, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Biphenyl Compounds, Drug Combinations, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Stroke Volume, Ventricular Function, Left, Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review