Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 346

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Actions of the chemotactic cytokines MCP‐1, MCP‐2, MCP‐3, RANTES, MIP‐1α and MIP‐1β on human monocytes

Uguccioni, Mariagrazia, D'Apuzzo, Massimo, Loetscher, Marcel, Dewald, Beatrice, Baggiolini, Marco·1995·European Journal of Immunology

Abstract

The activities of six synthetic CC chemokines, MCP‐1, MCP‐2, MCP‐3, RANTES, MIP‐1α and MIP‐1β on human blood monocytes were studied. All CC chemokines elicited a bimodal migration response in vitro. Highest numbers of migrating cells were obtained with the monocyte chemotactic proteins (MCP) and RANTES, somewhat lower numbers with MIP‐1α, and only weak migration with MIP‐1β. The most potent attractants were MCP‐1 and MIP‐1α which reached maximum efficacy at 0.1 to 1 nM. All CC chemokines also induced the release of N‐acetyl‐β‐D‐glucosaminidase from cytochalasin B‐pretreated monocytes. The MCP were most effective (MCP‐1 > MCP‐3 > MCP‐2), RANTES and MIP‐1α showed moderate (1/3 of MCP‐1 activity), and MIP‐1β only minimal activity. Cytosolic free Ca 2+ changes and exocytosis were used to monitor receptor desensitization. Marked cross‐desensitization was observed among MCP‐1, MCP‐2 and MCP‐3 on the one hand, and RANTES, MIP‐1α and MIP‐1β on the other, indicating receptor sharing within these two subgroups of CC chemokines. The responses to RANTES, MIP‐1α and MIP‐1β were also moderately to markedly desensitized by pretreatment with MCP‐1, MCP‐2 or MCP‐3, while the responses to the MCP were virtually unaffected by pretreatment with RANTES, MIP‐1α and MIP‐1β. These results suggest that the MCP also interact with receptors recognized by RANTES, MIP‐1α and MIP‐1β, but not vice versa. Binding studies were performed with radiolabeled MCP‐1 or MIP‐1α. All MCP competed readily for labeled MCP‐1 yielding a concentration‐dependent sigmoidal displacement curve. Displacement with RANTES, MIP‐1α and MIP‐1β was observed at higher concentrations, but was not complete. Radiolabeled MIP‐1α was displaced efficiently by MIP‐1α or MIP‐1β, but only partially by RANTES. Of the MCP, only MC‐3 completely displaced MIP‐1α, while only partial displacement was observed with MCP‐1 and MCP‐2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eji.1830250113

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 346

Metadata

Authors
Uguccioni, M., D'Apuzzo, M., Loetscher, M., Dewald, B., & Baggiolini, M.
Venue
European Journal of Immunology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
64-68
ISSN
  • 0014-2980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4141
OpenAlex
W1973724657
Cited by
346
References
0
FWCI
11.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Actions of the chemotactic cytokines MCP‐1, MCP‐2, MCP‐3, RANTES, MIP‐1α and MIP‐1β on human monocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/eji.1830250113
The paper
Uguccioni, M., D'Apuzzo, M., Loetscher, M., Dewald, B., & Baggiolini, M. (1995). Actions of the chemotactic cytokines MCP‐1, MCP‐2, MCP‐3, RANTES, MIP‐1α and MIP‐1β on human monocytes. European Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830250113

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.