The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organocatalyzed Asymmetric Friedel–Crafts Reactions
Abstract
Aromatic substitution enables the synthesis of relevant and promising biological entities through the direct synthesis of a range of highly functionalized compounds. Thus, since its discovery and over more than one century, the Friedel–Crafts (F‐C) alkylation has been used for carrying out such a transformation. Despite its aptitude and viability for aromatic substitutions, it is quite surprisingly that catalytic and asymmetric versions of F‐C reactions have only been described in the mid‐1980s. In this microreview, we are planning to underscore the main and recent developments in organocatalyzed F‐C reactions which were published within the 2001–2009 timeframe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wang, X., Liu, J., Xu, L., Hao, Z., Wang, L., & Xiao, J. (2015) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c5ra21919a · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Terrasson, V., Marcia de Figueiredo, R., & Campagne, J. M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Organic Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-04-27
- Volume
- 2010
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2635-2655
- ISSN
- 1099-0690 (ISSN-L)
- 1434-193X
- OpenAlex
- W2119984183
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
