Cited by 15Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Treatment

Treating youth in pain: Comparing tailored behavioural medicine treatment provided by physical therapists in primary care with physical exercises

Holm, S., Ljungman, G., Åsenlöf, P., Linton, S.J., Söderlund, A.·2016·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

Objectives: To study the efficacy of tailored behavioural medicine treatment within a physical therapy framework. Methods: The study was a randomized controlled study (RCT): tailored behavioural medicine treatment (EXT) delivered by physical therapists (PT s) was compared with exercise‐based treatment (CT). Thirty‐two adolescents (mean age 14.3 years) with persistent pain participated. Data on pain‐related disability and school attendance (primary outcomes), pain intensity, catastrophizing, fear of movement and self‐efficacy were collected. Results: The pain‐related disability measured by the Functional Disability Inventory (FDI) resulted in mean score change of EXT = −18 and CT = −11, respectively. A significant change within both groups was found (EXT p = 0.003, CT p = 0.001), and a large effect size for FDI between the conditions was demonstrated (AUC of 0.77). For school attendance post‐treatment, no difference was found between conditions. For secondary outcomes, a significant improvement in pain intensity and pain catastrophizing was found for the EXT and self‐efficacy for the CT groups but no statistically significant difference between the two conditions was detected. Caution should be given to the small sample size, as it may affect the interpretation and generalizability of the results. Conclusion: In this study, differences between tailored behavioural medicine treatment delivered by PT s and exercise‐based treatment could not be demonstrated, although the effect size was large. Patients who received either treatment demonstrated significant changes over time in pain‐related disability. The low number of participants and suboptimal tailoring of the psychological components may partly explain the failure to demonstrate differences between groups, and future studies are warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejp.780

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holm, S., Ljungman, G., Åsenlöf, P., Linton, S. J., & Söderlund, A.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Örebro University (SE)
  • Mälardalen University (SE)
Corresponding author
Holm, S.
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-09-24
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
626-638
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W1910242146
Cited by
15
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
pediatric chronic pain, adolescents, behavioral medicine, tailored treatment, physiotherapy, exercise therapy, pain-related disability, school attendance, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, self-efficacy, primary care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Behavioral Medicine, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Movement, Pain, Primary Health Care, Exercise, Self Efficacy, Physical Therapy Modalities, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review