Emotional prejudice, essentialism, and nationalism The 2002 Tajfel lecture
Open accessAbstract
In explaining differences between groups, people ascribe the human essence to their ingroup and consider outgroups as less human. This phenomenon, called infra‐humanization, occurs outside people's awareness. Because secondary emotions (e.g. love, hope, contempt, resentment) are considered uniquely human emotions, people not only attribute more secondary emotions to their ingroup than to outgroups, but are reluctant to associate these emotions with outgroups. Moreover, people behave less cooperatively (in terms of altruism, imitation, and approach) with an outgroup member who expresses himself through secondary emotions. Infra‐humanization occurs for high and low status groups, even in the absence of conflict between groups. It does not occur when the outgroup target is adequately individualized, by a complete name or through perspective taking, for instance. The differential familiarity with the ingroup and the outgroup cannot explain infra‐humanization. Yet, preliminary results show that subjective essentialism and ingroup identification may mediate the effects of infra‐humanization. A connection is made between nationalism and infra‐humanization. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Outgroups are not perceived as experiencing complex human emotions to the same extent as ingroups, a phenomenon termed infra-humanization.
“Outgroups are not perceived as experiencing complex human emotions to the same extent as ingroups, a phenomenon termed infra-humanization (Leyens et al., 2001, 2003).”
From Dehumanized Perception: A Psychological Means to Facilitate Atrocities, Torture, and Genocide? (2011) · cites this paper as Leyens et al., 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 90 · Cited by 314
- Authors
- Leyens, J., Cortes, B., Demoulin, S., Dovidio, J. F., Fiske, S. T., Gaunt, R., Paladino, M., Rodriguez‐Perez, A., Rodriguez‐Torres, R., & Vaes, J.
- Affiliations
- UCLouvain (BE)
- Fund for Scientific Research (BE)
- Colgate University (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- University of Trento (IT)
- Universidad de La Laguna (ES)
- University of Padua (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Leyens, Jacques‐Philippe
- Venue
- European Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 703-717
- ISSN
- 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0992
- OpenAlex
- W2154778516
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 35.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- European Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Association of Social Psychology
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
- Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles
- Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- essentialism, nationalism, secondary emotions, ingroup identification, outgroup perception, intergroup differences, altruism, imitation, approach behavior, perspective taking, group status, individualization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review