Dehumanized Perception: A Psychological Means to Facilitate Atrocities, Torture, and Genocide?
Open accessAbstract
Dehumanized perception, a failure to spontaneously consider the mind of another person, may be a psychological mechanism facilitating inhumane acts like torture. Social cognition - considering someone's mind - recognizes the other as a human being subject to moral treatment. Social neuroscience has reliably shown that participants normally activate a social-cognition neural network to pictures and thoughts of other people; our previous work shows that parts of this network uniquely fail to engage for traditionally dehumanized targets (homeless persons or drug addicts; see Harris & Fiske, 2009, for review). This suggests participants may not consider these dehumanized groups' minds. Study 1 demonstrates that participants do fail to spontaneously think about the contents of these targets' minds when imagining a day in their life, and rate them differently on a number of human-perception dimensions. Study 2 shows that these human-perception dimension ratings correlate with activation in brain regions beyond the social-cognition network, including areas implicated in disgust, attention, and cognitive control. These results suggest that disengaging social cognition affects a number of other brain processes and hints at some of the complex psychological mechanisms potentially involved in atrocities against humanity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
6 of 32 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Social neuroscience has reliably shown that people normally activate a social-cognition neural network when viewing or thinking about other people.
“Social neuroscience has reliably shown that participants normally activate a social-cognition neural network to pictures and thoughts of other people”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Amodio & Frith, 2006 source
- cites Overwalle, 2009 source
The Conclusions (p. 21) describe a social-cognition circuit involving the TPJ and mPFC when people infer others’ goals and traits. But “Identifying the social other” (pp. 7, 14) distinguishes viewing faces and bodies, which engages visual-perception regions; the paper does not establish that merely viewing pictures of other people normally activates the social-cognition circuit. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Manipulations of social goals validate the prediction: inferring preference significantly increases MPFC and STS activity to otherwise dehumanized targets.
“Besides manipulations of target persons, manipulations of social goals validate this prediction: Inferring preference, a mental-state inference, significantly increases MPFC and STS activity to these otherwise dehumanized targets (Harris & Fiske, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Harris & Fiske, 2007 source
The Task main effect and Discussion report significantly greater mPFC activity during vegetable-preference inference than during age judgments, including for the disgust-eliciting targets. They do not report a corresponding STS increase from preference inference: the STS finding is a separate comparison in which activity was greater for other social-group members than for the disgust-eliciting targets, collapsed across tasks. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
People anthropomorphize a range of inanimate objects and animals.
“People also anthropomorphize a range of inanimate objects and animals (Kwan & Fiske, 2008; Gray, Gray, & Wegner, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Kwan & Fiske, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gray, Gray, & Wegner, 2007 source
In “Dimensions of Mind Perception” (page unavailable), respondents rated mental capacities in three nonhuman animals and a sociable robot, supporting the point that people attribute minds to animals and at least one nonliving entity. The paper does not establish anthropomorphism across a range of inanimate objects; the robot is the only such object studied. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
One indication of dehumanized perception may be reduced activation in the social-cognition neural network, including medial prefrontal cortex and superior temporal sulcus.
“One indication of dehumanized perception may be reduced activation in the social-cognition neural network (see Amodio & Frith, 2006; Overwalle, 2009, for reviews), including medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; Harris & Fiske, 2006) and superior temporal sulcus (STS; Harris & Fiske, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The ACC has been active when participants needed to override a prepotent response to endorse sacrificing dehumanized targets.
“but more recently, has been active when participants needed to override a prepotent response to endorse sacrificing dehumanized targets (Cikara, Farnsworth, Harris, & Fiske, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Cikara, Farnsworth, Harris, & Fiske, 2010 source
The fMRI findings report ACC activation when participants judged sacrificing a low-warmth, low-competence target to save high-warmth, high-competence people; the paper also describes the former targets as dehumanized. But the General discussion says overriding moral aversion is a proposal, not an established explanation: participants may instead have felt less aversion, and the design cannot separate the effects of sacrificing the target from saving the ingroup. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Study 2 found that human-perception dimension ratings correlate with activation in brain regions beyond the social-cognition network, including areas implicated in disgust, attention, and cognitive control.
“Study 2 shows that these human-perception dimension ratings correlate with activation in brain regions beyond the social-cognition network, including areas implicated in disgust, attention, and cognitive control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Study 1 found that participants rate dehumanized targets differently on a number of human-perception dimensions.
“and rate them differently on a number of human-perception dimensions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Study 1 found that participants fail to spontaneously think about the mental contents of dehumanized targets when imagining a day in their life.
“Study 1 demonstrates that participants do fail to spontaneously think about the contents of these targets’ minds when imagining a day in their life”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The 3:1 deviant-cell contrast analyses revealed no significant differences in adjectives, interpretive-action verbs, or descriptive-action verbs used in the descriptions of any type of social target.
“The 3:1 deviant-cell contrast analyses revealed no significant differences in adjectives, interpretive-action verbs, or descriptive-actions verbs used in the descriptions of any type of social target.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Right anterior insula showed parametric modulation with warmth ratings, t(19) = −4.31, p < 4.76E−4, partial η2 = 0.49, at x = 38, y = 13, z = 15, 312 voxels.
“we found parametric modulation of the right anterior insula with warmth ratings, t(19) = −4.31, p < 4.76E−4, partial η2 = 0.49, at x = 38, y = 13, z = 15, 312 voxels”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No significant differences appear on perceived experience of complex emotions.
“No significant differences appear on perceived experience of complex emotions, separating apparent dehumanization from previous work on infra-humanization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No significant differences distinguished the total number of words used to describe the different social targets, F(3, 93) = .20, p = .90.
“No significant differences distinguished the total number of words used to describe the different social targets, F(3, 93) = .20, p = .90.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants use significantly fewer mental-state verbs to describe a day in the life of dehumanized targets, t(86.22) = 2.52, p < .05.
“However, as predicted, a 3:1 deviant-cell contrast revealed that participants use significantly fewer mental-state verbs to describe a day in the life of dehumanized targets, t(86.22) = 2.52, p < .05.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Dehumanized targets were rated as having significantly more ups and downs in life, t(55.54) = 3.49, p < .05.
“Significantly more ups and downs in life appear for these social targets, t(55.54) = 3.49, p < .05”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No significant differences in mental-state verb use appear for any of the other social targets.
“No significant differences in mental-state verb use appear for any of the other social targets (see Figure 1 for means).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Dehumanized targets were viewed as marginally less typically human, t(114) = −1.72, p = .09.
“participants also viewed them as marginally less typically human, t(114) = −1.72, p = .09.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Left posterior insula showed parametric modulation with competence ratings, t(19) = 4.27, p < 5.21E−4, partial η2 = 0.49, at x = 38, y = 13, z = 15, 54 voxels.
“We also found parametric modulation of the left posterior insula with competence ratings, t(19) = 4.27, p < 5.21E−4, partial η2 = 0.49, at x = 38, y = 13, z = 15, 54 voxels”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Perceivers do not use mental-state verbs when describing dehumanized targets' daily life.
“and perceivers do not use mental- state verbs when describing dehumanized targets’ daily life.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Perceivers describe it as more difficult to infer the content of dehumanized targets' minds and personality.
“perceivers describe it as more difficult to infer the content of their minds and personality”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Bilateral STS, a component of the social-cognition network, was correlated with rated ease of getting into other people's heads, similarity, and familiarity.
“Bilateral STS, a component of the social-cognition network, was correlated with rated ease of getting into other people’s heads, similarity, and familiarity (see Table 1)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
These human-perception dimensions correlate with parts of the brain implicated in disgust, conflict resolution, and attention, in addition to social-cognition neural regions.
“Moreover, these human-perception dimensions correlate with parts of the brain implicated in disgust, conflict resolution, and attention, in addition to social-cognition neural regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ratings of ups and downs in life activated a range of neural regions, including bilateral anterior insula, and visual regions implicated in attention such as Brodmann area 18 in occipital cortex, t(19) = 4.15, p < 5.97E−4, partial η2 = 0.48, at x = −22, y = −88, z = 20, 355 voxels.
“Finally, ratings of ups and downs in life activated a range of neural regions, including bilateral anterior insula, and visual regions implicated in attention such as Brodmann area 18 in occipital cortex, t(19) = 4.15, p < 5.97E−4, partial η2 = 0.48, at x = −22, y = −88, z = 20, 355 voxels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ratings of typical humanity modulated activity in the anterior cingulate cortex, t(19) = −4.01, p < 7.69E−4, partial η2 = 0.46, at x = 5, y = 11, z = 42, 24 voxels.
“Ratings of typical humanity modulated activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), t(19) = −4.01, p < 7.69E−4, partial η2 = 0.46, at x = 5, y = 11, z = 42, 24 voxels”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Dehumanized perception-the tendency not to think spontaneously about what is in someone else's mind-may be a mechanism that enables cruel acts such as torture.
“Dehumanized perception, a failure to spontaneously consider the mind of another person, may be a psychological mechanism facilitating inhumane acts like torture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These results suggest that disengaging social cognition affects a number of other brain processes.
“These results suggest that disengaging social cognition affects a number of other brain processes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This prior neural pattern suggests that participants may not consider the minds of dehumanized groups.
“This suggests participants may not consider these dehumanized groups’ minds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The authors' prior work shows that parts of the social-cognition network uniquely fail to engage for traditionally dehumanized targets such as homeless persons or drug addicts.
“our previous work shows that parts of this network uniquely fail to engage for traditionally dehumanized targets (homeless persons or drug addicts; see Harris & Fiske, 2009, for review)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Harris & Fiske, 2009 source
- Interpretationreasoning
This suggests that a neural network critical for social interaction may disengage when people view disgust-inducing people.
“This suggests that a neural network critical for social interaction (Frith & Frith, 2001) may disengage when people view these disgust-inducing people.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Study 1 results are the first rating-data demonstration of reduced spontaneous social cognition to traditionally dehumanized people.
“The Study 1 results are the first rating-data demonstration of reduced spontaneous social cognition to traditionally dehumanized people.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Dehumanized perception may be necessary to facilitate extremely inhumane acts like torture against other people by robbing them of moral protection.
“dehumanized perception may be necessary to facilitate extremely inhumane acts like torture against other people, robbing them of their moral protection”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Person perception sets moral norms for the social interaction that follows.
- Premisecitation
According to the Stereotype Content Model, disgust-inducing targets such as homeless people and drug addicts in US samples, and immigrants and poor people in all samples, are perceived as low on both warmth and competence.
“while disgust-inducing targets (homeless people and drug addicts in US samples; immigrants and poor people in all samples) are perceived as low on both trait dimensions (Fiske, Cuddy, & Glick, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fiske, Cuddy, & Glick, 2007 source
- Interpretationown data
Participants are spontaneously inferring the contents of the dehumanized targets' minds less often than other social targets.
“Participants are spontaneously inferring the contents of the dehumanized targets’ minds less often than other social targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Members of social categories perceived as low on both warmth and competence reliably elicit more disgust than other social categories.
“Members of social categories (e.g., homeless people, drug addicts) perceived as low on both warmth and competence reliably elicit more disgust than do other social categories (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002 source
- Interpretationcitation
Dehumanized perception may be related to the dehumanized target eliciting disgust instead of at least partially positive social emotions generally felt in the presence of other people.
“Dehumanized perception may be related to the dehumanized target eliciting disgust instead of the at least partially positive social emotions generally felt in the presence of other people.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The just described neural data do not actually show that dehumanized targets fail to engage participants in spontaneous social cognition.
“However, the just described neural data do not actually show that dehumanized targets fail to engage participants in spontaneous social cognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Propaganda depicting Tutsi in Rwanda as cockroaches and Hitler's classification of Jews as vermin may have facilitated atrocities like torture and genocide.
“Indeed propaganda depicting Tutsi in Rwanda as “Inyenzi” or cockroaches, and Hitler’s classification of Jews in Nazi Germany as vermin may have facilitated atrocities like torture and genocide”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Different types of verbs and adjectives provide different levels of abstraction.
“Different types of verbs and adjectives provide different levels of abstraction (Semin & Fiedler, 1988).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Semin & Fiedler, 1988 source
- Interpretationown data
Overall, these findings support the hypothesis that dehumanized targets are rated significantly lower on 10 out of 14 rating dimensions that in past research are social psychological or folk dimensions of dehumanization.
“Overall, these findings support the hypothesis, showing that dehumanized targets are rated significantly lower on 10 out of 14 rating dimensions that in past research are social psychological or folk dimensions of dehumanization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
People may spontaneously think about the minds of other social targets who elicit social emotions such as pride, envy, or pity.
“People may spontaneously think about the minds of other social targets who elicit social emotions such as pride (American heroes, ingroups), envy (business people, rich people), or pity (elderly people, disabled people).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
People can spontaneously infer mental states even for targets without actual minds.
“People can spontaneously infer mental states even for targets without actual minds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
These results hint at complex psychological mechanisms potentially involved in atrocities against humanity.
“and hints at some of the complex psychological mechanisms potentially involved in atrocities against humanity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The more warm participants view a social target, the less activation in anterior insula.
“suggesting that the more warm participants view a social target, the less activation in anterior insula.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Increased competence ratings of social targets result in increased posterior insula activation.
“such that increased competence ratings of social targets result in increased posterior insula activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The more participants rated a social target as typically human, the less activity in the ACC.
“suggesting that the more participants rated a social target as typically human, the less activity in the ACC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Outgroups are not perceived as experiencing complex human emotions to the same extent as ingroups, a phenomenon termed infra-humanization.
“Outgroups are not perceived as experiencing complex human emotions to the same extent as ingroups, a phenomenon termed infra-humanization (Leyens et al., 2001, 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Dehumanization facilitates behavior generally not reserved for human beings because perceiving a person implies a number of moral rules and norms that govern the social interaction.
“Moreover, dehumanization facilitates behavior generally not reserved for human beings because perceiving a person implies a number of moral rules and norms that govern the social interaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Participants spontaneously think about the minds of dehumanized targets less often than the minds of other social targets.
“Specifically, participants spontaneously think about the minds of dehumanized targets less often than the minds of other social targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
People spontaneously fail to consider another person's mind if that person elicits predominantly disgust, a phenomenon characterized as dehumanized perception.
“People spontaneously fail to consider another person’s mind if that person elicits predominantly disgust, a phenomenon we characterize as dehumanized perception.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Dehumanized perception of extreme outgroups suggests that they are perceived as unlike all other people.
“Dehumanized perception of extreme outgroups suggests that they are perceived as unlike all other people.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Discriminatory or inhumane behaviors may not seem to matter because one fails to consider the person's mental experience.
“Thus, discriminatory or inhumane behaviors may not seem to matter because one fails to consider the person’s mental experience (Fiske, Harris, & Cuddy, 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fiske, Harris, & Cuddy, 2004 source
- Premisecitation
Research in this topical issue shows negative relationships between violence and likelihood of developing posttraumatic stress disorder in two separate instances of genocide and mass killings.
“For instance, research in this topical issue shows negative relationships between violence and likelihood of developing posttraumatic stress disorder in two separate instances of genocide and mass killings (PTSD; Weierstall, Schalinski, Crombach, Hecker, & Elbert, 2011; Weierstall, Schaal, Schalinski,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Weierstall, Schalinski, Crombach, Hecker, & Elbert, 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Weierstall, Schaal, Schalinski, Dusingizemungu, & Elbert, in press
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
These ratings rely on the social-cognition neural network.
“suggesting that these ratings rely on the social-cognition neural network.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 14
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 14
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe default decreased social-cognition neural activity to dehumanized targets replicates across stimuli and contexts, suggesting reliability.
“The default, decreased social cognition neural activity to dehumanized targets, replicates across stimuli and contexts (Harris, McClure, van den Bos, Cohen, & Fiske, 2007), suggesting reliability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Harris, McClure, van den Bos, Cohen, & Fiske, 2007 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown data7 out of the 10 human-perception rating dimensions successfully activated ROIs that met the reporting criteria; intelligence, articulateness, and ease of inferring dispositions failed to meet the criteria.
“We found that 7 out of the 10 human-perception rating dimensions successfully activated ROIs that met our criteria for reporting (intelligence, articulateness, and ease of infer- ring dispositions failed to meet our criteria).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo significant differences appear on self-awareness, responsibility for their situation, or control over their situation.
“Self-awareness, suggesting that participants think the target has an “inner life,” responsibility for their situation, and control over their situation, suggesting, respectively, that participants think the target has autonomy and agency, produced no significant differences either.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPerceivers view dehumanized targets as less typically human, unfamiliar, dissimilar, unintelligent, inarticulate, cold, incompetent, and having more ups and downs in life.
“Perceivers moreover view these targets as less typically human, unfamiliar, dissimilar, unintelligent, inarticulate, cold, incompetent, and having more ups and downs in life”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationChildren commonly create imaginary others, both people and objects, and interact with them as if they exist.
“Similarly, children commonly create imaginary others, both people (imaginary friends) and objects (imaginary food treats), effortlessly interacting with these targets as if they exist (see Kwan & Fiske, 2008, for examples).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kwan & Fiske, 2008 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningOne-way, four-level ANOVAs followed by a 3:1 deviant-cell contrast best examined the data because the a priori hypothesis concerns a deviant cell in the four-cell SCM warmth-by-competence space.
“One-way, four-level ANOVAs, followed by a 3:1 deviant- cell contrast, best examined the data, because our a priori hypothesis concerns a deviant cell in the four-cell SCM warmth-by-competence space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataA pair of independent raters separately classified 200 verbs, resulting in an inter-rater r(100) = .75, p < .05.
“First, a pair of independent raters separately classified 200 verbs, resulting in an inter-rater r(100) = .75, p < .05.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMental-state verbs describe actions in terms of the target's internal state; interpretive-action verbs interpret the target's action; descriptive-action verbs describe the action.
“The most abstract, mental-state verbs, describe actions in terms of the target’s internal state (e.g., quench). Then follow interpretive-action verbs that interpret the target’s action (e.g., guzzle) and finally descriptive-action verbs (e.g., drink) simply describe the action.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Semin & Fiedler, 1988 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe anterior insula has been implicated in disgust, interoception, and as part of a pain and punishment neural network.
“The anterior insula has been implicated in disgust (Calder, 2003), interoception (Craig, 2009), and as part of a pain and punishment neural network (Seymour, Singer, & Dolan, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataWording created no differences, so all analyses collapse across wording.
“Wording created no differences, so all analyses collapse across wording.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenBy denying a person full humanity, perhaps inhumane behavior like torture and genocide becomes permissible.
“By denying a person full humanity, perhaps inhumane behavior like torture and genocide becomes permissible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThese results provide significant leads for further investigating the dehumanized perception that may underlie the ability to inflict severe harm on other people.
“These results provide significant leads for further investigating the dehumanized perception that may underlie the ability to inflict severe harm on other people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHaving a mind is a uniquely human trait, suggesting dehumanized others may be treated more like objects in the environment without internal states.
“Having a mind is a uniquely human trait, suggesting dehumanized others may be treated more like objects in the environment without internal states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Having a mind is a uniquely human trait.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDehumanization has been studied in social psychology since Allport described it as the worst kind of prejudice.
“Of course, dehumanization has been studied in social psychology since Allport (1954) described it as the worst kind of prejudice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allport, 1954
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningViolating these rules should lead to feelings of remorse and guilt unless the victim is recategorized as nonhuman beyond the boundaries of moral protection.
“Therefore, violating these rules should lead to feelings of remorse and guilt unless the victim is recategorized as nonhuman beyond the boundaries of moral protection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataThe variety of modulation with this rating dimension suggests a number of psychological processes engaged during this estimation.
“The variety of modulation with this rating dimension suggests a number of psychological processes engaged during this estimation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDenial of typically human characteristics such as intelligence or language reduces targets to the level of animals, a phenomenon observed in African-American perception.
“Denial of typically human characteristics, such as intelligence or language, reduces targets to the level of animals (Haslam, 2006), a phenomenon observed in African-American perception (Goff, Eberhardt, Williams, & Jackson, 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEstimations of less typical humanity to social targets relate to increased conflict resolution, perhaps because participants are aware that the targets are human beings.
“This suggests that estimations of less typical humanity to social targets relate to increased conflict resolution, perhaps because participants are obviously aware that the targets are indeed human beings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTheory suggests that acting beyond societal norms leads to moral exclusion, and outgroups allegedly operate beyond moral rules and values.
“Theory has suggested that acting beyond societal norms leads to moral exclusion (Bar-Tal, 1989), and out- groups allegedly operate beyond moral rules and values (Opotow, 1990; Staub, 1989).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe ACC is implicated in cognitive control or conflict resolution.
“This neural region is implicated in cognitive control or conflict resolution (Botvinick, Braver, Barch, Carter, & Cohen, 2001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Botvinick, Braver, Barch, Carter, & Cohen, 2001 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe negative correlation between warmth ratings and a neural region implicated in disgust, interoception, and pain suggests that increased insula activation probably facilitates dehumanization and perhaps harmful behaviors such as torture.
“However, the fact that this most important person perception dimension negatively correlates with a neural region implicated in these processes suggests that increased insula activation probably facilitates dehumanization (and perhaps harmful behaviors such as torture).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThis should be considered another possible psychological mechanism of torture, as implicated in people denying obvious humanity to other people.
“This should be considered as another possible psychological mechanism of torture, as implicated in people denying obvious humanity to other people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Considering another person's mind is what recognizes them as a human being entitled to moral treatment.
“Social cognition – considering someone’s mind – recognizes the other as a human being subject to moral treatment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Person perception sets moral norms for the social interaction that follows.
“Since person perception imbues the subsequent social interaction with moral norms”
The paper relies on this without support.
Having a mind is a uniquely human trait.
“Having a mind is a uniquely human trait”
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentr(100) = 0.75reported p < .05 · recomputed p < .001
“r(100) = .75, p < .05”
- ConsistentF(3, 93) = 0.2reported p = .9 · recomputed p = .896
“F(3, 93) = .20, p = .90”
- Consistentt(86.22) = 2.52reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .014
“t(86.22) = 2.52, p < .05”
- Consistentt(115) = -6.11reported p < .05 · recomputed p < .001
“t(115) = −6.11, p < .05”
- Consistentt(115) = -3.26reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .001
“t(115) = −3.26, p < .05”
- Consistentt(115) = -3.53reported p < .05 · recomputed p < .001
“t(115) = −3.53, p < .05”
- Consistentt(115) = -3.36reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .001
“t(115) = −3.36, p < .05”
- Consistentt(115) = -5.23reported p < .05 · recomputed p < .001
“t(115) = −5.23, p < .05”
- Consistentt(115) = -7.19reported p < .05 · recomputed p < .001
“t(115) = −7.19, p < .05”
- Consistentt(115) = -2.26reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .026
“t(115) = −2.26, p < .05”
- Consistentt(115) = -3.1reported p < .05 · recomputed p = .002
“t(115) = −3.10, p < .05”
- Consistentt(55.54) = 3.49reported p < .05 · recomputed p < .001
“t(55.54) = 3.49, p < .05”
- Consistentt(114) = -1.72reported p = .09 · recomputed p = .088
“t(114) = −1.72, p = .09”
- Consistentt(19) = -4.31reported p < .000476 · recomputed p < .001
“t(19) = −4.31, p < 4.76e-4”
- Consistentt(19) = 4.27reported p < .000521 · recomputed p < .001
“t(19) = 4.27, p < 5.21e-4”
- Consistentt(19) = -4.01reported p < .000769 · recomputed p < .001
“t(19) = −4.01, p < 7.69e-4”
- Consistentt(19) = 4.15reported p < .000597 · recomputed p < .001
“t(19) = 4.15, p < 5.97e-4”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The claimed count of significantly lower ratings exceeds the reported results
MinorThe results identify eight dimensions with significantly lower ratings. They also report significantly *more* ups and downs and only a marginal difference in typical humanity, so they do not support the claim that 10 dimensions were rated significantly lower.
“dehumanized targets are rated significantly lower on 10 out of 14 rating dimensions”
“competence t(115) = −6.11, p < .05, warmth t(115) = −3.26, p < .05, similarity t(115) = −3.53, p < .05, familiarity t(115) = −3.36, p < .05, articulateness t(115) = −5.23, p < .05, intelligence t(115) = −7.19, p < .05, ease of mentalizing t(115) = −2.26, p < .05, and ease of inferring dispositions t(115) = −3.10, p < .05”
Two differently located insula regions have identical coordinates
MinorThe right anterior and left posterior insula findings give exactly the same x, y, and z coordinates. A single coordinate cannot identify both of those locations.
“right anterior insula with warmth ratings, t(19) = −4.31, p < 4.76E−4, partial η2 = 0.49, at x = 38, y = 13, z = 15, 312 voxels”
“left posterior insula with competence ratings, t(19) = 4.27, p < 5.21E−4, partial η2 = 0.49, at x = 38, y = 13, z = 15, 54 voxels”
Cites
(1954) · Cited by 15,935 · see citing works
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878 · Cited by 7,364 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Two pretested pictures represented each quadrant of the warmth-by-competence Stereotype Content Model (SCM; Fiske et al., 2002), as follows (the typical emotion for each pair of social targets appears in parentheses): female college student and male American firefighter (pride), business woman and…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationConflict monitoring and cognitive control
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · Cited by 7,351 · see citing works
How do you feel — now? The anterior insula and human awareness
(Bud) Craig, A. D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2555 · Cited by 6,657 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The anterior insula has been implicated in disgust (Calder, 2003), interoception (Craig, 2009), and as part of a pain and punishment neural network (Seymour, Singer, & Dolan, 2007).”
BackgroundUniversal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005 · Cited by 4,567 · see citing works
Self-citationMeeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782 · cited 1× · see citing works
“One indication of dehumanized perception may be reduced activation in the social-cognition neural network (see Amodio & Frith, 2006; Overwalle, 2009, for reviews), including medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; Harris & Fiske, 2006) and superior temporal sulcus (STS; Harris & Fiske, 2007).”
BackgroundAn Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416950 · Cited by 3,340 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Participants infer the intentions of point-light walkers (Heberlein, Adolphs, Tranel, & Damasio, 2004) and shapes in biological motion (Heider & Simmel, 1944), objects that objectively do not have N IH -PA Author M anuscript N IH -PA Author M anuscript cognitions and emotions.”
BackgroundDehumanization: An integrative review
Haslam, N. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 · Cited by 2,919 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Denial of typically human characteristics, such as intelligence or language, reduces targets to the level of animals (Haslam, 2006), a phenomenon observed in African-American perception (Goff, Eberhardt, Williams, & Jackson, 2008).”
BackgroundGray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1134475 · Cited by 2,342 · see citing works
Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis
Van Overwalle, F. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20547 · Cited by 1,792 · see citing works
Moral Exclusion and Injustice: An Introduction
Opotow, S. (1990) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00268.x · Cited by 1,313 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Theory has suggested that acting beyond societal norms leads to moral exclusion (Bar-Tal, 1989), and out- groups allegedly operate beyond moral rules and values (Opotow, 1990; Staub, 1989).”
Background(1989) · Cited by 1,165 · see citing works
Dehumanizing the Lowest of the Low: Neuroimaging Responses to Extreme Out-Groups
Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01793.x · Cited by 985 · cited 2× · see citing works
“One indication of dehumanized perception may be reduced activation in the social-cognition neural network (see Amodio & Frith, 2006; Overwalle, 2009, for reviews), including medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; Harris & Fiske, 2006) and superior temporal sulcus (STS; Harris & Fiske, 2007).”
BackgroundSelf-citationNot yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences.
Goff, P. A., Eberhardt, J. L., Williams, M. J., & Jackson, M. C. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.292 · Cited by 880 · see citing works
Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.558 · Cited by 854 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Coding Scheme A coding scheme provided by Semin and Fiedler (1988) tests the hypothesis of less mentalizing to dehumanized tar- gets.”
BackgroundMethodLeyens, J., Rodriguez‐Perez, A., Rodriguez‐Torres, R., Gaunt, R., Paladino, M., Vaes, J., & Demoulin, S. (2001) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.50 · Cited by 622 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Outgroups are not perceived as experiencing complex human emotions to the same extent as ingroups, a phenomenon termed infra-humanization (Leyens et al., 2001, 2003).”
BackgroundThe Biological Basis of Social Interaction
Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2001) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00137 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Emotional prejudice, essentialism, and nationalism The 2002 Tajfel lecture
Leyens, J., Cortes, B., Demoulin, S., Dovidio, J. F., Fiske, S. T., Gaunt, R., Paladino, M., Rodriguez‐Perez, A., Rodriguez‐Torres, R., & Vaes, J. (2003) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.170 · Cited by 314 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Outgroups are not perceived as experiencing complex human emotions to the same extent as ingroups, a phenomenon termed infra-humanization (Leyens et al., 2001, 2003).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Roots of Evil: The Origins of Genocide and Other Group Violence.
Kuper, L., & Staub, E. (1990) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2072322 · Cited by 307 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Theory has suggested that acting beyond societal norms leads to moral exclusion (Bar-Tal, 1989), and out- groups allegedly operate beyond moral rules and values (Opotow, 1990; Staub, 1989).”
BackgroundDelegitimization: The Extreme Case of Stereotyping and Prejudice
Bar-Tal, D. (1989) · Stereotyping and Prejudice · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3582-8_8 · Cited by 273 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Theory has suggested that acting beyond societal norms leads to moral exclusion (Bar-Tal, 1989), and out- groups allegedly operate beyond moral rules and values (Opotow, 1990; Staub, 1989).”
BackgroundCortical Regions for Judgments of Emotions and Personality Traits from Point-light Walkers
Heberlein, A. S., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (2004) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/0898929041920423 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
The neurobiology of punishment
Seymour, B., Singer, T., & Dolan, R. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2119 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Social groups that elicit disgust are differentially processed in mPFC
Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2007) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsl037 · Cited by 224 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Besides manipulations of target persons, manipulations of social goals validate this prediction: Inferring preference, a mental-state inference, significantly increases MPFC and STS activity to these otherwise dehumanized targets (Harris & Fiske, 2007).”
BackgroundSelf-citationStereotyping and prejudice: changing conceptions
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-2390 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Why Ordinary People Torture Enemy Prisoners
Fiske, S. T., Harris, L. T., & Cuddy, A. J. C. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1103788 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Self-citationOn the wrong side of the trolley track: neural correlates of relative social valuation
Cikara, M., Farnsworth, R. A., Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2010) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsq011 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Self-citationEuropean Journal of Psychotraumatology
Olff, M., & Bindslev, A. (2011) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.3402/ejpt.v2i0.15546 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Social neuroscience evidence for dehumanised perception
Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2009) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280902954988 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Self-citationRegions of the MPFC differentially tuned to social and nonsocial affective evaluation
Harris, L. T., McClure, S. M., van den Bos, W., Cohen, J. D., & Fiske, S. T. (2007) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.7.4.309 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citationWeierstall, R., Schalinski, I., Crombach, A., Hecker, T., & Elbert, T. R. (2012) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-12-41 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Weierstall, R., Schaal, S., Schalinski, I., Dusingizemungu, J., & Elbert, T. R. (2011) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.3402/ejpt.v2i0.6345 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Missing Links in Social Cognition: The Continuum from Nonhuman Agents to Dehumanized Humans
(2008) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.125 · Cited by 59 · cited 2× · see citing works
“People also anthropomorphize a range of inanimate objects and animals (Kwan & Fiske, 2008; Gray, Gray, & Wegner, 2007).”
BackgroundSelf-citationCalder, A. J. (2003) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.10565 · Cited by 32 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The anterior insula has been implicated in disgust (Calder, 2003), interoception (Craig, 2009), and as part of a pain and punishment neural network (Seymour, Singer, & Dolan, 2007).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dehumanization and Infrahumanization
Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045 · Cited by 1,156 · see citing works
“A small number of neuroimaging studies (Harris & Fiske 2006, 2011) reveal a lack of activation of social cognition networks in the brain when low-low targets are present.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialInstitutionalizing passion in world politics: fear and empathy
Crawford, N. C. (2014) · International Theory · doi:10.1017/s1752971914000256 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Tyler, T. R., Goff, P. A., & MacCoun, R. J. (2015) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100615617791 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
“The other is the literature on the dehumanization of out-groups (Goff, Eberhardt, Williams, & Jackson, 2008; L. T. Harris & Fiske, 2011; Haslam, 2006; Staub, 1992), especially as it is manifested in the military and police professions.”
BackgroundDehumanization and self-reported proclivity to torture prisoners of war
Viki, G. T., Osgood, D., & Phillips, S. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.006 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Grewal, D., Kroschke, M., Mende, M., Roggeveen, A. L., & Scott, M. L. (2020) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2020.03.001 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
“Dehumanization is frequently linked to decreases in the inferred warmth and competence of an observed target (Harris & Fiske, 2011).”
BackgroundHackel, L., Looser, C., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.12.001 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
“For example, inferring a mind in others allows us to see them as worthy of moral consideration (Gray, Gray, & Wegner, 2007; Gray, Young, & Waytz, 2012), and the failure to perceive a mind in others may facilitate prejudice and inhumane acts such as torture (Harris & Fiske, 2011).”
BackgroundOwusu-Bempah, A. (2017) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/1362480616677493 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
“The concept is commonly employed in war, genocide, and ethnic conflict (Harris and Fiske, 2011).”
BackgroundThe Emotional Cost of Humanity
Cameron, C. D., Harris, L. T., & Payne, B. K. (2015) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550615604453 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
“Yet we often engage in dehumanization: the denial of mental states to other human beings (Fiske, 2013; Harris & Fiske, 2006, 2011; Haslam, 2006; Haslam & Loughnan, 2014; Leyens et al., 2001).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSeven Challenges for the Dehumanization Hypothesis
Over, H. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620902133 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“…they are frequently attributed others In some theories, dehumanization is characterized as a failure to consider the mind of another person (Harris & Fiske, 2011; see also Hackel et al., 2014; Harris & Fiske, 2006, 2011; Leyens et al., 2007; Rai et al., 2017; Waytz, Gray, Epley, & Wegner, 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialDenying humanity: The distinct neural correlates of blatant dehumanization.
Bruneau, E., Jacoby, N., Kteily, N., & Saxe, R. R. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000417 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Threat Perception and American Support for Torture
Conrad, C., Croco, S. E., Gomez, B. T., & Moore, W. (2018) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-017-9433-5 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Seeing human: Distinct and overlapping neural signatures associated with two forms of dehumanization
Jack, A. I., Dawson, A. J., & Norr, M. E. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.109 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Social, psychological, and demographic characteristics of dehumanization toward immigrants
Markowitz, D. M., & Slovic, P. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1921790117 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Torture and the limits of democratic institutions
Conrad, C. R., Hill, D. W., & Moore, W. H. (2017) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343317711240 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Young children perceive less humanness in outgroup faces
Mcloughlin, N. C., Tipper, S. P., & Over, H. (2017) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12539 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“More generally, outgroup members are thought to have less of a mind (Hackel, Looser, & Van Bavel, 2014; Harris & Fiske, 2006, 2011; Krumhuber, Swiderska, Tsankova, Kamble, & Kappas, 2015).”
Background“Yuck, you disgust me!” Affective bias against interracial couples
Skinner, A. L., & Hudac, C. M. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.05.008 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Virtuous violence from the war room to death row
Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Markowitz, D. M., Quist, A., & Västfjäll, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2001583117 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
“36).”
Agency's Role in Dehumanization: Non‐human Metaphors of Out‐groups
Tipler, C. N., & Ruscher, J. B. (2014) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12100 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
The limited importance of dehumanization in collective violence
Lang, J. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.002 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Kinship intensity and the use of mental states in moral judgment across societies
Curtin, C. M., Barrett, H. C., Bolyanatz, A., Crittenden, A. N., Fessler, D. M. T., Fitzpatrick, S., Gurven, M., Kanovský, M., Kushnick, G., Laurence, S., et al. (2020) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.07.002 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Incitement on Trial: Prosecuting International Speech Crimes
Wilson, R. A. (2017) · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Moral coherence processes: constructing culpability and consequences
Clark, C. J., Chen, E. E., & Ditto, P. H. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.016 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“, the homeless) may serve as a justification for treating them poorly [69].”
BackgroundPluta, A., Mazurek, J., Wojciechowski, J., Wolak, T. P., Soral, W., & Bilewicz, M. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-31146-1 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Varieties of (De) Humanization: Divided by Competition and Status
Fiske, S. T. (2013) · Nebraska Symposium on Motivation/The Nebraska symposium on motivation · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9_3 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“Questionnaire data converged with the neuro-imaging data (Harris and Fiske 2011).”
MethodSelf-citationA Framework for the Computational Linguistic Analysis of Dehumanization
Mendelsohn, J., Tsvetkov, Y., & Jurafsky, D. (2020) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2020.00055 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Enock, F. E., Flavell, J. C., Tipper, S. P., et al. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104682 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“According to this perspective, to the extent a group is dehumanized, they are viewed as lacking beliefs, desires and intentions (Harris & Fiske, 2006; Harris & Fiske, 2011).”
The System‐Justifying Function of Gratitude Norms
Eibach, R. P., Wilmot, M. O., & Libby, L. K. (2015) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12184 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Clark, J. A., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2014) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-014-9240-0 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“For example, a cornerstone of many arguments against disgust is a set of neuroimaging studies by Harris and Fiske (2006, 2007, 2009, 2011) in which they argue that disgust produces dehumanization of stigmatized groups.”
BackgroundFalsifying the Dehumanization Hypothesis
Over, H. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620969657 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
The neuroscience of intergroup threat and violence
Lantos, D., & Molenberghs, P. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.025 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
The Neuroscience of Human and Artificial Intelligence Presence
Harris, L. T. (2023) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-013123-123421 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationSöderlund, M. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102209 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“Furthermore, it has been suggested that also disgust evoked by a target person can reduce the perceived humanness of the person (Harris and Fiske, 2011; Valtorta et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMcCall, C., Hildebrandt, L. K., Hartmann, R., Bączkowski, B. M., & Singer, T. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.028 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Stereotyping: Processes and content.
Fiske, S. T., & Tablante, C. B. (2014) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/14341-015 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial perceptions of warmth and competence influence behavioral intentions and neural processing
Simon, J. C., Styczynski, N., & Gutsell, J. N. (2020) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-019-00767-3 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“…low in warmth predicts increased activity in areas of the brain associated with subjective pleasure (Cikara & Fiske, 2012), while those outgroup members perceived as low in both warmth and competence elicit deactivation of brain areas involved in social cognition (Harris & Fiske, 2006, 2007, 2011).”
BackgroundKuljian, O. R., & Hohman, Z. P. (2022) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12565 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Guys and Dolls: Relational Life in the Technological Era
Knafo, D. (2015) · Psychoanalytic Dialogues · doi:10.1080/10481885.2015.1055174 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“Most writers (Harris & Fiske, 2011; Keen, 1991; Livingstone Smith, 2011), including psychoanalysts (Altman, 2008; Dalal, 2006; Kernberg, 2003), address dehumanization as it relates to prejudice and social stereotyping, war, and genocide.”
BackgroundSimon, J. C., & Gutsell, J. N. (2021) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsab014 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
The Evil Animal: A Terror Management Theory Perspective on the Human Tendency to Kill Animals
Lifshin, U., Greenberg, J., Zestcott, C. A., & Sullivan, D. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167217697092 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Ferris, L. J., Jetten, J., Johnstone, M., Girdham, E., Parsell, C., & Walter, Z. C. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00016 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Journey to the edges: Social structures and neural maps of inter‐group processes
Fiske, S. T. (2012) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02092.x · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“…that shows relevant neural differences (e.g., SCM quadrant), validated by correlations with theoretically predicted dependent variables (e.g., Harris & Fiske, 2011); or (d) using half the scanning runs to identify regions of interest and testing their correlates with predicted behavior on…”
MethodSelf-citationBeal, B. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619867106 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“In addition to the classic situationist studies discussed above, recent research into dehumanization (Harris & Fiske, 2006, 2011; Haslam, 2006; Haslam & Loughnan, 2014; Leyens et al., 2003; Leyens, Demoulin, Vaes, Gaunt, & Paladino, 2007) and superhumanization (Waytz, Hoffman, & Trawalter, 2015;…”
The construction of racial stereotypes and how they serve as racial propaganda
Melson-Silimon, A. T., Spivey, B. N., & Skinner, A. L. (2023) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12862 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
The primacy of communality in humanization
Chu, C., & Martin, A. E. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104224 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Group membership dictates the neural correlates of social optimism biases
Dricu, M., Schüpbach, L., Bristle, M., Wiest, R., Moser, D. A., & Aue, T. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-58121-4 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Evidence of the unidimensional structure of mind perception
Tzelios, K., Williams, L. A., Omerod, J., & Bliss‐Moreau, E. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-23047-6 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Morehouse, K. N., Maddox, K. B., & Banaji, M. R. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2300995120 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Essentially subhuman: Psychological essentialism facilitates dehumanization.
Landry, A., Ihm, E. D., Protzko, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2021) · Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology · doi:10.1037/pac0000587 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Landry, A., Ihm, E. D., & Schooler, J. W. (2021) · Evolutionary Psychological Science · doi:10.1007/s40806-021-00296-8 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“Moreover, groups that are stigmatized due to their perceived lack of warmth and competence both elicit disgust and are considered less capable of complex, “uniquely human” experiences (Harris & Fiske, 2011).”
BackgroundDehumanization and mass violence: A study of mental state language in Nazi propaganda (1927–1945)
Landry, A., Orr, R. I., & Mere, K. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0274957 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“[9], or their possession of fundamentally human mental capacities [10] (see [11] for review).”
BackgroundSchofield, T. P., Haslam, N., & Butterworth, P. (2019) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12616 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Humanization of social relations: Nourishing health and resilience through greater humanity.
Castro, S. A., & Zautra, A. (2016) · Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1037/teo0000040 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Elbert, T. R., Schauer, M., Ruf, M., Weierstall, R., Neuner, F., Rockstroh, B. S., & Junghöfer, M. (2011) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000064 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Social optimism biases are associated with cortical thickness
Moser, D. A., Dricu, M., Wiest, R., Schüpbach, L., & Aue, T. (2020) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsaa095 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“They are also implicated in social group perception (Krill and Platek, 2009; Hein et al., 2010; Harris and Fiske, 2011; Scheepers et al., 2013) and are therefore most likely to be involved in social optimism bias.”
BackgroundKhatry, P., Manokara, K., & Harris, L. T. (2020) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620976206 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“A seven-item version of the human attributes inventory (Harris & Fiske, 2011) was used (1 ¼ not at all , 7 ¼ extremely ), which included both cognitive (e.g., how competent?”
InfluentialSelf-citationMetaphors They Kill by: Dehumanization of Palestinians by Israeli Officials and Sympathizers
Maalej, Z. A., & Zibin, A. S. (2024) · International Journal of Arabic-English Studies · doi:10.33806/ijaes.v25i1.693 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
The Developmental Origins of Dehumanization
Mcloughlin, N. C., & Over, H. (2017) · Advances in child development and behavior · doi:10.1016/bs.acdb.2017.10.006 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Lantos, D., & Harris, L. T. (2021) · Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/jts5.114 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationCross-species Analyses of Intra-species Behavioral Differences in Mammals and Fish
Demin, K. A., Lakstygal, A. M., Volgin, A. D., de Abreu, M. S., Genário, R., Alpyshov, E. T., Serikuly, N., Wang, D., Wang, J., Yan, D., et al. (2020) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.12.035 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Lee, V. K., Kranton, R. E., Conzo, P., & Huettel, S. A. (2021) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2021.102424 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Deep Learning in a Disorienting World
Wergin, J. F. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108647786 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Law and Sentiment in International Politics
Traven, D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108954280 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Poublan‐Couzardot, A., & Talmi, D. (2024) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.15141 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“165 Given that some degree of dehumanization is manifest across everyday social interactions, 166 the theory of constructed emotion is well placed to explain the flexible engagement and disengagement of emotion models.”
BackgroundCovid, racism and Black Lives Matter: A deadly constellation
Music, G. (2020) · Developmental Child Welfare · doi:10.1177/2516103220959814 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Strikingly, while the empathy circuits in the volunteers’ brains lit up for all the others, for both the homeless person and the drug addict areas dominant for disgust, such as the insula, were most active (Harris & Fiske, 2011).”
BackgroundImagined otherness fuels blatant dehumanization of outgroups
van Loon, A., Goldberg, A., & Srivastava, S. B. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00087-4 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“The other approach is exempli fi ed by research on stereotype content 27,28,42 and dementalization 29,43,44 .”
First impressions: Do faces with scars and palsies influence warmth, competence and humanization?
Paruzel‐Czachura, M., Workman, C. I., Toukhy, N. E., & Chatterjee, A. K. (2024) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12719 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Recoquillon, C. (2020) · Géographie et cultures · doi:10.4000/gc.15201 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Tausen, B. M., Lee, J. H., Dischinger, A. S., & Dennis, I. A. (2023) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12971 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Language Matters in British Newspapers: A Participatory Analysis of the Autism UK Press Corpus
Karaminis, T. N., Botha, M., Longley, S., Waldock, K. E., Storey, S., Strachan, K., Ransom, N., & Pellicano, E. (2024) · Autism in Adulthood · doi:10.1089/aut.2023.0105 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Cognitive bots and algorithmic humans: toward a shared understanding of social intelligence
McDonald, K. R., & Pearson, J. M. (2019) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.04.013 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Centeno, M. Á., & Yang, V. (2016) · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Animalistic slurs increase harm by changing perceptions of social desirability
Enock, F. E., & Over, H. (2023) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.230203 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Paskuj, B., & Orosz, G. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910848 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Research on dehumanized perception argues that perceiving the mind of others is an effortful social cognitive mechanism that may or may not be spontaneously engaged, depending on a host of situational variables (Harris and Fiske, 2011).”
BackgroundSin, K. F., Yang, L., & Ye, F. T.-F. (2023) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-023-01178-3 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Recent development in the field has enriched the understanding of dehumanization as a border conceptual framework that encompasses attributing uniquely human emotions [19, 20], warmth and competence [21, 22], mental states [23], and personality traits [24].”
BackgroundTausen, B. M., & Fossum, J. L. (2024) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.13050 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Novel theory of mind task demonstrates representation of minds in mental state inference
Long, E. L., Cuve, H. C., Conway, J. R., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-25490-x · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Schofield, T. P., & Butterworth, P. (2018) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2018.1496335 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Groups stereotyped as low in warmth and competence, including recipients of unemployment benefits, are also seen as less human than other groups (Harris & Fiske, 2011; Schofield et al., unpublished manuscript submitted for publication; Waytz & Epley, 2012).”
BackgroundMorris, V. (2023) · Contemporary Justice Review · doi:10.1080/10282580.2023.2284424 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Out-groups are dehumanized, so the in-group views them as objects rather than humans, evoking disgust rather than empathy and normalizing discrimination and violence (Harris & Fiske, 2011).”
BackgroundWeaverdyck, M. E., Thornton, M. A., & Tamir, D. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118258 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A Functional and Neuroanatomical Model of Dehumanization
Mendez, M. F. (2022) · Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology · doi:10.1097/wnn.0000000000000316 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Tausen, B. M., Douglass, K. M., Hodges, R., et al. (2022) · Journal of Psychology and Theology · doi:10.1177/00916471221130325 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“At worst, they may fuel apathy, justification for the unequal distribution of resources, or even direct forms of harm (Bastian et al., 2011, 2013; Harris & Fiske, 2011; Loughnan et al., 2014; Rai et al., 2017)— behaviors directly opposed to the Christian ethic of neighbor love.”
BackgroundVarga, S. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0994-8 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Also, the literature on dehumanization confirms that failure to perceive minds in other people may aggravate prejudice and facilitate humiliation and torture (Harris and Fiske 2006, 2011; Haslam and Loughnan 2014; Viki et al. 2013).”
BackgroundMalmqvist, K. (2019) · Emotions and Society · doi:10.1332/263168919x15670063481536 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Political Institutions, Plausible Deniability, and the Decision to Hide TorturePreprint
Conrad, C. R., Hill, D. W., & Moore, W. H. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2481762 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Landry, A. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/egxt6 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Gonzalez-Puerto, J. A., & Fernández, S. (2024) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12823 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Cruelty is often facilitated by the perpetrator's dehumanized perception of the victim (Harris & Fiske, 2011).”
Orr, R. I., & Gilead, M. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01911-7 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Research into this theoretical framework has utilized neuroimaging methods to provide evidence for reduced “mentalizing network” activity towards outgroup members, relative to the ingroup (Cikara et al., 2011; Harris & Fiske, 2006; Harris & Fiske, 2011).”
BackgroundAmes, D. R., & Lee, A. J. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.05.002 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“…torture attitudes reflect not just consequentialist reasoning (e.g., assumed information payoffs) but also other motives as well, such as retribution, ingroup glorification, and dehumanization (Carlsmith & Sood, 2009; Harris & Fiske, 2011; Leidner et al., 2010; Liberman, 2013; Waytz & Epley, 2012).”
BackgroundGender Role Beliefs and Ontologization of Mothers: A Moderated Mediation Analysis
Battista, S. D. (2023) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci12010048 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Construction and Validation of a Tool for Measuring Prejudice Toward Childfree People
Ciesielski, P. (2024) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000822 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Disgust, Prejudice, and Stigma
Vartanian, L. R., McCutcheon, T. B., & Rubenstein, S. A. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-84486-8_10 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Wojtczak, S. (2018) · Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna · doi:10.14746/fped.2016.5.1.5 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Humanizing animals does not reduce blatant dehumanization by children or adults
Zhou, W., Bowie, A., Tan, J., & Hare, B. A. (2024) · Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cresp.2024.100194 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Hate Speech on the Map of Stereotype Content
Soral, W., Bieńkowski, M., & Bilewicz, M. (2024) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000562 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
To what extent is research on infrahumanization confounded by intergroup preference?
Bunce, C., Eggleston, A., Brennan, R., et al. (2025) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.241348 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The nonmoral conditions of moral cognition
Beal, B. (2021) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2021.1942811 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“…al., 2012; Schein & Gray, 2015, 2018), while also analyzing the literature on moral dilemmas (e.g., Foot, 1967; Greene, 2013; Kohlberg, 1981; Mikhail, 2007; Thomson, 1985), dehumanization (e.g., e.g., Harris & Fiske, 2006, 2011; Haslam, 2006; Haslam & Loughnan, 2014; J.P. Leyens et al., 2007; J-P.”
Deceptive (De)humanization: How Lying About Perceived Outgroups is Revealed in Language
Markowitz, D. M. (2022) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x221117497 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Other forms of subtle dehumanization relate to the mind attribution model popularized by social psychologists (Gray et al., 2007), where perceivers ascribe less of a mind or fail to consider the minds of outgroups (Harris & Fiske, 2006, 2009, 2011; Kozak et al., 2006).”
BackgroundAnimalistic dehumanisation as a social influence strategy
Quiamzade, A., & Lalot, F. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.999959 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
How voice and helpfulness shape perceptions in human–agent teams
Westby, S., Radke, R. J., Riedl, C., & Welles, B. F. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100101 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Challenge 8: A Response to Over (2021)
Smith, D. L. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620917351 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- Venue
- Zeitschrift für Psychologie
- Publisher
- Hogrefe Publishing Group
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 219
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 175-181
- ISSN
- 0044-3409 (ISSN-L)
- 2190-8370
- 2151-2604
- PMC
- PMC3915417
- OpenAlex
- W2017180264
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 18.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Zeitschrift für Psychologie (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Princeton University
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD047879)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Keywords
- dehumanization, social cognition, theory of mind, cognitive control, attention, atrocities, torture, homeless people, drug addicts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review