The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The distinction between desires and intentions
Abstract
Within attitude theory the concepts of desires and intentions are not differentiated but are often treated as synonyms. However, we argue that there are theoretical reasons for distinguishing between desires and intentions, and we articulate three main criteria,perceived performability,action‐connectedness, and temporal framing, that differentiate between the two constructs. Two studies are reported to test the distinction. Study 1 (n = 188) revealed that desires, compared to intentions, are less performable, are less connected to actions, and are enacted over longer time frames. Study 2 (n = 249) showed, among other things, that the perceived feasibility for actions that are desired and intended is higher than for those that are only desired, but only when the action refers to relatively short time frames (i.e. 1 week or 4 weeks vs. 4 months). The findings are discussed in the light of the distinction between intentions and desires and the role that they play in individual decision making. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ?
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8 · Cited by 8,599
On the Self-Regulation of Behavior
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174794 · Cited by 4,110
Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content.
Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338 · Cited by 2,319
What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior.
Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.1.3 · Cited by 1,802
Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes.
Bargh, J. A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.6.925 · Cited by 1,150
How People Explain Behavior: A New Theoretical Framework
Malle, B. F. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_2 · Cited by 538
Cited by
To reduce and not to reduce resource consumption? That is two questions
Richetin, J., Perugini, M., Conner, M., Adjali, I., Hurling, R., Sengupta, A., & Greetham, D. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.01.003 · Cited by 68
Self-citationDo People Have Reproductive Goals? Constructive Preferences and the Discovery of Desired Family Size
Bhrolcháin, M. N., & Beaujouan, É. (2019) · The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93227-9_3 · Cited by 59
Presseau, J., Francis, J. J., Campbell, N. C., & Sniehotta, F. F. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-73 · Cited by 47
Understanding consumers’ decisions to adopt technology-enabled transformative services
Schuster, L., Drennan, J., & Lings, I. (2015) · The Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2015.1090979 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P.
- Venue
- European Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-84
- ISSN
- 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0992
- OpenAlex
- W2058725609
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 7.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
