Cited by 64Social and Intergroup PsychologyMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationEuropean Cultural and National Identity

Stereotype content of refugee subgroups in Germany

Open access
Kotzur, Patrick F., Friehs, Maria‐Therese, Asbrock, Frank, van Zalk, Maarten H. W.·2019·European Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

Stereotypes of refugee subgroups are still understudied. We contribute to this body of research by investigating differences in stereotype content, meaning warmth and competence ratings, of refugee subgroups in Germany (N = 264). Most extant Stereotype Content Model research is based on observed warmth and competence mean values. We applied latent variable modelling using the alignment optimisation to ensure meaningful and reliable mean value comparisons. Generic refugees were rated as lacking warmth and competence. Warmth assessments of refugee subgroups varied depending on flight motives, geographical origin, and religious affiliation, implying that perceptions of threat and competition differed between these subgroups. Fewer differences emerged in competence assessments, indicating that refugee groups are generally regarded as lacking status. Our results enhance knowledge of the stereotype content of refugee subgroups and make a methodological contribution to stereotype content research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejsp.2585

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Generic immigrants and undocumented immigrants in the United States and refugees in Germany are seen as low in both warmth and competence, whereas most immigrant groups are viewed as higher on one dimension than the other.

    “Though generic immigrants and undocumented immigrants in the United States and refugees in Germany are seen as low in both warmth and competence, most immigrant groups are viewed as higher on one dimension than the other (Fiske 2012, Kotzur et al. 2019).”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Kotzur et al. 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kotzur, P. F., Friehs, M., Asbrock, F., & van Zalk, M. H. W.
Affiliations
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • Osnabrück University (DE)
  • Chemnitz University of Technology (DE)
  • University of Osnabrück Osnabrück Germany
Corresponding author
Kotzur, Patrick F.
Venue
European Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-05-17
Volume
49
Issue
7
Pages
1344-1358
ISSN
  • 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0992
OpenAlex
W2922703553
Cited by
64
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4
FWCI
15.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • European Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • osnaDocs (Osnabrück University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › European Cultural and National Identity
Keywords
stereotype content, warmth and competence, stereotype content model, religious affiliation, geographical origin, threat perception, perceived competition, intergroup perception, Germany

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review