Cited by 9Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth

Self‐efficacy as a moderator of negative and positive self‐fulfilling prophecy effects: mothers' beliefs and children's alcohol use

Willard, Jennifer, Madon, Stephanie, Guyll, Max, Spoth, Richard, Jussim, Lee·2008·European Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

This research examined two issues relevant to self‐fulfilling prophecies. First, it examined whether children's risk for alcohol use, as indicated by their self‐efficacy to refuse alcohol from peers, moderated their susceptibility to negative and positive self‐fulfilling prophecy effects created by their mothers. Second, it explored behavioral mediators that could be involved in the self‐fulfilling process between mothers and children. Longitudinal data from 540 mother–child dyads indicated that (1) low self‐efficacy children were more susceptible to their mothers' positive than negative self‐fulfilling effects, whereas high self‐efficacy children's susceptibility did not vary, (2) mothers' global parenting and children's perception of their friends' alcohol use partially mediated mothers' self‐fulfilling effects, and (3) these mediators contributed to low self‐efficacy children's greater susceptibility to positive self‐fulfilling prophecy effects. The power of self‐fulfilling prophecies, their link to social problems, and the potential for mothers' favorable beliefs to have a protective influence on adolescent alcohol use are discussed. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejsp.429

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even today, positive SFPs in individual, dyadic interactions are more likely and pronounced than negative ones.

    “Indeed, there is evidence that even today, positive SFPs in individual, dyadic interactions are more likely and pronounced than negative ones.”

    From What Is the Function of Confirmation Bias? (2022) · cites this paper as Willard et al. (2008)

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 66 · Cited by 9

Authors
Willard, J., Madon, S., Guyll, M., Spoth, R., & Jussim, L.
Affiliations
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
  • Willard, Jennifer
  • Madon, Stephanie
Venue
European Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-05
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
499-520
ISSN
  • 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0992
OpenAlex
W2134414428
Cited by
9
References
66
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Keywords
self-fulfilling prophecy, self-efficacy, adolescent alcohol use, maternal beliefs, mother-child relationship, parenting, peer alcohol use, mediation, moderation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review