The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The relationship between acculturation strategies, relative fit and intergroup relations: immigrant‐majority relations in Germany
Open accessAbstract
This study examined the impact of the acculturation strategy preferences of both immigrants and host society on intergroup relations. It was expected that integration would lead to the best outcome for both groups. Moreover, it was tested whether the relative ‘fit’ between host society and immigrant strategy preference would predict intergroup relations. The predictive power of two different operationalisations of fit was compared. School students (193 German host society members and 128 immigrants to Germany) participated in a questionnaire study. Findings revealed that both acculturation strategies of one group and relative ‘fit’ between immigrant and host society strategy preference were predictive of intergroup relations. In general, a strategy of integration was associated with more favourable intergroup relations in both groups, and a mismatch between host and immigrant preferred strategies yielded the most negative outcomes. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cameron, L., Rutland, A., Brown, R., & Douch, R. (2006) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00929.x · Cited by 539
Self-citationGonzález, R., & Brown, R. (2003) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.140 · Cited by 264
Self-citationJasinskaja-Lahti, I., Liebkind, K., Horenczyk, G., & Schmitz, P. (2003) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/s0147-1767(02)00061-5 · Cited by 253
Čehajić (2010) · doi:10.1177/1948550609359088 · Cited by 125
Chirkov, V. (2024) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102009 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Zagefka, H., & Brown, R.
- Venue
- European Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-188
- ISSN
- 0046-2772 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0992
- OpenAlex
- W2002878058
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between acculturation strategies, relative fit and intergroup relations: immigrant‐majority relations in Germany. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ejsp.73
- The paper
- Zagefka, H., & Brown, R. (2002). The relationship between acculturation strategies, relative fit and intergroup relations: immigrant‐majority relations in Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.73
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.