Cited by 539Social and Intergroup PsychologyMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

Changing Children's Intergroup Attitudes Toward Refugees: Testing Different Models of Extended Contact

Cameron, Lindsey, Rutland, Adam, Brown, Rupert, Douch, Rebecca·2006·Child Development

Abstract

The present research evaluated an intervention, derived from the "extended contact hypothesis," which aimed to change children's intergroup attitudes toward refugees. The study (n=253) tested 3 models of extended contact among 5- to 11-year-old children: dual identity, common ingroup identity, and decategorization. Children read friendship stories based upon these models featuring in- and outgroup members. Outgroup attitudes were significantly more positive in the extended contact conditions, compared with the control, and this was mediated by "inclusion of other in self." The dual identity intervention was the most effective extended contact model at improving outgroup attitudes. The effect of condition on outgroup intended behavior was moderated by subgroup identity. Implications for theoretically based prejudice-reduction interventions among children are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00929.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several teams have reported increased tolerance after multi-week behavioral interventions involving reading and discussing stories about stigmatized groups.

    “While several teams (e.g.Cameron & Rutland, 2006; Cameron, Rutland, Brown & Douch, 2006; Vezzali, Stathi & Giovannini, 2012; Vezzali et al., 2014) have reported increased tolerance after multi-week behavioral interventions involving reading and discussing stories about stigmatized groups, it is not clear to what extent such interventions contribute to the schools' academic goals.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cameron, L., Rutland, A., Brown, R., & Douch, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Kent (GB)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Cameron, Lindsey
Venue
Child Development
Published
2006-09-01
Volume
77
Issue
5
Pages
1208-1219
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W1993753214
Cited by
539
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 23
FWCI
35.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
intergroup attitudes, refugees, children, prejudice reduction, dual identity, common ingroup identity, decategorization, outgroup attitudes, friendship stories
MeSH terms
Attitude, Child, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Female, Group Processes, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Prejudice, Refugees, Social Identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review