The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Critical Review on Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalysis: Re‐exploring the Volcano‐relationship
Abstract
The “volcano”‐relationship for the electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction seems to be a generally accepted phenomenology in electrochemistry. Based on the Sabatier principle, which suggests a not too strong, nor too weak binding of reaction intermediates as prerequisite for high reaction rates, it provides a straightforward and intuitive explanation for a plethora of experimental results. However, while the Sabatier principle as a main paradigm of heterogeneous catalysis was never really disputed in the case of gas‐phase reactions, it remains questionable if it can be the main driving principle that governs activity trends of electrocatalytic reactions. This work provides an overview on this topic for the model hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), pointing out certain inconsistencies and contradictions found in literature. The critical assessment provides a viewpoint which could have important practical consequences and could provide different perspective on future catalyst design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The nature of the active site in heterogeneous metal catalysis
Nørskov, J. K., Bligaard, T., Hvolbæk, B., Abild-Pedersen, F., Chorkendorff, I., & Christensen, C. H. (2008) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b800260f · Cited by 885
Masa, J., Weide, P., Peeters, D., Sinev, I., Xia, W., Sun, Z., Somsen, C., Muhler, M., & Schuhmann, W. (2016) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201502313 · Cited by 854
Cited by
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Electrode Materials in Modern Organic Electrochemistry
Heard, D. M., & Lennox, A. J. J. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202005745 · Cited by 523
Ďurovič, M., Hnát, J., & Bouzek, K. (2021) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229708 · Cited by 436
Wu, D., Kusada, K., Yamamoto, T., Toriyama, T., Matsumura, S., Gueye, I., Seo, O., Kim, J., Hiroi, S., Sakata, O., et al. (2020) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d0sc02351e · Cited by 315
Plevová, M., Hnát, J., & Bouzek, K. (2021) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230072 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeradjanin, A. R., Grote, J., Polymeros, G., & Mayrhofer, K. J. J.
- Venue
- Electroanalysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2256-2269
- ISSN
- 1040-0397 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4109
- OpenAlex
- W2504921843
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Critical Review on Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalysis: Re‐exploring the Volcano‐relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elan.201600270
- The paper
- Zeradjanin, A. R., Grote, J., Polymeros, G., & Mayrhofer, K. J. J. (2016). A Critical Review on Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalysis: Re‐exploring the Volcano‐relationship. Electroanalysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201600270
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
