Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 714

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two‐dimensional electrophoresis of proteins: An updated protocol and implications for a functional analysis of the genome

Klose, Joachim, Kobalz, Ursula·1995·ELECTROPHORESIS

Abstract

The two‐dimensional electrophoresis (2‐DE) technique developed by Klose in 1975 (Humangenetik 1975, 26, 211–234), independently of the technique developed by O'Farrell (J. Biol. Chem. 1975, 250, 4007–4021), has been revised in our laboratory and an updated protocol is presented. This protocol is the result of our experience in using this method since its introduction. Many modifications and suggestions found in the literature were also tested and then integrated into our original method if advantageous. Gel and buffer composition, size of gels, use of stacking gels or not, necessity of isoelectric focusing (IEF) gel incubation, freezing of IEF gels or immediate use, carrier ampholytes versus Immobilines, regulation of electric current, conditions for staining and drying the gels – these and other problems were the subject of our concern. Among the technical details and special equipment which constitute our 2‐DE method presented here, a few features are of particular significance: (i) sample loading onto the acid side of the IEF gel with the result that both acidic and basic proteins are well resolved in the same gel; (ii) use of large (46 × 30 cm) gels to achieve high resolution, but without the need of unusually large, flat gel equipment; (iii) preparation of ready‐made gel solutions which can be stored frozen, a prerequisite, among others, for high reproducibility. Using the 2‐DE method described we demonstrate that protein patterns revealing more than 10 000 polypeptide spots can be obtained from mouse tissues. This is by far the highest resolution so far reported in the literature for 2‐DE of complex protein mixtures. The 2‐DE patterns were of high quality with regard to spot shape and background. The reproducibility of the protein patterns is demonstrated and shown to be thoroughly satisfactory. An example is given to show how effectively 2‐DE of high resolution and reproducibility can be used to study the genetic variability of proteins in an interspecific mouse backcross (Mus musculus × Mus spretus) established by the European Backcross Collaborative Group for mapping the mouse genome. We outline our opinion that the structural analysis of the human genome, currently pursued most intensively on a worldwide scale, should be accompanied by a functional analysis of the genome that starts from the proteins of the organism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/elps.11501601175

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 714

Metadata

Authors
Klose, J., & Kobalz, U.
Venue
ELECTROPHORESIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
1034-1059
ISSN
  • 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2683
OpenAlex
W2132851761
Cited by
714
References
1
FWCI
11.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two‐dimensional electrophoresis of proteins: An updated protocol and implications for a functional analysis of the genome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elps.11501601175
The paper
Klose, J., & Kobalz, U. (1995). Two‐dimensional electrophoresis of proteins: An updated protocol and implications for a functional analysis of the genome. ELECTROPHORESIS. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.11501601175

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.