Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 962

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Progress with gene‐product mapping of the Mollicutes: Mycoplasma genitalium

Wasinger, Valerie C., Cordwell, Stuart J., Cerpa‐Poljak, Anne, Yan, Jun X., Gooley, Andrew A., Wilkins, Marc R., Duncan, Mark W., Harris, Ray, Williams, Keith L., Humphery‐Smith, Ian·1995·ELECTROPHORESIS

Abstract

A protein map of the smallest known self‐replicating organism, Mycoplasma genitalium (Class: Mollicutes), revealed a high proportion of acidic proteins. Amino acid composition was used to putatively identify, or provide unique parameters, for 50 gene products separated by two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis. A further 19 proteins were subjected to peptide‐mass fingerprinting using matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionisation‐time of flight (MALDI‐TOF) mass spectrometry and 4 were subjected to N‐terminal Edman degradation. The majority of M. genitalium proteins remain uncharacterised. However, the combined approach of amino acid analysis and peptide‐mass fingerprinting allowed gene products to be linked to homologous genes in a variety of organisms. This has allowed proteins to be identified prior to detection of their respective genes via the M. genitalium sequencing initiative. The principle of ‘hierarchical’ analysis for the mass screening of proteins and the analysis of microbial genomes via their protein complement or ‘proteome’ is detailed. Here, characterisation of gene products depends upon the quickest and most economical technologies being employed initially, so as to determine if a large number of proteins are already present in both homologous and heterologous species databases. Initial screening, which lends itself to automation and robotics, can then be followed by more time and cost intensive procedures, when necessary.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/elps.11501601185

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 962

Metadata

Authors
Wasinger, V. C., Cordwell, S. J., Cerpa‐Poljak, A., Yan, J. X., Gooley, A. A., Wilkins, M. R., Duncan, M. W., Harris, R., Williams, K. L., & Humphery‐Smith, I.
Venue
ELECTROPHORESIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
1090-1094
ISSN
  • 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2683
OpenAlex
W2036641811
Cited by
962
References
22
FWCI
13.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progress with gene‐product mapping of the Mollicutes: Mycoplasma genitalium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elps.11501601185
The paper
Wasinger, V. C., Cordwell, S. J., Cerpa‐Poljak, A., Yan, J. X., Gooley, A. A., Wilkins, M. R., Duncan, M. W., Harris, R., Williams, K. L., & Humphery‐Smith, I. (1995). Progress with gene‐product mapping of the Mollicutes: Mycoplasma genitalium. ELECTROPHORESIS. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.11501601185

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.