Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Identifying the major proteome components of Haemophilus influenzae type‐strain NCTC 8143

Link, Andrew J., Hays, Lara G., Carmack, Edwin B., Yates, John R.·1997·ELECTROPHORESIS

Abstract

With the completion of the Haemophilus influenzae Rd genomic sequence, we know the identity of most of the theoretical proteins in the proteome of this bacterium. However, the most abundant components of the actual proteome are unknown. Using mass spectrometry and two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis (2‐DE), we sequenced and analyzed the most abundant proteins observed in the ATCC reference strain of H. influenzae, NCTC 8143 (303 of ≈︁ 400 Coomassie‐stained 2‐DE spots). To automate the identification of 2‐DE spots, we coupled a liquid autosampler to a microcolumn liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometer capable of identifying 22 spots per day. From the 303 sequenced spots, we identified 263 unique proteins. Most of the abundant proteins lie in an isoelectric point range of pH 4–7 and a molecular mass range of 10–100 kDa. Of the observed proteins, the most abundant is the outer membrane protein P2. Based on variety and abundance, proteins involved in energy metabolism and macromolecular synthesis are the dominant classes of proteins. Unexpectedly, tryptophanase was identified as a highly abundant protein in the strain NCTC 8143 whose sequence is rot present in the genome of the Rd strain. By searching the tandem mass spectra against the translated genomic sequence, we identified several proteins which were not annotated in the genomic sequence. Surprisingly, 22% of the identified 2‐DE spots represent isoforms in which gene products with the same primary sequence have different observed p I and Mr, indicating that these proteins are post‐translationally processed. Although most proteins' predicted and observed isoelectric points and molecular masses show reasonable concordance, the observed values for several proteins deviate significantly from the predicted values. These anomalies may represent either highly processed proteins or misinterpretations of the genomic sequence. Using the technology developed in this project, the protein expression of other strains of H. influenzae grown under different environmental conditions can be compared to identify differences in their proteomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/elps.1150180808

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 168

Metadata

Authors
Link, A. J., Hays, L. G., Carmack, E. B., & Yates, J. R.
Venue
ELECTROPHORESIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-01
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
1314-1334
ISSN
  • 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2683
OpenAlex
W2107886940
Cited by
168
References
0
FWCI
13.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying the major proteome components of Haemophilus influenzae type‐strain NCTC 8143. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elps.1150180808
The paper
Link, A. J., Hays, L. G., Carmack, E. B., & Yates, J. R. (1997). Identifying the major proteome components of Haemophilus influenzae type‐strain NCTC 8143. ELECTROPHORESIS. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150180808

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.