Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 489

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Extraction of membrane proteins by differential solubilization for separation using two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis

Molloy, Mark P., Herbert, Ben R., Walsh, Bradley J., Tyler, Margaret I., Traini, Mathew, Sanchez, Jean‐Charles, Hochstrasser, Denis F., Williams, Keith L., Gooley, Andrew A.·1998·ELECTROPHORESIS

Abstract

We describe the extraction and enrichment of membrane proteins for separation by two‐dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2‐D PAGE) after differential solubilization of an Escherichia coli cell lysate. In a simple three‐step sequential solubilization protocol applicable for whole cell lysates, membrane proteins are partitioned from other cellular proteins by their insolubility in solutions conventionally used for isoelectric focusing (IEF). As the first step, Tris‐base was used to solubilize many cytosolic proteins. The resultant pellet was then subjected to conventional solubilizing solutions (urea, 3‐[(3‐cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]‐1‐propanesulfonate, dithiothreitol, Tris, carrier ampholytes). Following the completion of this step, 89% of the initial E. coli sample mass was solubilized. Finally, the membrane protein rich pellet was partially solubilized using a combination of urea, thiourea, tributyl phosphine and multiple zwitterionic surfactants. Using N‐terminal sequence tagging and peptide mass fingerprinting we have identified 11 membrane proteins from this pellet. Two of these outer membrane proteins (Omp), OmpW and OmpX, have previously been known only as an open reading frame in E. coli, while OmpC, OmpT and OmpTOLC have not previously been identified on a 2‐D gel. The prefractionation of an entire cell lysate into multiple fractions, based on solubility, results in simplified protein patterns following 2‐D PAGE using broad‐range pH 3.5–10 immobilized pH gradients (IPGs). Additional advantages of sample prefractionation are that protein identification and gel matching, for database construction, is a more manageable task, the procedure requires no specialized apparatus, and the sequential extraction is conducted in a single centrifuge tube, minimizing protein loss.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/elps.1150190539

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 489

Metadata

Authors
Molloy, M. P., Herbert, B. R., Walsh, B. J., Tyler, M. I., Traini, M., Sanchez, J., Hochstrasser, D. F., Williams, K. L., & Gooley, A. A.
Venue
ELECTROPHORESIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-05
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
837-844
ISSN
  • 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2683
OpenAlex
W2007629654
Cited by
489
References
0
FWCI
15.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extraction of membrane proteins by differential solubilization for separation using two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elps.1150190539
The paper
Molloy, M. P., Herbert, B. R., Walsh, B. J., Tyler, M. I., Traini, M., Sanchez, J., Hochstrasser, D. F., Williams, K. L., & Gooley, A. A. (1998). Extraction of membrane proteins by differential solubilization for separation using two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis. ELECTROPHORESIS. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150190539

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.