The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Database searching using mass spectrometry data
Abstract
Large‐scale DNA sequencing is creating a sequence infrastructure of great benefit to protein biochemistry. Concurrent with the application of large‐scale DNA sequencing to whole genome analysis, mass spectrometry has attained the capability to rapidly, and with remarkable sensitivity, determine weights and amino acid sequences of peptides. Computer algorithms have been developed to use the two different types of data generated by mass spectrometers to search sequence databases. When a protein is digested with a site‐specific protease, the molecular weights of the resulting collection of peptides, the mass map or fingerprint, can be determined using mass spectrometry. The molecular weights of the set of peptides derived from the digestion of a protein can then be used to identify the protein. Several different approaches have been developed. Protein identification using peptide mass mapping is an effective technique when studying organisms with completed genomes. A second method is based on the use of data created by tandem mass spectrometers. Tandem mass spectra contain highly specific information in the fragmentation pattern as well as sequence information. This information has been used to search databases of translated protein sequences as well as nucleotide databases such as expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences. The ability to search nucleotide databases is an advantage when analyzing data obtained from organisms whose genomes are not yet completed, but a large amount of expressed gene sequence is available (e.g., human and mouse). Furthermore, a strength of using tandem mass spectra to search databases is the ability to identify proteins present in fairly complex mixtures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrospray Ionization for Mass Spectrometry of Large Biomolecules
Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F., & Whitehouse, C. M. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2675315 · Cited by 7,634
The complete genome sequence of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori
Tomb, J.-F., White, O., Kerlavage, A. R., Clayton, R. A., Sutton, G. G., Fleischmann, R. D., Ketchum, K. A., Klenk, H. P., Gill, S., Dougherty, B. A., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/41483 · Cited by 3,529
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry of biopolymers.
Hillenkamp, F., Karas, M., Beavis, R. C., & Chait, B. T. (1991) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac00024a716 · Cited by 1,930
Covey, T. R., Huang, E. C., & Henion, J. D. (1991) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac00013a003 · Cited by 446
Cited by
Proteomics to study genes and genomes
Pandey, A., & Mann, M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35015709 · Cited by 2,373
Tabb, D. L., McDonald, W. H., & Yates, J. R. (2002) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr015504q · Cited by 1,367
Self-citationGilar, M., Olivova, P., Daly, A. E., & Gebler, J. C. (2005) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.200500116 · Cited by 425
Weed, S. A., Karginov, A. V., Schafer, D. A., Weaver, A. M., Kinley, A. W., Cooper, J. A., & Parsons, J. T. (2000) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.151.1.29 · Cited by 419
Sadygov, R. G., Cociorva, D., & Yates, J. R. (2004) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth725 · Cited by 408
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yates, J. R.
- Venue
- ELECTROPHORESIS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 893-900
- ISSN
- 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2683
- OpenAlex
- W2093548063
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Database searching using mass spectrometry data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elps.1150190604
- The paper
- Yates, J. R. (1998). Database searching using mass spectrometry data. ELECTROPHORESIS. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150190604
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.