The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Protein indentification using mass spectrometric information
Abstract
In an effort to gain an understanding of the value of the information in different mass spectrometric measurements for protein identification, the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was studied in silico. We calculate how constraining the knowledge of the mass of a proteolytic peptide is as a function of mass and mass accuracy. We also assess the value for protein identification of additional information concerning a proteolytic peptide, including the presence or absence of a given amino acid, the number of exchangeable hydrogens, the N‐terminal sequence, and the masses of mass spectrometrically produced fragment ions. Knowledge of the relative value of these different constraints is useful in the design of efficient protein identification experiments. Finally, we describe a software tool, PepFrag, for searching protein and DNA sequence databases that can use different types of mass spectrometric information to restrict the search.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kuzmichev, A., Nishioka, K., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P., & Reinberg, D. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1035902 · Cited by 1,596
Proteolytic 18O Labeling for Comparative Proteomics: Model Studies with Two Serotypes of Adenovirus
Yao, X., Freas, A., Ramirez, J., Demirev, P. A., & Fenselau, C. (2001) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac001404c · Cited by 759
Vassilev, A., Kaneko, K. J., Shu, H., Zhao, Y., & DePamphilis, M. L. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.888601 · Cited by 719
ProLuCID: An improved SEQUEST-like algorithm with enhanced sensitivity and specificity
Xu, T., Park, S. K., Venable, J. D., Wohlschlegel, J. A., Diedrich, J. K., Cociorva, D., Lu, B., Liao, L., Hewel, J., Han, X., et al. (2015) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2015.07.001 · Cited by 511
Phillips, G. R., Huang, J. K., Wang, Y., Tanaka, H., Shapiro, L., Zhang, W., Shan, W.-S., Arndt, K., Frank, M., Gordon, R. E., et al. (2001) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00450-0 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Fenyö, D., Qin, J., & Chait, B. T.
- Venue
- ELECTROPHORESIS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 998-1005
- ISSN
- 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2683
- OpenAlex
- W2095013942
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein indentification using mass spectrometric information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elps.1150190615
- The paper
- Fenyö, D., Qin, J., & Chait, B. T. (1998). Protein indentification using mass spectrometric information. ELECTROPHORESIS. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150190615
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.