The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Zeta potential of microfluidic substrates: 1. Theory, experimental techniques, and effects on separations
Abstract
This paper summarizes theory, experimental techniques, and the reported data pertaining to the zeta potential of silica and silicon with attention to use as microfluidic substrate materials, particularly for microchip chemical separations. Dependence on cation concentration, buffer and cation type, pH, cation valency, and temperature are discussed. The Debye‐Hückel limit, which is often correctly treated as a good approximation for describing the ion concentration in the double layer, can lead to serious errors if it is extended to predict the dependence of zeta potential on the counterion concentration. For indifferent univalent electrolytes (e.g., sodium and potassium), two simple scalings for the dependence of zeta potential on counterion concentration can be derived in high‐ and low‐ζ limits of the nonlinear Poisson‐Boltzman equation solution in the double layer. It is shown that for most situations relevant to microchip separations, the high‐ζ limit is most applicable, leading to the conclusion that the zeta potential on silica substrates is approximately proportional to the logarithm of the molar counterion concentration. The ζ vs. pH dependence measurements from several experiments are compared by normalizing the ζ based on concentration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Polymer surface modification for the attachment of bioactive compounds
Goddard, J. M., & Hotchkiss, J. H. (2007) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.04.002 · Cited by 1,379
Bazant, M. Z., Kilic, M. S., Storey, B. D., & Ajdari, A. (2009) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2009.10.001 · Cited by 916
Zhang, H., Shao, J., Zhang, S., Zhang, X., & Chen, H. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121349 · Cited by 281
Song, Y. K., Hong, S. H., Eo, S., Han, G. M., & Shim, W. J. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c02288 · Cited by 264
Drug Targeting Strategies Based on Charge Dependent Uptake of Nanoparticles into Cancer Cells
Saadat, M., Zahednezhad, F., Zakeri-Milani, P., Reza Heidari, H., Shahbazi-Mojarrad, J., & Valizadeh, H. (2019) · Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.18433/jpps30318 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirby, B. J., & Hasselbrink, E. F.
- Venue
- ELECTROPHORESIS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-202
- ISSN
- 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2683
- OpenAlex
- W2122486657
- Cited by
- 1,004
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zeta potential of microfluidic substrates: 1. Theory, experimental techniques, and effects on separations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elps.200305754
- The paper
- Kirby, B. J., & Hasselbrink, E. F. (2004). Zeta potential of microfluidic substrates: 1. Theory, experimental techniques, and effects on separations. ELECTROPHORESIS. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200305754
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.