Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CE‐MS in metabolomics

Ramautar, Rawi, Somsen, Govert W., de Jong, Gerhardus J.·2009·ELECTROPHORESIS

Abstract

An overview of the use of CE‐MS in the field of metabolomics is provided. Metabolomics is concerned with the comprehensive analysis of endogenous low‐molecular‐weight compounds in biological samples. CE‐MS has demonstrated to be a powerful technique for the profiling of polar metabolites in biological samples. This review covers the use of various CE separation modes, capillary coatings, MS analyzers, sample preparation techniques, and data analysis methods used in CE‐MS for metabolomics. The applicability of CE‐MS in metabolomics research is illustrated by giving examples of the analysis of bacterial extracts, plant extracts, urine, plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid samples. The relevant CE‐MS metabolomics studies published between 2000 and 2008 are presented in tabular form, including information on sample type and pretreatment and MS detection mode. Future developments with regard to the use of alternative ionization techniques, the use of coupled separation systems and the potential of microchip CE systems for metabolomics are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/elps.200800512

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1002/jssc.200700077 · doi:10.1002/jssc.200700077
  2. 10.1016/j.trac.2006.02.004 · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2006.02.004
  3. 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.05.100 · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2004.05.100
  4. 10.1002/elps.200700420 · doi:10.1002/elps.200700420
  5. 10.1002/elps.200600606 · doi:10.1002/elps.200600606
  6. 10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00368-9 · doi:10.1016/s1570-0232(02)00368-9
  7. 10.1002/elps.200700929 · doi:10.1002/elps.200700929
  8. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.06.004 · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.06.004
  9. 10.1021/ac0263925 · doi:10.1021/ac0263925
  10. Neusüss C., 2002, Electrophoresis, 18, 3149, 10.1002/1522-2683(200209)23:18<3149::AID-ELPS3149>3.0.CO;2-8 · doi:10.1002/1522-2683(200209)23:18<3149::aid-elps3149>3.0.co;2-8
  11. 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.04.055 · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.04.055
  12. 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)00157-2 · doi:10.1016/s0378-4347(00)00157-2
  13. 10.1016/S0003-2670(03)00473-2 · doi:10.1016/s0003-2670(03)00473-2
  14. 10.1021/ac0202684 · doi:10.1021/ac0202684
  15. 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.04.011 · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.04.011
  16. 10.1002/elps.200305905 · doi:10.1002/elps.200305905
  17. 10.1021/pr0600576 · doi:10.1021/pr0600576
  18. 10.1016/j.jpba.2007.01.049 · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2007.01.049
  19. 10.1002/elps.200500688 · doi:10.1002/elps.200500688
  20. 10.1002/elps.200305791 · doi:10.1002/elps.200305791
  21. 10.1080/15257770600894667 · doi:10.1080/15257770600894667
  22. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(20000101)21:1<41::AID-ELPS41>3.0.CO;2-7 · doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2683(20000101)21:1<41::aid-elps41>3.0.co;2-7

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Ramautar, R., Somsen, G. W., & de Jong, G. J.
Venue
ELECTROPHORESIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
276-291
ISSN
  • 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2683
OpenAlex
W1977343606
Cited by
280
References
62
FWCI
10.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CE‐MS in metabolomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elps.200800512
The paper
Ramautar, R., Somsen, G. W., & de Jong, G. J. (2009). CE‐MS in metabolomics. ELECTROPHORESIS. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200800512

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.