The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pumps for microfluidic cell culture
Open accessAbstract
In comparison to traditional in vitro cell culture in Petri dishes or well plates, cell culture in microfluidic‐based devices enables better control over chemical and physical environments, higher levels of experimental automation, and a reduction in experimental materials. Over the past decade, the advantages associated with cell culturing in microfluidic‐based platforms have garnered significant interest and have led to a plethora of studies for high throughput cell assays, organs‐on‐a‐chip applications, temporal signaling studies, and cell sorting. A clear concern for performing cell culture in microfluidic‐based devices is deciding on a technique to deliver and pump media to cells that are encased in a microfluidic device. In this review, we summarize recent advances in pumping techniques for microfluidic cell culture and discuss their advantages and possible drawbacks. The ultimate goal of our review is to distill the large body of information available related to pumps for microfluidic cell culture in an effort to assist current and potential users of microfluidic‐based devices for advanced in vitro cellular studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion
Yeung, T., Georges, P. C., Flanagan, L. A., Marg, B., Ortiz, M., Funaki, M., Zahir, N., Ming, W., Weaver, V., & Janmey, P. A. (2005) · Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton · doi:10.1002/cm.20041 · Cited by 2,325
Biological implications of polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic cell culture
Regehr, K. J., Domenech, M., Koepsel, J. T., Carver, K. C., Ellison-Zelski, S. J., Murphy, W. L., Schuler, L. A., Alarid, E. T., & Beebe, D. J. (2009) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b903043c · Cited by 719
Gomez-Sjoberg, R., Leyrat, A. A., Houseman, B. T., Shokat, K., & Quake, S. R. (2010) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac101870s · Cited by 104
Cited by
Advances in organ-on-a-chip engineering
Zhang, B., Korolj, A., Lai, B. F. L., & Radisic, M. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0034-7 · Cited by 1,017
Fluorinated Polymers as Smart Materials for Advanced Biomedical Applications
Cardoso, V., Correia, D., Ribeiro, C., Fernandes, M., & Lanceros-Méndez, S. (2018) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym10020161 · Cited by 286
Moshksayan, K., Kashaninejad, N., Warkiani, M. E., Lock, J. G., Moghadas, H., Firoozabadi, B., Saidi, M. S., & Nguyen, N.-T. (2018) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2018.01.223 · Cited by 267
Flow-induced stress on adherent cells in microfluidic devices
Shemesh, J., Jalilian, I., Shi, A., Heng Yeoh, G., Knothe Tate, M. L., & Ebrahimi Warkiani, M. (2015) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c5lc00633c · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Byun, C. K., Abi‐Samra, K., Cho, Y., & Takayama, S.
- Venue
- ELECTROPHORESIS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 245-257
- ISSN
- 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2683
- OpenAlex
- W1490182400
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pumps for microfluidic cell culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/elps.201300205
- The paper
- Byun, C. K., Abi‐Samra, K., Cho, Y., & Takayama, S. (2014). Pumps for microfluidic cell culture. ELECTROPHORESIS. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201300205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
