Cited by 41

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LC-MS Untargeted Metabolomic Analysis of Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity in HepG2 Cells

García‐Cañaveras, Juan Carlos, Jiménez, Nuria, Gómez‐Lechón, M. José, Castell, José V., Donato, M. Teresa, Lahoz, Agustín·2015·ELECTROPHORESIS

Abstract

Hepatotoxicity is the number one cause for agencies not approving and withdrawing drugs for the market. Drug‐induced human hepatotoxicity frequently goes undetected in preclinical safety evaluations using animal models. Human‐derived in vitro models represent a common alternative to in vivo tests to detect toxic effects during preclinical testing. Most current in vitro toxicity assays rely on the measurement of nonspecific or low sensitive endpoints, which result in poor concordance with human liver toxicity. Therefore, making more accurate predictions of the potential hepatotoxicity of new drugs remains a challenge. Metabolomics, whose aim is to globally assess all the metabolites present in a biological sample, may represent an alternative in the search for sensitive sublethal markers of drug‐induced hepatotoxicity. To this end, a comprehensive LC‐MS‐based untargeted metabolite profiling analysis of HepG2 cells, exposed to a set of well‐described model hepatotoxins and innocuous compounds, was performed. It allowed to determine meaningful metabolic changes triggered by a toxic insult and gave a first estimation of the main toxicity‐related pathways. Based on these metabolic patterns, a partial least squares‐discriminant analysis model, able to discriminate between nontoxic and hepatotoxic compounds, was constructed. The approach described herein may provide an alternative for animal testing in preclinical stages of drug development and a controlled experimental approach to gain a better understanding of the underlying causes of hepatotoxicity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/elps.201500095

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1208/aapsj080106 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.cbi.2004.09.003 · DOI
  3. 10.2174/138161210791208910 · DOI
  4. 10.2174/138920008783331086 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.tox.2009.08.007 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.cbi.2004.09.011 · DOI
  7. 10.2174/092986708785132861 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/toxsci/kfs083 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s00204-014-1197-7 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05673.x · DOI
  11. 10.1038/4551054a · DOI
  12. 10.1093/toxsci/kfi102 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/jssc.200600199 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/elps.201200605 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.cbi.2006.11.004 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.tiv.2010.07.018 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/1087057111427586 · DOI
  18. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-395 · DOI
  19. 10.1021/pr200629p · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s11306-011-0292-5 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/nar/gks1065 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/nar/gkm324 · DOI
  23. 10.1097/01.ftd.0000179845.53213.39 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1002/jms.1777 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1093/nar/gks374 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr001 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.04.023 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00155-1 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1021/ac051495j · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.10.015 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1007/s00204-006-0091-3 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.11.006 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/978-3-642-00663-0_11 · DOI
  35. 10.2174/138920012802850001 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.plipres.2012.10.004 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.mam.2008.08.003 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/s00216-014-7983-5 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.02.063 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s11306-007-0099-6 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Germano D., 2014, Toxicol. In Vitro
  42. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.08.009 · DOI
  43. 10.1021/tx4004165 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/pmic.200300552 · DOI
  45. 10.1093/toxsci/kfq380 · DOI
  46. 10.1177/1087057108318428 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.tiv.2012.08.001 · DOI
  48. 10.1124/dmd.109.030197 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
García‐Cañaveras, J. C., Jiménez, N., Gómez‐Lechón, M. J., Castell, J. V., Donato, M. T., & Lahoz, A.
Affiliations
Unidad de Hepatología Experimental, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria—Fundación Hospital La Fe, Valencia Spain
Venue
ELECTROPHORESIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-07-22
Volume
36
Issue
18
Pages
2294-2302
ISSN
  • 0173-0835
  • 1522-2683
Cited by
41
References
1
Language
en
Funders
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI14/00026 and PI13/0986)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review