Cited by 609Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionAnimal testing and alternativesImmunotoxicology and immune responses

High concordance of drug-induced human hepatotoxicity with in vitro cytotoxicity measured in a novel cell-based model using high content screening

O’Brien, P. J., Irwin, W., Diaz, D., Howard-Cofield, E., Krejsa, C. M., Slaughter, M. R., Gao, B., Kaludercic, N. +4 more·2006·Archives of Toxicology

Abstract

To develop and validate a practical, in vitro, cell-based model to assess human hepatotoxicity potential of drugs, we used the new technology of high content screening (HCS) and a novel combination of critical model features, including (1) use of live, human hepatocytes with drug metabolism capability, (2) preincubation of cells for 3 days with drugs at a range of concentrations up to at least 30 times the efficacious concentration or 100 microM, (3) measurement of multiple parameters that were (4) morphological and biochemical, (5) indicative of prelethal cytotoxic effects, (6) representative of different mechanisms of toxicity, (7) at the single cell level and (8) amenable to rapid throughput. HCS is based on automated epifluorescence microscopy and image analysis of cells in a microtiter plate format. The assay was applied to HepG2 human hepatocytes cultured in 96-well plates and loaded with four fluorescent dyes for: calcium (Fluo-4 AM), mitochondrial membrane potential (TMRM), DNA content (Hoechst 33,342) to determine nuclear area and cell number and plasma membrane permeability (TOTO-3). Assay results were compared with those from 7 conventional, in vitro cytotoxicity assays that were applied to 611 compounds and shown to have low sensitivity (<25%), although high specificity ( approximately 90%) for detection of toxic drugs. For 243 drugs with varying degrees of toxicity, the HCS, sublethal, cytotoxicity assay had a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 98%. Drugs testing positive that did not cause hepatotoxicity produced other serious, human organ toxicities. For 201 positive assay results, 86% drugs affected cell number, 70% affected nuclear area and mitochondrial membrane potential and 45% affected membrane permeability and 41% intracellular calcium concentration. Cell number was the first parameter affected for 56% of these drugs, nuclear area for 34% and mitochondrial membrane potential for 29% and membrane permeability for 7% and intracellular calcium for 10%. Hormesis occurred for 48% of all drugs with positive response, for 26% of mitochondrial and 34% nuclear area changes and 12% of cell number changes. Pattern of change was dependent on the class of drug and mechanism of toxicity. The ratio of concentrations for in vitro cytotoxicity to maximal efficaciousness in humans was not different across groups (12+/-22). Human toxicity potential was detected with 80% sensitivity and 90% specificity at a concentration of 30x the maximal efficacious concentration or 100 microM when efficaciousness was not considered. We conclude that human hepatotoxicity is highly concordant with in vitro cytotoxicity in this novel model and as detected by HCS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00204-006-0091-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although cytotoxicity measures are fundamental in assessing a drug's potential for hepatotoxicity in vitro, gene expression and various phenotypic changes can occur at much lower concentrations.

    “although cytotoxicity measures are fundamental in the assessment of a drug’s potential for hepatotoxicity in vitro33,34, gene expression and various phenotypic changes can occur at much lower concentrations35,36.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Brien, P. J., Irwin, W., Diaz, D., Howard-Cofield, E., Krejsa, C. M., Slaughter, M. R., Gao, B., Kaludercic, N., Angeline, A., Bernardi, P., Brain, P., & Hougham, C.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Venue
Archives of Toxicology
Published
2006-04-06
Volume
80
Issue
9
Pages
580-604
ISSN
  • 0340-5761 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0738
OpenAlex
W1995042037
Cited by
609
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 37
FWCI
20.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Keywords
drug-induced liver injury, high-content screening, human hepatocytes, HepG2 cells, mitochondrial membrane potential, intracellular calcium, plasma membrane permeability, nuclear area, hormesis, assay sensitivity and specificity, drug safety assessment, fluorescent dyes, Hoechst
MeSH terms
Animal Testing Alternatives, Calcium, Cell Survival, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Predictive Value of Tests, Reproducibility of Results, Xenobiotics, Toxicity Tests, Inhibitory Concentration 50, Hepatocytes, Cell Line, Tumor, Membrane Potential, Mitochondrial, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review