Cited by 38Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Investigating capillary electrophoresis‐mass spectrometry for the analysis of common post‐translational modifications

Open access
Faserl, Klaus, Sarg, Bettina, Gruber, Peter, Lindner, Herbert H.·2018·ELECTROPHORESIS

Abstract

Capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry is a very efficient analytical method for the analysis of post‐translational modifications because of its high separation efficiency and high detection sensitivity. Here we applied CE‐MS using three differently coated separation capillaries for in‐depth analysis of a set of 70 synthetic post‐translationally modified peptides (including phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, and nitration). We evaluated the results in terms of peptide detection and separation characteristics and found that the use of a neutrally coated capillary resulted in highest overall signal intensity of singly modified peptides. In contrast, the use of a bare‐fused silica capillary was superior in the identification of multi‐phosphorylated peptides (12 out of 15 were identified). Fast separations of approximately 12 min could be achieved using a positively coated capillary, however, at the cost of separation efficiency. A comparison to nanoLC‐MS revealed that multi‐phosphorylated peptides interact with the RP material very poorly so that these peptides were either washed out or elute as very broad peaks from the nano column which results in a reduced peptide identification rate (7 out of 15). Moreover, the methods applied were found to be very well suited for the analysis of the acetylated, nitrated and methylated peptides. All 36 synthetic peptides, which exhibit one of those modifications, could be identified regardless of the method applied. As a final step in this study and as a proof of principle, the phosphoproteome enriched from PC‐12 pheochromocytoma cells was analyzed by CE‐MS resulting in 5686 identified and 4088 quantified phosphopeptides. We compared the characterized analytes to those identified by a nanoLC‐MS proteomics study and found that less than one third of the phosphopeptides were identical, which demonstrates the benefit by combining different approaches quite impressively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/elps.201700437

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multi-phosphorylated peptides were poorly retained on the reversed-phase LC-MS stationary phase, leading to fewer peptide identifications than in CE-MS analysis.

    “These authors observed that multi-phosphorylated peptides were poorly retained on the stationary phase of a reversed-phase LC-MS method, resulting in a decreased number of peptide identification relative to the CE-MS analysis.”
  • Faserl and co-workers demonstrated the value of CZE for separating 70 synthetic peptides carrying PTMs including phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, and nitration.

    “Faserl and co-workers demonstrated the value of CZE for the separation of 70 synthetic peptides that were post-translationally modified including phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, and nitration84.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 38

Authors
Faserl, K., Sarg, B., Gruber, P., & Lindner, H. H.
Affiliations
Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
Corresponding author
Lindner, Herbert H.
Venue
ELECTROPHORESIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-08
Volume
39
Issue
9-10
Pages
1208-1215
ISSN
  • 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2683
OpenAlex
W2794239972
Cited by
38
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Electrophoresis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Austrian Science Fund (P 25491)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry, post-translational modification, phosphopeptides, capillary coating, phosphoproteome, PC12 cells, acetylation, methylation, nitration
MeSH terms
Peptides, Phosphorylation, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review