Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High‐throughput capillary electrophoresis analysis of biopharmaceuticals utilizing sequential injections

Kumar, Ramesh, Sarin, Deepika, Rathore, Anurag S.·2023·ELECTROPHORESIS

Abstract

The complexity of biotherapeutic products implies an ever‐increasing list of product quality attributes that need to be monitored and characterized. In addition, the growing interest in implementing process analytical technology in biopharmaceutical production has further increased the testing burden, together with the need for rapid testing that can facilitate real‐time or near‐real‐time decision‐making. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) has made a place in biopharmaceutical analysis but is regarded as a low‐throughput method, with the instrument dead time constituting more than 80% of the total time of analysis. In this study, the dead time of CE was utilized to analyse 3 mAb samples in a single‐CE run. This approach resulted in an up to 77% reduction in the total analysis time and increased the productivity by up to 300%, compared to traditional single CE‐ultraviolet runs, without compromising resolution or relative peak areas. Additionally, good method reproducibility was observed. The compatibility of the method has been demonstrated with protein A eluate and cation exchange chromatography fractions. We, thus, propose that sequential injections can be applied for fast and robust CE analysis of biopharmaceuticals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/elps.202200208

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1016/j.xphs.2019.09.023 · DOI
  2. 10.18869/acadpub.ibj.21.3.131 · DOI
  3. 10.3390/pharmaceutics13060919 · DOI
  4. Payne R, 2014, Continued process verification for biopharma manufacturing, BioPharm Int, 27, 48
  5. 10.1002/bit.26383 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.07.004 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.01.003 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/elps.202100182 · DOI
  9. Espinosa‐De La Garza CE, 2017, Capillary electrophoresis separation of monoclonal antibody isoforms using a neutral capillary, J Visual Exp, 119
  10. 10.1177/1469066718807798 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/ac403171u · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41596-020-00475-0 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462355 · DOI
  14. 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05054 · DOI
  15. 10.3390/biomedicines9101488 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.07.022 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1002/pmic.201700310 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113218 · DOI
  19. 10.1039/D1AY00223F · DOI
  20. 10.1002/elps.201900456 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/elps.201600078 · DOI
  22. Andrasi M, 2014, Analysis of rituximab, a therapeutic monoclonal antibody by capillary zone electrophoresis, J Chromatogr Sep Tech, 6, 259

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, R., Sarin, D., & Rathore, A. S.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Delhi Hauz Khas New Delhi India
Venue
ELECTROPHORESIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-02-08
Volume
44
Issue
9-10
Pages
767-774
ISSN
  • 0173-0835
  • 1522-2683
Cited by
10
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review