Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 572

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Some like it cold: understanding the survival strategies of psychrophiles

Open access
De Maayer, Pieter, Anderson, Dominique, Cary, Craig, Cowan, Don A·2014·EMBO reports

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/embr.201338170

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Cited by

See all 572

Metadata

Authors
De Maayer, P., Anderson, D., Cary, C., & Cowan, D. A.
Venue
EMBO reports
Published
2014-03-26
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
508-517
ISSN
  • 1469-221X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3178
OpenAlex
W2104894769
Cited by
572
References
77
FWCI
23.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some like it cold: understanding the survival strategies of psychrophiles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/embr.201338170
The paper
De Maayer, P., Anderson, D., Cary, C., & Cowan, D. A. (2014). Some like it cold: understanding the survival strategies of psychrophiles. EMBO reports. https://doi.org/10.1002/embr.201338170

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.