Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6,023

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Positive matrix factorization: A non‐negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values

Paatero, Pentti, Tapper, Unto·1994·Environmetrics

Abstract

A new variant ‘PMF’ of factor analysis is described. It is assumed that X is a matrix of observed data and σ is the known matrix of standard deviations of elements of X. Both X and σ are of dimensions n × m. The method solves the bilinear matrix problem X = GF + E where G is the unknown left hand factor matrix (scores) of dimensions n × p, F is the unknown right hand factor matrix (loadings) of dimensions p × m, and E is the matrix of residuals. The problem is solved in the weighted least squares sense: G and F are determined so that the Frobenius norm of E divided (element‐by‐element) by σ is minimized. Furthermore, the solution is constrained so that all the elements of G and F are required to be non‐negative. It is shown that the solutions by PMF are usually different from any solutions produced by the customary factor analysis (FA, i.e. principal component analysis (PCA) followed by rotations). Usually PMF produces a better fit to the data than FA. Also, the result of PF is guaranteed to be non‐negative, while the result of FA often cannot be rotated so that all negative entries would be eliminated. Different possible application areas of the new method are briefly discussed. In environmental data, the error estimates of data can be widely varying and non‐negativity is often an essential feature of the underlying models. Thus it is concluded that PMF is better suited than FA or PCA in many environmental applications. Examples of successful applications of PMF are shown in companion papers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/env.3170050203

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1016/S0021-8502(05)80089-8 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0169-7439(93)80055-M · DOI
  3. Tapper U., 1994, Robust modelling of data errors in non‐negative factor analysis of bulk wet deposition
  4. 10.1016/S0922-3487(08)70128-X · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0004-6981(89)90190-X · DOI
  6. 10.1007/978-3-642-93295-3_112 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0003-2670(91)85070-9 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/env.3170050204 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0004-6981(84)90376-7 · DOI
  10. Antilla P. Paatero P. Tapper U.andJärvinen O.‘Source identification of bulk wet deposition in Finland by positive matrix factorization’ Atmospheric Environment(1994). · DOI
  11. Paatero P., 1992, Use of three‐matrix positive matrix factorization for analyzing environmental data’, Conference ‘Environmetrics

Cited by

See all 6,023

Metadata

Authors
Paatero, P., & Tapper, U.
Venue
Environmetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-06
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
111-126
ISSN
  • 1099-095X (ISSN-L)
  • 1180-4009
OpenAlex
W2059745395
Cited by
6,023
References
0
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Positive matrix factorization: A non‐negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/env.3170050203
The paper
Paatero, P., & Tapper, U. (1994). Positive matrix factorization: A non‐negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values. Environmetrics. https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.