Cited by 64Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsDielectric materials and actuatorsNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

High‐performance piezoelectric yarns for artificial intelligence‐enabled wearable sensing and classification

Open access
Kim, Dabin, Yang, Ziyue, Cho, Jaewon, Park, Donggeun, Kim, Dong Hwi, Lee, Jinkee, Ryu, Seunghwa, Kim, Sang‐Woo +1 more·2023·EcoMat

Abstract

Abstract Piezoelectric polymer fibers offer a fundamental element in intelligent fabrics with their shape adaptability and energy‐conversion capability for wearable activity and health monitoring applications. Nonetheless, realizing high‐performance smart polymer fibers faces a technical challenge due to the relatively low piezoelectric performance. Here, we demonstrate high‐performance piezoelectric yarns simultaneously equipped with structural robustness and mechanical flexibility. The key to substantially enhanced piezoelectric performance is promoting the electroactive β‐phase formation during electrospinning via adding an adequate amount of barium titanate (BaTiO 3 ) nanoparticles into the poly(vinylidene fluoride‐trifluoroethylene) (P(VDF‐TrFE)). When transformed into a yarn structure by twisting the electrospun mats, the BaTiO 3 ‐doped P(VDF‐TrFE) fibers become mechanically strengthened with significantly improved elastic modulus and ductility. Owing to the tailored convolution neural network algorithms architected for classification, the as‐developed BaTiO 3 ‐doped piezo‐yarn device woven into a cotton fabric exhibits monitoring and identifying capabilities for body signals during seven human motion activities with a high accuracy of 99.6%. image

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eom2.12384

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A CNN with a multi-kernel efficiently classified motion signals captured from the body through piezo-yarns, yielding an accuracy of 99.6%.

    “Therefore, to better identify human activities, a CNN with a multi-kernel was considered to efficiently classify the motion signals captured from the body through piezo-yarns, yielding an accuracy of 99.6%.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, D., Yang, Z., Cho, J., Park, D., Kim, D. H., Lee, J., Ryu, S., Kim, S., & Kim, M.
Affiliations
  • Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Kim, Sang‐Woo
  • Kim, Miso
Venue
EcoMat
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-06-13
Volume
5
Issue
8
ISSN
2567-3173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380538238
Cited by
64
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 7
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EcoMat (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National NanoFab Center
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF‐2018M3D1A1058794, NRF‐2021M3A7C2089759, NRF‐2021R1A2C2095767)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Dielectric materials and actuators
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
P(VDF-TrFE), BaTiO3 nanoparticles, β-phase formation, electrospinning, smart textiles, wearable sensors, convolutional neural networks, mechanical flexibility, health monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review